N.S. moves forward with plan to force municipalities to protect coastlines
The Nova Scotia government is offering municipalities a blueprint on how they can protect the province's 13,000 kilometres of coastline.
Environment Minister Tim Halman on Tuesday announced a new website link with examples of bylaws and other regulations municipalities can use to prevent coastal erosion.
It's a controversial measure — the Progressive Conservatives have refused to put into force a 2019 law adopted by the previous Liberal government that would have required the provincial government to manage coastal protection.
Instead, the Tories want the province's municipalities to draft their own bylaws that define where coastal regulations would apply, set minimum building elevations, and create buffer zones to protect infrastructure from erosion.
Halman also announced more than $1.3 million for the Nova Scotia Federation of Municipalities to hire a climate change policy analyst and help its 49 members create their own bylaws.
The Progressive Conservatives promised to offer examples of bylaws when they announced their coastal protection strategy in February 2024 and confirmed they would not proclaim the Liberals' 2019 Coastal Protection Act.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
17 hours ago
- CBC
When absence of consultation can become a political headache
In the afterglow of his party forming government in 2021 on the strength of a promise to fix health care, Premier Tim Houston and other senior officials set out on a tour across Nova Scotia to hear directly from health-care workers about how to help an ailing system. Those consultations would lead to a variety of programs and initiatives, based on feedback from people directly involved, that helped the Tories begin to make progress on a file that had become a political headache for previous governments. In the second term of Houston's Progressive Conservative government, however, people could be forgiven for being skeptical about just how interested the Tories are in consulting with the public, and whether feedback they receive will be reflected in policy and programs. Houston came off a resounding election win in November only to go into the next session at the legislature with a number of bills that caught most people off guard because none of it was discussed during the election. That included a bill that would have clipped the powers of the auditor general and privacy commissioner, give the government the power to fire non-union civil servants without cause, and lift bans and moratoriums on uranium exploration and mining and hydraulic fracturing for onshore natural gas. As the natural resources bill was making its way through the legislature, Houston responded to criticism about a lack of consultation by saying that bans had to be removed before conversations could be had. But since the Tories passed the bill, Mi'kmaw chiefs and municipal government officials continue to feel left out of any discussions, and Natural Resources Minister Tory Rushton announced a call for proposals for uranium exploration before letters could even land in the mailboxes of potentially affected property owners. Unintended consequences There was also an absence of conversation on the government's plan to make parking free at health-care sites. Sources say the Tories were warned of potential implications at hospitals in Halifax Regional Municipality, but the government pushed ahead anyway before steps could be taken to lessen impacts on health-care staff. In the face of major blowback, the government retreated on increased parking fees for health-care workers and is now scrambling to find whatever new spaces it can, including spending $1 million to upgrade land it already owns on South Street near the IWK Health Centre and Victoria General Hospital. A lack of consultation caused the Tories headaches even on legislation that should have been an easy public relations win. Houston's bill to help knock down interprovincial trade barriers was lauded by other provinces and premiers who said they would follow his lead. The problem for the premier was no one bothered to talk to professional regulators before the bill was introduced. They quickly pointed out flaws that, had the government not amended the bill, would have prevented regulators from being able to provide oversight and detect people posing as professionals. A government's prerogative Houston and his team will say that change, along with changes to the bill that would have affected the auditor general and privacy commissioner, are signs of a government willing to listen to feedback. But consultation ahead of time would have identified the flaws that created problems for the Tories in the first place. When it wants to, this government can lead a thorough and thoughtful consultation process. Along with the health tour and other efforts to get feedback from health-care workers, the recent work related to the new student code of conduct was mostly well received. The government is also in the midst of consultation about the potential of changing the rules governing where alcohol can be sold. But then there is the process used for the Coastal Protection Act, where the government disregarded documented results in favour of a different direction. That's its prerogative, but it can risk creating widespread cynicism. Much is made of the supermajority Houston won last November, and what it means for his government's ability to advance its agenda. But that supermajority also means that when the government does something that upsets the public, there's an increased chance a PC MLA will be the one fielding angry telephone calls, office visits or emails from constituents. The next election might be three or four years away, but an accumulated perception that a government won't take the time to ask questions or seek feedback before pushing ahead with plans can be difficult to overcome when voters next turn their minds to casting a ballot.
Global News
a day ago
- Global News
Prime Minister Carney's G7 invite to Modi sends ‘wrong' message, Liberal MP says
Prime Minister Mark Carney is facing criticism from within his own party for inviting Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to the upcoming G7 summit in Kananaskis, Alta., despite allegations the Modi government orchestrated a campaign of violence in Canada. Liberal MP Sukh Dhaliwal, who represents a riding in Surrey, B.C. with a large Sikh community, disagrees with Carney and says dozens of his constituents have reached out to him in 'outrage.' 'It is sending the wrong message… that anyone can come into Canada and kill Canadians and they can walk away with impunity.' 1:28 Canada reaffirms RCMP's independence in ongoing assassination probe despite India's invitation to G7 'It's not only the Sikh Canadians I'm hearing from. I'm hearing from a wide range of constituents on this issue.' Story continues below advertisement Last fall, the RCMP accused India of homicide, extortion and violence on Canadian soil. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Former prime minister Justin Trudeau stood up in the House of Commons in September 2023, saying Canada had 'credible evidence' agents of the Indian government were involved in the murder of Sikh separatist Hardeep Singh Nijjar. 3:02 Carney asked if he believes Modi was involved in murder of B.C. Sikh leader Hardeep Singh Nijjar '[India] has got to be held accountable… and fully cooperate with this investigation,' said Dhaliwal, pointing out that Nijjar lived in the his B.C. riding. New Delhi has long denied any involvement in the killing and accused Trudeau of pursuing a 'political agenda.' Carney defended reaching out to Modi, saying, 'There are certain countries that should be at the table' for G7 discussions and that India has agreed to 'continued law enforcement dialogue.' Story continues below advertisement 1:55 RCMP unveils security operation plans for G7 summit On Saturday, Carney unveiled Canada's 'priorities' for the summit, which will place between June 15 and 17. They include securing partnerships, building energy security, and protecting communities and the world by countering foreign interference and transnational repression. 'The fact that leaders from a number of countries have been invited to [G7] meeting does not and should not detract from the importance of the independent investigation that is ongoing,' Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand told journalists Saturday. Vina Nadjibulla, vice-president of research and strategy at the Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada, says the Carney government made the right call giving Modi a seat at the G7 table. 'We're in a different moment when it comes to international relations,' said Nadjibulla. India — the world's fifth largest economy — has been invited to the last six G7 meetings. Nadjibulla says Canada needs to recalibrate its relationships in the Indo-Pacific to reduce its 'overreliance' on the U.S. Story continues below advertisement 'From tariffs to the trade agenda and to the realignment that we're seeing around the world of different powers, I think it's important for Canada to approach diplomacy differently,' she said.
Toronto Star
2 days ago
- Toronto Star
Doug Ford won't be the only one feeling the heat this summer
Ontario's long, hot summer of 2025 just got hotter. And longer. Not just for Doug Ford. The premier's political rivals will also be facing the heat, each in their own way. MPPs headed home this week with a surprise: Ford's Tories told them to stay away until Oct. 20. That's a sweet summer break lasting nearly 20 weeks for provincial politicians who sat in their legislative seats for only six weeks this year. Another seven weeks of work awaits them upon their return, after which they're back home for the Christmas break. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Total time at work in the legislature: 13 weeks out of 52 for the whole year. The ready excuse? Ford's Tories argue they've produced so much 'ambitious' legislation to date that they need more time to recharge. The real explanation? The premier has provoked so much antagonism to his controversial plan for 'special economic zones' — a new law to dilute old laws — that he's better off lying low. Ford's mishandling of the issue sparked warnings from Indigenous leaders that protests will flare over the summer. Away from the daily question period in the legislature, Ford can talk about standing up to Donald Trump instead of taking questions about trampling on rights of First Nations. All that said, if tensions rise, it could complicate Ford's plans to host his fellow premiers in Muskoka at their annual summit meeting in mid-July. Instead of the usual banter, there could be blockades pitting protesters against politicians — and cottagers. Ford won't be the only one on the firing line. Any highway blockades would also put Ontario's opposition leaders on the spot, forcing them to pick a lane — or, more precisely, restate their stance when the stakes are high. New Democratic Party Leader Marit Stiles and Liberal Leader Bonnie Crombie, choosing their words carefully, have said they won't side with civil disobedience on the highways. Not when motorists are fuming under the baking sun. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW As Ontario's populist premier has noted, blockades rarely win public support. Either way, Ford will spend much of the summer watching his rivals face the heat while he cools off at his cottage. With or without the drumbeat of First Nations protests, both Stiles and Crombie will be facing the music in leadership reviews mandated by their parties after every election. New Democrats will meet on Sept. 20 in Niagara Falls — Canada's honeymoon capital — to vote on the post-honeymoon future of Stiles after the Feb. 27 loss to Ford. Despite losing seats and stature in the election — her party stumbled and tumbled in the popular vote — Stiles seems sure to prevail. Most activists understand their party was predestined to decline in an election called early by Ford to capitalize on anti-American animus. Provincially as federally, New Democrats suffered from a political squeeze play as polarized voters opted for a binary choice between Tories and Liberals to cope with economic uncertainty. In the aftermath, the NDP fell from a competitive 23.7 per cent of the popular vote in the 2022 election to a dismal 18.6 per cent this time. The only saving grace was the final seat count. While New Democrats dropped to 27 seats from 31, the Liberals came third with only 14 seats — despite winning a far higher 30 per cent of the popular vote (up from 23.9 per cent in 2022). For Crombie, the failure to win her own riding — or any seats — in her home base of Mississauga, where she once served as mayor, proved an embarrassment. In truth, Stiles was dragged down by the declining fortunes of the federal NDP under former leader Jagmeet Singh. So too, Crombie was lifted up by the remarkable popularity of Carney's federal Liberals. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW While federal-provincial crossover is a constant in Ontario politics, Crombie's Mississauga shutout leaves her with a lot of explaining to do. Now, she too faces a party leadership review in September — and a long, hot summer of reaching out to provincial Liberals who are wondering who does what next. Yet her future depends less on past performance than on future prospects. The problem for both Stiles and Crombie is that if another election were held now, Ford would do even better. A key difference is that Crombie's Liberals are positioned to fare better than the New Democrats under Stiles. The latest Leger poll shows Ford's Tories preferred by 45 per cent of respondents (up from 43 per cent in the February vote). That compares to 32 per cent for the Liberals (up from 30 per cent), versus 15 per cent for the NDP (down from 18.6 per cent in the election). You can do the math. Crombie's Liberals are more than twice as popular as the New Democrats, and Ford's Tories are precisely three times more popular. Which explains why Ford will be sitting pretty this summer while Stiles and Crombie will be stuck in their respective hot seats, looking over their shoulders. Politics Headlines Newsletter Get the latest news and unmatched insights in your inbox every evening Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. Please enter a valid email address. Sign Up Yes, I'd also like to receive customized content suggestions and promotional messages from the Star. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Politics Headlines Newsletter You're signed up! You'll start getting Politics Headlines in your inbox soon. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page.
