logo
Canada Post should phase out door-to-door delivery as part of overhaul, report recommends

Canada Post should phase out door-to-door delivery as part of overhaul, report recommends

Globe and Mail16-05-2025

With less than a week before another potential Canada Post strike, a new report warns the Crown corporation is 'effectively insolvent, or bankrupt,' and calls for sweeping changes to ensure its survival — including phasing out individual door-to-door mail delivery.
The industrial inquiry commission report, led by labour negotiator and former law professor William Kaplan, outlines several recommendations aimed at breaking the deadlock between Canada Post and its unionized workers, and preserving Canada Post as a 'national institution.'
Among the recommendations: Allowing Canada Post to close more rural post offices, expand community mailboxes, and give the postal service flexibility to hire part-time workers for weekend parcel delivery.
Canada Post workers could go on strike. Here's what to know
Canada Post and the Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW) have until May 22 to reach a new collective agreement. Without a deal, more than 55,000 workers could workers could legally strike again, after walking off the job for 32 days over November and December of last year.
In December, the federal labour relations board ordered postal workers back on the job after a request by then-labour minister Steve MacKinnon. That decision extended the existing collective agreement and triggered the formation of the industrial inquiry commission to figure out why talks have repeatedly failed.
Hearings for the inquiry took place in Ottawa in January and February of this year, with participation from both Canada Post and CUPW. The report was delivered to the federal government on Thursday and made public on Friday.
Doug Ettinger, president and CEO of Canada Post, praised the report.
'This report provides Canada Post, CUPW, our employees and all Canadians with a frank and straightforward assessment of the challenges we face,' he said in a statement. 'It comes at a critical time as our efforts to respond to the changing delivery needs of the country have taken on greater urgency as Canada works to strengthen its economy in response to U.S. threats.'
Earlier this week, Canada Post told workers it was taking a 'temporary pause' in negotiating, citing a lack of progress. CUPW condemned the move as 'reprehensible' and said on Tuesday it expects new proposals from Canada Post 'immediately' following the report's release.
The report painted a bleak picture of Canada Post's financial health. 'Without thoughtful, measured, staged, but immediate changes, its fiscal situation will continue to deteriorate.'
The report said that CUPW attributed Canada Post's financial challenges to the Crown corporation's bad business decisions, but the report didn't fully agree.
'I am not persuaded by CUPW's assertion that Canada Post's mismanagement and incompetence are the reasons for the current financial situation,' Mr. Kaplan wrote in the report. The report attributes the main reasons for financial losses to the decline of letter mail and increased competition.
Canada Post has lost at least $3-billion since 2018, driven by a drop in letter mail volume. In January, it received a $1.034-billion loan from the federal government to help cover operations this year.
In its latest annual report, Canada Post said 'at least $1-billion will also be needed in 2026 and each year afterward to maintain operations and meet our employee obligations.'
Stephanie Ross, an associate professor of labour studies at McMaster University, said that the report is largely a win for Canada Post. She said the union is being told it has to accept more flexible work and face possible face job losses with the phasing out of services such as door-to-door delivery.
But there was a bright spot for workers, she said. The report said that the use of part-time employees during the week and on weekends should not be gig workers, but 'good jobs' under the collective agreement with access to benefits such as a pension.
'There are not a lot of bones being thrown to the union here at all.'
The CUPW did not respond to a request for comment on the report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BCI Invests in KKR Tower Platform Pinnacle Towers
BCI Invests in KKR Tower Platform Pinnacle Towers

National Post

timean hour ago

  • National Post

BCI Invests in KKR Tower Platform Pinnacle Towers

Article content Article content SINGAPORE & VICTORIA, Canada — KKR, a leading global investment firm, British Columbia Investment Management Corporation ('BCI'), and Pinnacle Towers, an Asia-based digital infrastructure platform with a focus on the Philippines, today announced the signing of definitive agreements under which BCI will acquire a minority stake in Pinnacle Towers from KKR, which will remain the majority shareholder. Article content Pinnacle Towers was established in 2020 to serve the rapidly increasing demand for connectivity and quality telecommunications infrastructure in the Philippines. Led by a highly experienced management team, the platform specializes in executing on Build-to-Suit ('BTS') telecommunications tower projects, optimizing the use and management of Sale-and-Leaseback ('SLB') assets with leading mobile network operators, and providing ancillary management services to industry players. In the span of five years, Pinnacle Towers has scaled to become the largest independent tower company in the Philippines with around 7,000 towers. 1 Lincoln Webb, Executive Vice President & Global Head, Infrastructure & Renewable Resources, BCI, said, 'We are excited to work closely with KKR and Pinnacle's management team to support the growth of the business. The Philippines represents a compelling market for long-term capital, especially in essential digital infrastructure services. This investment aligns with our emerging markets strategy of backing high-quality infrastructure assets alongside strong institutional partners. We look forward to supporting Pinnacle Towers as it continues to enhance digital connectivity and drive meaningful impact across the Philippines.' Article content Projesh Banerjea, Managing Director, Infrastructure, KKR Article content , said, 'We are very proud of the success that we have achieved with Pinnacle Towers to serve the Philippines' connectivity needs. Since our initial investment, we have collaborated closely with Pinnacle Towers' outstanding management team to deepen the platform's capabilities and scale its presence organically and through bolt-on acquisitions. We are delighted to welcome BCI, who share our long-term vision and commitment to developing critical digital infrastructure, as strategic partners and look forward to building on Pinnacle Towers' strong growth momentum.' Article content Patrick Tangney, Chairman and CEO of Pinnacle Towers Article content , said, 'Over the last five years, with the support of KKR, Pinnacle Towers has grown to become the leading independent tower company in the Philippines. BCI's investment marks an important milestone in our journey and is a strong endorsement of our mission. With BCI and KKR as strategic partners, we are well-positioned to continue driving greater digital connectivity in the Philippines and across the region.' Article content BCI Infrastructure & Renewable Resources has a global portfolio with nine active investments in the Asia-Pacific region, including Rakuten Mobile (a leading communications tower company in Japan), Altius (a leading communications tower company in India), and Cube Highways (the largest toll road operator in India). The program continues to expand its presence in the region with the addition of this minority stake acquisition in Pinnacle Towers. Article content KKR made its investment in Pinnacle Towers from its Asia Infrastructure Funds I and II. KKR first established its global infrastructure team and strategy in 2008 and has since been one of the most active infrastructure investors around the world. KKR's Asia Pacific infrastructure platform was established in 2019 and has since organically grown to approximately US$13 billion in assets under management. Article content The transaction is expected to be completed by Q3 2025, subject to customary regulatory approvals. Article content About BCI Article content British Columbia Investment Management Corporation (BCI) is amongst the largest institutional investors in Canada, with C$250.4 billion in gross assets under management as of March 31, 2024. Based in Victoria, British Columbia, with offices in Vancouver, New York, and London, U.K., BCI manages a portfolio of diversified public and private market investments on behalf of its British Columbia pension fund and institutional clients. Learn more at Article content About KKR Article content KKR is a leading global investment firm that offers alternative asset management as well as capital markets and insurance solutions. KKR aims to generate attractive investment returns by following a patient and disciplined investment approach, employing world-class people, and supporting growth in its portfolio companies and communities. KKR sponsors investment funds that invest in private equity, credit and real assets and has strategic partners that manage hedge funds. KKR's insurance subsidiaries offer retirement, life and reinsurance products under the management of Global Atlantic Financial Group. References to KKR's investments may include the activities of its sponsored funds and insurance subsidiaries. For additional information about KKR & Co. Inc. (NYSE: KKR), please visit KKR's website at For additional information about Global Atlantic Financial Group, please visit Global Atlantic Financial Group's website at Article content Pinnacle invests in, builds and operates telecommunications infrastructure with a focus on towers and related assets. Pinnacle is an Asia-focused digital infrastructure platform with a strong focus on the rapidly growing Philippines market. Frontier's leadership team includes founders of a number of highly successful tower companies and former C-level executives from some of the world's leading wireless operators. KKR first invested in Pinnacle Towers in 2020. Article content Article content Article content Article content Article content Contacts Article content Media Contacts Article content

Global streamers fight CRTC's rule requiring them to fund Canadian content
Global streamers fight CRTC's rule requiring them to fund Canadian content

CTV News

timean hour ago

  • CTV News

Global streamers fight CRTC's rule requiring them to fund Canadian content

A person browses a television menu showing icons for streaming services Netflix and Amazon Prime in a photo illustration made in Toronto on Friday, March 22, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Giordano Ciampini OTTAWA — Some of the world's biggest streaming companies will argue in court on Monday that they shouldn't have to make CRTC-ordered financial contributions to Canadian content and news. The companies are fighting an order from the federal broadcast regulator that says they must pay five per cent of their annual Canadian revenues to funds devoted to producing Canadian content, including local TV news. The case, which consolidates several appeals by streamers, will be heard by the Federal Court of Appeal in Toronto. Apple, Amazon and Spotify are fighting the CRTC's 2024 order. Motion Picture Association-Canada, which represents such companies as Netflix and Paramount, is challenging a section of the CRTC's order requiring them to contribute to local news. In December, the court put a pause on the payments — estimated to be at least $1.25 million annually per company. Amazon, Apple and Spotify had argued that if they made the payments and then won the appeal and overturned the CRTC order, they wouldn't be able to recover the money. In court documents, the streamers put forward a long list of arguments on why they shouldn't have to pay, including technical points regarding the CRTC's powers under the Broadcasting Act. Spotify argued that the contribution requirement amounts to a tax, which the CRTC doesn't have the authority to impose. The music streamer also took issue with the CRTC requiring the payments without first deciding how it will define Canadian content. Amazon argued the federal cabinet specified the CRTC's requirements have to be 'equitable.' It said the contribution requirement is 'inequitable because it applies only to foreign online undertakings and only to such undertakings with more than $25 million in annual Canadian broadcasting revenues.' Apple also said the regulator 'acted prematurely' and argued the CRTC didn't consider whether the order was 'equitable.' It pointed out Apple is required to contribute five per cent, while radio stations must only pay 0.5 per cent — and streamers don't have the same access to the funds into which they pay. The CRTC imposes different rules on Canadian content contributions from traditional media players. It requires large English-language broadcasters to contribute 30 per cent of revenues to Canadian programming. Motion Picture Association—Canada is only challenging one aspect of the CRTC's order — the part requiring companies to contribute 1.5 per cent of revenues to a fund for local news on independent TV stations. It said in court documents that none of the streamers 'has any connection to news production' and argued the CRTC doesn't have the authority to require them to fund news. 'What the CRTC did, erroneously, is purport to justify the … contribution simply on the basis that local news is important and local news operations provided by independent television stations are short of money,' it said. 'That is a reason why news should be funded by someone, but is devoid of any analysis, legal or factual, as to why it is equitable for foreign online undertakings to fund Canadian news production.' In its response, the Canadian Association of Broadcasters said the CRTC has wide authority under the Broadcasting Act. It argued streamers have contributed to the funding crisis facing local news. 'While the industry was once dominated by traditional television and radio services, those services are now in decline, as Canadians increasingly turn to online streaming services,' the broadcasters said. 'For decades, traditional broadcasting undertakings have supported the production of Canadian content through a complex array of CRTC-directed measures … By contrast, online undertakings have not been required to provide any financial support to the Canadian broadcasting system, despite operating here for well over a decade.' A submission from the federal government in defence of the CRTC argued the regulator was within its rights to order the payments. 'The orders challenged in these proceedings … are a valid exercise of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission's regulatory powers. These orders seek to remedy the inequity that has resulted from the ascendance of online streaming giants like the Appellants,' the office of the attorney general said. 'Online undertakings have greatly profited from their access to Canadian audiences, without any corresponding obligation to make meaningful contributions supporting Canadian programming and creators — an obligation that has long been imposed on traditional domestic broadcasters.' The government said that if the streamers get their way, that would preserve 'an inequitable circumstance in which domestic broadcasters — operating in an industry under economic strain — shoulder a disproportionate regulatory burden.' 'This result would be plainly out of step with the policy aims of Parliament' and cabinet, it added. The court hearing comes as trade tensions between the U.S. and Canada have cast a shadow over the CRTC's attempts to regulate online streamers. The regulator launched a suite of proceedings and hearings as part of its implementation of the Online Streaming Act, legislation that in 2023 updated the Broadcasting Act to set up the CRTC to regulate streaming companies. In January, as U.S. President Donald Trump was inaugurated for his second term, groups representing U.S. businesses and big tech companies warned the CRTC that its efforts to modernize Canadian content rules could worsen trade relations and lead to retaliation. Then, as the CRTC launched its hearing on modernizing the definition of Canadian content in May, Netflix, Paramount and Apple cancelled their individual appearances. While the companies didn't provide a reason, the move came shortly after Trump threatened to impose a tariff of up to 100 per cent on movies made outside the United States. Foreign streamers have long pointed to their existing spending in Canada in response to calls to bring them into the regulated system. Anja Karadeglija, The Canadian Press

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store