Israeli West Bank offensives displace thousands: officials
Jonathan Fowler, UNRWA spokesman, said an estimated 2,450 to 3,000 families have been displaced from the Tulkarem refugee campFaisal Salama, head of the camp's popular committee, estimated that 80 percent of the camp's 15,000 residents have been displacedRAMALLAH: Israeli military offensives in two West Bank refugee camps have displaced nearly 5,500 Palestinian families since December, local and UN officials said Tuesday, amid escalating violence in the occupied territory.The Israeli military describes its ongoing operations as 'counterterrorism' efforts aimed at rooting out Palestinian militancy.Jonathan Fowler, spokesman for the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (UNRWA), said an estimated 2,450 to 3,000 families have been displaced from the Tulkarem refugee camp.Faisal Salama, head of the camp's popular committee, estimated that 80 percent of the camp's 15,000 residents have been displaced.Both Salama and Fowler said that obtaining precise figures is challenging because of the security situation within the camp and its fluctuating population.'The displaced people from the camp are scattered in the suburbs and in the city of Tulkarem itself,' Salama told AFP.He said that six people had been killed and dozens wounded since the offensive began on January 25.'The bombing of residential homes in the camp continues, along with destruction and bulldozing of everything.'Salama also reported that the violence has severely restricted the movement of goods into the camp.'There is a shortage of water, no electricity, no communication and a lack of essential supplies such as milk for children, diapers, and medicine,' he added.Displacement has also been severe in Jenin, also in the northern West Bank, where the military launched an intensive assault it dubbed 'Iron Wall' on January 21.Fowler reported that 3,000 families — around 15,000 people — have fled Jenin refugee camp since December, initially when Palestinian security forces staged their own operation against militants and then later because of the Israeli offensive.Displacement has surged in recent days after the military assault inflicted further destruction on the camp.On Sunday, Israeli media and the Palestinian news agency Wafa reported that Israeli forces had demolished 20 buildings in a single coordinated detonation in the camp.Both the Tulkarem and Jenin refugee camps are known strongholds of Palestinian militancy.A gunman attacked an Israeli military checkpoint in the northern West Bank at Tayasir on Tuesday, fatally wounding two soldiers before troops shot him dead, the military said.The Palestinian health ministry reported on Tuesday that 70 people had been killed by Israeli forces in the West Bank this year, 38 of them in Jenin.Israel's military says its forces had killed 'approximately 55 terrorists' across the West Bank in January, without specifying the locations.Its West Bank operations intensified following a ceasefire in the Israel-Hamas war in the Gaza Strip on January 19.The Palestinian health ministry says Israeli troops and settlers have killed at least 884 Palestinians, including many militants, in the West Bank since the Gaza war began on October 7, 2023.Over the same period, at least 32 Israelis have been killed in Palestinian attacks or during Israeli military raids in the territory, official Israeli figures show.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
33 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
IAEA chief relays Iran warning against Israeli strikes on nuclear facilities
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Rafael Grossi said Iranians warned him that an Israel strike on the country's nuclear facilities could cause Iran to be more determined about developing a nuclear weapon, according to an interview broadcast and published on Monday. 'A strike could potentially have an amalgamating effect, solidifying Iran's determination – I will say it plainly – to pursue a nuclear weapon or withdraw from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons,' Grossi said in the interview, published on the Jerusalem Post website and broadcast on i24 TV on Monday. Grossi, however, doubted that Israel would strike Tehran's nuclear facilities, the Jerusalem Post reported. The Iranian nuclear program 'runs wide and deep,' Grossi told the Jerusalem Post. 'Disrupting them would require overwhelming and devastating force.' Tehran and Washington have recently engaged in Oman-mediated nuclear talks. Iran is set to hand a counter-proposal for a nuclear deal to the United States via Oman, Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said on Monday, in response to a US offer that Tehran deems 'unacceptable.' Last week, US President Donald Trump said he had warned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu not to take actions that could disrupt nuclear talks with Iran. 'I told him this would be inappropriate to do right now because we're very close to a solution now,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. 'That could change at any moment.'
Asharq Al-Awsat
an hour ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Will Lebanon Learn from al-Sharaa's Government?
It's been about 150 days since Joseph Aoun and Nawaf Salam took office. On one hand, Lebanon is experiencing its best chapter in two decades. On the other hand, there are concerns about the slow pace of progress – and that another war is on the verge of erupting. Regardless of whether the fighters on both sides of the Litani River are preparing for a decisive battle – which is unlikely or not—the road is long before Lebanon can fully reclaim its sovereignty from both Israel and Hezbollah. Israeli forces still occupy Lebanese land, and Hezbollah has handed over only a fraction of its weapons – barely the tip of the iceberg. The repeated rhetoric in both presidents' speeches about the 'Israeli enemy' carries no real weight today, nor is it necessary in modern political discourse. The bitter truth, for some, is this: it is Israel – not the Lebanese authorities – that will determine the shape of Hezbollah's future. Israel will define its size, the limits of its capabilities, and its influence. Neighboring Syria is facing a similar situation, but has chosen a different approach. Bashar al-Assad's regime has collapsed, just like Hezbollah's grip has weakened, leaving behind a complex legacy to navigate with the region's 'superpower' neighbor. Israeli forces are also present on Syrian soil and continue to target Syrian sites frequently. Amid this complex situation, President Ahmed al-Sharaa's government has managed to turn crisis into opportunity – and has earned global praise not only for what it has done, but for what it has deliberately chosen not to do. It quickly abandoned the ostrich-head-in-the-sand approach of previous regimes, which had failed to address internal and external politics with realism. Al-Sharaa did not attack Israel in his speeches. He did not mobilize his forces or instruct his militias to clash or even respond to Israeli fire. Nor did he inflate government statements with false claims of confrontations and victories. In fact, he never even referred to Israel as 'the enemy,' nor did he reject mediation or negotiations with the 'evil' neighbor. He made it clear: his goal is to stabilize war-torn Syria – not destabilize those around it. Lebanon's president and prime minister come from elite circles – military and civilian alike. Salam is a graduate of the Sorbonne in France and Harvard in the US – arguably the most internationally qualified leader in Lebanese political history. In contrast, President al-Sharaa is a product of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham and had seen nothing of the world before assuming power except what lay between Iraq's Anbar and Syria's Idlib. You don't need a magnifying glass to see that al-Sharaa has advanced Syria's recovery, securing deals with both friendly and hostile powers. He has neutralized threats from Israel, Iran, Iraqi factions, and US sanctions – through dialogue – and has lured foreign investors with contracts to build and operate airports, ports, energy facilities, and industrial projects. We recognize that the challenges in Beirut differ from those in Damascus. Nevertheless, Lebanon today has a rare opportunity – perhaps once in forty years – to end decades of foreign domination, from the Palestinians to the Syrians and now the Iranians. This moment demands flexibility and a new approach, unlike the rigid policies of the past. Looking at the two warring sides – Hezbollah and Israel – Hezbollah has only three possible futures. First: It could return as a cross-border regional force, threatening Israel, managing Yemen's Houthis, and operating in Syria and Iraq. But that now seems impossible given Israel's insistence on a policy of preempting any force that poses a border threat. Note that Egypt, Jordan, and Syria – under their treaties with Israel –agreed to regulate weapons types and distances from the border, something Hezbollah used to reject. Yet under the ceasefire agreement, it accepted withdrawal from south of the Litani River, surrendering heavy weapons, military production platforms, and dismantling its infrastructure. Second: Hezbollah could reposition itself as a purely local force. That would require acknowledging the shift in the balance of power and abandoning its role as a threat to Israel or as a bargaining chip for Iran. It may try to keep its weapons to maintain dominance in Lebanon. To counter that, Lebanese and Israeli authorities are cooperating – Israel provides Beirut with intelligence on hidden arms, and the Lebanese side carries out raids and seizures. But Hezbollah is skilled at the game of hiding – though the current environment is tougher than before. This time, there's no escape, even after sidelining US mediator Morgan Ortagus, whom Hezbollah and its allies portray as Netanyahu's puppet. The reality is: it's Israel – not the US – that now dictates Lebanon's course. This is underscored by the unprecedented scale of Israeli strikes on the southern suburbs – the first since the war's end. The Lebanese presidency has promised to restore full state sovereignty by disarming Hezbollah and ending Lebanon's role as a proxy warfront. So far, it hasn't succeeded. Without this, stability will remain fragile, and investment will stay limited. Lebanon's future over the next 10 or 20 years hinges on what happens in these very days, transforming the country from a militia playground into a sovereign state focused on its internal affairs and the needs of its citizens. This is exactly what al-Sharaa is doing in Syria – with courage and cunning – even though his circumstances are arguably far more difficult and dangerous than those faced by Lebanon's leadership. And it's false to claim that the world simply rushed to support al-Sharaa – not at all. He set his priorities clearly, forged his own alliances, and refused to be blackmailed by local or regional propaganda about 'jihad' or the 'enemy.' His task now is to fight remnants and separatists, repair the economy, and focus on building a state that's been collapsing since the end of the Cold War.
Asharq Al-Awsat
3 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Israel Ultra-Orthodox Party Threatens Government over Draft Law
Israel's ultra-Orthodox Shas party on Monday threatened to bring down Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government by backing a motion for early elections amid a row over military service. Netanyahu's coalition, one of the most right-wing in Israel's history, is at risk of collapsing over a bill that could reverse the long-standing exemption from the draft for ultra-Orthodox Jews. The exemption is facing growing pushback as Israel wages war on the Palestinian group Hamas in Gaza. Netanyahu is under pressure from within his Likud party to draft more ultra-Orthodox men and impose penalties on draft dodgers -- a red line for Shas. The party is demanding legislation to permanently exempt its followers from military service and gave Netanyahu two days to find a solution. "We don't want to bring down a right-wing government, but we've reached our limit," Shas spokesperson Asher Medina told public radio. "If there's no last-minute solution (on conscription), we'll vote to dissolve the Knesset," he said, referring to the Israeli parliament. Last week, a Shas source told AFP the party was threatening to quit the coalition unless a solution was reached by Monday. The opposition is seeking to place a bill to dissolve parliament on Wednesday's plenary agenda, hoping to capitalize on the ultra-Orthodox revolt to topple the government. Netanyahu's coalition, formed in December 2022, includes Likud, far-right factions and ultra-Orthodox parties. A walkout by the latter would end its majority. A poll published in March by right-wing daily Israel Hayom found 85 percent of Israeli Jews support changing the conscription law for Haredim. Forty-one percent backed compulsory military service -- currently 32 months for men -- for all eligible members of the community.
