logo
Decatur looks to spend $1.79 million drugmaker settlement on opioid recovery support

Decatur looks to spend $1.79 million drugmaker settlement on opioid recovery support

Yahoo11-04-2025

Apr. 11—The city of Decatur has so far received $1.79 million in opioid settlement money from pharmaceutical companies, and the state attorney general recently advised that it must be spent on opioid recovery services.
Endo Health Solutions, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Purdue Pharma and McKesson Corp. are among the companies involved in the settlements.
With state Attorney General Steve Marshall's instructions on how the money must be spent in hand, the Decatur City Council is considering proposals from Partnership for a Drug-Free Community, a Huntsville-based nonprofit.
City Chief Financial Officer Kyle Demeester said he, Mayor Tab Bowling and City Attorney Herman Marks recently participated in an online video conference with Marshall, who told leaders of cities how the money could be spent.
"It's very much tied to the (opioid) crisis," Demeester said of the settlement money. "We don't have a lot of options."
Partnership for a Drug-Free Community won a request for proposal through the state to provide opioid-related recovery support services for Madison, Marshal, Limestone and Morgan counties.
Recently retired Director Cheryl Russell and new Director Kim Lamar presented the proposal on behalf of Partnership for a Drug-Free Community at Monday's council meeting. The nonprofit already has agreements with Huntsville, Madison and Ardmore. It also has plans to meet with other north Alabama city officials.
Russell said they met four times with Decatur officials to decide "what a relationship with Partnership would look like."
They presented two options, both of which would be on a four-year contract. The first option is at a lower cost of $467,678 because the services would be provided out of its Huntsville office at 2608 Artie St.
The second option is for $1.7 million, with the services provided out of a fully staffed office in Decatur.
Bowling said they discussed in the meetings starting with an office in Decatur, but decided they prefer beginning with the option of providing services out of the Huntsville office.
"We thought we would crawl before we walk," Bowling said.
Russell said they know they would be more effective if they are in the city, but that comes with a lot of additional expenses required to have an office.
She said they have eight employees in its Artie Street office, which gives Partnership the current capacity to help Decatur.
Lamar said Partnership is a recovery resource at no cost for a person struggling with addiction, or a family member or friend of the addiction.
"If they call us, we immediately start helping that person," Lamar said.
She said they would do an assessment as soon as possible. This could include doing assessments by teleconference, if necessary.
"If someone needs help, you can't wait until tomorrow because they're going to change their minds," Lamar said. "It's very important to act quickly."
They then send an assessment to three certified agencies in the state and to the client, she said.
"We have peer support who immediately becomes involved and walks that person through the process," Lamar said.
She said it's unfortunate that there are very few ways to get treatment in Alabama, "so a big portion of what we do is daily motivation. We also provide other things to meet family needs like food and shelter."
Lamar said the Partnership provides family support and, once they know they have a bed, provides transportation when necessary to a treatment facility. There would be limited scholarships available to access treatment. The nonprofit also provides fentanyl test strips, Narcan training and public information training.
According to the proposal, Partnership will provide an administrator, a certified recovery specialist, case manager and certified licensed clinical assessor and community volunteers.
Ladner said the council will review the proposals and would likely have more questions at a future meeting.
— bayne.hughes@decaturdaily.com or 256-340-2432

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why AST SpaceMobile Stock Is Skyrocketing This Week
Why AST SpaceMobile Stock Is Skyrocketing This Week

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Why AST SpaceMobile Stock Is Skyrocketing This Week

Jeff Bezos visited Space Mobile's Texas headquarters. A picture from the visit on social media fueled speculation that AST's relationship with Bezos' companies could grow. A public spat between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump could leave the door open for other space companies to win some of SpaceX's contracts. 10 stocks we like better than AST SpaceMobile › Shares of AST SpaceMobile (NASDAQ: ASTS) are moving higher this week, up 33.9% as of 2 p.m. ET from last Friday's close. The gain comes as the S&P 500 gained 1.5% and the Nasdaq-100 gained 2.2%. Earlier in the week, a board member posted a picture to social media that fueled speculation of a possible partnership with Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin. The stock also received a boost after yesterday's public spat between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk. After Bezos visited the company's Texas headquarters, AST board member Adriana Cisneros posted a picture of Bezos, AST CEO Abel Avellan, and herself to Instagram with the caption, "Amazing things are happening at AST & Science + Blue Origin." This fueled speculation that Blue Origin, Bezos' space exploration company, could be looking to create a closer relationship with AST. The company already has a contract with AST to launch 45 satellites, but a more formal partnership would be a game changer for AST SpaceMobile. Elon Musk and President Donald Trump escalated a public spat yesterday. What began when Musk took to X to criticize Trump's flagship "Big, Beautiful Bill" quickly turned personal and included Trump threatening to cancel contracts with Musk's SpaceX. If this were to happen, it could leave the door open for AST SpaceMobile to, at least partially, fill the void. This is all speculation; nothing is concrete. That being said, both of these possibilities represent a huge upside for AST. For investors with a high risk appetite, AST can be a solid pick. However, be aware that there is a significant risk. The company has a long way to go to justify its valuation. Before you buy stock in AST SpaceMobile, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and AST SpaceMobile wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $674,395!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $858,011!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 997% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Johnny Rice has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why AST SpaceMobile Stock Is Skyrocketing This Week was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Apparel brand Oak + Fort to restructure amid tariff woes
Apparel brand Oak + Fort to restructure amid tariff woes

Hamilton Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Apparel brand Oak + Fort to restructure amid tariff woes

VANCOUVER - Canadian apparel brand Oak + Fort says it has obtained creditor protection as it works to restructure the business. The Vancouver-based company says the move is necessary because U.S. tariffs have joined other price pressures and led to a decline in consumer confidence and spending. The tariffs arrived after Oak + Fort pushed to open 26 new Canadian and U.S. stores in the last four years, which the company says resulted in a reduced and ultimately insufficient investment in its e-commerce platforms. Court documents show the company owes more than $25 million to creditors including some landlords who didn't receive May rent payments. Oak + Fort says it will continue to operate stores and an e-commerce business during the restructuring. The retailer has hired Reflect Advisors LLC to assist with the restructuring. Oak + Fort was founded in 2010 as an online boutique that eventually expanded to 42 stores in Canada and the U.S. selling womenswear, menswear, accessories, jewelry and home goods. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 7, 2025.

The Trump-Musk feud shows danger of handing the keys of power to one person
The Trump-Musk feud shows danger of handing the keys of power to one person

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The Trump-Musk feud shows danger of handing the keys of power to one person

After a year of effusive praise and expressions of love for each other, Elon Musk and Donald Trump exploded their political partnership in dramatic fashion this week. The highly public split included, among other highlights, the world's richest person accusing the president of the United States of associating with a notorious sex offender. Trump said Musk had 'lost his mind'. As Musk and Trump traded insults, each on his own social network, they also issued threats with tangible consequences. Trump suggested that he could cancel all of Musk's government contracts and subsidies – 'the best way to save money', he posted – a move that would have devastating consequences not only on the tech billionaire's companies but also on the federal agencies that have come to depend on them. Musk responded by announcing that he would begin decommissioning the SpaceX Dragon spacecraft that Nasa relies on for transport missions, although he later reversed the decision. While the ongoing episode had the tenor of sensational reality TV, the fight between Trump and Musk once again exposed the danger of putting key public goods in the hands of private companies controlled by erratic billionaires. It highlighted how something like space travel, once a vaunted and collective national enterprise, can now be almost entirely derailed by the emotional whims of a single person. Musk and Trump's partnership had already fueled months of concern about corruption and calls for investigations into the Tesla CEO's use of his position in government to benefit his companies. The breakup has highlighted another risk of Musk's deep ties with the government, where the services that he provides can now become collateral damage in interpersonal disputes. Tens of billions of dollars hang in the balance of their fight. The messy, public way that the clash has played out also serves as a reminder of how unpredictable their decision-making can be. Musk's vow to sideline SpaceX's spacecraft and his reversal, without which the US would have immediately been prevented from reaching the International Space Station (ISS), appeared, for instance, as an emotional lash-out amid a string of other insults against Trump, and it was nearly impossible to discern whether he was serious. 'In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately,' Musk posted without warning on Thursday. 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon,' Musk followed up less than a day later, responding to an anonymous user with about 5,000 followers who said he should 'cool off and take a step back for a couple days'. If Musk and Trump's fight ends up disrupting government services or further turning them into political leverage, it will not have come without warning. Ever since Musk refused in 2023 to let Ukraine use Starlink in Crimea to launch a surprise attack against Russian forces, governments have dealt with the uncomfortable reality of Musk's control over global infrastructure. Musk's claim that he could hobble Ukraine's 'entire front line' by turning off Starlink caused a diplomatic incident earlier this year. Meanwhile, European governments have recently rushed to find alternatives to Starlink amid concerns over Musk's unpredictability. While Musk provoked foreign governments and acted as an unaccountable global power broker, the US has by contrast continued to hand him contracts and increase its dependence on his companies. Space operations in particular have become practically synonymous with Musk. Related: Trump and Musk's very public feud is like Alien v Predator for political nerds Since SpaceX won its first Nasa contract in 2006, the government has awarded about $15bn worth of contracts to the company and has come to depend on it for ferrying astronauts and cargo into space. Nasa has also contracted SpaceX for its planned crewed mission to the moon, as well as a mission to explore one of Saturn's moons. Last year, the agency turned to SpaceX when it needed to rescue two astronauts stuck on the ISS. The government's reliance on Musk's empire also extends beyond Nasa. The Pentagon has extensive contracts with Musk, using SpaceX to launch intelligence satellites. SpaceX was also the frontrunner in the Trump administration's plans to build a 'Golden Dome' missile defense shield, which has become a US national defense priority. Starlink, Musk's satellite communications service, had also made inroads into the government to the point that it was installed this year at the White House. Musk is still accountable to market forces and the investors backing his companies, as was made evident on Thursday after Tesla's shares plunged roughly 14% during his dustup with Trump. Musk has previously stated that he is willing to lose money over his ideology, however, and his immense wealth somewhat insulates him against even large shocks to his companies. When Tesla's shares dropped on Thursday, it wiped about $34bn off his total net worth in a single day – yet he remained the world's richest person by a gap of more than $90bn. The extensive reliance on Musk and the privatization of government services has always drawn criticism from ethics watchdogs and some aerospace and defense industry experts, but it appears especially risky now that Musk has threatened to hold certain services hostage. It has also served as a counterpoint to the project of slashing and privatizing the federal government that Musk spent his tenure with the Trump administration carrying out. Musk has furiously campaigned against bureaucracy, courts and regulators as impediments to getting things done, but these also exist as a bulwark against exactly the kind of unaccountable personal power and erratic whims that both he and Trump put on display during their clash.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store