Meet superstar who had affair with Rekha, caught red-handed by his wife in…, divorced her first wife due to…, his name is…
In a career filled with legendary roles and unmatched stardom, this superstar's personal life once created more headlines than his films. At the peak of his fame, whispers of an alleged relationship with one of the most enigmatic actresses of the time, Rekha, sparked a media storm. Though both remained tight-lipped, things took huge turn when this superstar's wife caught her red-handed with actress. The Most Versatile Actor Of Indian Cinema
Here we are talking about superstar Kamal Haasan , who has given huge contribution to the field of cinema with his stellar performances and remarkable roles. The four-time National Award recipient began his acting journey as a child artist in 1960, earning the President's Gold Film Award for his role.
Although his personal life has frequently been surrounded by controversies with various leading actresses. Among the numerous rumors about the actor, his supposed relationship with Rekha has made headlines in the past.
When Kamal Haasan Was Caught Red Handed With Rekha In…
In 1981, while Rekha was on set of Yash Chopra's Silsila alongside Amitabh Bachchan , she was cast for Tamil film called Meendum Kokila . The film featured Kamal Haasan and Sridevi . During the production, Rekha and Kamal were rumored to have developed a romantic relationship, which went unnoticed by anyone on the set. However, things turned ugly when Kamal Haasan's then-wife, Vani Ganapathy , stormed into hotel where the actress was staying.
She not only caught her husband in the act with Rekha but also created a scene in front of other guests. A few weeks later, it was reported that Rekha had been removed from the film, and Malayalam actress Deepa (known as Unni Mary) was given her part. When Kamal Haasan Left Vani For…
After few years of this incident, the relationship with Vani was struggling at that period, which led him to develop feelings for Sarika while they were on set together for the 1984 film Raaj Tilak . Sarika became known as the other woman in the lives of Kamal Haasan and Vani Ganapathy.
Despite making several attempts to end their affair due to his marital status, fate seemed to intervene in their lives. Later, the news of Sarika's pregnancy reached the media. Kamal separated from Vani in 1988 and married Sarika in the same year. They welcomed their children, Shruti and Akshara , into the world, but it ended with divorce in 2004.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
41 minutes ago
- NDTV
Viral: Foreign Vlogger Ordered Pizza During Indian Train Journey, Here's What Happened Next
Train journeys in India are all fun and games. But let us be honest, not everyone likes the food served on trains. At times, it's natural to crave something flavourful - be it burgers or pizzas. But is it possible to order such zesty items while on the train? Well, the answer to this question is a resounding yes. A travel vlogger, Justin Murphy, recently posted a video on Instagram showing viewers how he and his friends relished cheesy pizzas from Domino's during their 14-hour train ride in India. Also Read: Office Team Transforms Train Cabin Into Mobile Cinema With Projector And Popcorn The clip begins with Justin Murphy speaking about his intense pizza cravings when suddenly a random plan strikes him. "While cruising through the Indian countryside, I called up a random Domino's in the city up ahead and requested they deliver the pizzas to the next station," he says. As the train halts momentarily at Madurai Junction, the vlogger becomes sceptical about whether his order will make it to the station. His doubt soon fades away as he spots a Domino's driver already waiting at the platform. Justin and his pals collect their pizzas and even take a selfie with the delivery agent before hopping back on the train. They open the box only to discover a mouthwatering, medium-sized pizza, infused with loads of cheese and topped with juicy minced chicken. They dig into the delectable Italian delight and rate the food 11 out of 10. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Justin Murphy (@ Also Read: Travel Vlogger Gives Inside Look At Doraemon-Themed Train Station In Japan The internet had lots to say about the video. 'Only in India. Trust me,' wrote one user. 'Could have tried using the ZOMATO APP. Online food delivery service. They also have an option to deliver on the train,' suggested another. 'Great to see you guys are experiencing Indian railways,' commented one person. 'You don't have to even dial them. Simply book it online and they will deliver it to your seat. You don't even have to leave your seat,' pointed out an individual. 'India and Indians can surprise you anytime,' read a remark. 'India is wayyyyy too convenient,' shared another user. So far, the video has received close to 1.5 million views.
News18
42 minutes ago
- News18
Anurag Kashyap Asked Nawazuddin Siddiqui ‘Bewakuf Hai Kya Tu?' For Acting Like Al Pacino
Last Updated: Nawazuddin Siddiqui tried channeling Al Pacino for Gangs of Wasseypur until Anurag Kashyap advised him to be natural. Nawazuddin Siddiqui's iconic performance as Faisal Khan in Gangs of Wasseypur has stood the test of time, but few know the actor was initially influenced by Hollywood legends while stepping into the role. In a recent interview, he shared that on the first day of shooting, he had actually tried to act like Al Pacino—until director Anurag Kashyap stepped in and changed the course of his performance. In a chat with Filmfare, Nawazuddin Siddiqui recalled, 'I went on the first day acting like Al Pacino. I had thought about emulating him beforehand. Thoda bhoot chaaya hua tha. I used to have phases – Robert De Niro for three months, Al Pacino for three months, and Brando. He said, 'Bewakoof hai kya tu? Don't do that, you will become stiff and stuck at one place.'" He continued by sharing how Kashyap noticed something off about his performance and approached him after the day's shoot. 'I did the scenes Al Pacino style on the first day of shoot. Anurag came to my room at night and asked what am I upto. He said you are being very stiff, Al Pacino type. I told him that I wanted to show my power," he said. But it was Kashyap's grounded advice that really stuck with him. 'Anurag said that woh mera kaam hai, main tere peeche 6 foot ke log khade kardunga, apne aap powerful lagega (That's my work, I will put tall men behind you, you will look powerful). Don't do anything, be normal. I couldn't sleep the whole night. I felt that he was right." Taking the director's words to heart, Siddiqui approached the character with a more natural mindset the following day. 'The very next day, I went and forgot everything. Bhaad mein jaaye, main Nawaz hu, main jaisa dikhta hu vaisa hi jaakar karunga." The transformation clearly worked. Gangs of Wasseypur, directed by Anurag Kashyap, became both a box-office hit and a critical success. Nawazuddin's portrayal of Faisal Khan became one of the most memorable characters in Indian cinema. The ensemble cast included standout performances by Manoj Bajpayee, Huma Qureshi, Richa Chadha, Pankaj Tripathi, and Jaideep Ahlawat, helping cement the film's cult status. First Published:
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
What went wrong with Kamal Haasan and Mani Ratnam's Thug Life?
'Thug Life' marked the legendary and most ambitious collaboration in Indian cinema by bringing Kamal Haasan and Mani Ratnam after almost four decades. Their gangster saga promised an epic exploration of gangsters, violence and betrayal in the trailer sparked curiosity, evoking memories of Mani Ratnam's classic gangster films like 'Nayakan' and 'Chekka Chivantha Vaanam'. With a strong cast including Silambarasan TR, Trisha, Joju George, and music by AR Rahman, expectations were once the film ended, one question remained: what went wrong with a film that had everything going for it? Spoiler alert...!The story wants to be everything, and ends up being nothing'Thug Life' tells the story of Rangaraya Sakthivel, an ageing gangster seeking revenge on those who betrayed him, including his brother, his own gang members, and Amar (his right hand and adopted son, played by Silambarasan). It is also a tale of mistrust and power struggles, with Sakthivel willing to destroy anyone he suspects of threatening him. The film also explores a morally murky subplot: Sakthivel's extramarital relationship with Indrani (Trisha Krishnan), a social media influencer. He casually calls the act of infidelity his 'disorder'.On paper, 'Thug Life' is rich with ideas: it aims to be a dark, psychological crime drama in the vein of 'Nayakan'. But in execution, it tries to be too many things at once. With multiple subplots competing for attention, characters feel underdeveloped and scenes rushed. While 'Nayakan' also juggled complex narratives, it did so with organic flow and emotional depth, something 'Thug Life' gangster drama feels like the final instalment of a franchise film, packed with too many characters and motives, yet without the benefit of prior films to build toward this so-called final arcs and unclear motivationsPerhaps the most unexpected shortcoming is the lack of clear motivations, surprising from a legend like Mani Ratnam, known for emotionally complex characters. For instance, Sakthivel names Amar as his successor as he goes to prison. Amar conquers and calls himself the next Rangaraya Sakthivel. Also, there's a secret regarding Amar's father's killing that affects his bond with Sakthivel. What makes Amar the potential leader? What does he contribute to the gang? The film offers no satisfying answers. If the gangsters' own activities are unclear, it is unrealistic to expect a well-defined motivation for Indrani is another missed opportunity. After her nuanced role as Kundavai in the 'Ponniyin Selvan' series, here she feels vague and ornamental. Is she a lover, muse, or distraction? The film never gives her enough space or clarity. With better writing, she could have anchored the shifting dynamics between Amar and Sakthivel, much like Nandini's character in 'Ponniyin Selvan'.Silambarasan's Amar lacks a clear personality or emotional grounding. His choices appear impulsive without adding intrigue. If his confusion was deliberate to explore inner conflict, it might have worked, but instead it feels like the film itself is unsure of who he is. Consequently, key moments like Amar's betrayal or Sakthivel's revenge lack the emotional impact they the large cast, only Inspector Jai Royappa (Ashok Selvan) carries emotional weight. His motivations are clearer, and his past is explored enough to make him compelling. But even he cannot hold together a film where most characters feel half-formed and much telling, too little showingMani Ratnam is celebrated for his visual storytelling. Iconic scenes like the sun shot in 'Thalapathi' or Shaila's pregnancy-reveal in 'Bombay' communicate volumes without words. 'Thug Life', however, leans heavily on exposition. Key developments like Amar's rise, Sakthivel's exile transformation, the gang's collapse, and what happened to Jeeva (Sakthivel's wife) are relayed through rushed dialogue and montages. Instead of giving these moments emotional weight, the film tells us what happened without letting us feel example, Amar supposedly restructured the gang's operations in two years, but what exactly did he do? How did the world change during Sakthivel's absence? Why does Amar's rise make sense, or does Sakthivel's influence wane? None of this is shown; characters just talk about it. The story feels disjointed, important moments are described rather than highs and flat revealsThe trailer's standout line, 'Inimel inga naan dan Rangaraya Sakthivel (Here on, I am Rangaraya Sakthivel),' hits hard in promos but barely registers in the film. It is not due to Simbu's performance, which is strong, but because the build-up is missing. Mani Ratnam's best films rely on emotional highs: Remember the mirror scene in 'Nayakan', the train departure in 'Alaipayuthey', or the press conference in 'Guru'? In 'Thug Life', many emotional beats arrive without proper setup or feel hastily key interval reveal, intended as a pivotal twist, falls flat. The issue is not the twist but the missing emotional groundwork. If Amar was told early on that the gang was responsible for his father's death, what motivates his sudden switch at the interval? The manipulation by Manikkam (Nasser) is unclear, and the strength of Amar's bond with Sakthivel is not explored. The scene feels gimmicky and unconvincing. Similarly, confrontations like the beach scene between Sakthivel and Jeeva or Amar's final showdown with Indrani aim for gravity but come off sluggish and under the weight of its own legacyA major factor behind the mixed response to 'Thug Life' is how it was promoted. Marketed as Kamal Haasan's grand return to the gangster genre, with heavy callbacks to 'Nayakan', from the character's name to interviews where both Kamal and Mani Ratnam evoked their earlier works' emotional and cinematic weight, expectations soared. The stage was set for a profound character drama rich with tragedy and 'Thug Life' leans heavily on the aesthetics of those classics without capturing their emotional soul. The title, tone, and visuals suggest depth, but the world it builds lacks real stakes. The final product: a gangster saga with no real danger, a father-son conflict without emotional rupture, and a betrayal that feels the film excels. But this beauty often feels disconnected from the storytelling. At times, the music, composed by AR Rahman, overwhelms rather than supports key emotional scenes. The expectations set by its legacy and marketing created a bar so high that the film struggled to reach. 'Thug Life' is not without merit. There are moments where the film shines, especially in the performances of Sakthivel and Amar, and the early scenes between them that carry Mani Ratnam and Kamal Haasan's signature craft. But instead of building on these strengths, the film often chooses style over substance. It is not a bad film, but one that feels stuck, caught somewhere between honouring the past and finding a new voice. This unresolved tension leaves the film feeling distant when it should have been deeply engaging.
