&w=3840&q=100)
Harvard sues Trump admin for stopping $2.2 bn in grants as fight escalates
By David Voreacos and Janet Lorin
Harvard University sued several US government agencies and top officials for freezing billions of dollars in federal funding, significantly ratcheting up a high-stakes showdown with the Trump administration.
The Trump administration unlawfully suspended Harvard's funding after it refused to comply with 'unconstitutional demands' to overhaul governance, discipline and hiring policies, as well as diversity programs, lawyers for the university argued in a lawsuit filed Monday in federal court in Massachusetts. It comes after government has accused the nation's oldest and richest university of failing to combat antisemitism on campus.
'Over the course of the past week, the federal government has taken several actions following Harvard's refusal to comply with its illegal demands,' the university's president Alan Garber said. 'We filed a lawsuit to halt the funding freeze because it is unlawful and beyond the government's authority.'
In his statement posted on the university's website, Garber cited the Trump administration's pause on $2.2 billion in federal funding, threats to block an additional $1.1 billion in grants, a crackdown on foreign students, and the possible revocation of Harvard's tax-exempt status.
The Trump administration is pushing for sweeping changes at the most elite US universities, and has frozen or is reviewing federal funding to Princeton, Cornell, Northwestern and Columbia universities. At Harvard, the government halted $2.2 billion of multi-year grants to on April 14, claiming the school failed to enforce civil rights laws to protect Jewish students.
Harvard's lawsuit claims that the funding freeze violates its First Amendment guarantee of free speech and the Administrative Procedures Act. It asks a judge to bar the US from freezing the funding and declare the government's actions unconstitutional.
'The government has not — and cannot — identify any rational connection between antisemitism concerns and the medical, scientific, technological, and other research it has frozen that aims to save American lives, foster American success, preserve American security, and maintain America's position as a global leader in innovation,' the lawsuit claims.
The White House and the Education Department didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
Trump escalated his fight with Harvard after the school refused to bow to his administration's demands. Since threatening its funding, Trump suggested the Internal Revenue Service should tax the university as a 'political entity.' Senior administration officials, including Vice President JD Vance, have criticized tax breaks given to the school's $53 billion endowment.
Government Demands
The showdown began last month when the government threatened about $9 billion in federal funding to Harvard. Days later, the administration demanded that Harvard remake its governance, transform admissions and faculty hiring, stop admitting international students hostile to US values and enforce viewpoint diversity.
The government also called for scrapping any hiring preferences based on race or national origin, adopting a broad ban on masks and adding oversight for 'biased programs that fuel antisemitism.'
Harvard rejected those demands on April 14, saying it 'will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights' and that a private university 'cannot allow itself to be taken over' by the US government.
'The government has only ratcheted up cuts to funding, investigations, and threats that will hurt students from every state in the country and around the world, as well as research that improves the lives of millions of Americans,' the complaint claims.
Without the funding, the school said in its complaint that it will be forced to either reduce or halt ongoing research projects and terminate employment contracts with researchers, staff, and administrators, or make other cuts to departments or programs.
Campuses across the US were roiled by protests after Hamas, which the US considers a terrorist organization, murdered 1,200 Israelis and took more than 200 hostages in October 2023. Israel's retaliation against Hamas in Gaza has killed more than 48,000 Palestinians, according to the Hamas-run health ministry.
Other university leaders, including Princeton's, have expressed support for Harvard's stance, but they also face pressure from the White House. The administration has already canceled $400 million in federal money to Columbia University and frozen dozens of research contracts at Princeton, Cornell and Northwestern universities.
'All told, the tradeoff put to Harvard and other universities is clear: allow the government to micromanage your academic institution or jeopardize the institution's ability to pursue medical breakthroughs, scientific discoveries, and innovative solutions,' Harvard argued in its lawsuit.
Harvard named several cabinet secretaries in the lawsuit, including Robert F. Kennedy Jr., whose agency, Health and Human Services, funds the most research, as well as other agencies including the Department of Defense and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
As part of its legal team, Harvard has hired two conservative lawyers with connections to the Trump administration - William Burck and Robert Hur. Harvard also hired a lobbying firm, Ballard Partners, where Trump's chief of staff used to be a partner. The school also placed John Manning, a conservative lawyer, as its permanent provost, the second-most powerful leadership role at the university where he will oversee academic policies.
The case is President and Fellows of Harvard College v. US Department of Health and Human Services et al, 25-cv-11048, US District Court, District of Massachusetts (Boston).
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
36 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Elon Musk, Donald Trump feud ‘fake'? Here's why conspiracy theorists are convinced
As President Donald Trump and Elon Musk cooled down on their attacks on each other, several conspiracy theorists came up with a wild theory. Social media users suggested that the duo's clash over the 'Big Beautiful Bill' was 'fake' and 'staged'. Some even added that they 'cooked up' the feud while Musk was working from Mar-a-Lago back in January. This comes days after the Musk vs Trump breakup peaked this week after the Tesla CEO claimed that the administration was not releasing the Epstein Files because the president is mentioned in them. The billionaire did not stop there. He even shared a post calling for Donald Trump's impeachment and criticized his tariff policy, predicting a recession this year. Trump, too, went after his former senior adviser and DOGE chief. He told reporters at the Oval Office that he was 'disappointed' in Musk and even threatened to roll back the 53-year-old's federal contracts. Read More: Elon Musk deletes explosive X post claiming Trump's name in Epstein Files 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump wrote on Truth Social 'Go ahead, make my day," Musk quickly replied on X, platform formerly known as Twitter. Hours later, he announced SpaceX would begin decommissioning the spacecraft it used to carry astronauts and cargo to the International Space Station for NASA. QAnon and conspiracy theory circles speculated that the Musk vs Trump clash and was a ruse to trick Democrats into demanding Epstein file disclosures. Some said it's a scripted ploy, dubbed 'kayfabe', a pro-wrestling term for staged conflicts. Read More: Musk's 'baby mama' Ashley St Clair offers 'breakup advice' to Trump amid president's row with tech billionaire QAnon influencer who goes by AwakenedOutlaw, with 300,000+ X followers, wrote: 'Smooth-brained folks who haven't been paying attention and don't understand that kayfabe is in play, actually believe Trump and Musk are fighting." Others said that the feud is '5D chess' to manipulate Democrats. A Telegram user on David Clements' channel said, 'It's a wonderful game of 5D chess! Get the popcorn out, and watch the left go wild.' Liz Crokin, a Pizzagate theorist, claimed, 'It would not surprise me if the Deep State created fake evidence falsely implicating Trump. If this is case, their scheme will fail and backfire. So grab your popcorn and watch the media and Democrats falsely report Trump is a pedophile and a sex trafficker—this boomerang will be epic! 5D chess at its finest, baby—checkmate!'


Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
Musk TAPs a third party -- The America Party -- even as he backs down in battle with Trump
Elon Musk TOI correspondent from Washington: Elon Musk teased America about forming a new political party even as he dialled down from his spat with MAGA President Donald Trump , deleting a series of posts linking him to the late sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. The Musk climbdown came after Trump declined to engage in a phone call that mediators tried to initiate between the two, and instead threatened to cut off huge federal loans and subsidies to Musk's companies. "We'll take a look at everything. I look at everything. He's got a lot (of) money. He gets a lot of subsidy. So we'll take a look at that. Only if it's fair. Only if it's fair for him and for the country. I would certainly think about it. But it has to be fair,' Trump told reporters in an oblique hint that Musk could be spared punitive action. Trump also dismissed Musk's threat of forming a new political party based on a poll he ran on X, saying he was happy with his own poll numbers that showed support for him and his policies. In a sketchy poll on X, where Musk has more than 220m "followers" but which is boiling with fake accounts and bots, Musk asked, "Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?" The question elicited only 5.6 million online "votes" from 100m views. More than 80 per cent respondents answered in the affirmative. "The people have spoken. A new political party is needed in America to represent the 80% in the middle! And exactly 80% of people agree This is fate," Musk exulted, suggesting the new entity could be called "America Party," although X is hardly representative of US voters or its demographics. Trump wasn't impressed with the online exercise, but he still dialled down from firing back, ostensibly because even a five to ten per cent shift in votes could overturn the GOP majority in both the Senate and Congress in the November 26 midterm elections. Musk also reposted analysis from a strawman whom he frequently cites. "History warns third parties fail. But Elon brings unprecedented resources, platform, and timing. Technology has democratized politics. "The America Party", in it's elegant simplicity, could finally give the 80% what they want: destruction of the swamp, not just new management," Musk frontman Mario Nawfal wrote. While efforts by interested parties to bring about a truce if not reunite the two warring men continue, for now they appear to be circling each other looking for weak spots. Given the low blows they have delivered at each other -- including innuendos about drug use and sex trafficking -- a re-union seems unlikely.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
43 minutes ago
- First Post
Wrongfully deported man returned to US to face migrant-smuggling charges
Abrego Garcia's homecoming represented a watershed moment in a case cited by critics of President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown as evidence that the government was violating civil liberties in its quest to increase deportations read more Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran migrant who lived in the US legally with a work permit and was erroneously deported to El Salvador, is seen wearing a Chicago Bulls hat, in this handout image obtained by Reuters on April 9, 2025. File Photo/Reuters Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the man wrongfully deported from Maryland to El Salvador by the Trump administration, has been flown back to the United States to face criminal charges for transporting illegal aliens within the country, Attorney General Pam Bondi announced on Friday. Abrego Garcia's homecoming represented a watershed moment in a case cited by critics of President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown as evidence that the government was violating civil liberties in its quest to increase deportations. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Abrego Garcia, 29, a Salvadoran whose wife and young child in Maryland are US citizens, appeared in federal court in Nashville on Friday evening. His arraignment was set for June 13, when he will enter a plea, according to local media reports. Until then, he will remain in federal custody. If convicted, he would be deported to El Salvador after serving his sentence, Bondi said. The Trump administration has said Abrego Garcia was a member of the MS-13 gang, an accusation that his lawyers deny. Officials on Friday portrayed the indictment of Abrego Garcia by a federal grand jury in Tennessee as vindication of their approach to immigration enforcement. 'The man has a horrible past, and I could see a decision being made, bring him back, show everybody how horrible this guy is,' Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One, adding that it was the Justice Department that decided to bring Abrego Garcia back. According to the indictment, Abrego Garcia worked with at least five co-conspirators as part of a smuggling ring to bring immigrants to the United States illegally, then transport them from the US-Mexico border to destinations in the country. Abrego Garcia often picked up migrants in Houston, making more than 100 trips between Texas and Maryland between 2016 and 2025, the indictment alleges. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD It also accuses Abrego Garcia of transporting firearms and drugs. According to the indictment, one of Abrego Garcia's co-conspirators belonging to the same ring was involved in the transportation of migrants whose tractor trailer overturned in Mexico in 2021, resulting in 50 deaths. Abrego Garcia's lawyer, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, called the criminal charges 'fantastical' and a 'kitchen sink' of allegations. 'This is all based on the statements of individuals who are currently either facing prosecution or in federal prison,' he said. 'I want to know what they offered those people.' The indictment also led to a high-level resignation in the federal prosecutor's office in Nashville, with news that Ben Schrader, chief of the criminal division for the Middle District of Tennessee, had resigned in protest. A 15-year veteran of the US Attorney's Office, Schrader had grown increasingly uncomfortable with the administration's actions, and the indictment of Abrego Garcia was 'the final straw,' a person familiar with the situation told Reuters. Schrader declined comment. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Schrader had posted notice of his resignation on LinkedIn last month, around the time the indictment was filed under seal, but he did not give a reason. Abrego Garcia was deported on March 15, more than two months before the charges were filed. He was briefly held in a mega-prison known as the Terrorism Confinement Center, despite a US immigration judge's 2019 order barring him from being sent to El Salvador because he would likely be persecuted by gangs. Bondi said Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele had agreed to return Abrego Garcia after US officials presented his government with an arrest warrant. 'The grand jury found that over the past nine years, Abrego Garcia has played a significant role in an alien smuggling ring,' she told a press conference. In a court filing on Friday, federal prosecutors asked a judge to keep Abrego Garcia detained pending trial. Citing an unnamed co-conspirator, prosecutors said Abrego Garcia joined MS-13 in El Salvador by murdering a rival gang member's mother. The indictment does not charge Abrego Garcia with murder. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Abrego Garcia could face 10 years in prison for each migrant he is convicted of transporting, prosecutors said, a punishment that potentially could keep him incarcerated for the rest of his life. Tensions with the courts The case has become a symbol of escalating tensions between the Trump administration and the judiciary, which has blocked a number of the president's signature policies. More recently, the US Supreme Court has backed Trump's hardline approach to immigration in other cases. After Abrego Garcia's lawyers challenged the basis for his deportation, the US Supreme Court ordered the Trump administration to facilitate his return, with liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor saying the government had cited no basis for what she called his 'warrantless arrest.' US District Judge Paula Xinis has opened a probe into what, if anything, the Trump administration had done to secure his return, after Abrego Garcia's lawyers accused officials of stonewalling their requests for information. That led to concerns among Trump's critics that his administration would openly defy court orders. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In a court filing on Friday, Justice Department lawyers told Xinis that Abrego Garcia's return meant they were in compliance with the order to facilitate bringing him back to the US Sandoval-Moshenberg said Abrego Garcia's return did not mean the government was in compliance, asserting that his client must be placed in immigration proceedings before the same judge who handled his 2019 case. Chris Van Hollen, a Democratic US senator from Maryland who visited Abrego Garcia in El Salvador, said in a statement on Friday that the Trump administration has 'finally relented to our demands for compliance with court orders and the due process rights afforded to everyone in the United States.' 'The administration will now have to make its case in the court of law, as it should have all along,' Van Hollen said.