
‘Games of chicken': Trump reversing foreign student legal status raises concerns
While the Trump administration's reinstatement of the legal status of international students on Friday seems like it could be a positive move, legal experts and international students are wary of its implications.
Over the past month, the federal government revoked numerous foreign students' Student and Exchange Visitor Information System database (SEVIS) records without notice. The records are required for living and studying in the U.S.
To Leo Gerdén, a Harvard international student, the announcement about the reversal is only a partial victory.
" I'm afraid that they're going to go back to the drawing board and going to find new, innovative, and perhaps smarter ways of pursuing the same policy of essentially harassing international students into silence," he said.
The administration said it would be working on a new policy for international students studying in the U.S. to provide a framework for SEVIS record terminations.
The status of international students' visas is tracked through the SEVIS database. A SEVIS record allows a foreign student to remain in the United States. Over the course of the past month, over a thousand students have been notified that their student visas and/or their status had been revoked.
In response, over 100 lawsuits were filed, with more than 50 of the cases ordering the Trump administration to temporarily undo the actions, according to Politico.
Five international students — including two from Worcester Polytechnic Institute — filed a federal class action lawsuit last week in New Hampshire federal court that aims to represent more than 100 students in New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Maine and Rhode Island who had their F-1 student immigration status revoked by the Republican administration.
Read more: Could Trump's crackdown on foreign students exacerbate declining college enrollment?
Gerdén said he still doesn't feel safe as an international student in the U.S. who has spoken out against the Trump administration.
" I am feeling it every day, whenever I'm walking on the street, I'm looking behind my shoulder and thinking if that man who looks like a civilian is actually a civilian or if it's a masked ICE agent," he said.
The decision by the Trump administration raises more questions than answers, according to legal experts.
" All we have seen is a series of restoration of SEVIS but we can't tell from the systems we've seen so far whether they're retroactive. We can't tell how that will affect the student's future statuses. We can't tell if ICE will be working with [the] Department of State to un-revoke the visas they caused revocations of, and we can't tell whether or not ICE will even issue an apology to these students for upending their lives," Charles Kuck, former president of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, said.
Even if students' SEVIS records are restored, it is unclear whether they will have a period of unlawful presence from their revocation, which will cause them future problems, Kuck said.
" We don't know any of the real information you need to know as a lawyer to determine whether this is a good measure, a full measure or a half measure," said Kuck, who is also an adjunct faculty member at Emory University.
While students' SEVIS records are being reinstated, it remains unclear whether their student visa could also be reinstated, according to Stephen Yale-Loehr, a retired immigration law professor at Cornell University.
'It is a welcome development, but there are a lot of questions that remain to be answered,' he said.
While the Trump administration's decision to reverse course isn't fully known, legal experts suspect it could be due to the number of court cases that have gone against the federal government's actions.
The actions from the Trump administration were 'legally indefensible,' Ian Campbell, an immigration lawyer, said.
'Even if one of these cases had made it to the Supreme Court, which is generally highly deferential to Trump on immigration, especially, they would have been forced to reinstate SEVIS for all of the cases I am aware of,' Campbell said.
He questions who is 'behind the wheel, and what the plan was all along?'
'If they weren't prepared to fight those cases for more than a week, why bother in the first place? Even if the plan was just to intimidate international students and the universities that sponsor them, why fold so quickly?' said Campbell, who graduated from Harvard Law.
The Trump administration did something similar with tariffs, announcing it would impose up to a 145% tariff on Chinese goods and a universal 10% tariff on all countries in addition to higher tariffs for numerous countries. The administration later said it would implement a 90-day pause on most of its plan, although the 10% universal tariff remains.
'If you can ascribe any conscious strategy to the administration, it seems to be initiating games of chicken, but then immediately backing down,' he said.
'Except that no one would choose that strategy on purpose and it seems more likely that there's simply no plan at all,' Campbell said.
Several Massachusetts institutions have seen student visas and statuses revoked. Among them have been: Northeastern University, the University of Massachusetts Amherst and Boston, Berklee College of Music, Harvard University, Clark University, Bentley University and Worcester Polytechnic Institute.
Three of the nine of those who had their SEVIS records terminated at Tufts University have been returned to active status as of the late morning, according to Patrick Collins, Tufts spokesperson.
All reactivated records are F-1 student visa holders who are alumni on post-completion. The institution is continuing to monitor developments, Collins said.
Clark University said it is 'cautiously optimistic' about the announcement from the federal government. At the same time, the institution is still 'very concerned about our international students.'
'At this point, it appears that a few of our students' SEVIS records have been reinstated, but not all. We are looking into the details and hope to learn more over the next few days. Our international students are an integral part of our Clark community. We stand firmly committed to their continued success here,' said John LaBrie, dean and associate provost for graduate studies and international programs at Clark.
The Office of Global Affairs at UMass Amherst is 'assessing the impact on the UMass community and will advise students on a case-by-case basis as appropriate,' according to Melinda Rose, university spokesperson.
Read more: Trump is threatening to block international students from Harvard. Is that legal?
There is 'a long way ahead' for international students, said Harvard sophomore Abdullah Shahid Sial, who is from Pakistan.
While he is optimistic about the reversal, he said he doesn't know if it will significantly affect Harvard international students.
This is because the Department of Homeland Security ordered Harvard to submit detailed records of 'illegal and violent activities' by foreign student visa holders before the end of the month, or it would lose a key certification that allows international students to attend Harvard.
About 27% of Harvard's undergraduate and graduate students are international, according to 2024 to 2025 data.
" I will definitely take this as a win along the way, a win for international students at large," Shahid Sial said.
'Maybe not for Harvard international students, but it's definitely for international schools at large,' he said.
Trump is threatening to block international students from Harvard. Is that legal?
Could Trump's crackdown on foreign students exacerbate declining college enrollment?
Harvard has a $53 billion endowment. Could it be a weapon in its fight against Trump?
Harvard's president to talk stakes of Trump admin's demands in new NBC interview
Researchers discover novel bacteria linked to deadly fever in New England ticks
Read the original article on MassLive.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

33 minutes ago
Republicans urge Donald Trump and Elon Musk to end their feud
WASHINGTON -- As the Republican Party braces for aftershocks from President Donald Trump's spectacular clash with Elon Musk, lawmakers and conservative figures are urging détente, fearful of the potential consequences from a prolonged feud. At a minimum, the explosion of animosity between the two powerful men could complicate the path forward for Republicans' massive tax and border spending legislation that has been promoted by Trump but assailed by Musk. 'I hope it doesn't distract us from getting the job done that we need to,' said Rep. Dan Newhouse, a Republican from Washington state. "I think that it will boil over and they'll mend fences' Sen. Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican, was similarly optimistic. 'I hope that both of them come back together because when the two of them are working together, we'll get a lot more done for America than when they're at cross purposes,' he told Fox News host Sean Hannity on Thursday night. Sen. Mike Lee, a Republican from Utah, sounded almost pained on social media as Trump and Musk volleyed insults at each other, sharing a photo composite of the two men and writing, "But … I really like both of them.' 'Who else really wants @elonmusk and @realDonaldTrump to reconcile?' Lee posted, later adding: 'Repost if you agree that the world is a better place with the Trump-Musk bromance fully intact.' So far, the feud between Trump and Musk is probably best described as a moving target, with plenty of opportunities for escalation or detente. One person familiar with the president's thinking said Musk wants to speak with Trump, but that the president doesn't want to do it – or at least do it on Friday. The person requested anonymity to disclose private matters. In a series of conversations with television anchors Friday morning, Trump showed no interest in burying the hatchet. Asked on ABC News about reports of a potential call between him and Musk, the president responded: 'You mean the man who has lost his mind?' Trump added in the ABC interview that he was 'not particularly' interested in talking to Musk at the moment. Still, others remained hopeful that it all would blow over. 'I grew up playing hockey and there wasn't a single day that we played hockey or basketball or football or baseball, whatever we were playing, where we didn't fight. And then we'd fight, then we'd become friends again,' Hannity said on his show Thursday night. Acknowledging that it 'got personal very quick,' Hannity nonetheless added that the rift was 'just a major policy difference.' House Speaker Mike Johnson projected confidence that the dispute would not affect prospects for the tax and border bill. 'Members are not shaken at all,' the Louisiana Republican said. 'We're going to pass this legislation on our deadline.' He added that he hopes Musk and Trump reconcile, saying 'I believe in redemption' and 'it's good for the party and the country if all that's worked out.' But he also had something of a warning for the billionaire entrepreneur. 'I'll tell you what, do not doubt and do not second-guess and don't ever challenge the president of the United States, Donald Trump,' Johnson said. "He is the leader of the party. He's the most consequential political figure of this generation and probably the modern era.'
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jeffries declines to embrace Musk amid the billionaire's feud with Trump
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) is keeping his distance from Elon Musk even after the billionaire's extraordinary public rebuke of President Trump and the GOP's domestic agenda. Asked Friday if Musk's bitter break from Trump presents Democrats with an opportunity to form a strange-bedfellows alliance with the tech titan, Jeffries shifted the conversation immediately to the Democrats' efforts to kill Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' 'The opportunity that exists right now is to kill the GOP tax scam,' Jeffries told reporters in the Capitol. 'It's legislation that we have been strongly opposed to, and uniformly opposed to, from the very beginning. … It rips health care away from millions of people. It snatches food out of the mouths of hungry children. And it rewards billionaires and [GOP] donors in ways that are fiscally irresponsible.' Pressed on whether Musk should be 'welcomed back' to the Democratic Party after the high-profile split from Trump, Jeffries punted again. 'Same answer,' he said. Jeffries's cautious remarks demonstrate the limits of the old adage that the enemy of one's enemy is one's friend. They also highlight the potential difficulties Democrats would face if they embraced a polarizing and nationally unpopular figure in Musk — one they've spent most of the last year bashing for heavy spending on Trump's campaign and, more recently, for his role in heading Trump's efforts to gut the federal government. Still, some Democrats say Musk's influence is significant enough that Democrats should make the effort to try to court him to their side amid the Trump feud. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who represents parts of Silicon Valley, is leading the charge. 'If Biden had a big supporter criticize him, Trump would have hugged him the next day,' Khanna posted Thursday on social platform X, which is owned by Musk. 'When we refused to meet with @RobertKennedyJr, Trump embraced him & won. We can be the party of sanctimonious lectures, or the party of FDR that knows how to win & build a progressive majority,' referring to former President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Jeffries isn't going nearly so far. But he has welcomed Musk's attacks on Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' and the Republicans who voted for it. And he aligned Democrats with Musk's sentiments that the package piles too much money onto the federal debt, a figure the Congressional Budget Office estimated to be $2.4 trillion. 'To the extent that Elon Musk has made the same point that everyone who has voted for this bill up until this moment should be ashamed of themselves, we agree,' Jeffries said. 'And to the extent that Elon Musk has made the point that the bill is a 'disgusting abomination,' we agree. And to the extent that Elon Musk has made the observation about the GOP tax scam — that it is reckless and irresponsible to explode the deficit by more than $3 trillion, and that potentially could set our country on a path toward bankruptcy — we agree.' 'These are arguments that Democrats have been making now for months.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Vance Sucks Up to Trump to Deny He's Part of Musk Coup Plot
J.D. Vance was forced to reaffirm his allegiance to President Trump after Elon Musk backed a call for the vice president to replace his boss. A spat between Musk and Trump over the president's 'big beautiful bill,' which the Tesla CEO denounced as a 'disgusting abomination,' has blown up into an all-out MAGA civil war, with Musk and Trump dramatically trading blows in public. On Thursday, the Tesla and SpaceX CEO replied 'Yes' to a post by an X user who asked: 'President vs Elon. Who wins? My money's on Elon. Trump should be impeached and Vance should replace him.' Musk publicly mused about starting a political party, and told his followers in a bombshell allegation that Trump was named in the Epstein files, signing off by saying: 'Have a nice day, DJT!' He added in a follow-up post, 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' Vance also features in a conspiracy theory called 'Dark Enlightenment' or Dark MAGA" that suggests a secretive cabal of tech titans is plotting to blow up the government and rule as a giant corporation with a CEO instead of a president. The Silicon Valley plotters, including Musk, chose Vance as the person who would take over when Trump is toppled, according to the theory. Trump has yet to address the latest allegations personally. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt issued a statement saying: 'This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' because it does not include the policies he wanted.' As the drama escalated, Vance posted a picture teasing a Friday appearance on the podcast of Trump-friendly comedian Theo Von. 'Slow news day, what are we even going to talk about?' Vance joked. In a follow-up post, the vice president added: 'President Trump has done more than any person in my lifetime to earn the trust of the movement he leads. I'm proud to stand beside him.' Musk and Trump's alliance began to unravel after the GOP-controlled House of Representatives narrowly passed Trump's flagship budget proposal last month. Before that, Musk had pushed Trump's agenda by leading his so-called Department of Government Efficiency, an initiative within the administration tasked with cutting government spending and jobs. Musk publicly attacked Trump's bill on the grounds that it would undermine his work with DOGE by adding trillions to the U.S. budget deficit. But on Thursday, Trump claimed that Musk was really upset about the effect the bill will have on his electric vehicle company, Tesla. 'I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' the president added.