
Noel Clarke's wife tells court his accusers are liars who fabricated claims
Noel Clarke's wife has said his accusers are liars who have deliberately fabricated sexual misconduct claims about him.
Giving evidence in the actor's libel case against the Guardian, Iris Clarke said her husband was generous and caring, and that people he had worked with and helped had taken advantage of him.
Noel Clarke, 49, who wrote and produced the Kidulthood trilogy, is suing Guardian News and Media (GNM) over seven articles and a podcast published between April 2021 and March 2022.
Among GNM's witnesses are Gina Powell, a film producer and documentary maker, who worked for Clarke from 2014 to 2017 and alleges 'a pattern of abusive behaviour, financial exploitation, bullying and sexual misconduct'.
Iris Clarke said Powell had never seemed uncomfortable around her husband and so could not be telling the truth. 'She is a liar,' she said. 'She was not threatened or intimidated by him. I feel like she was infatuated with him.'
Asked by Gavin Millar KC, for GNM, how she could say Powell had never been uncomfortable away from her own presence, she replied: 'I am telling you, she was never uncomfortable around my husband, and even when she was not in my presence I could see she was not uncomfortable, or do I have to be physically beside her?'
She also accused Davie Fairbanks, a writer, director and former creative partner of her husband, of lying. Fairbanks's allegations include claims that Noel Clarke secretly filmed nude auditions and groped an actor at a wrap party.
Iris Clarke said Fairbanks had been like a brother to her husband but had been envious of him and deceitful. 'He would go around telling people not nice things about my husband to better himself,' she told the court. 'He's a liar … It's very clear he wanted to target my husband.'
She said the former Doctor Who star had tried to help Fairbanks when his friend's mother had died and with finding a place to live. She told the court she had warned her husband that Fairbanks was manipulative but he was 'always with his kind heart trying to help people'.
'Noel is a person who is too generous, he's too caring,' she said.
Earlier, completing his evidence on day four in the witness box, Noel Clarke said: 'I think the world has changed. I think things that were acceptable 10, 20 years ago are just no longer acceptable and throwing a blanket lens of 2021 on them is just not fair on anybody.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
32 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
How five men stole £4.75m toilet from Blenheim Palace in just five minutes
The full details of the raid and how two guilty suspects were brought to justice can be revealed JUSTICE CISTERN How five men stole £4.75m toilet from Blenheim Palace in just five minutes Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) AS bathroom breaks go, it was a quickie. Five men took just five minutes to steal a £4.75million solid gold toilet from Blenheim Palace, the Oxfordshire birthplace of Sir Winston Churchill. The gang smashed their way into the stately home with sledge- hammers in the early hours. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 9 A gang broke into Blenheim Palace to steal a £4.75million solid gold toilet Credit: PA 9 The raiders were armed with sledge-hammers and took just five minutes to seize the toilet Credit: Matrix Pictures 9 The criminals rolled the 98kg lavatory out of the palace and into a waiting VW Golf getaway car Credit: CPS Their goal was the 98kg 18-carat gold lavatory, an installation by conceptual artist Maurizio Cattelan called America that was installed in the palace just a week earlier. The masked raiders ripped the working WC from the wall, causing water to cascade from cut pipes, then rolled it out of the palace and into a waiting VW Golf getaway car. But within ten days of the audacious raid on September 14, 2019, police were being told the name of the man believed to be responsible: James 'Jimmy' Sheen. Detective Superintendent Bruce Riddell said 'community intelligence' — code for being ratted out — provided Sheen's name. The head of specialist operations at Thames Valley Police added: 'He went to hospital the day after for an injury to his hand, which we think he got from going through the window. "And as the investigations unfolded, thousands of the evidence exhibits were linked to him. 'On his phones we found voice messages of him trying to sell the gold. "Then we found traces of gold in his pockets, and in a flatbed lorry there was a pair of gloves containing fragments of the gold and his DNA.' 'Evidence overwhelming' The career criminal — a member of the traveller community — will have another four years to think about where his heist has landed him, added to the 19 years he is already doing inside. Jailing him at Oxford Crown Court yesterday, Judge Ian Pringle blasted: 'This bold and brazen heist took no more than five-and-a-half minutes to complete. 'America' has never been seen again.' Sir Winston Churchill's birthplace, Blenheim Palace, gets new autonomous robot tour guide that looks like Dalek from Doctor Who Sheen was out of jail on licence when he planned the Blenheim raid. He had received 14 years in 2010 when an innocent couple got caught in the spray from a shotgun during a shoot-out in Coventry with a rival traveller clan. Builder Sheen, 40, ran a burglary gang from his slick end-of-terrace home on an Oxford council estate. They broke into the National Horseracing Museum in Newmarket in May 2020, making off with the Ascot Gold Vase and two Doncaster cups, and stole tractors and other farm equipment, making an estimated £2.6million within a year. Sheen also conned elderly customers out of hundreds of thousands of pounds for dodgy building work. 9 James Sheen was already in jail for 19 years - and has had an extra four years added to the sentence Credit: PA 9 Co-defendant Michael Jones was locked up for 27 months for helping plan the raid Credit: PA Yesterday Oxford Crown Court heard how Sheen's burglaries had grown more bold. His lawyer, Michael Neofytou, described the raid as 'crude', adding: 'It didn't have the hallmarks of a sophisticated heist.' The burglary leader pleaded guilty to conspiracy to burgle. The evidence against James Sheen was so overwhelming he had no choice but to plead guilty. Det Supt Riddell Co-defendant Michael Jones, 39, who had worked for Sheen's building company, was locked up for 27 months for helping plan the raid. The roofer — first convicted at the age of 13 — was found guilty in March of burglary. Yesterday, a judge said he wasn't satisfied Jones was one of the five masked men who actually took the golden loo. He had denied that a visit to see the sparkly toilet the day before it was stolen was a reconnaissance trip, and described the experience of using it for real as 'splendid'. Sheen and four others smashed through two locked gates in a pair of stolen cars. They then broke a side window and splintered two more doors before prising the 18-carat loo from the wall. Sheen's DNA was found on one of the hammers that was left behind. Red-faced palace bosses admitted that the exhibit — which had been installed at Blenheim days earlier — was not covered by CCTV. Chief executive Dominic Hare later told the BBC: 'We took possession of this precious item and managed to lose it within a day.' Cops found a mountain of dodgy messages on Sheen's phone. Two days after the raid, as he was laid up in hospital having an operation on an infected hand, Sheen texted gold dealer pal Fred Doe: 'I got something right up your path.' 9 Sheen and four others smashed through two locked gates in a pair of stolen cars Credit: PA 9 Sheen's DNA was found on one of the hammers that was left behind in the raid Credit: CPS The pair tried to flog the loot in London's Hatton Garden area. Det Supt Riddell said: 'The evidence against James Sheen was so overwhelming he had no choice but to plead guilty.' None of the gold has ever been recovered — but cops believe the toilet was broken up between the five thieves. Prosecutors say Sheen had tried to sell the gold to Bora Guccuk, a boyfriend of glam Instagram model Chloe Othen, but the deal collapsed. Hatton Garden jeweller Guccuk, 41, was cleared of money laundering in March. Doe, 36, was found guilty but spared jail last month for his part in trying to sell on the metal. Sheen's WhatsApps suggest he pawned his share in Birmingham, pocketing £520,000. Det Supt Bruce Riddell is now focusing on recouping Sheen's ill-gotten gains. He said: 'Trading Standards have already identified almost £200,000 worth of assets that they're in the process of recovering.' The seasoned cop is also trying to bring the three other members of the five-strong heist gang to justice. He appealed for anyone with information about the outstanding raiders to come forward, adding: 'Relationships and allegiances change over the years.' 9 Red-faced palace bosses admitted the exhibit — which had been installed at Blenheim days earlier — was not covered by CCTV Credit: Getty


The Guardian
8 hours ago
- The Guardian
Reader Survey Prize Draw Terms and Conditions
All participants who enter their email address will be automatically entered into the prize draw with a chance to win a £250 John Lewis voucher. Only one entry per person is permitted. Entries will be open from Saturday 14 June to Sunday 22nd June 2025. Any entries submitted outside of the above dates will be excluded. One winner will be randomly selected on Monday 23 June 2025. Entrants must be 18+ and live in the UK. Entrants must share their email address at the end of the survey in order to be entered into the prize draw. The winner will be asked for their postal address in order to be sent the voucher. This prize draw ('the Prize Draw') is open to residents of the UK aged 18 and over. The Prize Draw is not open to employees or agents of Guardian News & Media Limited ('GNM'), their group companies or family members, freelance contributors to GNM, or anyone else connected to the Prize Draw. Entrants to the Prize Draw shall be deemed to have accepted these Terms and Conditions. The winner will be notified by email on or before Monday 30 June 2025 and their postal address will be requested. If a winner does not respond to GNM within 21 days of being notified of their win, the prize will be forfeited and GNM shall be entitled to randomly select another participant. If a winner rejects the prize or the entry is invalid or in breach of these terms, the winner's prize will be forfeited and GNM shall be entitled to select another winner. The surname and county of residence of the winning nominee can be obtained after Monday 23 June 2025 by sending a stamped addressed envelope to the following address: Publishing, Guardian News & Media Limited, Kings Place, 90 York Way, London N1 9GU. The prize is non-exchangeable, non-transferable and not redeemable for cash or any other prize. GNM reserves the right to substitute the prizes with an alternative prize of similar value in the event that the original prize offered is not available. GNM shall use and take care of any personal information entrants supply to it as described in its privacy policy, a copy of which can be seen at and in accordance with data protection legislation. By entering the Prize Draw, entrants agree to the collection, retention, usage and distribution of their personal information in order to process and contact them about the Prize Draw. GNM intends to make available the surname and county of residence of the winners as outlined in paragraph 5 above. GNM accepts no responsibility for any damage, loss, liabilities, injury or disappointment incurred or suffered by the entrants as a result of entering the Prize Draw or accepting the prize. GNM further disclaims liability for any injury or damage to the entrants' or any other person's computer relating to or resulting from participation in or downloading any materials in connection with the Prize Draw. Nothing in these Terms and Conditions shall exclude the liability of GNM under law for fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation, or for death or personal injury resulting from its negligence. GNM reserves the right at any time and from time to time to modify or discontinue, temporarily or permanently, this Prize Draw with or without prior notice due to reasons outside its reasonable control (including, without limitation, in the case of anticipated, suspected or actual fraud). The decision of GNM in all matters relating to the Prize Draw is final and no correspondence will be entered into. Delivery will take place within one month of the winner being notified subject to any unforeseen circumstances that might lead to a delay. GNM shall not be liable for any failure to comply with its obligations relating to this Prize Draw where the failure is caused by something outside its reasonable control. The Prize Draw and these Terms and Conditions will be governed by English law and entrants to the Prize Draw submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the English courts. Promoter: Guardian News & Media Limited, Kings Place, 90 York Way, London, N1 9GU. Any queries regarding this Prize Draw may be emailed to


The Guardian
10 hours ago
- The Guardian
Tell us your favourite new podcasts of 2025 so far
We would like to hear about the new podcasts you have particularly enjoyed listening to so far this year. Is there a podcast from this year that has you rapt? Are there any new releases that you would recommend? Tell us your nomination and why you like it below. You can tell us your favourite new podcast of the year so far using this form. Please include as much detail as possible. Please note, the maximum file size is 5.7 MB. Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian. Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian. If you include other people's names please ask them first.