Russia, China, North Korea condemn Trump's $175 billion Golden Dome missile shield
The U.S.'s chief adversaries, Russia, North Korea and China, all of which are nuclear-armed nations, have condemned President Donald Trump's space-based defensive plan he dubbed the "Golden Dome" as "dangerous" and a threat to global stability.
The president discussed his $175 billion plan, which will use satellites and other technologies to detect and intercept a missile strike "even if they are launched from other sides of the world," Trump said last week.
The defensive plan, though it is believed to be years away before being fully operational despite Trump's three-year goal mark, sparked stiff backlash from the U.S.'s top competitors, who took direct aim at what they called Trump's "arrogance."
North Korea's foreign ministry, whose leader shared an uncommonly cordial relationship with Trump during his first term, called it the equivalent of an "outer space nuclear war scenario" that supports the administration's strategy for "uni-polar domination."
According to local media outlets, the ministry on Tuesday said it was a "typical product of 'America first', the height of self-righteousness, arrogance, high-handed and arbitrary practice."
The White House did not immediately respond to Fox News' Digital's questions regarding the reactions to the plan, intended to resemble Israel's "Iron Dome" defensive capability.
But the North Korean foreign ministry claimed the defensive strategy was actually an "attempt to militarize outer space" and "preemptively attain military superiority in an all-round way."
Similarly, on Tuesday, Russian foreign minister Maria Zakharova said the strategy would undermine the basis of strategic stability by creating a global missile defense system, reported Reuters.
But her comments were not the first time Moscow aligned its condemnation of the "Golden Dome" as it issued a joint statement with China earlier this month after Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping met for formal talks in Russia.
The duo called the plan "deeply destabilizing" and claimed it erodes the "inseparable interrelationship between strategic offensive arms and strategic defensive arms."
They also argued that it would turn "outer space into an environment for placing weapons and an arena for armed confrontation."
Russia has remained relatively muted in its response following Trump's Oval Office discussion on the Golden Dome, which came just two days after Trump held a two-hour phone call with Putin.
But China reiterated its objection to the plan, and following Trump's announcement on it, Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Mao Ning said last week, "The project will heighten the risk of turning space into a war zone and creating a space arms race, and shake the international security and arms control system."
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has rejected the claims that the plan could be viewed as an "offensive" strategy and told Fox News Digital, "All we care about is protecting the homeland."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bizarre detail that saw Aussie woman 'jailed' in US amid Trump's border crackdown: 'What do you mean?'
An Australian former police officer with no criminal history and a valid visa has spoken out after being detained in the US and sent packing back to Sydney, in the latest example of the Trump administration's uncompromising border control measures. Nicolle Saroukos, from Padstow Heights in the city's southwest, has an American husband serving in the US military — but that still didn't stop immigration officials from jailing her for the night, searching her phone, luggage and "racially profiling" her, ultimately deciding to deny her entry into the country without clear reason why. Officers in Honolulu, Hawaii, stated that Nicolle had packed "too many clothes" for the planned three-and-a-half-week trip and even questioned her tattoos. "I said, 'what do you mean I'm going to prison?'" she told 9News in an interview aired Wednesday night. The 25-year-old's disturbing experience is one that has become increasingly common at airports across the US, with Australian travellers growing more and more cautious. Last month, Melbourne nurse Remi told Yahoo News she had just finished planning a "dream trip" to New York for Christmas with her husband later this year when she heard reports of travellers being detained and turned away at the border. "When we booked, we hadn't heard about this happening, and then all of a sudden, there were these different stories from travellers from Germany, Canada and Australia being pulled aside at the border. It's scary, especially as a person of colour," she told Yahoo. As for Nicolle, it was her third trip to visit her husband, Matt, a US Army lieutenant based on Oahu. The couple had married last December, and while her previous visits had gone smoothly, this time was very different. "[An immigration officer] went from completely composed to just yelling at the top of his lungs, telling my mother to go stand at the back of the line and to 'shut up,'" Nicolle told Hawaii News Now. "So I automatically started crying because that was my first response." Nicolle said a border officer told her she would be sent to "prison" overnight, not a detention centre. Fearing she'd be held with serious criminals, she was further distressed when officials, who claimed they'd contact her husband, failed to do so. She also described being subjected to a body cavity search, escorted through the airport in handcuffs, and taken to the Federal Detention Centre. Nicolle was told she wasn't under arrest, hadn't done anything wrong, and wouldn't face charges. But at prison, she was strip-searched and detained alongside women convicted of serious crimes, she said. Sharing a cell with another deportee from Fiji, Nicolle was also denied food for missing the dinner cutoff and wasn't allowed to contact her husband or mother. "My rights, as a human being, should be to contact at least one person," she said. "I found that so absurd." Nicolle's experience, along with a growing number of similar cases, has prompted travel experts to issue renewed warnings about the rising risks tied to travel to the US. Australians are being urged to be extra vigilant, as even minor paperwork issues can lead to major consequences. Travellers are advised to never book a one-way ticket, keep a printed copy of their itinerary on hand, and take particular care when completing their ESTA — the electronic visa waiver application required for most tourists. 🌼 Travelling mum highlights little-known feature at airports ✈️ The tourists whose dream holidays were destroyed by Trump's crackdown 🛫 Couple 'traumatised' over horrifying seating request on Aussie flight It's recommended that travellers lodge their ESTA as early as possible and double-check all details, as errors or inconsistencies can raise red flags at the border. Immigration lawyers also caution that US border officials may screen social media accounts during entry checks. In addition to securing the correct documents, Australians should familiarise themselves with all visa and transit requirements, including terms and conditions of the visa waiver program, to avoid unexpected detention or deportation. The federal government's Smartraveller website updated its advice to those travelling to the US last month. "Entry requirements are strict," it reported. "US authorities have broad powers to decide if you're eligible to enter and may determine that you are inadmissible for any reason under US law." Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@ You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.
CNN
13 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump says he believes US is close to reaching a new Iran nuclear deal as he confirms he told Israel not to disrupt the talks
President Donald Trump believes his administration is 'very close to a solution' on an Iran nuclear agreement and he has personally warned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu not to disrupt the talks, he said on Wednesday. Trump cautioned his close ally last week that any move to upend the negotiations would be 'inappropriate,' he told reporters. Sources familiar with the discussions echoed Trump's optimism and told CNN that they are closing in on a broad agreement that could be clinched when the US and Iran meet next, most likely in the Middle East. But concerns about Israel derailing the process are clearly high. Asked about reports that he warned Netanyahu against disrupting the talks during a phone call last week, Trump said, 'Well, I'd like to be honest. Yes I did.' He added: 'It's not a warning – I said I don't think it's appropriate.' Trump said that his team is having 'very good discussions' with Iran. Talks have taken place over the last several weeks led by special envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff and moderated by Oman. 'Right now, I think they want to make a deal. And if we can make a deal, I'd save a lot of lives,' Trump said. Trump's candid admission about the Netanyahu call follows CNN reporting last week that the US obtained new intelligence suggesting Israel is making preparations to strike Iranian nuclear facilities. Netanyahu has long been a staunch opponent of any kind of deal with Tehran and he applauded Trump's decision in his first term for the US to exit the nuclear agreement agreed to by President Barack Obama in 2015. The stakes are enormously high – an Israeli strike could undo the progress the US has made, risk triggering a wider regional conflict and ruin Trump's chances of achieving a major foreign policy breakthrough as progress on brokering ceasefires in the wars in Ukraine and Gaza has stalled. Trump's comments come after Iran's foreign ministry spokesperson expressed openness to compromises, telling CNN on Monday that there are 'so many ways' an agreement on the future of its nuclear program could be reached. Still, the issue of whether Iran would be allowed to enrich uranium remains the key sticking point. And Trump himself acknowledged Iran 'still (has) to agree to the final stages of a document.' The fifth round of talks, which took place in Rome on Friday, dealt more heavily with the question of enrichment. 'Everyone is feeling good,' a Trump administration official said following the talks in Rome. 'We have a much better understanding of everyone's positions.' The Trump administration had demanded Iran stop all uranium enrichment, which Witkoff has said 'enables weaponization' and called a red line in the talks. Uranium, a key nuclear fuel, can be used to build a nuclear bomb if enriched to high levels. Iran has advanced its nuclear program in recent years but also maintains that its program is peaceful. Iran says it is willing to commit not to enrich uranium to weapons-grade as part of an agreement but has said it would reject an outright ban on all enrichment. Trump – who said that he wants a 'very strong document' – seemed to indicate on Wednesday that the current talks have included discussions on increased inspections inside Iran and the dismantling of at least a part of Iran's nuclear program. 'I want it very strong where we can go in with inspectors. We can take whatever we want, we can blow up whatever we want, but nobody getting killed. We can blow up a lab, but nobody's going to be in the lab, as opposed to everybody being in the lab and blowing it up,' Trump said. Trump administration officials, including Witkoff, have said publicly said that the US red line is any Iranian enrichment. But Trump's comments on Wednesday indicated that he may be open to allowing limited enrichment with inspectors as a solution to the impasse. Previously, US officials have also floated the idea of Iran importing enriched uranium, rather than doing so in the country – a notion that Iran has repeatedly rejected. The current discussion includes the US possibly investing in Iran's nuclear power program and standing up a consortium – expected to include nations from the Middle East and the UN's nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency – that would produce enriched uranium for Iran's reactors, explained one of the sources. But nothing has been agreed to regarding Iran's civilian nuclear energy program, a White House official said. Iran's ballistic missile program is not a part of the current discussion, despite some administration officials initially pressing for it to be included. Given how far the talks have advanced at this point sources did not expect an expansion of the topics under discussion. Witkoff in early May suggested that topics other than the nuclear file were 'secondary' issues. 'We don't want to confuse the nuclear discussion because that to us is the existential issue,' he told Breitbart at the time. Following the Rome talks, the two sides brought the latest proposals to their countries' respective leaders to confer and are planning to meet again soon, most likely in the Middle East. The goal is to strike an overall deal at the next meeting between the two sides that lays out specific markers for implementation but also leads to follow-up discussions on technical details, White House officials and sources familiar with the ongoing discussions said. Witkoff and Michael Anton, the director of policy planning at the State Department, have been taking the lead on all talks in addition to a technical team that has begun working out more specific details for an agreement. However, it is widely expected the technical team will take over and be far more involved once a broad agreement is struck. Despite Trump touting the expectation of 'good news' in the near future, progress in the negotiations has been bumpy at times. In the fourth round of talks, the US shared a proposal with Iran outlining some of the key requirements the Trump administration is looking for in a deal. But at one point an idea under discussion, which the negotiators on both sides appeared to support, was rejected by Trump, said a source familiar with the matter. And while Trump is projecting confidence that a deal is on the horizon, he also claimed on Wednesday that the situation 'could change at any moment – could change with a phone call.'
New York Times
13 minutes ago
- New York Times
16 States Sue Trump Over $1.4 Billion in Science Cuts
Sixteen states sued the Trump administration on Wednesday, asking a federal court to block cuts in programs and funding for the National Science Foundation that they argue are critical to maintaining the United States' position as a global leader in science, technology, engineering and math. The states sought the court order on grounds that the foundation's actions violated the law and would cause immediate and irreparable harm to the states involved in the lawsuit. The foundation last month began ending projects that were focused on increasing the participation of women, minorities and people with disabilities in STEM fields, and this month, it said it would cap indirect research costs, like laboratory space and equipment, at 15 percent of granted funds, according to the lawsuit. The states said in court papers that the cuts were 'in complete derogation of the policies and priorities set by Congress.' More than 1,700 research grants at the N.S.F. had been canceled as of Wednesday, according to a list published by the foundation, which amounts to $1.4 billion worth of cuts. 'This administration's attacks on basic science and essential efforts to ensure diversity in STEM will weaken our economy and our national security,' said Attorney General Letitia James of New York, who is leading the legal challenge filed in Federal District Court in Manhattan. 'Putting politics over science will only set our country back,' Ms. James said. A spokeswoman for the National Science Foundation declined to comment on the lawsuit. The federal government has worked to broaden participation of women and minorities in science and technology since at least 1980, upon direction from Congress. According to the lawsuit, that directive has been substantively amended only to also explicitly include people with disabilities. In court papers, the coalition of states said the foundation's directive to cap indirect costs at 15 percent for all N.S.F. research projects awarded to universities would be devastating. The State University of New York, for instance, would lose $18 million, the lawsuit says. Established in 1950, the N.S.F. funds much of the scientific research in the United States. In fiscal year 2024, the agency had a $9 billion budget. The Trump administration's draft budget, published earlier this month, proposed slashing those funds by 55.8 percent. The lawsuit comes amid a series of changes at the foundation as it tries to align its policies with those of the Trump administration, including issuing an updated statement of priorities to exclude the funding of activities supporting diversity, equity and inclusion. Days after the award terminations began, the director of the N.S.F., Sethuraman Panchanathan, announced his resignation. In addition to New York, the other states joining in the lawsuit were California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Wisconsin and Washington.
