Amazon refund lawsuit: Do you qualify for payouts? Check eligibility and how to apply
Amazon has been accused of violating its refund policy by failing to pay back customers for properly returned items. Plaintiff Holly Jones Clark of Kentucky filed the lawsuit in the US District Court for the Western District of Washington. They allege that the Jeff Bezos-led company systematically failed to issue refunds for products returned within the 30-day window.
Amazon's 30-day return policy allows most items to be returned within 30 days of delivery for a refund or replacement, provided they are in new, unused condition. Exceptions include digital products, gift cards, and hazardous materials. Devices are non-returnable after 30 days. Processing may take up to 30 days.
According to the lawsuit filed in Washington, the plaintiff said they ordered a book via Amazon, which was canceled by the seller. They were informed about a refund, but it was never issued, despite many follow-ups. After the complaint was filed, several social media users also raised similar issues.
'Contrary to its Return Policy and representations about its Return Policy, it is up to the customer to follow up on whether he has actually obtained a refund or not," the complaint, filed in 2023, read.
The proposed class includes: "All persons in the United States, who… were charged by Defendant [Amazon] for failing to return a product that was timely returned in its original condition during the six years prior to the filing of this action.'
Yes. You can join the class if you:
Returned an Amazon item on time and in proper condition
Were charged despite completing the return
Were promised a refund (or received an instant one) but never got it
The court is yet to certify the class. Only after the official certification, customers will be able to join or will be automatically included in the class. You will receive a mail or an email about the same.
Case website: There is no official portal yet, but keep an eye for one.
Court records: You can follow the docket via PACER.gov by searching Case No. 2:23-cv-01702.
Law firms: The case was filed by Borde Law PLLC and The Grant Law Firm PLLC.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
31 minutes ago
- The Print
‘What about Goanness?': Goa taxi drivers resist govt proposal to bring in app-based cabs
The fear is that the move will threaten the 'Goanness' of Goa's private transport industry, hurt the livelihoods of local taxi owners and flood the market with drivers from outside the state. While Goan taxi owners cite several technical objections to the entry of private app-based aggregators, at the heart of the argument is one key insecurity that is being voiced across multiple sectors in the state. Mumbai: Even as the summer recedes and the rain sets in, Goa is on the boil with the state's taxi drivers protesting against the Pramod Sawant-led government's plan of opening up the market for private app-based taxi aggregators. 'Goa's taxi drivers are the state's brand ambassadors. When tourists arrive, they first sit in the taxi from the airport. We are the first locals they interact with and we give them information on where to go, what to try, what to stay away from, etc,' Savio Valencio Goes, vice-president of North & South Goa Taxi Owners Association, told ThePrint. The overall fear is that Goa is being taken over by non-Goans everywhere, whether it is the staff that works in the state's hotels and resorts, or at restaurants and shacks. 'If all jobs are done by non-Goans, then what is the Goa that the tourists will experience?' asked Goes. The Goa government last month published draft guidelines on enabling the entry of private app-based taxi aggregators in the state. While taxi drivers in Goa have staunchly resisted the idea, tourists have often complained about Goa's taxi drivers overcharging them, not being available at all times and so on. This April, a video of a tourist slamming Goa's cab drivers as 'mafia' had gone viral on social media platforms, after which the taxi union leaders filed a police complaint objecting to the remark. The state's guidelines lay down a regulatory framework for private app-based taxi aggregators, listing the licensing fees, the tariffs, the kind of vehicles and drivers they can onboard, the fare to be received by the taxi owner, and so on. The North & South Goa Taxi Owners Association has called upon all the 23,000-24,000 taxi drivers of the state to submit their objections to the draft rules. The Goa government, meanwhile, has called upon private taxi drivers to join the two government-supported taxi aggregators that are already functional in Goa—Goa Miles and Goa Taxi app. 'We don't mind joining them, but there is absolutely no transparency. And there are basic issues that come up in the functioning of app-based aggregators,' Goes said. Speaking to reporters in Goa Monday, state transport minister Mauvin Godinho said: 'This is just a draft notification. We will take all stakeholders in confidence. We are having consultations with different bodies of industry, the tourism sector, the common man. We have given everyone one month to take feedback. It is not that the guidelines are final.' Also Read: Goa's resentment toward outsiders and settlers is rising. Calangute tourist tax is a sign The many objections The foremost concern of local taxi drivers over the new draft guidelines of the Goa government is that none of them was called as stakeholders in discussions that were held in the run up to the formation of the draft. In the memorandum of objections that the drivers are submitting to the Goa transport department, they call themselves the 'primary stakeholders of Goa's transport business'. 'Our practical experience and insights into the local transport landscape are invaluable, and their omission has resulted in a document that appears to overlook the ground realities and welfare of existing operators,' the memorandum, seen by ThePrint, says. It adds that large cab aggregator companies will have vast resources and aggressive market strategies. They fear that these companies could easily monopolise the transport sector and drive out local operators. 'This would lead to a significant loss of income and employment for Goan families,' the memorandum adds. It further suggests that the role of aggregators should be limited to pick-up and drop facilities in Goa, and they should not be permitted to enter the area of tourism services. These include facilitating bookings for local sightseeing tours, transporting to and from events, spice plantation visits, cruise bookings and so on. The memorandum also says that app-based services will not work in Goa because the state lacks the supporting infrastructure in many places. At several tourist spots, it states, there is inconsistent and poor cellular phone network. Tourists will have trouble finding a cab, and drivers too might be unwilling to ply to such destinations. 'Mandating a system heavily reliant on smartphone applications will disproportionately disadvantage both taxi operators and tourists in these areas,' the memorandum adds. Finally, it says that the guidelines are not transparent regarding fare structure for aggregators. It asserts that the current fare structure for private taxis is also outdated and needs to be revised keeping in mind the increase in petrol and diesel prices. Anand Naik, a taxi driver based in Vasco da Gama, told ThePrint that most Goans have their own cars and two-wheelers and don't need taxis. It is the tourists who do. 'If the tourists start using aggregator services, what will happen to Goans like us who have been driving taxis for generations?' Naik asked. He said that aggregator services may not be feasible in Goa as a lot of journeys are one way. Drivers would have to return to their main stand without a fare, he explained. State's guidelines for app-based aggregators In 2018, the Goa government had launched the Goa Miles cab aggregator service in collaboration with a private company. In 2023, it also launched the Goa Taxi app that allows people to book cabs online to travel anywhere in the state. Private taxi operators say that only a handful—about 2,000 to 3,000 taxi owners—have come on board these two platforms. The new draft guidelines, published on 20 May this year, aim to smoothen the entry of private companies in the app-based transport aggregator business too. The guidelines state that only companies which have obtained a valid licence from the Goa government can operate in the state. The aggregator should also either have a registered office in Goa or have a registered office somewhere in India, and a branch in Goa. The aggregator further has to ensure health insurance for drivers of not less than Rs 10 lakh with a 5 percent increase every year. According to the guidelines, the aggregator has to ensure that the cab owner receives at least the fare that has been prescribed by the government and not make any deductions from it. Moreover, the fare has to be settled with the taxi owner within 72 hours. In case the aggregator fails to settle the dues within the prescribed time frame, the company will have to shell out 25 percent of the dues as penalty for every day of delay. The guidelines also provide for a grievance redressal mechanism. (Edited by Nida Fatima Siddiqui) Also Read: The real problem to Goa tourism isn't from social media. Sea view homes are killing mangroves
India.com
31 minutes ago
- India.com
Followers of this religion are the richest in the world, Muslims only have...
There are over 7 billion individuals who adhere to various religions, traditions, and customs. They belong to a wide range of social and economic spheres: from the ultra-rich and wealthy elite to the middle class and poorer people. While speaking about the richest people in the world, Tesla's Elon Musk, Amazon's Jeff Bezos, Microsoft co-founder and philanthropist Bill Gates, and Meta's Mark Zuckerberg are some of the names that pop up in the minds of people. Not only are they among the wealthiest in the world, but they also have great power in controlling the world economy. We tend to look at rich people through different spectacles. Moreover, the amount of wealth that believers of many religions possess draws a bigger picture. A new global study has shown which religious denomination is richest worldwide. The research provides interesting facts about economic differences worldwide. Christians are reportedly the richest religious denomination worldwide, according to the report cited by Zeenews. Members of Christianity as a denomination own assets worth about $107.28 trillion, covering about 55% of global wealth, reported ZeeNews. This predominance can be attributed to industrialized countries like the United States, Canada, European nations, and Australia, where the majority are Christians. The Hindu community collectively holds around $655 billion in assets, a figure significantly lower compared to that of the Muslim community. One possible reason for this disparity is that a large number of Hindus live in developing or emerging economies. What's even more surprising is that despite having a relatively small global population, the Jewish community holds substantial wealth. Jews collectively own about $2.079 trillion in assets — more than three times the wealth of the Hindu community. This financial strength is often attributed to their strong presence in fields like education, technology, finance, and defense. Many Jewish individuals are prominently featured on billionaire lists. In the United States in particular, the Jewish community has had a significant social and economic impact. A significant portion of global wealth is also held by individuals who have no religious affiliation. According to recent study data, non-religious individuals collectively own $67.832 trillion in assets, accounting for 34.8% of the world's total wealth. This reflects a notable rise in the number of wealthy individuals who consider money their ultimate belief, without following any particular faith. From the United States to Western nations—especially in Europe—and across all seven continents, a deep analysis of the global population revealed some startling facts. Countries like India (with the highest population), followed by China, as well as nations with the largest Muslim populations and other religious demographics, were all considered in the study. Notably, the report also includes data on wealthy atheists, offering a broader perspective on wealth distribution beyond religious boundaries. When it comes to global wealth, followers of Islam—Muslims—hold the second-highest share. Collectively, Muslims possess assets worth approximately $11.335 trillion. Despite accounting for around 25% of the world's population, the Muslim community still holds the second-largest share of global wealth. This highlights their significant presence in global economic dynamics, particularly in regions rich in natural resources and emerging financial hubs.
Mint
39 minutes ago
- Mint
Why Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei thinks a 10-year AI regulation freeze is dangerous
Dario Amodei, Chief Executive of AI firm Anthropic, has criticised a Republican proposal to halt state-level regulation of artificial intelligence for ten years, calling the measure "far too blunt" in a sharply worded opinion piece published inThe New York Times. The proposal, reportedly embedded within former President Donald Trump's revived tax cut bill, seeks to prevent individual US states from enforcing their own AI regulations. This move, backers say, is intended to create a unified national framework. However, it has faced significant pushback, including from a bipartisan coalition of state attorneys general who have already enacted safeguards against high-risk AI use. You may be interested in Amodei, whose company is backed by Amazon, argued that the rapid pace of AI advancement demands a more agile and balanced approach. 'A 10-year moratorium is far too blunt an instrument. AI is advancing too head-spinningly fast,' he wrote. 'Without a clear plan for a federal response, a moratorium would give us the worst of both worlds — no ability for states to act, and no national policy as a backstop.' Instead, Amodei called for a coordinated effort between the White House and Congress to develop a federal transparency standard. Such a framework, he suggested, would compel AI developers to openly disclose their testing methods, risk mitigation strategies, and national security considerations prior to releasing advanced models. Anthropic already shares these details publicly, Amodei noted, and rivals OpenAI and Google DeepMind have adopted similar practices. However, he cautioned that voluntary transparency may not be sustainable as AI systems become more powerful and commercial stakes rise. 'Legislative incentives may become necessary to ensure this openness continues,' he said. Amodei's intervention adds weight to calls for a federal framework that preserves public safety while ensuring that innovation is not stifled, a balance that may prove increasingly difficult to strike as AI tools become more sophisticated and deeply embedded in daily life. (With inputs from Reuters)
