logo
GOP lawmakers reintroduce constitutional amendment to radically overhaul state Senate districts

GOP lawmakers reintroduce constitutional amendment to radically overhaul state Senate districts

Yahoo05-03-2025

North Carolina Legislative Building (Photo: Clayton Henkel)
Experts say it would run afoul of the U.S. Constitution and long-established U.S. Supreme Court precedent, but that hasn't deterred a group of Republican members of the state House from reintroducing an amendment to the state constitution that would dramatically alter how North Carolinians elect state senators.
Under the proposal, each of the state's 50 senators would represent two of the state's 100 counties, rather than a roughly equal number of state residents, as is the case now. Rep. Jay Adams (R-Catawba), who is one of the measure's chief sponsors, filed House Bill 234, which is entitled 'Little Federal Model NC Edition,' on Feb. 26. Adams introduced the same proposal in 2023, but it died in committee.
The General Assembly would have jurisdiction to decide which two counties would make up each senatorial district. The current state House electoral system would be unaffected.
The proposal would almost certainly have the effect of further expanding Republican dominance in the Senate — where it currently enjoys a 30-20 advantage — by allotting many more senators to conservative, rural areas.
Wake and Mecklenburg counties, the homes of Raleigh and Charlotte, respectively, are the state's most populous. They each have six senators representing portions of the counties in the 2025-2026 legislative session, according to the General Assembly's website.
Of these 12 lawmakers, only one is Republican: Rep. Vickie Sawyer, whose district covers part of Mecklenburg County and all of Iredell County.
If the proposed amendment were to become law, one senator would represent Wake and a neighboring county — the text declares districts must consist of 'contiguous territory.'
This means that instead of six Democratic lawmakers representing portions of Wake County, there would be only one, whose constituency would be comprised of North Carolina's most populous county and an additional adjoining county.
In contrast, the district of Republican Sen. Ralph Hise — chair of the Senate Elections Committee — covers nine western counties in the current legislative session. For seven of these, he is the county's sole senator.
Under the proposed measure, Hise would represent two counties. The other five counties for which he is the currently lone senator would be assigned to different districts, almost assuredly increasing Republican representation in the upper chamber.
As these counties are less populous, Hise's hypothetical district and those of other lawmakers from rural areas would serve drastically fewer constituents than the senator for Wake and a neighboring county.
When Adams' proposal was introduced two years ago, multiple experts panned it as unconstitutional.
Catawba College Professor of Politics and History Michael Bitzer told WGHP television, 'By my read, this legislature would need an overturning of the 1964 US Supreme Court case of Reynolds v. Sims, where a lower court held that Alabama, with an apportionment akin to the US Senate (using counties as Senate districts), was unconstitutional, due to violating the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection of the Law and the population disparities between districts.'
The Reynolds case was one of a group of rulings the Court issued in the early 1960's that validated the principle of 'one person, one vote' in state legislative elections.
In 2023, Adams defended the measure — which draws its name from the resemblance it bears to the way in the U.S. Senate is organized — by telling WGHP it would correct imbalances he saw in state policy that favor urban communities over rural.
He also questioned the Supreme Court precedent since it was established under the leadership of then-Chief Justice Earl Warren, who was widely vilified by southerners and segregationists. 'I am old enough to remember the billboards that said, 'Impeach Earl Warren.' I'm beginning to understand why,' Adams said.
If passed, the amendment would appear on the ballot for the November 2026 general election.
Adams and Hise did not respond to NC Newsline's requests for comment.
Rob Schofield contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

PBS, NPR funding on the line as House nears final vote on $9.4 billion in DOGE-backed cuts
PBS, NPR funding on the line as House nears final vote on $9.4 billion in DOGE-backed cuts

CNBC

time15 minutes ago

  • CNBC

PBS, NPR funding on the line as House nears final vote on $9.4 billion in DOGE-backed cuts

The House on Wednesday moved a step closer to approving President Donald Trump's $9.4 billion spending cut package, which would codify some cuts originally proposed by the Department of Government Efficiency. The package would grant permission to the White House not to spend billions of dollars that had already been approved by Congress. The money would be clawed back from specific agencies like the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which distributes federally appropriated grants to National Public Radio (NPR) and Public Broadcasting Service (PBS). Although the Wednesday procedural vote passed largely along party lines, a final vote expected Thursday could see some resistance from House Republicans who are uneasy about the popular programs that are being targeted, like PBS and National Public Radio. Given House Speaker Mike Johnson's narrow Republican majority, he can only afford to lose a handful of votes and still push the package over the finish line on a party-line vote. Johnson said earlier this week that he was "working on" getting enough Republicans on board to pass the DOGE package, CNN reported. Wednesday's vote also finalized changes to Republicans' "big, beautiful bill" that were required by the Senate before the measure was allowed to pass with a simple majority, rather than the typical 60-vote Senate threshold. Budget measures like the "big, beautiful bill" can be considered under a special set of rules known as reconciliation. The Senate's parliamentarian, who acts as a sort of referee in disputes over Senate rules, had flagged some provisions in the package earlier that she said were incompatible with the chamber's reconciliation rules.

Thune on protests: LA ‘needed some outside help'
Thune on protests: LA ‘needed some outside help'

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Thune on protests: LA ‘needed some outside help'

WASHINGTON, DC (KELO) — Senate Majority Leader John Thune is defending President Trump's decision to federalize the National Guard and send in Marines to put a stop to clashes between demonstrators and law enforcement in Los Angeles. Cheyenne River Reservation authorities investigating 2 deaths The South Dakota Republican fielded reporters' questions on a range of topics Wednesday on Capitol Hill, including the ongoing protests over immigration raids. The City of Los Angeles reported fewer clashes overnight as a curfew went into effect. Yet tensions remain high as members of the military are on standby in case of more violence. Thune says the military presence was needed because local officials in California didn't have a handle on the situation. Thune called public safety a 'political imperative' while discussing the protests taking place this week in Los Angeles. 'Because one of the most fundamental questions most people, or most voters ask is my family safe? Is my neighborhood safe? Is my community safe? And when you can't answer that in the affirmative, then you've got a problem and I think that's what they ran into in Los Angeles which is why they needed some outside help,' Thune said. But House Democrats say Los Angeles didn't need outside help from the military to keep the violence in check. 'And state and local law enforcement officials are prepared to do that. At the same time, we respect the right and should embrace the right for any American to peacefully protest,' (D) House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said. Thune wouldn't directly answer one reporter's question about President Trump's pardons of January 6th rioters. Manu Raju: 'Do you see any inconsistency when a president criticizes and condemns the violent LA protests but then pardons the violent January 6th protestors?' 'I think the issue that's in front of us right now is the chaos in Los Angeles. And clearly, the local officials there, for whatever reason, didn't seem up to the task,' Thune said. Critics say President Trump's deployment of troops to Los Angeles will only provoke more violence. But Thune and other Republicans on Capitol Hill say it was a move that needed to be made. 'At the end of the day, it's about preventing chaos and preserving law and order,' Thune said. A federal judge will hold a hearing Thursday on California Governor Gavin Newsom's request to stop President Trump from using troops in Los Angeles. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Republicans press Pentagon chief over Trump's plan to end Russia's war against Ukraine, Politico reports
Republicans press Pentagon chief over Trump's plan to end Russia's war against Ukraine, Politico reports

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Republicans press Pentagon chief over Trump's plan to end Russia's war against Ukraine, Politico reports

At a Senate budget hearing on June 11, Republican senators fiercely criticized U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over the Trump administration's effort to end the Ukraine war through negotiations involving Russia. The session revealed deep divisions within the GOP on U.S. foreign policy, as lawmakers clashed over the administration's strategic direction, Politico reports. Leading the pushback was Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, one of three Republicans who voted against Hegseth's confirmation, who warned, "America's reputation is on the line." McConnell, now chair of the panel overseeing defense funding, issued some of his strongest public criticism yet, questioning whether the United States would continue defending democratic allies against authoritarian threats. He contrasted his stance — rooted in a Reagan-era commitment to global leadership — with Hegseth's "America First" approach favored by many Trump supporters. "We don't want a headline at the end of this conflict that says Russia wins and America loses," McConnell said. When asked who the aggressor in the three-year-old war is, Hegseth responded, "Russia is the aggressor." But he avoided directly stating which side the U.S. wants to see win, instead emphasizing that President Trump is committed to achieving peace. Hegseth shifted blame to the Biden and Obama administrations, arguing that slow responses during their terms allowed Putin to seize Crimea and invade Ukraine. "Vladimir Putin knows that President Trump is strong," he said, suggesting a negotiated peace would bolster America's global position. Sen. Lindsey Graham, a prominent Trump ally, questioned whether Putin would stop his territorial ambitions if he gained ground in Ukraine. Joint Chiefs Chair Gen. Dan Caine said he did not believe Putin would stop. Hegseth, however, responded, "It remains to be seen." Graham rebuked that answer, saying, "This is the '30s all over. It doesn't remain to be seen." Democrats also raised concerns. Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware criticized the administration for omitting Ukraine aid in its 2026 budget request and warned against compromising too much for the sake of peace. 'We cannot abandon Ukraine,' he said. Hegseth defended the administration's strategy, calling a negotiated settlement a show of strength. "The alternative of endless war that is largely funded by the United States and fought by Ukrainians… does not make sense strategically," he said. Read also: America's weak strongman We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store