Hollywood boosts female leads but lags in people of color, report finds
LOS ANGELES, Feb 11 (Reuters) - Out of the top 100 movies in 2024, more than half featured a story centered on a female actor as a lead or co-lead, the first time representation has been above the U.S. Census where girls and women comprise 50.5% of the population, a 2025 report from the University of Southern California found.
However, representation fell for people of color in film, the report said.
The USC Annenberg Inclusion Initiative examined 1,800 top-grossing films from 2007 to 2024 and assessed the gender, race and ethnicity as well as the ages of the leading and co-leading actors for each movie.
'This is the first time we can say that gender equality has been reached in top-grossing films,' said Dr. Stacy L. Smith, founder of the USC Annenberg Inclusion Initiative.
"This is not the result of an economic awakening, but is due to a number of different constituencies and efforts - at advocacy groups, at studios, through DEI initiatives - to assert the need for equality on screen," Smith added.
Films like"Wicked" with lead Cynthia Erivo, " Anora" with lead Mikey Madison and Anya Taylor-Joy in "Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga" set the stage for these gains in Hollywood gender equality.
Out of the 100 top-grossing films of 2024, 54 featured a girl or woman in a lead or co-lead role, the USC report said.
This reflects an increase from 2023, when only 30 movies featured a female-identified protagonist.
Over half of the films distributed by Universal Pictures (66.7%), Warner Bros. Pictures (55.6%)and Lionsgate (54.5%) featured a female actor as the lead or co-lead of the story, the report found.
About 40% or more of films were centered on a female lead or co-lead at Paramount Pictures (44.4%), Walt Disney Studios (40%) and Sony Pictures Entertainment (38.5%).
However, leads and co-leads from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups have declined significantly, as only 25 of the top 100 films featured a lead of color in 2024, a decrease from 2023, when 37 leads or co-leads were people of color.
A third of all Paramount Pictures films released in 2024 featured a lead or co-lead of color, with Lionsgate (27.3%) and Universal Pictures (26.7%) having similar demographics.
Walt Disney Studios (20%), Sony Pictures Entertainment (15.4%) and Warner Bros. Pictures (11.1%) reflected even lower numbers.
In 2024, no distributors reached proportional representation with the U.S. Census (41.6%).
'This downturn signifies a lack of investment in storytelling that reflects the audience as a whole,' Smith said.
'The reality is that audiences want to see stories about women and people of color — studios and filmmakers do not have to choose between the two,' she added.
Thirteen films in 2024 had a woman of color lead or co-lead, which is similar to USC's 2023 report and higher than the 2007 report.
'While this year's findings mark a historic step towards proportional representation for women there is still work to be done for women of color,' said Katherine Neff, the study's lead author.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
7 hours ago
- Reuters
Disney, Universal sue image creator Midjourney for copyright infringement
LOS ANGELES, June 11 (Reuters) - Walt Disney (DIS.N), opens new tab and Comcast's (CMCSA.O), opens new tab Universal filed a copyright lawsuit against Midjourney on Wednesday, calling its popular AI-powered image generator a "bottomless pit of plagiarism" for its use of the studios' best-known characters. The suit, filed in federal district court in Los Angeles, claims Midjourney pirated the libraries of the two Hollywood studios, making and distributing without permission "innumerable" copies of characters such as Darth Vader from "Star Wars," Elsa from "Frozen," and the Minions from "Despicable Me". The studios claim the San Francisco company rebuffed their request to stop infringing their copyrighted works or, at a minimum, take technological measures to halt the creation of these AI-generated characters. Instead, the studios argue, Midjourney continued to release new versions of its AI image service that boast higher quality infringing images. Midjourney recreates animated images from a typed request, or prompt. In the suit filed by seven corporate entities at the studios that own or control copyrights for the various Disney and Universal Pictures film units, the studios offered examples of Midjourney animations that include Disney characters, such as Yoda wielding a lightsaber, Bart Simpson riding a skateboard, Marvel's Iron Man soaring above the clouds and Pixar's Buzz Lightyear taking flight. The image generator also recreated such Universal characters as "How to Train Your Dragon's" dragon, Toothless, the green ogre "Shrek," and Po from "Kung Fu Panda." "By helping itself to plaintiffs' copyrighted works, and then distributing images (and soon videos) that blatantly incorporate and copy Disney's and Universal's famous characters -- without investing a penny in their creation -- Midjourney is the quintessential copyright free-rider and a bottomless pit of plagiarism," the suit alleges. "Midjourney's infringement is calculated and willful." Disney and Universal asked the court for a preliminary injunction, to prevent Midjourney from copying their works, or offering its image- or video-generation service without protections against infringement. The studios also seek unspecified damages. The suit alleges Midjourney used the studios' works to train its image service and generate reproductions of their copyrighted characters. The company, founded in 2021 by David Holz, monetizes the service through paid subscriptions and generated $300 million in revenue last year alone, the studios said. This is not the first time Midjourney has been accused of misusing artists' work to train their AI systems. A year ago, a California federal judge found that 10 artists behind a copyright infringement suit against Midjourney, Stability AI and other companies had plausibly argued these AI companies had copied and stored their work on company servers, and could be liable for using it without permission. That ruling allowed the lawsuit over the unauthorized use of images to proceed. It is in the process of litigation. In a 2022 interview with Forbes, CEO Holz said he built the company's database by performing "a big scrape of the Internet." Asked whether he sought consent of the artists whose work was covered by copyright, he responded, "there isn't really a way to get a hundred million images and know where they're coming from."
The Guardian
11 hours ago
- The Guardian
Look at the head on that! Bottoms up to a pint of 28 Years Later beer
With ticket sales no longer a sure thing, additional income streams have become more important than ever to the movie business. If you want to know how much faith a studio has in a property, your best bet is to look out for licensed merchandise. This is why Wicked partnered with 400 corporate brands ahead of its release last year and why every shop on the high street is heaving with Lilo & Stitch merch. It's why the last bag of Doritos you ate had Jack Black's face on it. But this strategy isn't failsafe. Yes, if you're promoting a big four-quadrant blockbuster, it's easy to team up with companies who'll paste their products with adverts for your film. However, if your film is too small, or too sad, or too weird, then any sort of brand collaboration is going to seem an extremely odd fit. In other words, can I interest anyone in a pint of 28 Years Later beer? No, really. This week a press release announced that 'independent craft beer mavericks' Tiny Rebel are 'dialling up the chaos' by launching two new official 28 Years Later IPAs. One of them is a 'blood orange liqueur-infused IPA with an infectiously juicy bite', the other is a 'tropical pineapple IPA that's as bold as it is refreshing', and both are 'inspired by the ferocious energy and apocalyptic vibes of the new 28 Years Later film, bringing fans a taste experience as intense as the film itself'. Which isn't to say that the beers sound bad. Maybe they're a bit try-hard, sure, and aimed slightly too aggressively at 40-year-old men who wear little tiny beanie hats, but each to their own. Nevertheless, I cannot legitimately think of a situation where I'd walk into a pub and deliberately seek out a beer with palpably apocalyptic vibes. There is no feasible way that – were I to point at a beer and ask the server 'Is this intense?' and they reply 'Yes, it is exactly as intense as that film where an emaciated zombie gets machine-gunned to death by a screaming soldier as it kills and eats his friend' – I would say 'Ooh, that sounds nice. One of those please.' Again, this isn't a knock against 28 Years Later. Based on everything we've seen so far it looks like exactly the sort of poundingly intense folk horror that we don't make any more. It looks like a film (and this is a compliment) where you don't want to walk home alone in the dark after the credits roll. I am extremely excited to see it. The problem is trying to marry this sense of oppressive dread to happy funtimes. And this has always been an issue with this particular series. Nine years ago, I was asked to go and watch 28 Days Later at a screening hosted by the immersive Secret Cinema group. And I had such a crap time. Had I been sent to go and see (for example) Grease, it would have been a different matter entirely. If I'd seen Grease, I'd have been surrounded by cool cars and gum-popping girls and spontaneous dance parties. But no. I went to see 28 Days Later, which meant that it was full of extras in military uniforms angrily yelling at everyone, and a siren that went off every five minutes requiring all the ticketholders to crouch down for an arbitrary amount of time for no specific reason, and really overpriced cheeseburgers. All of which is perfectly in keeping with the tone of the film, but as a mode of entertainment in itself it was excruciatingly bad. That's the problem, really. 28 Days Later is a masterpiece – and the same might be said for the new sequel – but it isn't one you necessarily want to live inside. You're meant to survive it, not sip it. The fact that there's a branded tie-in beer is probably just a reflection of the world we live in, but you could argue that the fact it exists in the first place only detracts from the film as a piece of art. So thanks but no thanks. If I wanted a pint that feels like the end of the world, there's a Wetherspoons just down the road.
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
George Clooney, 63, reveals BIG pop star his twins, 8, want to meet but the only problem is he's NOT friends with her
George Clooney made some very rare comments about his twin children who are eight years old. When at the Tony Awards the 63-year-old said that Ella and Alexander love celebrities, just no one he is familiar with. And he has a lot of close pals: Brad Pitt, Robert De Niro and Julia Roberts are just a few. His little ones - whom he shares with wife of 11 years Amal, 47 - tend to like the stars that dad is not friends with. One of their top idols is the number one pop icon at the moment. 'They want to see Taylor Swift,' said Clooney to E! News. Swift has currently been taking a break from touring and staying out of the spotlight with boyfriend Travis Kelce, a tight end for the Kansas City Chiefs. One of their top idols is the number one pop icon at the moment. 'They want to see Taylor Swift,' said Clooney to E! News. Swift has currently been taking a break from touring and staying out of the spotlight with boyfriend Travis Kelce. Seen in February in Los Angeles He also said that they were big fans of Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande in Wicked and are 'looking forward to the second part,' which will be released in theaters on November 21, 2025. As far as Clooney's inner circle, the tots are not impressed. 'The funniest part is that they have no idea of references. Robert De Niro will be at the house, and they're like, "Who's that?" They don't care,' said the actor. He also praised his wife, who is a known human rights lawyer, for being such an 'incredible partner' that he is 'lucky' to have. 'I have this incredible partner who I couldn't be more proud of. She's the bravest human being I've ever met in my life. I am deeply proud of her and the fact that she's in any way proud of me, if just, I can't believe how lucky I am,' said Clooney. He was a hit at the Tonys held at Radio City Music Hall in NYC on June 8. George dyed his famous salt and pepper locks dark brown back in March for his role as legendary newsman Edward R. Murrow in his Broadway show Good Night And Good Luck. While the temporary hair might not impressed many, his work in the play certainly did - he was nominated for the Tony for Best Performance By An Actor In A Leading Role In A Play, but the award ultimately went to Cole Escola for his performance in Oh, Mary! They were shielded by an umbrella as they headed to Radio City Music Hall, where the awards show is being held As far as Clooney's inner circle, the tots are not impressed. 'The funniest part is that they have no idea of references. Robert De Niro will be at the house, and they're like, "Who's that?" They don't care,' said the actor. Robert seen with Tiffany Chen on May 13 in Cannes The actor looked in his element as he confidently posed on the red carpet with Amal by his side. They even showed some PDA with Amal - who has been married to George since 2014 and shares eight-year-old twins Ella and Alexander with him - planting a kiss on him. It comes after George endured ridicule over his shock hairstyle. Fans have shared been sharing their disapproval of his new darker hair and orange fake tan, with some admitting it makes him look '20 years older' Others joked he's put a 'full blown black sharpie on his hair' as they begged for him to wash out the hair dye. They wrote on X: 'Weird seeing George Clooney once had non-grey hair. I figured he popped out of the womb a silver fox!', 'What in the Sam Hell is that awful dye job on George Clooney? He looks pathetic'. George himself even admitted during a recent interview on CBS Mornings he knows his hair isn't good and said he still isn't used to the new look himself. Gayle King said: 'I have to take a moment looking at you with the dark hair.' 'I know it's not good!' George interjected. Gayle added: 'I didn't say it wasn't good!' 'Oh, It's not good! I'm not used to it, you never get used to it. Listen, I started getting grey when I was 25 so I've been grey most of my life so it's not my favorite look. 'And my wife, she thinks it's funny,' he said, adding their children 'laugh' at his hair. 'Honestly nothing makes you look older than being 63 and dying your hair,' he said. The play is based on his 2005 film of the same name which he previously wrote, directed and starred in. In his 2005 film, David Strathairn played the lead role, while George took a supporting role as CBS President Fred Friendly, in addition to working behind the camera. The movie, which was shot in black-and-white, focused on Murrow's reports on Senator Joseph McCarthy's unfounded claims of communist infiltration in the US government. This leads to a fiery confrontation between the two men on Murrow's CBS broadcast ahead of the senator's humiliation at the Army–McCarthy hearings and subsequent censure from the Senate.
