logo
Private Dump Owners Unhappy Over Council Court Action

Private Dump Owners Unhappy Over Council Court Action

Scoop30-04-2025

Article – Lois Williams – Local Democracy Reporter
The company, under Timaru-based directors Tony Moir and Bruce Tinnelly, is being prosecuted by the regional council, on charges of discharging contaminants to land.
The owners of a private dump near Greymouth say they are still 'disappointed' that the West Coast Regional Council has chosen to take them to court.
The case against Taylorville Resource Park Ltd (TRPL) for allegedly dumping unconsented toxic waste came up for review this week in the Greymouth District Court.
The company, under Timaru-based directors Tony Moir and Bruce Tinnelly, is being prosecuted by the regional council, on charges of discharging contaminants to land.
The pair are also co-directors of Paul Smith Earthmoving Ltd.
The council alleges the waste, not covered by the landfill's resource consent, included drums full of sandblasting media; 'road- derived sediments' containing heavy metals, and reels of fibre optic cable – all from Christchurch.
TRPL has pleaded not guilty to the charges as what it calls 'an interim measure.'
'We are currently working with a team of experts, scientific and legal, and have sought further time from the court to resolve these allegations,' a TRPL spokesperson said, after the case was called yesterday. (subs: Tuesday 29/4)
The company is planning to apply for a new resource consent from the WCRC that would allow it to expand its operations and accept a wider range of waste materials.
Under its existing consent, it can take cleanfill, demolition and construction waste, asbestos, coal tar and tyres.
But if it wants to take other contaminated material it must apply for consent from the WCRC on a case-by-case basis, a restriction it describes as 'unusual and cumbersome.'
The new Class 2 consent would mean it could accept waste – like the material it is being accused of having – as of right.
The original resource consent for the landfill was granted by the Regional Council without notification – a sore point for neighbours and the Grey District Council.
The council takes its public water supply from bores beneath the Grey River, and though the intake is upstream of the landfill, the council says the dump is still a potential risk.
Public feedback was sought for the landfill's expansion plans, with the company advertising in local media.
The company was now working 'proactively' through that feedback with the community and stakeholders and making good progress, a spokesperson told LDR.
The landfill sited above the Grey River has been controversial since it opened in 2021.
Neighbours complained of the stench coming from the dump after it accepted horticultural waste.
The Grey District Council called for the closure of the dump after tests revealed water from an unlined cell was leaching into local drains.
The Environmental Protection Authority took over the WCRC inquiry at the council's request; shut the dump down, ordered TRPL to dig out and line the offending pit, and eventually cleared it to reopen.
In 2023, two landfill workers were knocked out by poisonous gases in the pit they were clearing.
TRPL and Paul Smith Earthmoving have admitted Worksafe charges of endangering the lives of the two men and will be sentenced for those offences in July.
But TRPL says it now complies fully with Worksafe and environmental requirements, and the landfill poses no risk to the Greymouth water supply.
'We now meet national landfill standards, after making significant investments in the site, and to our health and safety operations.'
The company understood the 'sensitivities' around Greymouth's water supply, particularly given the recent contamination issue – which was not related to the landfill, the spokesperson said.
'We wish to again provide assurances to the community as to the safety of the water supply in relation to our facility.'
'That assurance is based on the landfill location downstream of the supply intake, but also on extensive scientific reports that have found the issue to be one of low to very low risk.'
When the company formally applies for its new resource consent, it will be asking the West Coast Regional Council to publicly notify the application, the spokesperson told LDR

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Foreign exchange fined amid transactions deemed 'objectively suspicious'
Foreign exchange fined amid transactions deemed 'objectively suspicious'

1News

timea day ago

  • 1News

Foreign exchange fined amid transactions deemed 'objectively suspicious'

An Auckland-based foreign exchange and money remittance company has been convicted and fined $1.125 million for failing to report suspicious activities and to submit prescribed transaction reports. An investigation by the Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) found that Qian DuoDuo Limited, which traded under the name Lidong Foreign Exchange, found it failed to report 197 international transactions to China between June 2018 and September 2019. The transactions, which totalled over $19.14 million, included 26 "objectively suspicious" activities with a value of $4.72 million and 171 involved prescribed transactions with a value of $14.42 million. The value of the nearly 200 transactions represented around one fifth of the gross value transactions undertaken by Qian DuoDuo Limited for the 2018/2019 financial year. Two individuals who completed the transactions, Xiaoyu Lu and Musubayoufa Fuati, were convicted of criminal offending. ADVERTISEMENT Fuati was convicted of structuring transactions to avoid anti-money laundering laws, while Lu was convicted of providing unregistered financial services, as well as multiple counts of money laundering. Both pleaded guilty to their charges. In sentencing, the Auckland District Court found the company failed to carry out adequate customer due diligence on the source of Fuati and Lu's funds and relied on questionable verification documents despite recognising a high risk that its operations could be used to launder money. Anti-money laundering and countering financing of terrorism director Serge Sablyak said Internal Affairs took offences under the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009 "very seriously". "Suspicious transactions have the potential to be linked to money laundering or terrorist financing activities. Prescribed transaction reports are vital in alerting law enforcement to suspected offenders and make money laundering and terrorist financing difficult to hide." Sablyak said Qian DuoDuo Limited had a "history of non-compliance". "In 2017, the Department took civil action against the company following non-compliance with its obligations, and the High Court confirmed multiple breaches of the company's legal obligations. "When financial institutions, including money remitters, continue to fail to meet their obligations under the Act, the Department can and will take action." ADVERTISEMENT Qian DuoDuo Limited appealed the District Court's decision to the High Court.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store