logo
Harry's Absence From Palace Balcony Is King Charles' Greatest Humiliation

Harry's Absence From Palace Balcony Is King Charles' Greatest Humiliation

Yahoo12-05-2025

A Harry-shaped hole
This week, the United Kingdom marked the 80th anniversary of Victory in Europe Day with a series of poignant and celebratory events.
The Royal Family—including King Charles III, Prince William, and Princess Kate—attended a service of Thanksgiving at Westminster Abbey, observing two minutes of silence in remembrance.
The commemorations culminated in a classic royal concert at Horse Guards Parade, celebrating the resilience and unity of the nation with plenty of Union Jack imagery.
Notably absent from these events was Prince Harry despite being one of the very few living royals to have seen active military service (in Afghanistan).
While it's valid to argue that Harry has behaved unwisely in litigating his grievances with the royal family in public, youthful idiocy in princes is usually forgiven.
Indeed, a YouGov poll this week indicated that Harry still maintains a 56 percent favorability rating in the United States.
Kings are expected to be wiser, and the failure to get Harry back inside the royal tent reflects exceptionally poorly on Charles.
Harry's ongoing absence as the king fights cancer—which Harry did his best last week to remind us is probably going to kill him in the not-too-distant future without actually saying it—represents a painful indictment of King Charles's authority, not to mention his oft-vaunted alleged convening power.
Sources close to the king and Prince William have repeatedly told The Daily Beast that the principal block to reconciliation is William.
Why is William able to thwart the king? Again, it's all connected to Charles' decision to announce he had cancer. William's team has argued that Charles cannot bequeath his heir a settlement with Harry that William cannot live with.
With the cat out of the bag, Charles increasingly looks like a lame duck monarch to many.
Prince Harry hunts for his pals
Harry's assertion in a recent BBC interview about how incredibly dangerous the U.K. is for him was compromised somewhat by the remarkable doorbell cam footage of Harry in Chelsea searching for friends John and Georgina Vaughan.
He was seen knocking on the doors of random residences they no longer occupy, having long since moved and rented out the house.
One resident told the Mail: 'The people he knew have long gone and moved elsewhere.'
It's a telling sign of Harry's total disconnect from the land of his birth.
Staffing news
In an apparent effort to stabilize their operations, Meghan Markle has appointed Sarah Fosmo, a former assistant to Bill Gates, as her new chief of staff. This move follows a series of staff departures and is seen as an attempt to professionalize their endeavors.
Royal children: A tale of two families
During the VE Day celebrations, Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis made rare public appearances, delighting fans. Prince Louis stole the show as usual, mimicking his older brother and brushing lint off his father's suit during the parade.
Meanwhile, Markle shared new photos of her children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, on Instagram to mark Mother's Day. The images, showing the backs of their heads, highlighted their red hair inherited from Harry.
They also highlighted the physical and emotional distance between the cousins; Harry has indicated that he cannot envision bringing his children back to the U.K., saying it is not safe, suggesting that the current estrangement may persist indefinitely.
Harry and Meghan Catch Beyoncé
Harry and Markle enjoyed a date night at Beyoncé's 'Cowboy Carter' tour at SoFi Stadium in Los Angeles on Friday. The couple shared affectionate moments, with Markle posting photos and videos on Instagram, including one of Harry wearing a cowboy hat personalized with their children's names.
In the Netflix docuseries Harry & Meghan, Markle shared a text message she received from Beyoncé the day after her and Harry's interview with Oprah Winfrey aired in March 2021. In the sixth episode, Markle reads the message aloud, expressing her surprise and gratitude: 'She wants me to feel safe and protected. She admires and respects my bravery and vulnerability and thinks I was selected to break generational curses that need to be healed.'
Sleaze
Prince Andrew's former crisis manager has been secretly filmed saying the British royal was 'f---ing underage girls' while friends with Jeffrey Epstein in embarrassing footage released online Thursday, as The Daily Beast reported.
The hidden-camera tape was made by the notorious MAGA provocateur James O'Keefe, the founder of the controversial Project Veritas, which has previously been accused of publishing deceptively edited videos. But still …Caught on tape is John Bryan, who dated Andrew's wife, Sarah Ferguson, for six years from 1991 to 1997.
He also became a friend of Prince Andrew despite U.K. newspaper claims that he sucked on Fergie's toes while on vacation in the South of France in 1992. Bryan always derided the story as a tabloid exaggeration, saying he was playing an innocent game with Fergie's kids in which they pretended she was a fairytale princess and were kissing her feet. However, it was a sensational story because Ferguson was still married to Andrew at the time. She was staying at Balmoral with the royals when the story was published, and Queen Elizabeth II told her to pack her bags and leave immediately. Prince Philip never spoke to her again. The couple officially separated in the aftermath of the story and divorced in 1996.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How China Silences Critics From Afar
How China Silences Critics From Afar

Miami Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

How China Silences Critics From Afar

United Kingdom-based human rights group Article 19 has released a report on the Chinese government's relentless campaigns to silence dissenting voices beyond China's borders. The report, based on existing research and on recent interviews with 29 members of diaspora communities, details "the myriad tactics and actors involved in China's ongoing transnational repression of protesters around the world." Hong Kongers, Tibetans and others who have fled China out of fear of political persecution have reported being targeted by a sophisticated network said to include Beijing's United Front Work Department, embassy personnel and online influencers. Outspoken opponents of China's human rights record, in particular, have been in the crosshairs, amid Chinese Communist Party (CCP) efforts to stamp out or delegitimize international protest movements, observers say. Newsweek reached out to the Chinese embassy in Washington, D.C., and the Federal Bureau of Investigation with emailed requests for comment. Transnational repression can take the form of digital threats, abduction, forced repatriation and even assassination Article 19 said in its report, released on June 4, the anniversary of China's bloody 1989 crackdown on protesters in Beijing's Tiananmen Square. While such tactics are also employed by governments like Russia, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, Beijing is "by far the most prolific perpetrator," the group said, citing Freedom House estimates that millions of Chinese nationals have been targeted in at least 36 countries. "From public acts of physical violence to online intimidation, the targeting of family members-especially against high-profile protest leaders-has a knock-on effect on human rights movements," the report said. In some cases, authorities have gone after the families of prominent dissidents deemed problematic. A recent example of this cited by rights groups centers on Anna Kwok, a U.S.-based activist wanted by the Hong Kong government. In late April, her father and brother were arrested on suspicion of violating the city's National Security Law-a sweeping measure imposed by Beijing following the 2019 pro-democracy protests. "The Chinese government has increased its appalling use of collective punishment against family members of peaceful activists from Hong Kong," Yalkun Uluyol, China researcher at Human Rights Watch, said in May. Michael Caster, head of Article 19's Global China Programme, said in the press release for the report: "The CCP employs its tactics to intimidate people from participating in protests, weakening global support and solidarity for human rights in China and around the world. Transnational repression silences dissent and chills freedom of expression." Liu Pengyu, spokesperson for the Chinese embassy in the U.S., told the Washington Post in April: "China firmly opposes the politicization, instrumentalization, or weaponization of human rights issues, as well as foreign interference under the pretext of human rights." With China expected to continue seeking to silence overseas dissidents, Article 19 urged governments to build up their response capacity for suspected cases of transnational repression and improve public awareness. The group also urged tech companies-some accused of complying with Chinese censorship demands-to be more transparent about these communications and to improve digital security and technical support for those targeted. Related Articles Welcome to the Age of Dumb Kissinger | OpinionChina Reacts to Trump's Steel Tariffs HikeNuclear Arms Race Warning as Warheads IncreaseThe 1600: Now Boarding the USS Idiocracy 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

GMC Updates Fitness to Practise Rules Amid PA Criticism
GMC Updates Fitness to Practise Rules Amid PA Criticism

Medscape

time4 hours ago

  • Medscape

GMC Updates Fitness to Practise Rules Amid PA Criticism

The General Medical Council (GMC) has published updated fitness to practise guidance aimed at providing greater clarity and consistency in handling concerns about medical professionals in the UK. The changes follow long-standing criticisms of the GMC's approach to fitness to practise (FtP) investigations and its promises to introduce more compassionate procedures. However, the updated guidance drew immediate criticism for treating doctors under the same regulatory framework as physician associates (PAs) and anaesthesia associates (AAs). Key Changes to Assessment Process The updates to FtP guidance provide case examiners with a framework for assessing whether concerns received by the GMC should be interpreted as meaning that a doctor may pose a risk to the public. This follows changes made last year by the regulator to investigations involving violence and dishonesty. These gave decision-makers more discretion in minor cases judged to represent a lower risk to public protection. The new guidance introduces three core questions for decision-makers when assessing whether concerns should proceed to investigation: What is the seriousness of the concern? What is the impact of relevant context? How has the doctor responded? Factors that may increase seriousness include repeat behaviour, abuse of position, or allegations involving vulnerable individuals. Decision-makers will also consider working environment, personal circumstances, and whether the professional has shown insight and remediation. Investigation Triggers Fitness to practise investigations may still be initiated for: Misconduct Poor performance Criminal conviction or caution Physical or mental ill-health affecting practice Determination by another regulatory body Insufficient knowledge of English The thresholds for FtP concerns remain unchanged, but the assessment process will be more structured. The Medical Protection Society (MPS) welcomed the GMC's efforts 'to deliver a fitness to practise process that is fairer and more compassionate'. Dr Rob Hendry, the society's medical director, told Medscape News UK : 'Finding out that fitness to practise is being called into question can have a significant impact on a doctor's mental wellbeing.' He added that the MPS had 'long called for more to be done to ensure doctors are not dragged through this stressful process unnecessarily'. Doctors' Association Raises Concerns The new guidance brings FtP decisions for doctors into line with how cases involving PAs and AAs are considered. The GMC assumed responsibility for regulation of PAs and AAs in December 2024. The move was vigorously opposed by many in the medical profession, particularly by GPs who wanted medical associates kept out of general practice altogether. The Doctors' Association UK (DAUK) appreciated the GMC's attempt to clarify its guidance but expressed concern about aligning doctor regulation with PA and AA processes. Helen Fernandes, DAUK chair, highlighted that the GMC has not set standards or scope of clinical practice for medical associates. 'If there was an issue around the clinical decision-making of a PA or AA, there are no standards against which they can be judged," she told Medscape News UK . This contrasts with doctors' clinical conduct being assessed against strict standards for many years. DAUK has expressed unease about how doctors will be held accountable for supervising PAs and AAs, noting that the GMC has attributed supervision responsibilities to anyone working with them in a team. "This guidance seems to add more confusion to an already confused picture, which we believe doesn't help our members – but more importantly, doesn't help our patients or the wider public," Fernandes said. The updated guidance is available on the GMC's website.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store