Duchess of Edinburgh to attend Anzac Day commemorations in the capital
The sacrifices of Australian and New Zealand forces will be remembered at a dawn service marking Anzac Day.
A congregation will gather in central London for the annual event commemorating the national day of remembrance for fallen Antipodean servicemen, old soldiers and those still serving.
Stephen Smith, Australia's High Commissioner, and Chris Seed, acting High Commissioner for New Zealand, will attend the service at the Australian War Memorial at Hyde Park Corner along with fellow countrymen and women, with the Duchess of Edinburgh also due to pay her respects.
Wreaths will be laid at Antipodean memorials and prayers said during the service.
Anzac Day has been commemorated in the capital since the first anniversary of the First World War Anzac – Australian and New Zealand Army Corps – landings at Gallipoli, Turkey, in 1916, when King George V attended a service at Westminster Abbey.
Since then, the services have become an important moment for thousands of New Zealanders and Australians, who honour the sacrifices of their countrymen and women in all wars.
Anzac Day will also be marked by a wreath-laying ceremony at the Cenotaph due to be attended by the Duchess of Edinburgh, who will later join the congregation at Westminster Abbey for a service of commemoration and thanksgiving.
The Princess Royal is in Turkey to mark, on behalf of the King, the 110th anniversary of the landing of the Australian and New Zealand Army Corps on the beaches of Gallipoli.
On Thursday Anne delivered a message from Charles during a service at Turkey's Canakkale Martyrs' Memorial, with the King extending his 'special thoughts and prayers', and describing how 'we may take some solace in the warm friendships and deep alliances that have emerged from the desperation of Gallipoli'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Feds expected to release final review of a plan to open Oak Flat site to copper mining
The U.S. Forest Service is expected to release the latest environmental impact statement as early as June 16 for a copper mine project that will obliterate one of the Apache peoples' most sacred sites after construction is complete and it becomes operational. The document is one of the last steps in finalizing a controversial land exchange between the Forest Service and British-Australian mining firm Resolution Copper. It has been anticipated by tribes, environmentalists, recreational enthusiasts, mining interests and elected officials since the original impact statement was rescinded by President Joe Biden in 2021. At least two lawsuits — on hold since January 2021 when the environmental review was released by the first Trump administration — are expected to be revived and possibly amended during the 60-day period before the exchange could be finalized. On June 9, a federal judge ordered that the government refrain from making the exchange until the full 60 days after the statement was published have passed. One environmental group is skeptical about what the new impact statement will contain. "Whatever the government publishes next week, we can be sure it isn't going to be a legitimate environmental review," said Russ McSpadden of the Center for Biological Diversity. "It's more likely to be a political handout to a multinational mining company." And no matter what the new statement says, the law requires the exchange to be completed. Resolution Copper is "confident the project satisfies all applicable legal requirements," said Vicky Peacey, the company's president and general manager. 'Energy emergency': Trump puts Oak Flat copper mine on permitting fast track For more than two decades, Oak Flat Campground, known to Apaches as Chi'chil Biłdagoteel, "the place where the Emory oak grows," has been ground zero in a battle over Native religious rights on public lands as well as preservation of one of Arizona's most scarce commodities, a working wetland. The 2,200-acre primitive campground and riparian zone within the Tonto National Forest about 60 miles east of Phoenix also lies over one of the nation's largest remaining bodies of copper. Tribes, environmentalists and their allies have been fighting to prevent Oak Flat from being given to Resolution Copper in exchange for other environmentally sensitive lands in Arizona. The company had pursued the land exchange with the Forest Service for about 10 years before it became attached to a defense bill by a group of congressional officials led by the late Sen. John McCain in December 2014. To obtain the copper ore, Resolution, which is owned by multinational firms Rio Tinto and BHP, will use a method known as block cave mining in which tunnels are drilled beneath the ore body, and then collapsed, leaving the ore to be moved to a crushing facility. Eventually, the ground will subside, leaving behind a crater about 1,000 feet deep and nearly 2 miles across where Oak Flat and its religious and environmental significance stands. Grassroots group Apache Stronghold filed a lawsuit in January 2021 in federal court to stop the land swap, citing religious rights guarantees under the First Amendment and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, a religious freedom nonprofit law firm, accepted the case and, along with a group of private attorneys and law professors, has represented Apache Stronghold, which includes Apache and other Native peoples and their allies. The San Carlos Apache Tribe and a consortium of environmentalists and Arizona tribes filed their own suits. Those two lawsuits have been on hold until the new impact statement is published. The Biden administration rescinded the environmental impact statement in March 2021 for further consultation with tribes. The Forest Service announced consultation was concluded in 2023. Resolution was granted permission to join the lawsuit in 2023. In 2024, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Apache Stronghold in a narrow 6-5 decision. That fall, the group appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Forest Service's announcement in April that the process would move forward again set off a flurry of court filings to stop or at least put on hold the move, which would open up a 60-day period when the land exchange could take place. Apache Stronghold won a temporary halt to the proceedings until the high court either decided not to take the case or issued a decision. The Supreme Court turned Apache Stronghold down in May. On June 9, U.S. District Court Judge Dominic W. Lanza barred the Forest Service from completing the land exchange until a full 60 days after the new document is issued to give parties from the other two lawsuits sufficient time to review the environmental impact statement and revive their litigation. Long battle: Indigenous people find legal, cultural barriers to protect sacred spaces off tribal lands The tribes and environmental groups who have been waiting for the new review were happy to get sufficient time to review and address it in their litigation. 'We are grateful that Judge Lanza has provided us an opportunity to be heard,' said San Carlos Apache Tribe Chairman Terry Rambler. 'The two-month window provides the tribe an opportunity to file an amended lawsuit challenging the legality of the pending environmental report and request an injunction to stop the land exchange until the merits of our case are settled.' McSpadden said the 2021 environmental document was faulty, and he doesn't expect the new one to be much better. "You can fully expect the environmental impact statement will perpetuate a massive disservice to the public and especially to Arizona tribes," he said. Also, there's the matter of where the ore is headed. Because the United States lacks the capacity to smelt and process the ore, "It's likely to be smelted in China and sold on the global market," McSpadden said. "That's hardly a win for American supply chain security." That's despite the fact that Trump signed an executive order ordering an investigation into "how copper imports threaten America's national security and economic stability." McSpadden said the copper from Oak Flat and the hundreds of billions of gallons of water required to extract it would be a resource effectively lost to Americans, especially Arizonans. "The profits will flow into Chinese-linked entities and global markets," he said. The Aluminum Corporation of China, known as Chinalco, is Rio Tinto's largest shareholder. Sacred lands: Oak Flat: A place of prayer faces obliteration by a copper mine The mine project's supporters said they were confident that the new environmental impact statement will show the mine will satisfy legal requirements and allow them to move forward. 'The court correctly found no legal basis for a preliminary injunction, and its order is consistent with prior decisions about this project at every level, including the Supreme Court's recent decision to deny further review in Apache Stronghold v. United States," Peacey said. She said that the order simply gives the two lawsuit parties time to review the impact statement within the congressionally-mandated timeframe for the land exchange. A Resolution spokesperson said the mine is vital to securing America's energy future, infrastructure needs and national defense. He said the mine has the potential to become one of the largest copper mines in the nation, and could add $1 billion a year to Arizona's economy and create thousands of local jobs. The mine also has the support of Superior Mayor Mila Besich. "Along with residents of our town and the Copper Corridor, we have worked diligently to address and ensure that the Resolution Copper mine project will be an asset not just for our communities, but also to contribute to technology and the national security of our nation." She said the town has worked with Resolution to co-design the mine to ensure it will benefit the region for generations to come and spur diverse economic activity, strengthening local economies' resilience and sustainability. The mayor said significant mitigation agreements are in place that would "protect and grow economic diversification, preserve the area's history and culture and that of our Native American neighbors." Besich pointed to environmental mitigations such as the preservation of the Emory Oak and extensive protections and improvements for the Queen Creek watershed. The new environmental impact statement is expected to be formally published in the Federal Register on June 20, and plaintiffs in the two lawsuits are gearing up to review it and renew their litigation. 'The Trump administration has been rushing to sell out our public lands and destroy sacred sites and the environment," said Marc Fink, the director of the Public Lands Law Center at the Center for Biological Diversity. "We look forward to having our day in court to defend Oak Flat based on a full record.' Debra Krol reports on Indigenous communities at the confluence of climate, culture and commerce in Arizona and the Intermountain West. Reach Krol at Follow her on X, formerly known as Twitter, @debkrol and on Bluesky at @ This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Forest Service ready to release final review of Oak Flat copper mine
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
CPA Australia says PM's roundtable must explore all options
Accounting association CPA Australia has voiced its approval of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's declaration regarding a productivity roundtable set for August 2025. This initiative aims to involve the business sector and essential stakeholders in tackling the nation's productivity challenges. CPA Australia Business Investment lead Gavan Ord pointed out that the roundtable represents a positive move towards collaborative problem-solving. The organisation believes that addressing productivity concerns is vital for promoting economic advancement in Australia. Ord said: 'The roundtable can be successful if it genuinely and openly seeks to explore all options for boosting productivity and improving our economy. 'It therefore must include examining regulatory burden, considering improvements to our tax settings, and exploring how we can boost support for our struggling SME sector. 'Business will come to the summit armed with goodwill and with the hope the Albanese Government will be ambitious with its productivity agenda.' In its recommendations to the Productivity Commission, CPA Australia stressed the importance of removing unnecessary regulations that impede economic development. The Commission has pinpointed 15 key reform areas for further investigation under five productivity inquiries launched by the Albanese Government. Moreover, CPA Australia has advocated for a thorough examination of the corporate tax framework. The organisation contends that such a review is crucial for identifying obstacles that may be limiting investment within the Australian economy. Recent data on economic growth reveals a deceleration, with Gross Domestic Product (GDP) increasing by just 0.2% in the first quarter of 2025. This represents a decline from the 0.6% growth recorded in the preceding quarter, highlighting the pressing need to address productivity issues. Ord emphasised that resolving Australia's productivity challenges will necessitate goodwill and bipartisan collaboration across various sectors, including the political arena. The effectiveness of the roundtable will rely on a collective dedication to discovering viable solutions. He said: 'Addressing it will require hard work – collective, long-term effort across all sectors, including government, business, unions, education and civil society. 'The solutions sit at all levels of government. A holistic approach must be taken to boost productivity, strengthen and diversify the economy, create jobs and deliver a culture-shift where entrepreneurism is encouraged and facilitated.' "CPA Australia says PM's roundtable must explore all options" was originally created and published by International Accounting Bulletin, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
The 100-year saga of one man's attempt to pay off the national debt
Gaspard Farrer may be just a footnote in history, but he will be remembered fondly by Rachel Reeves. A £585m fortune donated by the wealthy banker almost 100 years ago has finally been donated to the public purse after a five-year legal battle. Mr Farrer, a former partner at the now-defunct Barings Bank, is thought to have left £500,000 in 1927 as a gift to the nation in response to the UK's huge national debt after the First World War. But rules stipulated that the so-called National Fund, established in 1927, could only be made available when it was enough to pay off the national debt in full. It means that for years, the fortune has been locked away from successive governments. However, a 2022 High Court ruling ordered the funds to be released – a decision upheld after the fund's trustees lodged an appeal. They were finally paid to the Debt Management Office (DMO) in the financial year ending in April, according to a Freedom of Information request seen by The Telegraph. The DMO offers a little-known scheme that allows taxpayers to voluntarily contribute to paying off the national debt. Last year, donations reached a record £585,112,933 – almost entirely due to the payment of the 1927 National Fund. It was one of 16 donations – three of which were left in wills and 13 were one-off payments. In the nine years prior, just £175,000 per year on average has been donated to the scheme. The legal wrangling for Mr Farrer's money began under Theresa May's government which successfully used a niche legal argument to prise open the savings pot. The bid to tap into the pot used cy-près jurisdiction – meaning 'as near as possible' – which is applied primarily to charitable trusts whose original purpose became impossible to fulfil. The funds were being looked after by Zedra Fiduciary Services who acted as the defendant in the case. The Telegraph contacted representatives for Zedra for comment. The cash is now on the Exchequer's balance sheet, but will make just a 0.02pc dent in Britain's £2.7 trillion national debt, which has grown to the same size as the entire economy. The funds were originally set aside as a £500,000 investment in assets, including gilts, by a donor who remained anonymous for decades. After the government of the day lodged its legal bid to obtain the money in 2018, Mr Farrer's identity was at last revealed. The fund quietly grew in value for years until its transfer to the Treasury was revealed in a request made to the DMO by accountancy firm RSM. The documents confirmed it had received Mr Farrer's fortune. Chris Etherington, partner at RSM, said: 'It is generosity of a level that the Chancellor could not have expected. It could provide some inspiration as to how additional revenues could be generated for the Exchequer.' When Mr Farrer's donation was first made, Sir Winston Churchill said the money was 'inspired by clear-sighted patriotism and makes a practical contribution towards the ultimate – though yet distant – extinction of the public debt.' But doubts have grown over the years that the money would ever actually fulfil its original purpose. John Glenn, a former culture minister, said in response to a parliamentary question in 2018 that 'there is no realistic prospect of the fund ever amounting to a sum sufficient to pay off the whole of the national debt'. Mr Farrer's donation was held in the form of a charitable trust and was on paper one of the most well-endowed of its kind in the country. John Picton, a reader in law at the University of Manchester, said using the fund to pay off national debt would be a 'missed opportunity' to donate to more worthy causes. He added: 'It's a missed opportunity because the fund could have been kept in charity. I think it's unimaginative, personally.' Mr Picton suggested the money could go towards a charitable fund for the Armed Forces, or to support the work of the country's museums and art galleries. He said: 'In Gaspard Farrer's time, the national debt was associated with war debt and paying it off had a patriotic motivation and that's long lost.' 'But now the national debt, rather than having patriotic sentiments attached to it, is just a large number we all live with and grows throughout time. It's unthinkable now that people would want to voluntarily pay to reduce it.' Mr Farrer's only other surviving legacy is his 11,438 square foot mansion in Kent. He commissioned the legendary architect Sir Edwin Lutyens to design the property, which was built in 1911. The eight bedroom house was recently placed on the market for £3.5m. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
