logo
Wildfire mitigation bill described as good first step to deal with climate change in Montana

Wildfire mitigation bill described as good first step to deal with climate change in Montana

Yahoo06-03-2025

The Horse Gulch Fire near Canyon Ferry Reservoir on the evening of July 9, 2024. ((Photo courtesy InciWeb)
When Rep. Denise Baum, D-Billings, first heard about a bill to call on utilities to submit wildfire mitigation plans, she said she was a solid no.
But this week, Baum was among 98 representatives who voted in favor of House Bill 490, and she said it was thanks to the work of the sponsor, Rep. Amy Regier, R-Kalispell.
The bill, initially controversial, was described as one of the first attempts at addressing climate change in the Montana Legislature.
It requires regulated utilities and electric cooperatives to file and follow wildfire mitigation plans, outlines specific requirements for those plans, and it protects those entities from being liable for fires they didn't cause.
The bill was heavily amended, and, according to legislators, it continues to need scrutiny given its complexity and how quickly it has moved, but it garnered broad support in the House this week.
'The fundamental goal of this bill is to prevent wildfires so we don't get into the issue — as often — about who pays for what when we're looking at potentially tens and tens of millions of dollars of money needed to repair and replace property and potentially (compensate for) human life,' said Rep. Tom France, D-Missoula.
Just one representative opposed it — one seat is open after Rep. Ron Marshall, R-Hamilton, resigned — and Rep. Zooey Zephyr, D-Missoula, had strong criticisms of the bill in committee and on the floor.
Zephyr said the fact that one of the first looks at climate change resulted in a bill 'giving cover' to the entities that contribute to climate change was an 'indictment of capitalism.'
She said she feared the bill would protect utility ratepayers on one side, but at the cost of higher insurance premiums on the other side.
'This is such a wide miss of the mark, it's going to be bad for Montana's homeowners,' Zephyr said.
As amended, the bill says utilities and electric co-ops must file mitigation plans (instead of 'may'), and it is headed to the Senate after having passed the House on Wednesday on third reading.
Wildfires have become more frequent and are costly. In 2021, the state spent $54 million on firefighting, according to Montana Public Radio.
In southern California, losses from recent fires were estimated to have reached more than $250 million, according to the Los Angeles Times.
Earlier in California, a legal firm secured a $13.5 billion settlement from PG&E for victims of fires in 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 after the utility filed for bankruptcy protection, according to National Public Radio.
In a narrative about the settlement it negotiated, the Watts Law Firm said PG&E should have done more to mitigate risk.
On the House floor, other Democrats and Republicans spoke in favor of the bill and Montana's attempt to get ahead of the legal battles over who pays for wildfires.
Regier said the bill aims to ensure the electric co-ops and utilities demonstrate their commitment to reducing fire risk by requiring fire mitigation plans.
The bill also declares 'strict liability' does not apply to utilities and electric cooperatives in Montana when it comes to wildfires, a standard Regier said has caused bankruptcy, layoffs and 'skyrocketing utility rates' in California.
Under 'strict liability,' a party is liable for damages even if they didn't act negligently. In California in a 2023 memo, the Public Advocates Office, which advocates for ratepayers, said 'strict liability' contributes to the financial burden on ratepayers, and the office recommended changes.
'We need to ensure that these utilities operate responsibly and can continue to provide reliable service to ratepayers, while still being held accountable for wildfire damages where they act negligently or imprudently,' said the memo.
Regier said the required wildfire mitigation plans must meet nine specifications, including vegetation management and regular inspections and maintenance. She said the Montana Public Service Commission will review plans for regulated utilities, and electric co-op boards will review co-op plans.
'Electric facility providers are not automatically liable for damages from wildfires if they were not negligent and took preventative measures,' Regier said. 'To hold a utility liable, a plaintiff must demonstrate they were negligent.'
The plans must be updated every three years.
They must include descriptions of areas where facilities may be subject to 'heightened risk of wildfire,' strategies for inspecting the facilities, ways the supplier will reduce risks of its equipment igniting a fire, and methods for de-energizing power lines, among other requirements.
Legislators stood up in favor of the bill for a variety of reasons, even though some said it still needs work.
Rep. Tyson Running Wolf, D-Browning, said the financial risk to electricity customers in tribal communities was especially great.
'The rate impacts on utility customers and co-op members from unreasonable court judgments increase insurance costs, but have significant impact on tribal communities, which have poverty rates above the statewide rate average,' Running Wolf said.
Rep. Shane Klakken, R-Grass Range, said he's from a small town, and he doesn't want the electricity co-op of which he's a member, Fergus Electric, to get 'sued into nothing' and then go bankrupt.
He said any company that purchases it would only jack up rates to pay off the debt.
'I'm in the middle of nowhere.' Klakken said. 'I want my electricity.'
Rep. Bill Mercer, R-Billings, sponsored a controversial but successful amendment to say, in part, certain entities that have filed and 'substantially followed' wildfire plans, as opposed to only filed them, 'may not be' civilly liable for injuries or damages caused by wildfire, instead of 'are not.' Mercer said the bill does not preclude the 'ability to get relief under certain circumstances,' and the changes correct the bill's title to reflect its content.
Mercer, former U.S. Attorney for Montana, also said a couple of other changes align the bill with standards in such legal cases.
Some opponents of the amendment, including Regier, said Mercer made some good points but they were also hard to weigh at the last minute. Despite their arguments, the amendment passed 58-41.
Rep. Ed Stafman, D-Bozeman, ultimately supported the bill on the floor, although in committee, he voted no and said he would like to see the issue continued to be studied to address the argument that home insurance prices would spike.
'I think the amendment will help with that, but without an opportunity to study it, I'm just not sure it's enough,' Stafman said of work in committee.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Associated Press seeks full appeals court hearing on access to Trump administration events
Associated Press seeks full appeals court hearing on access to Trump administration events

San Francisco Chronicle​

time38 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Associated Press seeks full appeals court hearing on access to Trump administration events

The Associated Press on Tuesday asked for a hearing before the full U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington, seeking to overturn a three-judge panel's ruling that allowed the Trump administration to continue blocking AP access to some presidential events — a four-month case that has raised questions about what level of journalistic access to the presidency the First Amendment permits. Three judges of that court on Friday, in a 2-1 decision, said it was OK for Trump to continue keeping AP journalists out of Oval Office or other small events out in retaliation over the news outlet's decision not to follow his lead in changing the Gulf of Mexico's name. He had sought a pause of a lower court's ruling in AP's favor in April that the administration was improperly punishing the news organization for the content of its speech. 'The decision of the appellate panel to pause the district court's order allows the White House to discriminate and retaliate over words it does not like, a violation of the First Amendment,' AP spokesman Patrick Maks said. 'We are seeking a rehearing of this decision by the full appellate court because an essential American principle is at stake.' A hearing before the full court would change the landscape — and possibly the outcome as well. The two judges who ruled in Trump's favor on Friday had been appointed to the bench by him. The full court consists of nine members appointed by Democratic presidents, and six by Republicans. The news outlet's access to events in the Oval Office and Air Force One was cut back starting in February after the AP said it would continue referring to the Gulf of Mexico in its copy, while noting Trump's wishes that it instead be renamed the Gulf of America. For decades, a reporter and photographer for the AP — a 179-year-old wire service whose material is sent to thousands of news outlets across the world and carried on its own website, reaching billions of people — had been part of a small-group 'pool' that covers a president in places where space is limited. ___ David Bauder writes about media for the AP. Follow him at and

House GOP finalizes tweaks to keep megabill on track in Senate
House GOP finalizes tweaks to keep megabill on track in Senate

Politico

time43 minutes ago

  • Politico

House GOP finalizes tweaks to keep megabill on track in Senate

House Republicans have finalized changes to the party-line tax and spending package the House passed last month, to keep the bill in compliance with Senate rules. An early copy of the amendment House Republicans plan to adopt this week, first obtained by POLITICO, would make changes to biofuel policy and other provisions. By nixing items the Senate parliamentarian has flagged, the bill will retain its 'privilege' and can pass the Senate without having to overcome the filibuster. House GOP leaders plan to approve the tweaks in the Rules Committee later Tuesday and adopt them on the floor on Wednesday, according to House Majority Leader Steve Scalise.

Brevard County election 2025 results for Florida Senate District 19, House District 32
Brevard County election 2025 results for Florida Senate District 19, House District 32

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Brevard County election 2025 results for Florida Senate District 19, House District 32

Who are the winners and losers in the June 10, 2025, Brevard County special election? Voters in Brevard County cast ballots with their picks in the Florida Senate District 19 and Florida House District 32 races. The winners of the April 1 Republican primary election faced Democratic candidates in Tuesday's special general election. The Florida Senate District 19 election will fill the seat left vacant by Randy Fine, who resigned to run for Congress representing the Daytona Beach area. Primary winner Republican Debbie Mayfield faced Democrat Vance Ahrens. Florida's House District 32 seat was vacated by Debbie Mayfield, who is seeking to return to the Florida Senate after being term-limited out and winning this seat in November. The Florida Supreme Court ruled that she was eligible to once again seek her former Senate seat in the special election. Republican Brian Hodgers won the primary and faced Democrat Juan Hinojosa in the special general election. ➤ Dig Deeper: Ultimate voter guide to Brevard County June 10, 2025, special general elections Follow along below for the latest election results, continually updated until all ballots are counted. Polls close at 7 p.m. local time. Any voters waiting in line at 7 p.m. will have the opportunity to cast a ballot. Use the Brevard County voter information look-up to check your voter registration and party status. To find your Brevard County polling place, check the voter precinct look-up or your voter information card. To see a sample ballot for your Brevard County precinct, check the county elections office website. Support local journalism by subscribing to Florida Today. This article originally appeared on Florida Today: Brevard County election results: Florida D19, House D32

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store