Bavaria set to be home to new German gas power plants
Germany's new government is set to build gas plant plants in the southern state of Bavaria, Economy Minister Ketherina Reiche said on Monday.
Attending a meeting of the Bavarian Cabinet in the lakeside resort of Gmund am Tegernsee, Reiche said "two-thirds" of the new capacity would be built in southern Germany as part of a "southern bonus."
Bavaria will be prioritized in "the tender for the first 20 gigawatts that we have planned in Germany," she added.
Chancellor Friedrich Merz's conservative-led administration, which took office last month, is promising to bring down electricity prices for energy-intensive industries by constructing new gas-run plants.
The Cabinet is expected to decide on the first measures to relieve businesses by the summer, with a reduction of levies on electricity, grid charges and gas storage.
Reiche said high energy costs are leading companies to make new investments in countries where prices are more favourable.
"Security of supply, climate protection and affordability must come together again in a balanced triangle," said the minister.
Reiche said consultations with the European Commission over the plans are already under way.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Look to Wisconsin for Medicaid reform
Medicaid was created to help people living in poverty have access to health care. Under ObamaCare, it was expanded to include able-bodied, working-age adults without children. That was wrong. When I was governor of Wisconsin, we opted not to take the expansion. First, we could create our own plan for covering everyone living in poverty. We did — and it worked. My predecessor had raised the income requirements for Medicaid, but did not fund the gap. That left many impoverished people on a waiting list. Once I was in office, we restored the limits to cover those living in poverty and eliminated the waiting list. Today, my state is the only one in the nation to have no gap in insurance coverage despite not having taken the expansion. Second, I did not want to put more people on government assistance. For those who are able, public assistance should be more like a trampoline than a hammock. True freedom and prosperity do not come from the clumsy hand of the government. They come from empowering people to control their own destiny through the dignity of work. When I first took office, the Cabinet member who oversaw labor issues asked what my priorities were for the agency. He told me that the prior administration said their goal was to bring in as much federal assistance as possible to the state. I told him my goal was the opposite. I wanted to receive less federal funding because more people were working. During my tenure as governor, we pushed for work requirements for those who were able. We funded worker training and addiction recovery programs to get people into the workforce. It was a success. More people were employed during my years in office than had been at any point in our past. Third, I was concerned the federal government would not be able to sustain its commitments to the states. Unlike Wisconsin, which had a budget surplus each year I was in office, the federal government continues to have massive deficits and debt issues. Things have only grown worse since my early warnings. Initially, opposition to expanding Medicaid under ObamaCare was strong. Over the years, however, the appeal of 'easy money' from the federal government became too tempting for many state leaders — saddling private payers with higher costs as well. Thankfully, Republican lawmakers in Wisconsin remembered my concerns. With federal cuts increasingly likely, the Badger State will be one of the few not facing a major budget crisis. One of the proposals being circulated by congressional leaders is a plan to cut the rate of reimbursement to the states for the Medicaid expansion population from 90 percent to less than 60 percent. States that looked to the federal government to balance their budgets in the past will now experience significant shortfalls due to these reductions in federal funds. The reduced reimbursement rate being considered by Congress would have cost Wisconsin taxpayers an additional $154 million each year had the state taken the expansion funds according to a recent study by the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty. This is for a program that already represents about 30 percent of the state budget. Overall, Medicaid is a program that should provide assistance for children, families and seniors living in poverty. It should not be a barrier to able-bodied, working-age adults entering the workforce. These reforms will help provide true savings while ensuring the program serves the population it was intended to serve when it was established 60 years ago. Looking ahead, officials in the federal government as well as states would be wise to look at the Wisconsin model as they consider reforms to Medicaid. We showed that conservative reforms work. Scott Walker was governor of Wisconsin from 2011 to 2019. He is currently president of Young America's Foundation. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
The Hill
9 hours ago
- The Hill
Look to Wisconsin for Medicaid reform
Medicaid was created to help people living in poverty have access to health care. Under ObamaCare, it was expanded to include able-bodied, working-age adults without children. That was wrong. When I was governor of Wisconsin, we opted not to take the expansion. First, we could create our own plan for covering everyone living in poverty. We did — and it worked. My predecessor had raised the income requirements for Medicaid, but did not fund the gap. That left many impoverished people on a waiting list. Once I was in office, we restored the limits to cover those living in poverty and eliminated the waiting list. Today, my state is the only one in the nation to have no gap in insurance coverage despite not having taken the expansion. Second, I did not want to put more people on government assistance. For those who are able, public assistance should be more like a trampoline than a hammock. True freedom and prosperity do not come from the clumsy hand of the government. They come from empowering people to control their own destiny through the dignity of work. When I first took office, the Cabinet member who oversaw labor issues asked what my priorities were for the agency. He told me that the prior administration said their goal was to bring in as much federal assistance as possible to the state. I told him my goal was the opposite. I wanted to receive less federal funding because more people were working. During my tenure as governor, we pushed for work requirements for those who were able. We funded worker training and addiction recovery programs to get people into the workforce. It was a success. More people were employed during my years in office than had been at any point in our past. Third, I was concerned the federal government would not be able to sustain its commitments to the states. Unlike Wisconsin, which had a budget surplus each year I was in office, the federal government continues to have massive deficits and debt issues. Things have only grown worse since my early warnings. Initially, opposition to expanding Medicaid under ObamaCare was strong. Over the years, however, the appeal of 'easy money' from the federal government became too tempting for many state leaders — saddling private payers with higher costs as well. Thankfully, Republican lawmakers in Wisconsin remembered my concerns. With federal cuts increasingly likely, the Badger State will be one of the few not facing a major budget crisis. One of the proposals being circulated by congressional leaders is a plan to cut the rate of reimbursement to the states for the Medicaid expansion population from 90 percent to less than 60 percent. States that looked to the federal government to balance their budgets in the past will now experience significant shortfalls due to these reductions in federal funds. The reduced reimbursement rate being considered by Congress would have cost Wisconsin taxpayers an additional $154 million each year had the state taken the expansion funds according to a recent study by the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty. This is for a program that already represents about 30 percent of the state budget. Overall, Medicaid is a program that should provide assistance for children, families and seniors living in poverty. It should not be a barrier to able-bodied, working-age adults entering the workforce. These reforms will help provide true savings while ensuring the program serves the population it was intended to serve when it was established 60 years ago. Looking ahead, officials in the federal government as well as states would be wise to look at the Wisconsin model as they consider reforms to Medicaid. We showed that conservative reforms work. Scott Walker was governor of Wisconsin from 2011 to 2019. He is currently president of Young America's Foundation.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Musk's Trump Bromance Exploded Over Tweet Backing Biden: Sources
He may be out of the White House, but former president Joe Biden has played a starring role in the messiest divorce in Washington. Days before he went nuclear by calling Donald Trump's mega-spending bill a 'disgusting abomination', Elon Musk blasted out a post that marked a key turning point for the president and his allies. As Musk prepared to depart from his official duties at the Department of Government Efficiency, the Tesla chief and his electric vehicle company took to social media to warn that the 'big beautiful bill' would gut clean energy tax credits and undermine Trump's 'drill baby drill' American energy revival. 'Abruptly ending the energy tax credits would threaten America's energy independence and the reliability of our grid,' Tesla wrote on its X account on May 28, which Musk then reposted to his 220 million-plus followers. 'There is no change to tax incentives for oil & gas, just EV/solar,' Musk added, once again highlighting the fact that clean energy was being gutted while subsidies for other sectors remained. While it was hardly the scorched-earth tirade Musk has embarked on since, Trump and his allies were not impressed. After all, here was a man who had been invited into Trump's inner circle, to Mar-a-Lago and high-level Cabinet meetings, suddenly attacking the bill publicly for gutting a Biden-era initiative that Republicans had long viewed as a 'green new scam'. 'As the president said, he was very disappointed with Elon,' a White House source told the Daily Beast after the pair's bromance ended on Thursday. The clean energy tax credits formed part of the Inflation Reduction Act, which Biden views as a key part of his legacy. 'It's the largest climate investment in history!' the former president would often boast. But Trump's mega-spending bill would put those credits on the chopping block, disqualifying Tesla electric vehicles from a $7,500 incentive at a time when the company's sales have plummeted. In a note to clients on Thursday, JPMorgan estimated that eliminating the EV tax credit could cost Tesla about $1.2 billion annually. Trump has suggested that the loss of federal support for EVs led Musk to turn on him. 'I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' wrote Trump in a post on Truth Social. It wasn't a 'mandate' but a tax credit designed to incentivize investment in clean energy technology. It also happened to be signed into law by the only person who has beaten Trump. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
