logo
No funding for nascent Smithsonian Latino museum in Trump's 2026 budget request

No funding for nascent Smithsonian Latino museum in Trump's 2026 budget request

Miami Heralda day ago

The Smithsonian's planned American Latino museum – already a political football in the nation's capital – is getting no financial help from President Donald Trump.
The museum, still in its infancy, is effectively left out of Trump's proposed 2026 budget. The president's spending plan – the first of his second term – includes no money for the design and development of the museum, one of two new Smithsonian museums green-lit several years ago by Congress.
The prospects that the Trump administration would withhold money that the museum needs to get off the ground is potentially problematic for its leaders, who are seeking to raise hundreds of millions of dollars to construct the building. In a 2026 budget document released in May, the Smithsonian describes the president's budget as 'eliminating funding for the development of the National Museum of the American Latino.'
'The Smithsonian has received federal appropriations for the National Museum of the American Latino for the past four years,' a spokesperson for the museum told the Miami Herald, noting that the president's budget 'does not include funding' for the institution.
Why does Trump want to omit funding?
The museum, approved with bipartisan support by Congress and Trump in 2020, was created with the goal to 'honor the dreams, challenges and triumphs of U.S. Latinos, elevating [their] stories within the national narrative,' according to its website
Led by Jorge Zamanillo, former director of HistoryMiami, the museum does not yet have a location. Its leaders are still searching for as much as $800 million in funding reportedly needed to construct and fill a building.
A White House official told the Herald that the lack of a location for the museum factored into the president's decision to omit funding in his proposed budget. The official also said President Joe Biden's final budget included no money for the planning and design of the museum.
Trump, though, has been critical of the Smithsonian. In a March executive order, the president said the 'Smithsonian Institution has, in recent years, come under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology,' describing it as part of a movement to recast U.S. history in a negative light. The order directed Trump's vice president, who is among the leaders on the Smithsonian's Board of Regents, to 'prohibit expenditure on exhibits or programs that degrade shared American values, divide Americans based on race, or promote programs or ideologies inconsistent with Federal law and policy.'
The museum has also been the subject of criticism from conservative groups and Republican representatives.
In a 2024 article, The Heritage Foundation publicly denounced the Latino museum, deeming it a 'woke indoctrination factory' and 'disgraceful.'
'Its aim is to teach the young and future generations to see themselves as victims of America, so they can destroy it from within,' wrote Mike Gonzalez, a senior fellow at the conservative think tank.
In an X post Thursday morning, Alfonso Aguilar, conservative activist and former chief of the U.S. Office of Citizenship, said the Latino museum 'is being used to promote a 'woke, culturally Marxist' agenda.
'That's why #Trump is asking Congress to defund it,' Aguilar wrote. 'If Republicans really want to counter the woke agenda, they should comply with his request.'
Miami Republicans have also been critical at times of the museum. Cuban-American U.S. Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart deemed an exhibition created by the museum and hosted in the Smithsonian National Museum of American History as 'patronizing' and 'quasi-racist' during a 2023 subcommittee hearing. Diaz-Balart worked at the time with House Republicans to push legislation forward to pull the museum's funding, though he backed off that effort after he said he had a productive meeting with Smithsonian representatives.
What happens next?
Congress sets the U.S. budget, not Trump.
'This is the first step of a very long appropriations process,' said the Latino museum spokesperson.
Notably, Diaz-Balart serves on the U.S. House Committee on Appropriations, which is tasked with drafting legislation to allocate federal government funds. His office did not respond to a request seeking comment.
Miami Congressman Carlos Giménez, a Cuban-American Republican who sits on the Smithsonian Board of Regents, also did not respond to a request for comment.
'I consider the museum something which I'd like to have, but it's not something I gotta have,' Gimenez told Roll Call.
Meanwhile, some members of the House and Senate continue to push to create a space for the museum along the National Mall – the greenspace home to memorials and other museums east of the U.S. Capitol – and preserve financing for an institution that is supposed to highlight Latinos' influence on U.S. history.
A Senate bill called the 'Smithsonian National Museum of the American Latino Act,' led by California Democrat Alex Padilla and Texas Republican Ted Cruz, would allow the federal government 'to build a new Smithsonian museum on the National Mall that recognizes the accomplishments of Latinos,' according to a news release.
The bill says museum leaders 'shall ensure that the exhibits and programs of the Museum accurately and comprehensively represent the varied cultures, histories, events, and values of Hispanic or Latino communities.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Army, Trump ready June 14th birthday parade with tanks, rocket launchers
Army, Trump ready June 14th birthday parade with tanks, rocket launchers

UPI

time15 minutes ago

  • UPI

Army, Trump ready June 14th birthday parade with tanks, rocket launchers

President Donald Trump congratulates a cadet at the United States Military Academy graduation ceremony in Michie Stadium at West Point, New York, on May 24, and will review the Army's 250th birthday parade on June 14. Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo June 7 (UPI) -- The U.S. Army celebrates its 250th birthday on June 14th in the nation's capital, which coincides with President Donald Trump's 79th birthday, and will be marked by a parade that may include tanks, rocket launchers and more than 100 military vehicles. With the two birthdays occurring on the same day, the previously scheduled parade that was intended as a relatively small event at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., has grown in size and cost. Up to 300 soldiers and civilians, the U.S. Army Band and four cannons were initially slated to honor the Army's 250th birthday, with seating available for 120 attendees, The Washington Post reported. U.S. Army leaders last year sought a permit for the event, but Trump's election victory has changed its scope, while doubling as an unofficial celebration of the president's birthday. Axios reported the parade will live up to Trump's request for a showcase the U.S. miliatary's might, with dozens of tanks, rocket launchers, missiles and more than 100 other military aircraft and vehicles participating. About 6,600 Army troops will participate, and the Army is paying to house them in area hotels. The parade route has been moved to the northwest portion of Constitution Avenue and will include a flyover of F-22 fighter jets, World War II planes and Vietnam-era aircraft. The event is scheduled to start at 6:30 p.m. EDT at 23rd Street and continue along Constitution Avenue N.W. to 15th Street. Trump will review the parade on the Ellipse. The event has an estimated cost of nearly $45 million, including more than $10 million for road repairs after the heavy military equipment passes over. The parade's estimated cost has Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Roger Wicker, R-Miss., skeptical about its benefits. "I would have recommended against the parade," Wicker told an interviewer on Thursday, but the Department of Defense wants to use it as a recruiting tool. "On the other hand, [Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth] feels that it will be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for thousands of young Americans to see what a great opportunity it is to participate in a great military force," Wicker said. "So, we'll see."

Negotiate or fight? Trump has colleges right where he wants them.
Negotiate or fight? Trump has colleges right where he wants them.

Politico

time19 minutes ago

  • Politico

Negotiate or fight? Trump has colleges right where he wants them.

President Donald Trump's campaign against two of the planet's best-known universities is laying bare just how unprepared academia was to confront a hostile White House. Schools never imagined facing an administration so willing to exercise government power so quickly — targeting the research funding, tax-exempt status, foreign student enrollment and financial aid eligibility schools need to function. That's left them right where the president wants them. Even as Ivy League schools, research institutions, and college trade associations try to resist Trump's attacks in court, campus leaders are starting to accept they face only difficult choices: negotiate with the government, mount a painful legal and political fight — or simply try to stay out of sight. Groundbreaking scientific research, financial aid for lower-income students and soft power as an economic engine once shielded schools' access to federal funds. Trump has now transformed those financial lifelines into leverage. And the diversity and independence of U.S. colleges and universities — something they've seen as a source of strength and competition — is straining efforts to form a singular response to the president. 'Perhaps it's a failure of imagination on the part of universities,' said Lee Bollinger, the former president of Columbia University. 'It feels now like there has been a naïveté on the part of universities. There's been no planning for this kind of thing.' Schools are accustomed to tension with their faculty, governing boards, legislatures and governors. But punishments for resisting the Trump administration plumbed untested levels of severity this week when the president issued an executive order to bar foreign students from entering the country to study at Harvard University as his administration threatened Columbia's academic accreditation. Even though Project 2025 — The Heritage Foundation's roadmap for a second Trump administration — previewed some of the tactics the administration would use, many school leaders may have underestimated the president's determination. 'It just seemed inconceivable that we would be in this position of having massive amounts of federal funding withheld, threats to have legislation that attacks your tax status, and now these new issues with international students,' Bollinger said. A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order Thursday night that blocked Trump's directive to restrict Harvard's access to international students. But the administration is brandishing its response to Harvard's resistance as a warning to other schools who might resist, as federal officials pressure schools to negotiate the terms of a truce over the administration's complaints about campus antisemitism, foreign government influence and its opposition to diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. 'We've held back funding from Columbia, we've also done the same thing with Harvard,' Education Secretary Linda McMahon told House lawmakers this past week. 'We are asking, as Columbia has done, to come to the table for negotiations,' she said, just hours before telling the school's accreditor it was violating federal anti-discrimination laws. 'We've also asked Harvard. Their answer was a lawsuit.' A Harvard spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment. 'What we've seen so far when it comes to Harvard is the playbook for holding these radical schools accountable is way deeper than anyone anticipated or expected,' a senior White House official told POLITICO. 'You're starting to get to the bone, so to speak, of holding these people accountable,' said the official, who was granted anonymity to freely discuss White House strategy. 'Harvard knows they cannot endure this for long, they just can't. They're going to have to come to the table, and we'll always be there to meet them. But this was a test case of what to do.' The university described Trump's latest foreign student order this week as 'yet another illegal retaliatory step.' A federal judge in May blocked a separate administration attempt to prevent Harvard from enrolling international students. Harvard is still locked in a legal fight over more than $2 billion in federal grants the White House blocked after the school refused to comply with demands to overhaul its admissions and disciplinary policies. Trump announced plans to cancel Harvard's tax-exempt status in early May, then later floated redistributing billions of dollars in university grants to trade schools. 'It is not our desire to bring these schools to their knees. The president reveres our higher educational facilities. He's a product of one,' the White House official said. 'But in order to hold these people accountable, we will be unrelenting in our enforcement of the law and hitting them where it hurts, which is their pocketbook.' Many institutions have chosen a more muted response following months of conflict, including major public institutions in states that have also grown reliant on the full-freight tuition paid by international students. 'Universities don't have as many degrees of freedom, at least in the public sector, as you might think they do,' said Teresa Sullivan, the former president of the University of Virginia. 'One reason they seem to be relatively slow to act is there's a certain disbelief — can this really be happening?' 'We seem to be in uncharted territory, at least in my experience,' Sullivan said. 'All of a sudden, the rules don't seem to apply. I think that's disconcerting. It shakes the ground beneath you, and you don't necessarily know what to do next.' Still, some higher education leaders are trying to confront the government. More than 650 campus officials have so far signed onto a joint statement that opposes 'the unprecedented government overreach and political interference now endangering American higher education.' Sullivan and a group of other former presidents used an op-ed in The Washington Post to argue the Trump administration's offensive 'won't be confined to Harvard University.' Trade associations including the American Council on Education, Association of American Universities, and Association of Public and Land-grant Universities have joined schools in a lawsuit to block some of Trump's research funding cuts. The Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, a collective of school leaders, has also sued to challenge the Trump administration's attempts to target the legal status of thousands of foreign students. 'Your first obligation as president is you don't want to hurt the institution you represent,' Sullivan said of the relative silence coming from non-Ivy League institutions. 'These days it's hard to tell what hurts and what doesn't. I think that's the motive. The motive is not cowardice.' Schools still face a choice between negotiating with the government — and risk compromising on their principles — or inviting Trump's rage by putting up a fight. 'Every school has had an option to correct course and work with the administration, or stand firm in their violations of the law,' the administration official said. 'They have an option, they know very well what to do.' The real question, according to Bollinger, the former Columbia president, is how far the White House will go and how much resistance the schools are willing to put up. 'The power of government is so immense that if they want to destroy institutions, they can,' he said. 'What you do in that kind of environment is you stand on principle.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store