Proposed Louisiana law would expand definition of ‘coerced abortion'
State Rep. Josh Carlson, right, shown speaking with Rep. Rodney Lyons in the Louisiana House of Representatives, has filed legislation that would update the definition of coerced abortion in state law. (Allison Allsop/Louisiana Illuminator)
A state lawmaker has filed a bill that would significantly expand the definition of 'coerced abortion,' potentially making reproductive health laws in Louisiana even more restrictive.
The proposed legislation, House Bill 425, builds on the existing definition of coerced abortion, first approved in 2018, as one committed by a person who engages in the 'use or threatened use of force, control, or intimidation' against a pregnant woman to compel her to undergo an abortion against her will. The existing law already defines this as a crime 'whether or not the abortion procedure has been attempted or completed.'
Rep. Josh Carlson, R-Lafayette, who authored the bill, proposes replacing the word 'intentionally' with 'knowingly' and removes 'physical' to describe the use of force or intimidation.
The bill also details 18 examples of force, control or intimidation and removes references to outpatient abortion facilities.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Some of the examples of coercion are specific, such as kidnapping or blackmail, but others leave wide room for interpretation.
One example says 'restraint of speech or communication with others' can count as intimidation or control, including 'interference with the use of mail, telephone, or money.' Another cites 'isolation of an individual from others' or 'exploitation of needs for food, shelter, safety, affection,or intimate or marital relationships.'
Michelle Erenberg, who leads the reproductive rights group Lift Louisiana, said Carlson's bill is an attempt to weaponize the law.
'The law already prohibits coercing someone into having an abortion,' Erenberg said in an emailed statement to the Illuminator. 'Expanding the definition of what coercion means to include such broad categories is just another way to weaponize the law against anyone who may be trying to help someone access care. The real problem we should be trying to solve is people being forced by the state to carry pregnancies to term that they don't want or that may threaten their health.'
Carlson's proposal follows last year's creation of the new crime of coerced abortion using an abortion-inducing drug. That legislation made national headlines last year because it included a last-minute reclassification of mifepristone and misoprostol as 'controlled dangerous substances,' making Louisiana the first state to classify these drugs in the same family as addictive painkillers.
While the drugs are used for abortion, they also have many other medical uses including inducing labor and preventing or stopping postpartum hemorrhages.
State Sen. Thomas Pressly, R-Shreveport, who sponsored the abortion drug law, declined to comment on Carlson's bill, saying he had not yet reviewed the legislation.
Earlier this year, a grand jury indicted a Port Allen mother for allegedly giving her minor teen daughter abortion medication. The Illuminator is not identifying the mother to protect her daughter's privacy.
The grand jury also indicted the New York physician who allegedly wrote and shipped the prescription to Louisiana. Gov. Kathy Hochul has cited her state's shield laws and refused to extradite Dr. Margaret Carpenter.
The mother pleaded not guilty in March. Prosecutors have repeatedly claimed she 'coerced' her daughter into taking the abortion medication by threatening to kick her out of the house if she didn't. However, prosecutors notably did not seek an indictment related to the crime of coerced abortion, given the current definition.
The allegations against her are covered under the expanded definition in Carlson's bill because the incident could be considered 'exploitation of needs for shelter.'
Louisiana Right to Life told WWNO-FM its staff helped draft Carlson's bill, claiming it's 'common ground for most Louisianians.' The anti-abortion organization, which also helped draft Pressly's bill, has called the Port Allen case an example of why the definition of coerced abortion needs to be expanded.
Carlson's proposed legislation would punish anyone who commits the crime with a $5,000 fine or imprisonment with or without hard labor for up to five years.
Carlson was unavailable for an interview Monday.
Correction: This report was updated to accurately reflect the criminal charges against the Port Allen woman.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Seth Meyers Roasts Elon Musk For Waiting Until Now to Allege ‘That Trump Might Be a Pedophile': ‘You Already Knew That and It Wasn't a Dealbreaker'
After Elon Musk alleged in a post on X that President Trump's name appears in documents from Jeffrey Epstein's child sex trafficking case, Seth Meyers has pointed out one troubling aspect of the spat: It seems that Musk didn't share the information until much later than he allegedly learned it. Musk, who was a friend and administrative figure for Trump until very recently, ignited a feud with the president by criticizing the 'Big Beautiful Bill,' which passed in the U.S. House of Representatives and is now moving to the Senate. On Monday, Musk wrote on X that the 'massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' and the two have continued trading insults in the media since. That tension reached a major turning point on Thursday, when Musk posted, 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.' More from Variety Elon Musk Claims Donald Trump 'Is in the Epstein Files': 'That Is the Real Reason They Haven't Been Made Public' Donald Trump Says Elon Musk Has 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' as Rift Grows: 'I Don't Know If We Will' Have a 'Great Relationship' Anymore Jimmy Kimmel Roasts Trump for Sharing 'Deranged' Theory Claiming Biden Is a Robot Clone: 'This Is Deeply Nuts... if Your Dad Was Saying This, You'd Look for an Assisted Living Facility' The feud was the subject of the 'Late Night' segment 'A Closer Look' on Thursday, with Meyers saying, 'In the span of three hours, they went from Elon criticizing the bill to Trump threatening to take Elon's contracts away to Elon suggesting that Trump might be a pedophile. Also, if we're to take you at your word, Elon, you already knew that, and it wasn't a dealbreaker.' Later in the segment, Meyers added, 'It's as clear as ever that neither of these guys really believe in anything. Elon spent nearly $300 million to get Republicans elected, and now he's shocked that they're doing the thing everyone said they would do. And in the process, Trump used Elon to get back into power. You know, in a way, they were right. Watching these guys destroy each other is both 'big' and 'beautiful.'' Stephen Colbert made similar comments during his 'Late Show' monologue on Thursday. 'By the way, Elon, a little late on that intel. 'Donald Trump is a sexual predator that preyed on young women, which is something I've only decided to tell you because he hurt my feelings. I am the hero of the story!'' he said sarcastically. 'Trump's gonna have to get one of those bumper stickers for his Tesla that says, 'I bought this before Elon told everyone I was on Epstein's plane.'' Best of Variety New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week Emmy Predictions: Animated Program — Can Netflix Score Big With 'Arcane,' 'Devil May Cry' and the Final Season of 'Big Mouth?' What's Coming to Netflix in June 2025

4 hours ago
Michigan House Republicans sue the secretary of state over election training materials
KALAMAZOO, Mich. -- Michigan Republicans are suing the battleground state's top elections executive over access to election training materials. The lawsuit filed Thursday is the latest escalation in a brewing dispute that began when the GOP took majority control of the state's House of Representatives last year. Since winning control of the chamber in the 2024 election, statehouse Republicans have repeatedly scrutinized the state's election processes and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, a Democrat who is running for governor in 2026. The conflict comes as some state Republicans echo past false claims of election fraud in Michigan, which was a prime target of President Donald Trump and his backers after his 2020 election loss. Republicans on the chamber's Oversight Committee subpoenaed Benson in April, seeking access to training materials for local clerks and staff who administer elections, including access to the Bureau of Elections' online learning portal. Benson's office released some requested materials in response to the subpoena, but not all, citing cybersecurity and physical security concerns related to administering elections and the voting process. The office has said it needs to review the online portal for 'sensitive information" and make redactions. 'Since the beginning of this saga, Secretary Benson has asked lawmakers to let a court review their request for sensitive election information that, in the wrong hands, would compromise the security of our election machines, ballots and officials,' Michigan Department of State spokesperson Cheri Hardmon said in a statement Thursday. House Republicans say the goal of reviewing the material is to ensure clerks are trained in accordance with Michigan law. The House voted along party lines in May to hold Benson in contempt for not completely complying with the subpoena. The request for training materials originally came from GOP state Rep. Rachelle Smit, who has pushed false claims that the 2020 election was stolen. Smit is the chair of the House elections committee, which was renamed to the Elections Integrity Committee with the new Republican majority. 'Secretary Benson has proven she is unwilling to comply with our subpoena and Michigan law,' Rep. Smit said in a statement Thursday. 'She's skirted the rules and done whatever she could to avoid public scrutiny. It's become overwhelmingly clear that she will never release the training materials we're looking for without direction from a court." The lawsuit asks the Michigan Court of Claims to intervene and compel Benson to comply with the subpoena. 'The public interest is best served if the constitutional order of the State of Michigan is preserved and the Legislature can properly perform its duty to regulate the manner of elections in the state and, if deemed necessary, enact election laws for the benefit of Michigan residents,' the lawsuit says. Benson gained national attention for defending the results of the 2020 election in the face of Trump's attempts to undercut the outcome nationwide and in Michigan. Multiple audits — including one conducted by the then-Republican-controlled Michigan Senate — concluded former President Joe Biden won the state in 2020 and that there was no widespread or systemic fraud. Benson has remained a subject of GOP scrutiny this year. A Republican state representative introduced three articles of impeachment against Benson on Tuesday, and several of the accusations continue to cast doubts on the results of the 2020 election. With Democrats in control of the state Senate, it's unlikely the impeachment articles will result in a conviction.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
R.I. House approves assault-style weapons ban, sending high-profile legislation to the Senate
Rep. Jason Knight, a Barrington Democrat, defends his bill to ban assault-style weapons during debate on the House floor on June 5, 2025. (Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current) The Rhode Island House of Representatives on Thursday approved much-anticipated legislation banning the sale and manufacturing of a range of semiautomatic weapons in Rhode Island starting in July 2026. The 43-28 vote came after nearly five hours of debate and nine failed attempts by House Republicans to change the bill sponsored by Rep. Jason Knight, a Barrington Democrat. All 10 Republicans voted against the bill, along with 17 Democrats and the chamber's lone independent. 'We have an obligation to protect the community we live in,' Knight said on the House floor. 'Mass shootings are a real problem — it could happen here and we have a chance to minimize the chances.' Twenty-three state representatives voted against the assault-style weapons ban bill. Opponents included all 10 chamber Republicans: House Minority Leader Mike Chippendale, Richard Fascia, Marie Hopkins, George Nardone, Brian Newberry, Christopher Paplauskas, David Place, Robert Quattrocchi, Sherry Roberts and Paul Santucci Another 17 Democrats also opposed the ban: Samuel Azzinaro, Jacquelyn Baginski, David Bennett, Stephen Casey, Gregory Costantino, Megan Cotter, Deborah Fellela, Brian Kennedy, Charlene Lima, Thomas Noret, William O'Brien, Ramon Perez, Robert Phillips, Earl Read, Patricia Serpa, and Joseph Solomon. Also opposed was Rep. Jon Brien, the only independent. In introducing Knight's legislation to the floor, House Judiciary Chairman Robert Craven, a North Kingstown Democrat, said the legislation is justified if just one life is saved by banning assault-style weapons. 'One of the things I learned as a prosecutor many years ago was there's no undoing someone being dead,' Craven said. 'There's no retreat from that — dead is dead.' But opponents argued the bill's language is too broad and would not reduce gun violence. Many said it would criminalize responsible gun owners. 'This piece of legislation's true goal, as evidenced by its language, is clouded at best and disingenuous at worst,' said Rep. Arthur Corvese, a North Providence Democrat. The legislation, which was already revised before advancing out of committee earlier this week, would prohibit the sale and manufacturing of assault-style shotguns, handguns, and rifles beginning July 1, 2026. Weapons are defined as any semiautomatic firearm that has the ability to accept a detachable magazine and has at least one attachment such as stocks, pistol grips, and barrel shrouds. Certain .22 caliber rimfire rifles and Olympic-style target pistols would still be allowed. Assault-style firearms purchased before July 2026 would also be exempt from the legislation, along with weapons passed down through family. Violators of the proposed ban would face up to 10 years in prison, a fine of up to $10,000 and forfeiting their assault-style weapons. Gun owners could voluntarily register their weapons with police to receive a certificate of possession — a provision that has drawn the ire of opponents. 'If you are found to be in possession of one of these firearms and do not have this voluntary certificate you are handcuffed, you are printed, you are booked, you are arraigned, you go to pre-trial, you go to a trial,' said House Minority Leader Mike Chippendale, a Foster Republican. 'After maybe two years you can provide proof you owned the firearm before July 1, 2026.' Chippendale also argued that the bill's language is unclear on where gun owners could use their grandfathered weapons, saying that it would bar hunting. Rep. Joseph McNamara, a Warwick Democrat, said weapons subject to the proposed ban are not meant for hunting. 'If you need an AK-47 to hunt ducks, maybe you should take up bowling,' he said. House Republicans introduced nine floor amendments to address their issues with Knight's bill, but each were rejected. Democratic Reps. Mia Ackerman of Cumberland, John Edwards of Tiverton, Raymond Hull of Providence, and Alex Marszalkowski of Cumberland were not present for the vote. Rep. Kathleen Fogarty, a South Kingstown Democrat, voted by proxy in favor of the bill. The policy now rests with the Senate for consideration. Companion legislation introduced by Sen. Lou DiPalma, a Middletown Democrat, has 23 additional sponsors, including Senate President Valarie Lawson. DiPalma's bill was heard by the Senate Committee on Judiciary on May 14, where it remains under review. Three Democrats who serve on the committee voiced opposition to the proposal during the initial hearing on DiPalma's bill. Senate Majority Leader Frank Ciccone, a Providence Democrat and federal firearms dealer, has also said he does not support banning assault-style weapons as drafted. Knight's changes have not swayed his stance, Ciccone said in an interview Thursday. Lawson remains committed to seeing the proposal hit the Senate floor, chamber spokesperson Greg Paré said in an email. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX