logo
From razing rubble to blowing up homes: IDF soldiers share how they expanded Gaza buffer zone in new report

From razing rubble to blowing up homes: IDF soldiers share how they expanded Gaza buffer zone in new report

Yahoo07-04-2025

A new report from Breaking the Silence (BtS), an Israel-based NGO, has compiled testimony from soldiers who detail how they razed plots of land during the war in their mission to expand the buffer zone between Gaza and Israel deeper into the strip.
BtS, which was founded by Israel Defence Forces veterans, has released a report titled The Perimeter: Soldiers' testimonies from the Gaza Buffer Zone 2023-2024, containing information from interviews with dozens of IDF soldiers who served in Gaza and participated in the expansion of the buffer zone, which the report refers to as the perimeter. CBC News was able to speak to one of those soldiers who provided details of the IDF's activities in the area that runs north to south along the border.
Since it was founded in 2004, BtS has published reports based on more than 1,400 accounts from IDF soldiers based on their experiences while serving in Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem since September 2000, in its effort to "expose the public to the reality of everyday life in the Occupied Territories" and "bring an end to the occupation."
In a statement to CBC News, BtS said the creation of the perimeter through "confiscation of land" will cause significant obstacles to reconstruction efforts in the Gaza Strip and "undermines its long-term sustainability." The organization says that statements by Israeli officials, including that the territory would "remain in Israeli hands" and that Palestinians would not be allowed to return, amount to what BtS calls "ethnic cleansing."
BtS is also calling on the Israeli government to return to the negotiating table and seek a diplomatic solution to return the hostages and bring peace to the region.
'A future of no security'
Israeli forces have maintained a perimeter running north to south along the border between Gaza and Israel since at least the early 2000s. In 2015, the United Nations Humanitarian Agency OCHA noted that the buffer zone extended 300 metres into the strip. Palestinians generally have not been allowed within that distance of the fence separating the two regions.
Since Oct. 7, 2023 — when Hamas-led militants stormed across the Gaza-Israel border, killed over a thousand people and kidnapped 250, according to Israeli tallies — the perimeter has been expanded to at least one kilometre into Gaza, according to IDF soldiers who told BtS about their involvement in the mission to extend it. Though the report does not name the soldiers, it does give their ranks and the general areas and periods they served.
One IDF soldier featured in the report, a warrant officer who served in northern Gaza between January and February 2024, told BtS that the buffer zone would reach as far as 1.5 kilometres into Gaza, civilians would be banned and everything would be razed. When asked what the area would look like after they were through, they replied: "Hiroshima. That's what I'm saying, Hiroshima."
"This is a policy by the current Israeli government, which leads us to a future of no security," Joel Carmel, the advocacy director at BtS, told CBC News in a video call.
Carmel says Israel's ongoing push to extend the perimeter into Gaza during the war means the expanded zone where Palestinians are not allowed could become a permanent fixture in post-war Gaza, and that Israel is choosing a future for Gaza where "no one can ever come back" to that area.
Recent media reports, some citing Israeli humanitarian organization Gisha, have said that when Israel's expansion of the buffer zone is complete, it will encompass as much as 17 per cent of the Gaza Strip's area.
Israeli soldiers stand on a tank on the Israeli side of the border with Gaza, amid a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas on Feb. 11. (Amir Cohen/Reuters)
OCHA says 65 per cent of the enclave is now within "no-go" areas, under active displacement orders or both. Israel has not fully explained its long-term goals for the areas it is now seizing, though Gaza residents say they believe the aim is to permanently depopulate swaths of land, including some of Gaza's last farmland and water infrastructure.
Carmel points to a statement by Israel's Foreign Minister Eli Cohen in October 2023 where he said that "Gaza's territory will shrink" after the war ends.
CBC News reached out to the IDF and Israeli government officials for comment but did not hear back before publication.
In their testimonies to BtS, IDF soldiers who participated in the expansion of the perimeter, detail the destruction left behind and how the perimeter's presence impacts both Palestinian and Israeli societies.
IN PHOTOS | In the ruins of Gaza:
Leaving Gaza as a 'mound of rubble'
One soldier who spoke to BtS and CBC News served as a sergeant first class in northern Gaza in November 2023. They said that their unit was tasked with blowing up more than 100 buildings in the perimeter during their tour in Gaza. Though CBC confirmed the identity of the sergeant, they spoke on the condition that their identity be kept confidential out of fear for their security and livelihood.
According to the sergeant, IDF soldiers were told in a briefing that the areas they were told to destroy were near enough to Israeli settlements and cities that they were a security threat and had to be destroyed. The sergeant told CBC that this was the first time the perimeter was mentioned during their mission.
They began their tour in northern Gaza, an area that was already mostly rubble, where they were tasked with razing abandoned homes and buildings. Soon, they said their mission expanded to blowing up houses in southern Gaza, where they noted there were still signs of life. It was at this point, the sergeant said, questions about the purpose of the mission began to grow in their mind.
"The houses there were not nearly as destroyed as in the north," the sergeant told CBC News over Zoom. "You see the signs of people's lives were there, and their stuff."
The sergeant noted that the reservist training they received didn't cover how to blow up houses. Instead, they said, they were taught how to blow up tunnel entrances and set up mines on bridges and in fields.
"Houses … are not really something we trained for," the sergeant said. "Even the commanders were kind of learning it as we were going."
The sergeant said that when they left Gaza in December 2023, it was a "mound of rubble."
WATCH | Professor tracks destruction in Gaza:
'Everything is destroyed'
Professor Adi Ben-Nun of the Geography Information Systems department at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem has been tracking the destruction in Gaza and the expansion of the perimeter since the beginning of the war.
He says that before Oct. 7, 2023, there were about 180,000 buildings in Gaza, based on United Nations estimations. He says 120,000 of those buildings were destroyed before the ceasefire was broken in March. Data detailing the destruction since then is not yet available.
He says the agricultural land within the perimeter contained about 3,000 buildings, and that it has all been "completely demolished."
Adi Ben-Nun, with the Hebrew University of Jerusalem says he has been tracking the destruction in the strip since the beginning of the war using satellite imagery. He says that of the estimated 180,000 buildings in Gaza before the war, about 120,000 have been destroyed. (Submitted by Adi Ben-Nun)
"You must understand that it's not only the building, it's the roads, the electricity, the water structure, the sewage …everything is destroyed," he told CBC News during a video call, where he demonstrated the satellite imagery he used to track the destruction.
Using his computer, Ben-Nun toggled between two satellite images he created using Google maps — one showing the state of the perimeter before Oct. 7, and the other after. The map from before shows green patches of land and buildings. On the map from after, the greyish-beige colour of war emerges; tank tracks and destroyed buildings are all that can be seen.
He says that based on this level of destruction, it would take generations for Gazans to rebuild what has been lost.
"Even if people are allowed to go back home," Ben-Nun said, "there is no home."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Palantir CEO Karp says AI is dangerous and 'either we win or China will win'
Palantir CEO Karp says AI is dangerous and 'either we win or China will win'

CNBC

time16 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Palantir CEO Karp says AI is dangerous and 'either we win or China will win'

Palantir CEO Alex Karp said the artificial intelligence arms race between the U.S. and China will culminate in one country coming out on top. "My general bias on AI is it is dangerous," Karp told CNBC's "Squawk on the Street" on Thursday. "There are positive and negative consequences, and either we win or China will win." Karp has been a vocal advocate for U.S AI dominance. He told CNBC in January that the country needs to "run harder, run faster" in an "all-country effort" to develop more advanced AI models. In a recent letter to shareholders, he also touted Palantir's commitment to equipping and enhancing U.S. defense interests. The billionaire tech CEO said Thursday that the U.S. currently has a leg up in the AI race and Palantir is leading the way in making companies more secure and efficient with its tools. "There is no economy in the world with this kind of corporate leadership which is willing to pivot, which understands technologies, which is willing to look at new things, but also has deep domain expertise," he said. "Our allies in the West, in Europe, are going to have to learn from us." Shares of the Denver-based data analytics and AI software firm outperformed in 2024 and have continued their ascent in 2025 as investors bet on their software and work with key government contractors and agencies. The stock is up 74% this year, but investors have to shell out on a higher earnings multiple than its tech peers. "You don't like the price, exit," Karp said on Thursday in response. Karp also asserted that the company is "not surveilling Americans" in response to recent New York Times report that Palantir is helping the Trump administration gather data on Americans.

What is genocide and is it happening in Gaza?
What is genocide and is it happening in Gaza?

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

What is genocide and is it happening in Gaza?

Rights groups, lawyers and some governments are describing the Gaza war as "genocide" and calling for a ceasefire but Israel, created in the aftermath of the Nazi Holocaust of Jews, vehemently rejects the explosive term. Israel says it is seeking to wipe out Gaza's Islamist rulers and free its hostages still held in the occupied Palestinian coastal strip since the Hamas militant attack in Israel on October 7, 2023. But Israel's devastating war on Gaza -- largely populated by descendants of Palestinian refugees who were expelled from or fled what became Israeli land in 1948 -- has killed tens of thousands of civilians and sparked growing global outrage. The accusation against Israel of genocide has been made with increasing force from quarters ranging from "Schindler's List" star Ralph Fiennes to Amnesty International and some Israeli historians. What does the legal term really mean and who can decide whether it applies? What is 'genocide'? The word genocide -- derived from the Greek word "genos", for race or tribe, and "cide", from the Latin for "to kill" -- was coined in 1944 by Raphael Lemkin. Lemkin, a Polish Jew who had fled to the United States, used it to describe the crimes committed by Nazi Germany during the Holocaust. It was used for the first time within a legal framework by an international military tribunal at Nuremberg to try Nazi leaders for their crimes in 1945. However, those accused were eventually convicted on charges of crimes against humanity. It has been recognised within international law since 1948 and the advent of the UN Genocide Convention. That text defines genocide as any of five "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group". These five acts include killing members of the group, causing them serious bodily or mental harm, imposing living conditions intended to destroy the group, preventing births and forcibly transferring children out of the group. Regardless of the definition, the qualification of "genocide" has been hugely sensitive over the decades. What is happening in Gaza? Israel's military offensive on Gaza since October 2023 has killed 54,677 people, mostly civilians, according to the health ministry in the occupied Palestinian territory. The United Nations has said the territory's entire population of more than two million people is at risk of famine, even if Israel said last month it was partially easing the complete blockade on aid it imposed on Gaza on March 2. Despite international calls for an end to the war, a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas remains elusive. The latest war started after Hamas fighters attacked Israel on October 7, 2023. The attack resulted in the deaths of 1,218 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official Israeli figures. Of the 251 hostages seized, 55 remain in Gaza, including 32 the Israeli military says are dead. Who speaks of 'genocide' in Gaza? In December 2023, South Africa brought a case to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the United Nations' highest judicial organ, alleging that Israel's Gaza offensive breached the 1948 UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. Israel denies the accusation. In rulings in January, March and May 2024, the ICJ told Israel to do everything possible to "prevent" acts of genocide during its military operations in Gaza, including by providing urgently needed humanitarian aid to prevent famine. While no court has so far ruled the ongoing conflict is a genocide, human rights groups and international law experts -- including several who are Israeli -- have used the term to describe it. Amnesty International has accused Israel of carrying out a "live-streamed genocide" in Gaza, while Human Rights Watch has alleged it is responsible for "acts of genocide". A UN committee in November found Israel's warfare in Gaza was "consistent with the characteristics of genocide". And a UN investigation concluded in March that Israel carried out "genocidal acts" in Gaza through the destruction of the strip's main IVF clinic and other reproductive healthcare facilities. Omer Bartov, an Israeli scholar of the Holocaust, wrote in August last year that "Israel was engaged in systematic war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocidal actions". Fellow Israeli historians Amos Goldberg and Daniel Blatman in January co-wrote an article in which they said: "Israel is indeed committing genocide in Gaza." Western governments have largely refrained from using the word, with France's President Emmanuel Macron saying it was not up to a "political leader to use to term but up to historians to do so when the time comes". But Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has used it, while Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has accused Israel of "premeditated genocide". What does Israel say? Israel alleges it is exercising its right to security and "self defence", an argument echoed by its staunch ally the United States. Israel has dismissed accusations of genocide as "blatant lies" and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has accused the UN Human Rights Council of being "an antisemitic, corrupt, terror-supporting and irrelevant body". He has said UN experts should instead focus on "crimes against humanity and the war crimes committed by the Hamas terrorist organisation in the worst massacre against the Jewish people since the Holocaust", referring to October 7. The International Criminal Court (ICC) in November issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and former Israeli defence minister Yoav Gallant over alleged crimes against humanity and war crimes in Israel's war in Gaza -- including starvation as a method of warfare. It also issued an arrest warrant for Hamas military chief Mohammed Deif over allegations of crimes against humanity and war crimes in the October 7 attack, but the case against him was dropped in February after confirmation Israel had killed him. ICC prosecutor Karim Khan also initially sought warrants against Hamas leaders Yahya Sinwar and Ismail Haniyeh, but dropped those applications after their deaths in Israeli attacks. Who decides and when? Thijs Bouwknegt, a genocide expert, said the Israeli policy in Gaza seemed to be "designed to make a civilian population either perish or leave" but a court would have to decide if it was genocide. "It bears the hallmarks of it but we still have to wait and see whether it actually was," said the historian, who has conducted research for the ICC and observed trials over genocide in Rwanda and former Yugoslavia. In the case of Rwanda, in which the United Nations said extremist Hutus killed some 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus in 1994, it took a decade for the International Criminal Tribunal to conclude genocide had happened. It was not until 2007 that the ICJ recognised as genocide the murder by Bosnian Serb forces of almost 8,000 Muslim men and boys in Srebrenica in 1995 during the Bosnian war. "The threshold for genocide is nearly impossible to meet," Bouwknegt explained. "You have to prove that there was an intent and that there was the only possible explanation for what happened." Has there been intent? French-Israeli lawyer Omer Shatz said "there is no doubt that war crimes, crimes against humanity are being committed" in Gaza. But the international law expert agreed intent was more difficult to prove. That is why, after the ICC issued an arrest warrant against Netanyahu and Gallant, he filed a report with the court in December arguing they were among eight Israeli officials responsible for "incitement to genocide in Gaza". "If incitement is established, that establishes intent," he told AFP. His 170-page report lists such alleged incitements, including Gallant at the start of the war saying Israel was fighting "human animals" in Gaza and far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich urging "total extermination" in the Palestinian territory. It cites President Isaac Herzog failing to differentiate between Palestinian militants and civilians when he spoke of "an entire nation out there that is responsible" for the October 7 attack. Mathilde Philip-Gay, an international law expert, said it was ultimately up to a judge to decide on whether the genocide label applied. But, she warned: "International law cannot stop a war." "The judiciary will intervene after the war. The qualification (of genocide) is very important for victims but it will come later," she said. What now? The 1948 Genocide Convention says signatories can call on UN organs "to take such action... for the prevention and suppression of acts of genocide". But while it implies they should act to stop any such crime from occurring, it does not detail how. Activists have called for an arms embargo and sanctions against Israel. The European Union last month ordered a review of its cooperation deal with Israel and Britain halted trade talks with the government. But the United States and Germany, two major weapons suppliers, are not likely to want to review their relationship with Israel. cf-cl-ah/sjw/giv

Supreme Court sides with straight woman in decision that makes it easier to file ‘reverse discrimination' suits
Supreme Court sides with straight woman in decision that makes it easier to file ‘reverse discrimination' suits

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Supreme Court sides with straight woman in decision that makes it easier to file ‘reverse discrimination' suits

The Supreme Court on Thursday sided with a straight woman in Ohio who filed a 'reverse discrimination' lawsuit against her employer when her gay boss declined to promote her. The ruling will make it easier to file such suits in some parts of the country. Despite the politically divisive debate playing out over workplace diversity efforts – a fight that has been fueled by President Donald Trump – a unanimous coalition of conservative and liberal justices were in the majority. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote the opinion for the court. 'Our case law thus makes clear that the standard for proving disparate treatment under Title VII does not vary based on whether or not the plaintiff is a member of a majority group,' Jackson wrote. Marlean Ames started working for Ohio's state government in 2004 and steadily rose through the ranks at the Department of Youth Services. She claims that in 2017, she started reporting to a gay boss and was passed over for a promotion that was offered to another gay woman. Ames is challenging a requirement applied in five appeals courts across the nation that 'majority' Americans raising discrimination claims must demonstrate 'background circumstances' in order to pursue their suit. A plaintiff might meet that requirement, for instance, by providing statistical evidence documenting a pattern of discrimination against members of a majority. Ames couldn't do that and so she lost in the lower courts. An employee who is a member of a minority group does not face that same initial hurdle. The requirement was rooted in the notion that it is unusual for an employer to discriminate against a member of a majority group. But neither federal anti-discrimination law nor Supreme Court precedent speak to creating one set of requirements for a majority employee to file a discrimination suit and a different set for a minority employee. During oral arguments in the case in late February, it was clear Ames had widespread support from the justices. Citing the 'background circumstances' requirement, the Cincinnati-based 6th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled for Ohio. Federal appeals courts based in Denver, St. Louis, Chicago and Washington, DC, applied that same standard, according to court records. At a moment when Trump has politicized workplace diversity efforts, both the court's conservative and liberal justices – as well as the attorneys arguing the case – appeared to agree that the 6th Circuit's analysis was wrong. The case landed on the Supreme Court's docket last fall, about a month before Trump was elected on a pledge to clamp down diversity and inclusion efforts in both the government and the private sector. The administration has taken a number of steps in that direction, including but attempting to cut funding to entities federal officials allege have supported DEI efforts. Many of those actions are being reviewed by courts. But Ames' case was more procedural. Notably, both the Trump and Biden administrations agreed that the 6th Circuit should reconsider its approach. CNN's Hannah Rabinowitz contributed to this report. This story has been updated with additional developments.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store