
Fidesz MEPs turn to European Ombudsman over financing of NGOs
Csaba Dömötör said Fidesz MEPs would again submit their requests for information. "If we're denied entry through the door, we'll knock again ... but more firmly," he said.
Ruling party MEP Csaba Dömötör said on Thursday that Fidesz MEPs are turning to the European Ombudsman concerning the financing of NGOs, adding that the European Commission did not appear ready 'to disclose the list of its agreements with political activists'.
According to MTI, Dömötör said it was likely that there were more than 10,000 such contracts. He noted that the Fidesz group filed 86 requests with EC directorates and background institutions to obtain information, adding that the directorates had refused every one. He said the rejections were 'absurd', adding that the EC website provided only partial information concerning the matter.
'In addition … the amounts [quoted on the website] are often nowhere near the sums included in member states' reports,' he added.
Dömötör said Fidesz MEPs would again submit their requests for information. 'If we're denied entry through the door, we'll knock again … but more firmly,' he said.
The Fidesz group also will turn to the recently elected European Ombudsman, for whom 'nothing should be more important than ensuring transparency, especially when it comes to European taxpayers's money, or supporting liberal policies promoted by these organisations, even if in many cases they are in conflict with the will of European voters,' he said.
Dömötör said he had been informed that 'certain MEPs' in the EP's budget control committee had been given the list of 'activist contracts' from some of the directorates, but 'they were asked not to disclose them… They were even instructed that each group should have access to as many contracts as many MEPs they have in the committee… This is totally absurd.'
The MEP said, 'parties of the grand coalition are quiet because they are implicated.' He mentioned an MEP, for example, who he said was a supervisory board member of a Bavarian company that received subsidies in the million-euro range from the EC. 'The MEP receives an annual 75,000 euros for that second job, which clearly indicates why groups in the grand coalition are not so active: they have interests,' he added.
While Hungary ensures the transparency of contracts, with the documents and contract amounts available on ministries' websites for 14 days, the EC, which 'comes up with even more stringent transparency criteria for member states by way of rule of law procedures, does not disclose even basic information,' he said.
The EC has provided support to 'at least 54 organisations of so-called fact-checkers, including left-liberal groups in Hungary', Dömötör said, adding that those groups 'often act as censors'. The European Parliament democracy shield committee refused to answer relevant questions, he said. 'Moreover, at their last session, they even tried to prevent the question from being asked; that says all about their attitude towards transparency,' he said.
'They are not accustomed to applying those democratic values, principles and virtues that they keep demanding from member states and their governments. It is not part of their practice, and this is what we want to change. And we will,' the MEP said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Budapest Times
3 days ago
- Budapest Times
Orbán: The patriot plan is the only alternative to the European nightmare
Speaking before hundreds of international guests, including current and former heads of state and government, party leaders, and prominent conservative voices, Prime Minister Orbán positioned the event as a defining moment for Europe's right-wing resurgence. 'This is not a gathering of the defeated, but of those who have endured,' declared Prime Minister Orbán, paying tribute to leaders who, like him, have weathered relentless political attacks. He criticized liberal and progressive European politicians for their fragility in the face of scrutiny, stating, 'They cry at the first sign of criticism and hide behind progressive journalists.' The prime minister presented a stark contrast between two competing visions for Europe's future. According to him, the liberal plan envisions a post-Christian, post-national continent consumed by war, migration, and centralized debt. 'Brussels has stolen the European dream,' he warned, describing today's EU as a place where citizens fear for their safety and economic viability, and where 'organized population replacement' has taken the place of integration. In opposition, Prime Minister Orbán's patriot plan outlines four key pillars: Peace: 'We do not want the eastern front,' he said, firmly rejecting Ukraine's EU membership and war-driven policies. Sovereignty: Hungary opposes shared EU debts and taxes, and the funding of foreign wars with national resources. Freedom: Political freedom and freedom of expression must be restored to the European public. Security: Europe must be reclaimed from mass migration, and citizens must retake their urban neighborhoods. Prime Minister Orbán emphasized the necessity of local victories to achieve these aims: 'Everyone must return home and win their own battles.' He pointed to the upcoming elections in Poland as the next opportunity for the patriot alliance to gain ground. In a broader context, he celebrated Donald Trump's return to the U.S. presidency, calling it 'the greatest comeback in the history of the Western world.' Trump's early actions, including targeting the deep state and dismantling progressive ideologies, were described by the Hungarian leader as a 'truth serum' that has rekindled hope for peace and stability. The prime minister's address also saluted international allies like Andrej Babiš, Robert Fico, Santiago Abascal, and Alice Weidel—leaders who, according to him, exemplify the courage to resist the liberal consensus. Special recognition went to Robert Fico, whom he described as a leader who 'was shot five times and still returned as if nothing had happened.' Highlighting the ideological divide, Prime Minister Orbán lambasted Brussels' leftist elite for silencing dissent and orchestrating violent efforts to disrupt conservative events. 'This cannot continue,' he said. He accused EU liberals of attempting to replace national identity with an artificial construct, adding, 'The left does not want debate—they want submission.' 'The liberal plan leads to a centralized, indebted, war-driven Europe,' Prime Minister Orbán concluded. 'But Hungarians are a free people—we were born to follow our own path.' The message was unequivocal: The time has come for patriots across the continent to reclaim Europe.


Budapest Times
4 days ago
- Budapest Times
Poll: Europeans oppose sending troops and weapons to Ukraine
Amid escalating rhetoric from the European political elite in support of military aid to Ukraine, the latest survey from the Századvég Foundation's Europe Project reveals a growing divide between policymakers and public opinion. In 2025, for the first time since the outbreak of the conflict, a majority of EU citizens now oppose the delivery of weapons to Ukraine. According to the findings, 49 percent of Europeans are against weapons shipments, compared to 44 percent in favor. This represents a clear reversal from previous years, and marks a steady decline in support—down six percentage points from 2023. Simultaneously, the number of EU member states where the majority of the population opposes military aid rose from 12 in 2023 and 2024 to 16 in 2025 Despite this shift, key European leaders continue to pursue expanded military assistance. In early 2025, the President of the European Commission called for accelerating arms and ammunition deliveries to Ukraine. Shortly thereafter, a €800 billion rearmament plan was announced to strengthen European defense budgets, specifically citing the need to support Ukraine during this 'critical moment.' The divide is even starker on the question of troop deployments. Századvég's research shows that 67 percent of EU citizens oppose sending their own country's soldiers to Ukraine. In no EU member state does support for military intervention reach a majority, and in many—particularly Hungary (90 percent opposition) and Bulgaria (85 percent)—the rejection is overwhelming. Only Sweden and Finland approach a more balanced public stance.


Budapest Times
4 days ago
- Budapest Times
Bóka: Hungary is working to strengthen transparency regarding EU funding of NGOs
János Bóka, the minister of EU affairs, said in Brussels on Tuesday that Hungary is working to strengthen transparency regarding the European Union funding of NGOs, adding that there was a 'fundamental misunderstanding regarding the role of NGOs in a democratic society'. After a meeting of EU affairs ministers, Minister Bóka said Hungary and Slovakia did not support a proposal by the Polish presidency of the Council of the EU on strengthening democratic resilience in Europe. 'The text conflates the situation of constitutional institutions and NGOs, as well as the place of political parties and NGOs in a democratic society,' he said. 'In our opinion, European institutions and certain member states misinterpret [the concept of] democratic resilience,' Minister Bóka said, warning that democratic resilience would be used 'to justify foreign interference into member states' democratic processes rather than to strengthen their democratic institutions.' Commenting on Hungary's eighth hearing at the General Affairs Council within the framework of the Article 7 procedure against the country, Minister Bóka said that 'after a long wait', the European Commission had closed the infringement procedures launched in connection with Hungarian legislation on the Central European University and the 'Stop Soros' package of laws. 'The infringement procedures were closed because the European Commission itself has established that the Hungarian legislation currently in force is in line with EU legislation.' Regarding preparations for the EU summit in late June, Minister Bóka said Hungary supported that the European Council tabled'the situation in the Western Balkans'. 'We trust that the EU's leaders will send the positive message to the region that their future is in Europe,' he said. Hungary also supported a Swedish proposal that cross-border organised crime should be tabled in the EU as a risk to security and the rule of law. Hungary agreed that the fight against organised crime was in many areas a European task, 'including, for example, organised crime groups organising illegal migration from outside the EU,' he said.