Global Press Freedom at 'all-time low' in 2025, RSF says
Representative Image (AI)
Global press freedoms were at an "all-time low,"
Reporters Without Borders
(RSF) said in its annual ranking report on Friday, particularly noting a deterioration under US President Donald Trump.
"More than half of the world's population lives in countries with a 'very serious' situation," the France-based, non-profit organization said in its report, released ahead of International Press Freedom Day.
RSF said its main index has fallen to its lowest-ever level in the 23 years that it has been tracking press freedom.
The rankings are made by experts after considering the number of violent incidents involving journalists in each country, as well as other relevant data. They assess the situation in a country or territory in five categories: politics, law, economy, socio-culture and security.
What did RSF say about press freedom in the US?
RSF noted that the situation in the US has worsened since Trump took office in January.
"In the United States, Donald Trump's second term as president has led to an alarming deterioration in press freedom, indicative of an authoritarian shift in government," RSF said.
"His administration has weaponized institutions, cut support for independent media, and sidelined reporters."
The media watchdog referred to his administration cutting funding for state-funded broadcasters such as Voice of America and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL), as well as US foreign development aid that assisted media outlets overseas.
On Friday, Trump announced an executive order cutting funding to public news outlets
NPR
and
PBS
, calling them biased. He also said he was considering taking legal action against
The New York Times
.
The US fell two places from 2024 to the 57th spot behind Sierra Leone in West Africa. The report said vast regions of the US were turning into "news deserts."
"When journalists are impoverished, they no longer have the means to resist the enemies of the press — those who champion disinformation and propaganda," RSF Editorial Director Anne Bocande said in a statement.
Online advertising rose to $247.3 billion (roughly €218 billion) in 2024, but a major chunk of it was going to tech giants such as Meta, Google and Amazon rather than news organizations, RSF said.
Germany falls below top 10 in ranking '
The report noted that Europe was the region in the world where journalists enjoyed the most freedom, with China, North Korea and Eritrea as the bottom three out of 180 countries.
RSF Managing Director Anja Osterhaus said, "more than half of the world's population now lives in countries where we categorize the press freedom situation as very serious. Independent journalism is a thorn in the side of autocrats."
Norway topped the global rankings for the ninth year in a row, followed by Estonia and the Netherlands.
The situation was rated as "good" only in seven countries, all of which lie in Europe.
Germany, which was in the 10th place last year, dropped to the 11th spot. RSF owed the drop to an "increasingly hostile working environment for media professionals in Germany, particularly due to attacks from the far right."
The report said German journalists also faced difficulties when reporting on the conflict in the Middle East.
The report also highlighted the plight of Palestinian journalists reporting on Israel's attacks on Gaza.
"In Gaza, the Israeli army has destroyed newsrooms, killed nearly 200 journalists and imposed a total blockade on the strip for over 18 months," it said.
Israel itself fell 11 places to the 112th position, and "continues to repress its own news media," the report read.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
U.S. states would struggle to administer food stamp benefits under Republican tax bill
A Republican tax bill proposal could shift $22 billion in SNAP costs to states, potentially forcing them to cut eligibility or leave the program. State officials express concerns about absorbing these costs, which could impact millions of recipients. The bill also expands work requirements, potentially removing millions more from SNAP. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads States would struggle Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads U.S. states will not be able to fully administer food stamp benefits for millions of the nation's poor if a proposal in the Republican tax bill forcing them to shoulder billions of dollars in new costs is signed into law, according to state officials, local government associations and policy than 41 million people receive benefits from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, the nation's largest food aid program, which cost about $100 billion in 2024. The tax bill passed on May 22 by the U.S. House of Representatives and backed by President Donald Trump would shift some $22 billion in administrative and benefit costs to state and local governments, according to a Reuters of the move say it will promote accountability and reduce waste in the program. But states fear it will backfire."No state is going to be able to simply absorb that," Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear, a Democrat, told from North Carolina, Oregon and Michigan also said their states did not have the resources to easily take on the spending requirements in the proposal, which is now before the states could be forced to shrink SNAP eligibility or to leave the program altogether, according to letters sent in May to Congressional and agriculture committee leadership from state and county legislatures and health officials."Shifting the financial burden of SNAP onto states is fiscally unsustainable and risks harming the very individuals and families the program is designed to support," said one letter from the National Conference of State letters were sent by the National Association of Counties, National Association of County Human Services Administrators and the American Public Human Services Association. USDA spokesperson said that Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins supports Trump's agenda and that the agency will continue to provide technical assistance to have long supported reduced spending on SNAP, arguing that the program creates a dependence on federal support and should be more narrowly targeted to the most could not reach a representative from the Republican Governors Association or from Texas, Florida or Georgia, the Republican-led states facing the highest SNAP costs The House bill would require states for the first time to pay for a portion of SNAP benefits beginning in 2028, with their payment share from 5% to 25% tied to the state's error rate, a USDA measure of how accurately states determine eligibility and benefit that would amount to more than $20 billion in spending, according to a Reuters analysis of data from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The bill would also require states to immediately pay 75% of the cost of administering the SNAP program, up from their existing 50% obligation, adding another $2 billion to the sum, according to USDA states facing the most new spending would be California ($3.7 billion), New York ($2.1 billion), Florida ($1.7 billion) and Texas ($1.2 billion).The state spending requirements would push 1.3 million people off of SNAP in an average month, because some states would modify eligibility requirements or stop administering SNAP, according to a May 22 letter from the Congressional Budget Office to House and Senate agriculture committee does not have the ability to support $850 million in new SNAP spending and may need to restrict eligibility or reduce benefits if the House bill passes, said Elizabeth Hertel, director of the state Department of Health and Human would struggle to absorb more than $477 million and the state is planning for what they would do if forced to take on the spending, said Claire Seguin, director of the division of the Oregon Department of Human Services that administers Carolina is already budget constrained and "there isn't really a way to backfill" more than $650 million in new SNAP spending, said Department of Health and Human Services secretary Dev Sangvai, who did not provide details on what steps the state would take if the provision York also cannot absorb its projected costs, Barbara Guinn, Commissioner of the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, told Senators during a June 4 forum on the SNAP most states must balance their budgets and cannot accrue debt to offset new spending like the federal government can, shifting SNAP spending to states risks drawing down resources from other public programs like Medicaid, said Eric Mitchell, president of the Alliance to End Hunger. The bill would also expand work requirements for some SNAP recipients and restrict states' ability to waive those requirements when unemployment ticks up, which together would push another 3.2 million people off of SNAP in an average month, according to the CBO.
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Irregular migrant crossings into EU drop 20% in 2025: Frontex
The number of irregular migrant crossings into the European Union dropped by 20 percent in the first five months of the year, the EU's border agency said Wednesday. Warsaw-based Frontex said that a total of 63,700 crossings were detected this year, adding that the main nationalities were Afghan, Bangladeshi and Malian. The biggest decreases in irregular crossings were seen in the Western Balkans (minus 56 percent), the western African route (minus 35 percent) and the eastern Mediterranean (minus 30 percent). Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Don't Forget To Block Ads Before Wednesday Lifestyle Tech Tips Click Here Undo There was also a seven percent decrease in migrant crossings from Belarus into Poland and the Baltics to 5,062 crossings, Frontex said. But it pointed to a slight increase of seven percent in the number of migrants crossing the central Mediterranean towards Italy. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Frontex also said that the number of migrants attempting to cross into Britain via the Channel increased by 17 percent to 25,540 compared to the first five months of 2024. "Smuggling networks operating in the area are adapting, using simultaneous departures to increase the number of successful crossings," it said. Live Events RECOMMENDED STORIES FOR YOU Italy votes on citizenship reforms that could open doors for immigrants UK's visa crackdown leaves city of London immigrants in limbo Irregular migration has become a political flashpoint across Europe, as seen most recently in the Polish presidential election on June 1 which was won by a nationalist promising to crack down on immigration. Irregular border crossings detected into the European Union were down 38 percent to 239,000 last year after an almost 10-year peak in 2023, according to EU border agency Frontex. But, led by hawks including Italy and Denmark, EU leaders called in October for urgent new legislation to increase and speed up returns and for the commission to assess "innovative" ways to counter irregular migration.
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
US Secretary Rubio targets Harvard over potential sanctions breach at China conference; NYT reports
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has called for a Treasury Department investigation into Harvard University 's alleged sanctions violations linked to a health conference held in China. The request, which experts call highly unusual, comes amid the Trump administration 's wider campaign to increase scrutiny on the Ivy League school's global partnerships, as per a report by The New York Times. According to the NYT report, Rubio signed a recommendation last month urging the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) to examine whether Harvard's collaboration with Chinese officials—some from a blacklisted entity—violated federal law. The case centers on a long-running program called the 'Training Course on Health Financing,' held jointly by Harvard, the World Bank, and China's National Health Insurance Administration. Since 2019, it has hosted officials from the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (X.P.C.C.), a group sanctioned by the U.S. in 2020 for human rights violations against Uyghurs and other minorities in China. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villa For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Villas in Dubai | Search ads Learn More Undo Archived versions of a Harvard webpage list the X.P.C.C. among participants, though the university later removed those mentions. A Chinese government site showed the Corps still attended as recently as 2023. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Rubio's action marks a rare case of a cabinet secretary targeting a domestic institution for sanctions enforcement. John Smith, a former OFAC director, told The Times, 'I wouldn't say it's wrong or improper-I would just say it's unusual and not the usual course of business.' Live Events You Might Also Like: US resumes visa processing for Harvard students after court blocks Trump's policy ban The sanctions push is part of broader efforts by the Trump administration to pressure Harvard. The university has already lost nearly $3.7 billion in federal research grants since filing a lawsuit in April that accused the government of politically motivated interference. Trump allies have shifted focus from antisemitism concerns on campus to alleged foreign ties. On May 15, Senator Tom Cotton cited a report from Strategy Risks—funded by conservative think tank Manhattan Institute—calling for an investigation. Days later, the Department of Homeland Security stated Harvard had 'hosted and trained' members of the X.P.C.C. The Treasury and State Departments declined to comment on the probe. Harvard is reportedly conducting an internal review, but details remain undisclosed. A Harvard spokesperson declined to comment. Meanwhile, Education Secretary Linda McMahon defended the administration's actions. At a recent event, she said, 'We're pleased to see that,' referring to the replacement of faculty at Harvard's Center for Middle Eastern Studies. You Might Also Like: Now, lack of a social media profile could prompt US visa denial The Trump administration has also moved to revoke international student visas and continues to investigate Harvard through multiple federal agencies. Isaac Stone Fish, CEO of Strategy Risks, said his report 'should not be read as a blanket condemnation' of Harvard. However, he added, 'The X.P.C.C. is one of the world's most notorious organizations.' You Might Also Like: US to revoke visas of Chinese students linked to Chinese Communist Party or critical fields, Marco Rubio announces
