Utah health department to lay off nearly 40 people after ‘unexpected' federal cuts
SALT LAKE CITY (ABC4) — The Utah Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) is laying off 37 employees after receiving an 'unexpected notification' that the federal health department was immediately reducing funding.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services notified Utah's department of a reduction in federal funding on Monday, March 24, according to DHHS. Today, 37 employees were told their positions will end on April 11.
Gov. Cox signs fluoridation ban into law – a nationwide first
DHHS also notified external health and mental health programs that were receiving funding from the grants about the reductions.
DHHS said the federal department is immediately ending six COVID-related grants that were planned to last through 2026. Officials said there was approximately $98 million remaining in the grants, which would have been used to fund 'public health functions and behavioral health services.'
'We are sorry to see these positions end early,' DHHS Director Tracy Gruber said. 'We consider them all public health heroes, many of whom joined our department when we needed to ramp up operations to keep Utahns safe during the global pandemic. These staff came in to serve the public at an incredibly difficult time.'
DHHS said it will be providing resources to help the employees whose positions were cut, adding that they are welcome to apply to other jobs within the department where possible. It said it hopes to 'retain the talent that has been showing up for this department since the pandemic.'
The layoffs come as the U.S. health department plans to lay off 10,000 workers from its federal agencies and shut down several others, including agencies that provide funding to addiction services and community health centers nationwide, according to the Associated Press.
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced the restructuring on Thursday, saying the department's 82,000 workers contributed to a decline in Americans' health.
'Public health has faced many challenges, and will undoubtedly face new challenges moving forward,' the DHHS press release read. 'We will continue to work with our dedicated, passionate, and incredibly talented partners at the state and local levels, community-based organizations, healthcare system, and legislative leadership to protect the public's health.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Most people are guilty of doing this in the shower — but experts warn it's incredibly dangerous: ‘Don't do it'
What you do in the shower is your business, but the one thing experts are warning you to stop doing while sudsing up: peeing. One healthcare expert shared in a now-viral TikTok with over 1 million views that emptying your bladder while standing in the shower can be damaging — especially for women. Advertisement 'Hot take but don't pee standing up in the shower or anywhere for that matter. Ladies, you are training your bladder that it's okay to empty while standing. Don't do it! This could cause bladder leakage,' @kingsley.502 wrote as her caption. As expected, people ran to the comment section to share their opinions on this advice. 'My body created a human… I'm gonna let her tinkle wherever she likes,' one commenter wrote. Advertisement 'I can't even enjoy the simple pleasures in life,' shared another frustrated person. 'Meanwhile sitting for too long messes with our pelvic floor. So what actually is ok anymore?' said someone else, making a valid point. Many people in the comments of the viral TikTok video were upset to learn of this news. uduhunt – It's no surprise that this news is upsetting for many, considering almost a quarter of Americans admit to peeing in the shower regularly, according to a survey. Advertisement Unfortunately for these multitasking people, @kingsley.502 wasn't far off with her opinion on shower peeing — as other experts backed up her claims. 'It is one, not very hygienic, but more important than that, it will destroy your pelvic floor, and also it might create mental associations where you hear water running and all of a sudden you need to run to the bathroom,' Houston-based OB-GYN Emma Qureshey explained in a TikTok. And standing while peeing is not only unhealthy for women — it's also dangerous for men. Advertisement Since the pelvis and spine muscles are most relaxed when sitting, Gerald Collins, a consultant urological surgeon at Alexandra Hospital in Cheshire, England, said that 'Sitting is probably the most efficient way of doing it [peeing]' the doctor explained, Standing while urinating also puts men at risk for benign prostatic hyperplasia — which occurs when the prostate gland and surrounding tissue expand, obstructing the urethra. Sadly, for many men, the thought of sitting while peeing is looked down upon. In Germany, those who don't stand to relieve themselves are called 'Sitzpinkler' — a slur implying they are 'wimpy or effeminate.'
Hamilton Spectator
5 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Over 1,300 Take Part in Stouffville 5K, $330K Raised for Markham Stouffville Hospital
Memorial Park buzzed with energy on Father's Day morning as more than 1,300 runners, joggers, walkers, and spectators gathered for the third annual Stouffville Main Street 5K. Hosted by the Town and the Office of Mayor Iain Lovatt, $330,000 has been raised in support of Markham Stouffville Hospital (MSH) this year. Over the last three years, Stouffville has raised over $875,000 for MSH. Opening the event, Mayor Lovatt applauded participants for their efforts. 'Thank you for your hard work and dedication to fundraising. In our first two years of this event, we have raised over $545,000,' Lovatt told the crowd. 'Your donations directly support lifesaving equipment and essential services at Markham Stouffville Hospital.' This year's cheque presentation included more than $40,000 raised by participating runners. Additional fundraising and sponsorships brought the 5K event total to $110,000, with the remaining funds coming from the Mayor's 2025 Charity Golf Classic. 'Today is more than just about giving back. It's about celebrating the compassionate, selfless, and dedicated frontline healthcare workers who care for us, for our families, our friends, and our loved ones every single day,' Lovatt said. Markham Stouffville Hospital is celebrating its 35th anniversary this year, having been built in 1990 on land donated by Stouffville's Arthur Latcham. Suzette Strong, CEO of the MSH Foundation, thanked the Mayor and Town Staff while emphasizing the importance of community-driven fundraising. 'What a lot of people don't realize is that the government doesn't fund everything,' said Strong. 'Of the funds raised today, 100% of those proceeds go back into the hospital to invest in important things like beds, incubators, and diagnostic services. So thank you for being a part of raising money to keep Markham Stouffville Hospital on the leading edge of healthcare.' The race also featured standout performances by local athletes. Seventeen-year-old Marek St. Croix took first place with a time of 16 minutes and 33 seconds, improving on his fifth-place finish last year. Remy Chadwick placed second at 16:43, followed by Sebastian Blair Reynoso in third at 17:02. Thirteen-year-old Sawyer Nicholson, the Stouffville runner who set a world record at age 11 for the fastest 5K in her age group, was the first female to cross the finish line. She placed 10th overall with a time of 18 minutes and 13 seconds. Before the race, Nicholson shared words of encouragement with the crowd, recounting how she discovered running during the COVID-19 pandemic and has since broken more than 10 records. 'Back then, I didn't know how that first run would change me. But it did, step by step. It gave me clarity, it gave me strength, and most importantly, it gave me hope,' she said. 'Every step you take supports the Markham Stouffville Hospital, a place that has been there for so many of our families, neighbours, and friends,' Nicholson added. 'So if you're feeling nervous or unsure of how far or how fast you'll go today, just remember every journey begins with a single step. Those first few steps you take could be the beginning of something that changes your life, just like it changed mine.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
The Hill
6 hours ago
- The Hill
How Kennedy's overhaul could make vaccines more expensive
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s moves to upend decades of vaccine policy could hit patients hardest in their wallets, as shifting guidance over shots could make insurance coverage confusing and scattershot. For decades, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) independent advisory panel recommended which shots Americans should get and when. The Affordable Care Act requires all insurance companies to cover, for free, all vaccines the panel recommends. Those recommendations also help states decide which shots should be mandated for schoolchildren. Kennedy's most recent move to purge the entire advisory panel and replace them with his own handpicked members, including several vocal vaccine critics, is throwing that process into doubt. 'If we have a system that has been dismantled — one that allowed for open, evidence-based decisionmaking and that supported transparent and clear dialogue about vaccines — and then we replace it with a process that's driven largely by one person's beliefs, that creates a system that cannot be trusted,' Helen Chu, a newly ousted member of the panel and professor of infectious disease at the University of Washington School of Medicine, said during a press conference. Vaccine prices vary, but without insurance, coronavirus vaccines can cost nearly $150, the MMR shot ranges from $95 to nearly $280, and the HPV vaccine can exceed $300, according to CDC data. Individual pharmacies could charge even more. Candace DeMatteis, policy director at the Partnership to Fight Infectious Disease, said she worries about creating a two-tiered system. 'Out of pocket costs for vaccines become an issue where we could end up with a system where some people can afford vaccinating themselves and their families and others cannot,' DeMatteis said. Prior to enactment of the Affordable Care Act, vaccine coverage varied significantly depending on the type of insurance a person had. If the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) changes recommendations for existing vaccines or doesn't recommend new ones, maintaining access will be difficult. 'It's a seismic shift, if you will, away from facilitating access by removing coverage and cost barriers, to one where there's great uncertainty and coverage and cost issues become barriers,' DeMatteis said. It's not clear what the vetting process was for the eight people Kennedy appointed to the ACIP, or how prepared they will be for their first meeting, which is scheduled to occur in less than two weeks. According to a Federal Register notice, the panel is scheduled to vote on recommendations for COVID-19 vaccines as well as meningococcal, HPV, influenza, and RSV vaccines for adults and maternal and pediatric populations. Health experts said they have serious questions about what direction the new panel will take and whether Americans will still have access to free vaccines, including the coronavirus shot, in time for fall respiratory season. If the ACIP is no longer a reliable, independent authority on vaccines, it 'will be replaced by a patchwork of different policies by different states, and each state will have to make its own decisions,' Chu said. 'Washington state is a place where we have experts and scientists who work together. There are other states where this may not exist, or where they may not choose to recommend vaccines. So that is going to create a lot of chaos,' she added. Some state health officials have already begun taking steps in that direction. The Illinois Department of Health said on social media it will be convening its own vaccine advisory committee and national experts 'to ensure we continue to provide clear, science-backed vaccine guidance for our residents.' When Kennedy unilaterally changed the COVID-19 vaccine guidance earlier this month to remove recommendations for pregnant women and change the open recommendation for children, the Wisconsin Department of Health Services said it would continue to recommend the shots for every person at least 6 months old. 'The recent changes in CDC guidance were not made based on new data, evidence, or scientific or medical studies, nor was the guidance issued following normal processes,' the agency said in a statement. Tina Tan, president of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, said her organization as well as other major medical groups including the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics Academy have been speaking with insurance companies to urge them to continue paying for shots, even if the panel changes recommendations. Tan mentioned an initiative launched in April by a group of public health experts called the Vaccine Integrity Project, which is working to create an alternative process to maintain vaccine access. The initiative is funded by a foundation backed by Walmart heiress Christy Walton and led by Michael Osterholm, director of the University of Minnesota's Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy. Federal law is specific that insurance provisions are tied to the ACIP. Specialty organizations may have expertise to make their own recommendations, but they will still require the cooperation of insurance companies. States are also more limited, and they don't have the same power as the federal government to force coverage. 'I think it remains to be seen what the insurers are going to do,' Tan said. 'However, hopefully, with the discussions going on, they can get the insurers to understand that vaccines are extraordinarily safe and effective and are the best tool that we have to protect persons of all ages against serious vaccine preventable diseases.'
