logo
Convenience stores eyed as way to provide morning-after pill

Convenience stores eyed as way to provide morning-after pill

Yahoo6 days ago

St. PAUL, Minn., May 27 (UPI) -- Women's health advocates say they want to expand the availability of morning-after pills to convenience stores as new state abortion laws sow confusion about their legality and pharmacies are closing nationwide.
Emergency contraception deserts are arising in many areas of the United States where morning-after pills, although still legal everywhere, have become almost impossible to find due to a combination of misconceptions about their function and the ongoing drug store closures, healthcare experts told UPI.
Some suggest that wider availability of morning-after pills for women at convenience stores and other non-traditional outlets, such as gas stations, grocery stores, corner delis, travel retailers and hotels, could ease the problem.
Levonorgestrel, also known as "Plan B," or the morning-after pill, is a first-line oral emergency contraceptive pill approved from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the World Health Organization to prevent pregnancy. It is to be used within 72 hours of unprotected sexual intercourse or when a presumed contraceptive failure has occurred.
It has an average cost about $40 to $50, with generics generally costing less at about $11 to $45.
Approved in 2007
Levonorgestrel earned FDA approval to be sold over the counter without a prescription in 2007 after the agency deemed it to be safe following years of debate. Since then, it has been available without a prescription at drug stores alongside male contraceptives, such as condoms.
But while condoms are widely available in many different settings, women's health advocates are warning that the lack of similar availability for Plan B pills outside traditional pharmacies has created emergency contraception deserts in many areas.
Adding to the problem is confusion about how Plan B pills function and whether they're still legal in the wake of the Supreme Court's landmark 2022 Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision that allowed states to enact local abortion bans.
Uncertainty has arisen in states with the toughest abortion restrictions about whether the pills even remain legal as people confuse levonorgestrel, which prevents pregnancy, with mifepristone and misoprostol, which induce medical abortions, according to the women's health advocates.
Polls indicate that as many as 73% of people incorrectly think morning-after pills can end a pregnancy in its early stages. In fact, the right to such contraception is currently protected by two other landmark Supreme Court decisions, Griswold vs. Connecticut (1965) and Eisenstadt vs. Baird (1972), but this confusion is believed to have led to declines in their use since Dobbs, they argue.
Challenging economics
They also point to the challenging economics of the retail pharmacy industry. Walgreens, for instance, announced in October that it will close roughly 1,200 of its stores through 2027 and seeks to close at least 500 stores by the end of 2025 alone. It says one-quarter of its roughly 8,700 U.S. store locations are unprofitable.
About one-third of all U.S. pharmacies have closed since 2010 due to mergers of large pharmacy chains and the closure of stores deemed not profitable enough, according to a study published last year.
As these factors accelerate, some 7,000 U.S. ZIP codes in both urban and rural areas now qualify as emergency contraception deserts in which "healthcare services are lacking and there are few or no drug stores to fulfill the needs of the approximately 23 million women of childbearing age who live there," according to Cadence OTC, an Oakland, Calif.-based public benefit company that makes and markets a brand of levonorgestrel called "Morning After Pill."
Cadence officials say they have spent the last few years working hard to convince convenience retailers that stocking Morning After Pill benefits both their bottom lines and the health of their communities.
They have so far succeeded in getting the product into 11,000 locations in 48 states after forging a partnership with Lil' Drug Store Products, the nation's top supplier of health and beauty care products to convenience stores.
Sales in remote areas
"A lot of college campuses and military bases are in remote areas and are filled with young people, so these are priorities for contraceptive access," the company said in a statement issued to UPI. "C-stores are in every neighborhood and they are open long hours."
Stocking emergency contraceptives makes sense for convenience stores as a way to replace revenue lost as cigarette purchases decline, Cadence said, adding, "Urgent healthcare products are a logical expansion space for C-stores, and the profit margins are generally higher than food and soft drinks.
"Ninety percent of C-stores already carry condoms, so it makes sense to offer female contraceptives. as well."
The challenge "is to increase awareness among consumers to think of C-stores for these healthcare items," company officials said in a statement. "Many C-stores are excited about playing a more important role in serving young women, leaning into urgent OTC healthcare is a smart business strategy."
Health benefit
One gynecologist who has studied the availability of emergency contraception in the aftermath of the Dobbs decision said the push to get morning-after pills into convenience stores would provide a public health benefit.
Dr. Frank "Will" Williams III, who specializes in treating complicated pregnancies for Ochsner Health in New Orleans, co-authored a 2023 study that found only 35% of locally owned, independent pharmacies in the city had emergency contraception in stock. They were also much more likely than chain stores to keep the product behind the counter, require identification and carry no brand that cost under $50.
"The independent pharmacies are the ones who are not likely to have a gaggle of lawyers on retainer who can tell them, 'Yes, emergency contraception is fine, they're not discussed at all in any of the abortion legislation, you guys can keep going with this,'" Williams told UPI.
"They didn't have that luxury, so when Dobbs came through, that's where we really saw an absence of access to contraception."
Now with many chain-owned pharmacies closing as well, the push to expand emergency contraception into non-traditional retail venues is needed, he said.
Greater accessibility
"If I'm traveling and need ibuprofen, I can find it a grocery store or convenience store, so there's no reason why that can't also be true for emergency contraception," Williams said. "Whatever we can do to make sure that people have accessible options regarding their health seems like a win to me."
Agreeing is Dima Mazen Qato, an associate professor at the University of Southern California's Alfred E. Mann School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences and a senior scholar at the USC Schaeffer Center for Health Policy & Economics.
Qato has researched the causes behind the wave of pharmacy closures and their effects on socioeconomic and racial health disparities across the country.
Getting emergency contraception into non-traditional venues "makes sense, although I don't know what the price point is for it to be affordable and to actually be used by those who need it," she told UPI.
"It's important to make sure it's affordable at these different access points, and also that there's no ID required -- that's just available like anything else."
She added it's "definitely a great way to distribute emergency contraception, especially in states that, since Dobbs, have banned or partially banned abortion care. I think any effort to expand access to emergency contraception is needed across the country."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Two people rescued from small plane crash in Long Island Sound
Two people rescued from small plane crash in Long Island Sound

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Two people rescued from small plane crash in Long Island Sound

June 1 (UPI) -- Crews rescued two people aboard a small plane that crashed into Long Island Sound Sunday near a Connecticut airport, according to the FAA and U.S. Coast Guard. The Piper PA-32 plane went down about 10:30 a.m. south of the Tweed New Haven Airport in New Haven, a statement from the FAA said. "The two persons onboard the aircraft were rescued and in stable condition," the Coast Guard said in a statement, according to ABC News. The Coast Guard dispatched a 45-foot New Haven-based rescue boat to the scene after the Sector Long Island Sound Command Center received notification of the incident from the air traffic control tower that the plane had gone down near the Thimble Islands close to Branford, Ct. The rescued passengers were taken to the Stony Creek Pier in Branford, the Coast Guard said. The FAA is investigating the incident.

Mexico's first judicial elections fuel confusion and disillusionment among voters
Mexico's first judicial elections fuel confusion and disillusionment among voters

Boston Globe

time4 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

Mexico's first judicial elections fuel confusion and disillusionment among voters

Advertisement 'I'm not interested (in voting). Parties and their messages – they come and they go. It's all the same,' said Raul Bernal, a 50-year-old factory worker in downtown Mexico City. Yet the vote is set to transform Mexico's judiciary. Mexico's ruling party, Morena, overhauled the court system late last year, fueling protests and criticism that the reform is an attempt by those in power to seize on their political popularity to gain control of the branch of government until now out of their reach. 'It's an effort to control the court system, which has been a sort of thorn in the side' of those in power, said Laurence Patin, director of the legal organization Juicio Justo in Mexico. 'But it's a counter-balance, which exists in every healthy democracy.' Now, instead of judges being appointed on a system of merit and experience, Mexican voters will choose between some 7,700 candidates vying for more than 2,600 judicial positions. Advertisement Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, of Morena, rejected criticisms after voting on Sunday in a press conference, insisting that the election would only make Mexico more democratic and root out corruption in a system that most Mexicans believe is broken. 'Whoever says that there is authoritarianism in Mexico is lying,' she said. 'Mexico is a country that is only becoming more free, just and democratic because that is the will of the people.' Those who did turn out to cast their ballot – both critics and supporters of the overhaul – emphasized the importance of the election. In a middle-class Mexico City neighborhood, poll workers organized the color-coded ballots by federal and local contests. Four people were waiting to vote when the location opened. Esteban Hernández, a 31-year-old veterinary student, said he didn't agree with electing judges and doesn't support Morena, but came to vote because 'since there isn't much participation, my vote will count more.' He had studied the candidates on a website listing their qualifications and decided to pick those who had doctorates. Other critics said they only voted for the Supreme Court and other top courts. At a polling place in a park in Tapachula, near the border with Guatemala, Francisco Torres de León, a 62-year-old retired teacher, came prepared, having studied the ballots and his selections. He marked all the ballots in about five minutes, but even so, said, 'the process is painstaking because there are too many candidates and positions that they're going to fill.' Sheinbaum's predecessor and political mentor, former president Andrés Manuel López Obrador, who had pushed through the judicial reform, but remained out of the public eye since leaving office last year, also voted in Chiapas Sunday near his ranch. Advertisement 'I wanted to participate in this historic election,' he said. 'Never in the history of our country … have the people decided and had the right to elect judges.' The process however had raised concerns. Civil society organizations have raised red flags about a range of candidates running for election, including lawyers who represented some of Mexico's most feared cartel leaders and local officials who were forced to resign from their positions due to corruption scandals. Also among those putting themselves forward are ex-convicts imprisoned for years for drug trafficking to the United States and a slate of candidates with ties to a religious group whose spiritual leader is behind bars in California after pleading guilty to sexually abusing minors. Though others like Martha Tamayo, a lawyer and former congresswoman from conflict-ravaged Sinaloa, cast doubt on projections that the election could hand even more power over to criminals and criminal groups, simply because they already have strong control over courts. 'The influence of criminal groups already exists,' she said while waiting to vote. 'The cartels go with the judges (bribe them) whether they are elected or not.' At the same time, voters have been plagued by confusion over a voting process that Patin warned has been hastily thrown together. Voters often have to choose from sometimes more than a hundred candidates who are not permitted to clearly voice their party affiliation or carry out widespread campaigning. As a result, many Mexicans say they're going into the vote blind, though others voting on Sunday noted they supported the process despite the confusion. Mexico's electoral authority has investigated voter guides being handed out across the country, in what critics say is a blatant move by political parties to stack the vote in their favor. Advertisement 'Political parties weren't just going to sit with their arms crossed,' Patin said. Miguel Garcia, a 78-year-old former construction worker, stood in front of the country's Supreme Court on Friday peering at a set of posters, voter guides with the faces and numbers of candidates. He was fiercely scribbling down their names on a small scrap of paper and said that he had traveled across Mexico City to try to inform himself ahead of the vote, but he couldn't find any information other than outside the courthouse. But Garcia, a supporter of the reform and the president, said doing so was crucial because he wanted to cast out members of courts that had long been at odds with Morena, the ruling party. 'In the neighborhood where I live, there's no information for us,' he said, adding that he had to vote because 'the bad guys, they continue to be free, and the people are the ones that pay.'

Trump aides insist that tariffs will remain, even after court ruling
Trump aides insist that tariffs will remain, even after court ruling

Boston Globe

time4 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

Trump aides insist that tariffs will remain, even after court ruling

Asked about the future of the president's so-called reciprocal tariffs, first announced and quickly suspended in April, Lutnick added, 'I don't see today that an extension is coming.' Advertisement The president's tariff strategy entered uncharted political and legal territory last week after a federal trade court ruled that Trump had misused an emergency economic powers law in trying to wage a global trade war. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The decision would have put a quick halt to those duties, which form the centerpiece of the president's strategy of pressuring other countries into trade talks. But an appeals court soon granted the government a brief administrative pause to sort out arguments in the case, which is expected to reach the Supreme Court. The administration has said that a ruling against its tariffs would harm negotiations and undercut the president, a point Trump repeated Sunday. In a social media post that projected confidence he would ultimately prevail in court, he wrote that any ruling against his tariffs would allow other countries to 'hold our Nation hostage' and result in 'Economic ruination' for the United States. Advertisement Top White House officials once promised to strike 90 deals in 90 days, but they have since managed to announce only one framework for a possible deal, with Britain. On Sunday, though, the commerce secretary dismissed the notion that Trump had suffered a new setback, saying it 'cost us a week, maybe.' He said the White House would ultimately reach 'first-class deals.' The decision has not slowed down Trump, who attacked China on Friday for failing to adhere to an agreement brokered between Washington and Beijing in which the two nations lowered their once-withering tariff rates, pending a longer-term deal. The president also announced that day that he would double tariffs applied to imported steel, which would now be set at 50 percent, in a move that could result in higher prices for American consumers. Kevin Hassett, the director of the White House National Economic Council, told ABC's 'This Week' that he expected Trump and China's leader, Xi Jinping, could speak about trade as soon as this week, though he later said that a conversation had not been scheduled or finalized. Scott Bessent, the treasury secretary, separately reiterated that talks with China had stalled, citing the fact that Beijing is holding back its exports of rare earth minerals, which are critical for global industrial supply chains. 'Maybe it's a glitch in the Chinese system; maybe it's intentional,' Bessent said on CBS' 'Face the Nation.' Bessent also defended the steel tariffs as a means of protecting American steel jobs. He acknowledged that it was unclear how the new rates could affect the construction industry, which he characterized as a 'very complicated ecosystem.' Advertisement This article originally appeared in

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store