
FDA to offer faster drug reviews to companies promoting ‘national priorities'
WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. regulators will begin offering faster reviews to new medicines that administration officials deem as promoting 'the health interests of Americans,' under a new initiative announced Tuesday.
Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Marty Makary said the agency will aim to review select drugs in one to two months. FDA's long-standing accelerated approval program generally issues decisions in six months for drugs that treat life-threatening diseases. Regular drug reviews take about 10 months.
Since arriving at the FDA in April, Makary has repeatedly told FDA staff they need to 'challenge assumptions' and rethink procedures. In a medical journal commentary published last week, Makary suggested the agency could conduct 'rapid or instant reviews,' pointing to the truncated process used to authorize the first COVID-19 vaccines under Operation Warp Speed.
For the new program, the FDA will issue a limited number of 'national priority vouchers' to companies 'aligned with U.S. national priorities,' the agency said in a statement. The special designation will give the selected companies access to extra FDA communications, streamlined staff reviews and the ability to submit much of their product information in advance.
Speeding up drug approvals has long been a priority of the pharmaceutical industry, which has successfully lobbied Congress to create a variety of special programs and pathways for faster reviews.
Many aspects of the plan announced Tuesday overlap with older programs. But the broad criteria for receiving a voucher will give FDA officials unprecedented discretion in deciding which companies can benefit from the fastest reviews.
'The ultimate goal is to bring more cures and meaningful treatments to the American public,' Makary said in a statement.
Makary previously said the FDA should be willing to ease its scientific requirements for certain drugs, for instance, by not always requiring randomized studies in which patients are tracked over time to track safety and effectiveness. Such trials are generally considered the gold standard of medical research, though the FDA has increasingly been willing to accept smaller, less-definitive studies for rare or life-threatening diseases.
In several recent cases, the FDA has faced criticism for approving drugs based on preliminary data that didn't ultimately show benefits for patients.
The push to rapidly accelerated drug approvals is the opposite approach that Makary and his boss, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., have taken on vaccines.
Promising a 'return to gold-standard science,' Kennedy previously announced that all new vaccines would have to be compared to placebo, or a dummy shot, to win approval. Kennedy and Makary also have announced a stricter policy on seasonal updates to COVID-19 shots, saying they will have to undergo new testing before they can be approved for use in healthy children and most adults.
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Toronto Star
42 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
The ‘razor blade' sore throat: What to know about the new COVID-19 variant that's spreading
A new COVID-19 variant was this week expected to become the dominant strain in Ontario, after circulating in parts of the world including our neighbours to the south. The new variant, part of the Omicron subfamily, is called NB.1.8.1 and it is derived from the recombinant variant XDV.1.5.1, according to the World Health Organization (WHO), with cases detected globally as the previous dominant COVID-19 strain, LP.8.1, starts to decline.


Edmonton Journal
an hour ago
- Edmonton Journal
Opinion: Alberta's plan to limit free COVID vaccines makes no sense
Article content In the absence of any other explanation, it is cruel and hurtful on a personal level, and shortsighted and wasteful on a population level. Without explicitly saying it, the UCP government is once again clearly signalling their anti-vaccine and anti-science ideologies. Concerning the COVID-19 vaccination coverage policy, Premier Danielle Smith was quoted on the weekend as saying: 'I think it's because it doesn't work particularly well, if you want to know the truth.'


Vancouver Sun
2 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Health Canada won't fight Alberta's plan to charge for COVID vaccines
OTTAWA — Health Canada isn't quarrelling with Alberta Premier Danielle Smith's announcement that most Albertans will soon have to pay out of pocket for COVID-19 shots. Nicholas Janveau, a spokesperson for the federal agency, said Tuesday that the decision is entirely the premier's to make. 'Provinces and territories are responsible for the delivery and administration of their respective vaccination programs including determining which vaccines are publicly funded, eligibility criteria, and other relevant considerations,' wrote Janveau in an email to the National Post. Smith announced Friday that, starting this fall , most of Alberta's 4.8 million residents will need to pay out of pocket for COVID vaccines, if they choose to get them. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. She said on her weekly call-in radio show that the change was a necessary cost-saving measure, after the Liberal government announced in January that federal funding for vaccines would end this year. 'Now that we have to develop our own new program for payment … we want to avoid wastage (and) make sure that people get it as a priority who are most at risk, and then make (vaccines) available to whoever else wants (them),' said Smith. Smith noted that more than a million doses were left unused and discarded during the 2023-24 respiratory virus season, costing taxpayers $135 million. 'The sad part was we threw away over a million doses, because people just don't want to get the (COVID) vaccine in the same rates as others,' said Smith. 'I think it's because (the COVID vaccine) doesn't work particularly well,' said Smith, when asked what she made of the shortfall. A government press release said that provincially-funded vaccines will still be given free of charge to dependent seniors, the immunocompromised and those on social assistance. All other Albertans, including those over the age of 65, will be required to pay the full cost of the vaccine. The release doesn't say how much this will be but references a Center for Disease Control costing estimates of $110 per vaccine dose. Even with the changes, Alberta is budgeting $49 million for COVID vaccines for the 2025-26 respiratory season, versus $19 million for flu shots and $2 million for Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) shots. Toronto-area physician Shawn Whatley, formerly the head of the Ontario Medical Association and a fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, said that the permissibility of out-of-pocket costs under the Canada Health Act is largely a question of whether the services involved are deemed 'medically necessary.' 'If it's listed as a medically necessary service then yes, there are CHA implications with (federal health transfer) clawbacks,' said Whatley. Whatley noted that you have to be 65 or older to get many vaccines covered in Ontario. He added that he wouldn't be surprised if other provinces eventually followed Alberta's lead on charging for COVID vaccines, if Smith manages to limit the political blowback. 'In general, anytime one province finds a way to spend less without losing office, it tends to set a precedent,' said Whatley. Marisa Azad, an infectious disease specialist at the Ottawa Hospital, says she's concerned by Smith's off-the-cuff comments on the effectiveness of COVID vaccines. 'Although everyone is entitled to their opinions, certain issues should be decided upon by professionals — there's a mountain of scientific data supportive of the continued use of COVID-19 vaccines and their efficacy and safety,' said Azad. The Public Health Agency of Canada currently recommends COVID vaccinations for all adults aged 65 and older, as well as immunocompromised individuals, pregnant women, health care workers, Indigenous and Métis communities and other racial minorities. The Alberta Medical Association said in a statement Tuesday that people in most of these categories will need to pay out of pocket for vaccines under the incoming rules. 'Creating unclear policy and barriers to vaccination for high-need groups is counter-productive to public health measures,' read the statement. National Post rmohamed@ Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what's really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here . Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .