logo
The Covid pandemic was catastrophic. But don't overlook what went right.

The Covid pandemic was catastrophic. But don't overlook what went right.

Vox15-03-2025

is an editorial director at Vox overseeing the climate, tech, and world teams, and is the editor of Vox's Future Perfect section. He worked at Time magazine for 15 years as a foreign correspondent in Asia, a climate writer, and an international editor, and he wrote a book on existential risk.
Sandra Lindsay, left, a nurse in New York, received the first Covid-19 shot on December 14, 2020, in New York City. Mark Lennihan/Pool/Getty Images
For most people, the Covid-19 pandemic, which officially began five years ago this month, marked their first encounter with case counts and N-95 masks and lockdown orders.
Not me, though.
I was a young reporter for Time magazine in Hong Kong in early spring 2003, when we started getting reports about a strange new sickness spreading in southern China, just across the border. On March 15, exactly 22 years ago today, that sickness was given a name by the World Health Organization: severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS).
The SARS outbreak didn't get much attention in the US because the country only had a small number of cases, and the worst of it overlapped with the invasion of Iraq. But back in Hong Kong, which became an epicenter of the outbreak, we had no idea when or if it would end.
Looking back on those days now, it feels like a dry run for what the entire world would experience less than two decades later with another coronavirus. Overnight, all of Hong Kong wore surgical masks. Airports, hotels, and restaurants were abandoned.
At the Time offices in the city, editors sweating through uncomfortable N-95 masks debated sending some staff to work from home, to keep the magazine going if our building were to be closed. I interviewed scientists about the possibility of a vaccine or treatment, and was told that if one were needed, it would certainly take years for it to be developed.
Related Trump is running from his biggest health care success
We ended up getting lucky with SARS. The coronavirus that caused it turned out to be far less infectious than it first appeared, and the outbreak ended up petering out — though not before more than 8,000 people were sickened and 774 died around the world.
With Covid, of course, we were not that lucky. More than 7 million people have been confirmed to have died from Covid so far, a number that is both still rising and almost surely an undercount. The political, social, and educational side effects of the pandemic were enormous, and are still playing out. It was, simply put, a global catastrophe — one of the few events that is truly worthy of that name.
So why in the world would I put Covid in a newsletter that's supposed to be about good news?
A Covid pandemic before 2020 would have been far worse
Having lived through and covered both SARS and Covid, I sometimes like to run a thought experiment: How would we have responded back in 2003 if SARS had turned out to be as dangerous as Covid?
Think back to 2003. Smartphones didn't exist, and even laptops were less common. Video-calling was essentially nonexistent — if you told someone you were going to 'Zoom' with them, you would have gotten very strange looks.
What this all means is that remote work and remote schooling and telemedicine — which, as problematic as they all turned out to be, did keep the economy, education, and medical care moving forward during the pandemic — would have essentially been impossible. By one estimate, without remote work, US GDP would have declined twice as much as it ultimately did in that first year of the pandemic. All those Zoom meetings and cloud documents were a literal economic lifeline.
Or take the virus itself. It was months after the first cases of SARS before the coronavirus causing it was successfully identified by scientists. I still remember visiting Hong Kong University's Queen Mary Hospital in April 2003, and peering through an electron microscope at the virus's distinctive, sun-like corona. In Covid, thanks to vast improvements in the speed of genetic sequencing, full genomes of the virus were being distributed well before the world was fully aware of what Covid was.
Or vaccines. In 2003, early work on mRNA vaccine technology was only beginning, and BioNTech — the company that was responsible for the groundbreaking research on mRNA vaccines — wouldn't be founded for another five years..
Before Covid, it took anywhere from five to 15 years — if not longer — to develop a vaccine for a new virus. Had we needed one during SARS, we would have almost certainly been in for a long wait. But during Covid, the first vaccine candidates were produced by Pfizer-BioNTech on March 2, 2020 — less than two months after work on the vaccines had begun. Sandra Lindsay, a nurse in New York, received the first Covid shot on December 14, 2020, less than nine months later.
And while advances in science were the first necessary steps, the US government, for all its flaws, acted with impressive urgency and ambition.
We never would have received vaccines as quickly without the genius of Operation Warp Speed. By supporting the simultaneous development of multiple vaccine candidates, the parallel execution of multiple stages of vaccine development and trials, and by guaranteeing a market for the vaccines with billions of dollars, Operation Warp Speed lived up to is name.
Beyond the science, the bipartisan relief bills kept poverty from spiking during those first, terrible months of the pandemic. In fact, poverty actually dropped in 2021 compared to the years before the pandemic, with child poverty falling by more than half.
Don't forget what we accomplished
I realize that almost no one wants to look back at the Covid pandemic, and certainly not with pride. The subsequent virus variants and new waves increasingly evaded even our best vaccines, keeping the pandemic going for years while eroding belief in them. Division over the public health decisions made during the pandemic, from mask requirements to school closures, still linger, poisoning the political atmosphere. Perhaps hundreds of millions of people are experiencing the effects of long Covid, their every day a reminder of the pandemic's toll. The collective trauma we suffered is still with us.
And yet, I worry that all that pain and anger will cause us to neglect the amazing accomplishments of those years. Not just the scientists and officials who got us those vaccines in record time, but the doctors and nurses who toiled endless hours on the front lines of the pandemic, or the essential workers who kept things going while the rest of us isolated. My fear is not just that we'll forget that heroism, but that when the next pandemic comes — as it inevitably will — we'll forget that we have shown the ability and the will to fight it.
On the five-year anniversary of the pandemic, there has been no shortage of articles about what we got wrong during Covid — and yes, in retrospect, we got many, many things wrong. I realize 'it could have been worse' isn't exactly the most stirring rallying cry after something as catastrophic as Covid.
But it's still true, and we shouldn't overlook the people whose work ensured it wasn't.
A version of this story originally appeared in the Good News newsletter. Sign up here!

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

MTV VJ Ananda Lewis dead at 52 following lengthy battle with breast cancer
MTV VJ Ananda Lewis dead at 52 following lengthy battle with breast cancer

Miami Herald

timean hour ago

  • Miami Herald

MTV VJ Ananda Lewis dead at 52 following lengthy battle with breast cancer

Eight months after opening up about her breast cancer diagnosis, former MTV VJ Ananda Lewis has died at the age of 52. The news of her death comes after Lewis sat down at a CNN roundtable to talk about her initial cancer diagnosis and the decisions she made following receiving that news. Lewis' sister Lakshmi confirmed the news of her death in a June 11 Facebook post. 'She's free, and in His heavenly arms. Lord, rest her soul.' In a 2020 Instagram post, Lewis revealed she was first diagnosed with stage 3 breast cancer in 2019, admitting that she had been forgoing her regular mammograms out of a fear of radiation. Additionally, after receiving her diagnosis, Lewis also opted out of undergoing a double mastectomy, a surgery her doctors recommend she endure. Five years later, during her sit down with CNN, published on Oct. 15, Lewis revealed that her cancer had progressed to stage 4. While talking with her friend, CNN correspondent Stephanie Elam, Lewis shared she had some regret for how she handled her original diagnosis in 2019. 'I decided to keep my tumor and try to work it out of my body a different way,' Lewis explained. 'Looking back on that I go, 'Girl, maybe I should've (had the surgery).'' Lewis continued, sharing that she 'was not ready for' all of the 'big things' the doctors were encouraging her to do at the time. 'They wanted to take both (breasts),' she told CNN. Instead, Lewis said she moved forward with chemotherapy treatments and alternative methods, such as improving her mental health, getting more sleep and drinking less alcohol. At the end of every month, Lewis would monitor the cancer's grow with ultrasounds. It was during the COVID-19 pandemic that she was told the cancer was spreading. In October 2023. A 'scan showed that I had this kind of up my spine, through my hip, almost everywhere but my brain,' Lewis said. 'I've never been in pain like that in my life.' 'I don't get afraid of things,' Lewis continued. 'I was just like, 'Fudge, man, I really thought I had this.' I was frustrated. I was a little angry at myself.' In an Oct. 16 interview with The New York Times, Lewis explained that she iwas no longer a candidate for surgery or chemotherapy. At the time, she was taking a drug that treats metastatic cancer. 'Those medications are working beautifully for me in combination with the other things I'm doing that help support my body,' she said at the time. 'I'm really thriving right now,' adding that some of the tumors have shrunk so much that they are 'almost undetectable.' 'I wish I could go back,' she said, according to The New York Times. 'It's important for me to admit where I went wrong with this.' As the National Breast Cancer Foundation reports, those diagnosed with Stage 3 breast cancer have a five-year relative survival rate of 86%. Stage 4 breast cancer, which metastasizes throughout a person's body, is considered incurable, but is treatable. The survival rate for Stage 4 breast cancer in women is 31%.

COVID-19 Vaccine Maker BioNTech Buys CureVac as It Aims for Cancer Treatments
COVID-19 Vaccine Maker BioNTech Buys CureVac as It Aims for Cancer Treatments

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

COVID-19 Vaccine Maker BioNTech Buys CureVac as It Aims for Cancer Treatments

BioNTech is buying fellow German firm CureVac for approximately $1.25 billion as the COVID-19 vaccine maker moves to expand into cancer treatments. For each CureVac share they own, investors will get about $5.46 worth of BioNTech American Depositary Shares. CureVac is developing cancer medicines using the same mRNA technology that BioNTech uses for its COVID-19 (CVAC) shares skyrocketed 37% Thursday when the biotech company agreed to be bought by COVID-19 vaccine maker and fellow German firm BioNTech (BNTX) in an all-stock deal valued at about $1.25 billion. The purchase boosts BioNTech's move into producing new cancer treatments. CureVac said its investors will receive approximately $5.46 worth of BioNTech American Depositary Shares for each CureVac share they own. That a 34% premium to yesterday's closing price. The company noted it is "developing a novel class of transformative medicines in oncology and infectious diseases based on messenger ribonucleic acid ("mRNA")." BioNTech's COVID-19 shot is also mRNA-based. BioNTech co-founder and CEO Dr. Ugur Sahin said the deal is aimed at "advancing the development of innovative and transformative cancer treatments and establishing new standards of care for various types of cancer in the coming years." The transaction is expected to close this year and would see CureVac's operating subsidiary become a wholly owned subsidiary of BioNTech. Shares of CureVac soared to their highest level since December 2023. U.S.-listed shares of BioNTech were little changed and remain down nearly 8% year-to-date. Read the original article on Investopedia 擷取數據時發生錯誤 登入存取你的投資組合 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤

Hundreds of CDC employees reinstated after being laid off
Hundreds of CDC employees reinstated after being laid off

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Hundreds of CDC employees reinstated after being laid off

The Brief Over 460 CDC employees have been reinstated after April layoffs, mainly from public health divisions. Thousands of jobs remain unfilled, with no word on further reinstatements. RFK Jr. appointed eight new vaccine advisers, including controversial figure Dr. Robert Malone. ATLANTA - More than 460 employees at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have been reinstated after being laid off earlier this year, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) confirmed Wednesday, according to the Associated Press. What we know The employees are among the approximately 2,400 CDC staffers let go in April, a move that sparked widespread backlash and legal challenges. According to HHS, the reinstated workers include 200 employees from the Center for HIV, Hepatitis, STD and Tuberculosis Prevention and another 150 from the Environmental Health division, which includes a lab focused on lead poisoning prevention. PREVIOUS STORIES Reactions to mass layoffs underway at Atlanta-based CDC 2,400 CDC jobs to be cut in HHS overhaul announced by Secretary Kennedy CDC to lose nearly 1,300 probationary employees under Trump's job cuts Former employees and public health advocates have criticized the layoffs for leaving vital public health positions vacant. Reese Williams, a former CDC worker, said the terminations affected key personnel. "They fired a lot of our scientists, a lot of our public health communicators, a lot of anybody to do with DEI, birth defects, anything to do with smoke and health, domestic abuse and domestic violence," Williams said. Williams says the 2,400 roles that were eliminated this year played a critical role in public health. "They took a part a lot of the funding for our global partners. Funding that goes for Ebola or for these diseases that don't necessarily effect us, but could effect us, they took away a lot of that," she said. This is the second wave of reinstatements. In February, about 180 employees who were laid off were later asked to return. Despite the new round of rehirings, thousands of jobs remain unfilled, and officials have not indicated if additional reinstatements are forthcoming. Employees say many vital positions are still left empty. "Eventually, we will all feel this. Even the ones who think they won't feel it. We're going to feel it," Reese said. Meanwhile, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has appointed eight new members to the federal vaccine advisory committee. The move follows his abrupt dismissal of the previous panel earlier this week. Among the new appointees is Dr. Robert Malone, a controversial figure known for spreading misinformation about COVID-19 and vaccines. RELATED STORIES RFK Jr.'s newest CDC vaccine panel includes critics of COVID shots, lockdowns Protest against CDC vaccine committee firings held at Atlanta headquarters RFK Jr. ousts entire CDC vaccine panel The committee advises the CDC director on how approved vaccines should be used nationwide.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store