NATO commits to doubling military budgets: As it happened
The US-led blocs member states agreed to significantly increase military expenditures
NATO leaders have agreed to a massive spike in defense spending, overcoming internal divisions and relegating Ukraine to a secondary agenda item to finalize a historic pact that will double members' military budgets. At a short summit in The Hague, the US-led military bloc committed to raising defense expenditures to 5% of member GDP by 2035, a dramatic escalation from the current 2% target.
US President Donald Trump hailed the agreement as a "monumental win," having pressured European members to "pay their share" since the first term.
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte framed the spending surge as building an alliance that is "stronger, fairer, and more lethal", a mantra he has championed since June 2025 as NATO's new strategic doctrine.
Rutte has been doubling down on flattery, privately texting Trump praise for his "decisive action" by attacking Iran and crediting him for NATO's historic 5% defense spending target increase. During the summit the NATO chief then likened the US president to a "daddy" using "strong language," defending Trump's recent on-camera f-bomb about Iran and Israel.
In an unusually short five-paragraph statement NATO leaders cited undefined "long-term threats" from Russia while Ukraine was only mentioned in one sentence. Ukrainian Leader Vladimir Zelensky was confined to a pre-summit dinner, excluded from key meetings, and granted a sidelined conversation with Trump, who stated that ceasefire talks were "not on the agenda".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
10 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Goldman Stock Surges Over 57% in a Year: Is There Still Room to Run?
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. GS shares have surged 57.3% over the past year, outperforming the industry 's 40.9% growth. Its peers, JPMorgan JPM and Morgan Stanley MS, shares rose 48.4% and 50.6%, respectively, over the same time frame. Price Performance With such strong momentum, investors are now asking: Is there still room for Goldman to run, or has the stock peaked? Let us delve deeper and analyze what's driving the growth and whether there is more scope to grow further. Prospects of Goldman's IB Business A robust revival in merger and acquisition (M&A) activity was expected for 2025, bolstered by a potentially business-friendly Trump administration, expectations for regulatory rollbacks and pent-up demand. However, the reality so far has been more complicated. Now, the timeline for a solid rebound in M&As has shifted to the second half of 2025 due to Trump's tariff plans, which resulted in extreme market volatility. Given mounting inflationary pressure, a slowdown/recession in the U.S. economy is expected. Amid such a backdrop, companies are rethinking their M&A plans despite stabilizing rates and having significant investible capital. In the first quarter of 2025, Goldman reported an 8% year-over-year decline in IB revenues, underwhelming against JPMorgan's 12% growth and Morgan Stanley's 7.7% increase in IB fees over the same period. On the surface, this may suggest Goldman is losing ground to its peers. However, the company continues to maintain a leading market share in global M&A advisory, underscoring deep institutional relationships and trusted deal execution capabilities. GS has reported an increased IB backlog, indicating a strong pipeline of potential deals that could convert into revenues as soon as macro conditions improve. This positions Goldman to capitalize well once M&A momentum improves, potentially giving it an edge over peers. GS & Easing Capital Requirement Proposal This week, the Federal Reserve proposed a 1.4% reduction in capital requirements for Global Systemically Important Banks (GSIBs), which could translate to approximately $13 billion in capital relief for major players like Goldman, JPMorgan, and Morgan Stanley. This proposal, if finalized, would increase operational flexibility for GS. With lower capital buffers, Goldman would be able to reallocate resources more efficiently, potentially scaling operations in key areas such as lending, trading and treasury activities. Further, freeing up billions in capital could boost return on equity (ROE) and unlock new growth avenues. The company may opt to deploy excess capital into higher-yielding assets, invest in business expansion, or return it to shareholders via dividends and share buybacks. Goldman's Focus on Core Business GS is making efforts to exit non-core consumer banking business and sharpen its focus on areas wherein it holds a competitive edge — IB, trading, and asset and wealth management (AWM). Last November, per the Wall Street Journal report, Goldman received a proposal from Apple to end their consumer banking partnership. Per a January 2025 Reuters report, the collaboration may end before the contract runs out in 2030. The move is expected to affect two consumer banking products that Apple currently offers — the Apple Card and the Apple Savings account. In 2024, Goldman finalized a deal to transfer its GM credit card business to Barclays and completed the sale of GreenSky, its home-improvement lending platform. In 2023, the company divested its Personal Financial Management unit. These moves demonstrate a well-thought-out exit from consumer finance, allowing Goldman to reallocate capital and attention toward higher-margin, more scalable businesses. This strategic shift is benefiting the AWM division, which now plays a crucial role in the company's long-term growth. AWM is expanding into fee-based revenue streams to help offset the volatility of the IB business. As of March 31, 2025, AWM managed more than $3.2 trillion in assets under supervision and is experiencing strong momentum in alternative investments and customized wealth solutions for ultra-high-net-worth individuals. In the first quarter of 2025, Goldman reported significant net inflows into its wealth management platform, providing solid evidence of the segment's increasing market traction and client confidence. Goldman's Strong Liquidity Profile GS maintains a fortress balance sheet, with Tier 1 capital ratios well above regulatory requirements. This financial strength allows it to return capital to shareholders aggressively through buybacks and a healthy dividend yield (1.79%). As of March 31, 2025, cash and cash equivalents were $167 billion, and near-term borrowings were $71 billion. Given its strong liquidity, the company rewards its shareholders handsomely. In July 2024, it increased its common stock dividend 9.1% to $3 per share. In the past five years, the company hiked dividends four times, with an annualized growth rate of 23.6%. Currently, its payout ratio sits at 28% of earnings. Meanwhile, GS' peer JPMorgan raised its dividend five times over the past five years, with a payout ratio of 27%. Morgan Stanley raised its dividend four times over the past five years and has a payout ratio of 43%. Additionally, Goldman has a share repurchase plan in place. In the first quarter of 2025, the board of directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing additional repurchases of up to $40 billion of common stock. Earlier, in February 2023, it announced a share repurchase program, authorizing repurchases of up to $30 billion of common stock with no expiration date. At the end of the first quarter, GS had $43.6 billion worth of shares available under authorization. Goldman's Estimates and Valuation Analysis The Zacks Consensus Estimate for GS' 2025 and 2026 revenues indicates a year-over-year rise of 3.5% and 5.9%, respectively. Likewise, the consensus estimate for 2025 and 2026 earnings indicates an 8.8% and 14.1% rise, respectively. Sales Estimates Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Earnings Estimates Image Source: Zacks Investment Research In terms of valuation, GS stock also looks expensive. The stock is trading at forward price/earnings (P/E) of 14.60X compared with the industry average of 14.55X. Goldman is also trading at a discount compared with its peers, JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley. Currently, JPM and MS have P/E multiples of 15.26X and 15.67X, respectively. Price-to-Earnings F12M GS Stock: A Solid Long-Term Play, Near-Term Caution Advised Goldman has delivered outstanding returns over the past year, driven by strategic initiatives, strong capital returns and a growing wealth management business. Though its IB business performance lagged peers in the first quarter, its leadership in M&A advisory and robust deal pipeline signal potential upside once market conditions stabilize. The Fed's proposed capital requirement changes, combined with Goldman's exit from lower-margin consumer banking, provide additional flexibility to boost profitability and scale core operations. However, with the stock trading at a premium compared with the industry and macro uncertainties persisting, the near-term risk/reward may be balanced. As such, Goldman stock warrants a cautious approach for now. However, it remains a strong long-term holding for investors looking for exposure to a diversified, well-capitalized financial giant poised to benefit from a recovery in deal-making and capital markets activity. At present, Goldman carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. Zacks' Research Chief Picks Stock Most Likely to "At Least Double" Our experts have revealed their Top 5 recommendations with money-doubling potential – and Director of Research Sheraz Mian believes one is superior to the others. Of course, all our picks aren't winners but this one could far surpass earlier recommendations like Hims & Hers Health, which shot up +209%. See Our Top Stock to Double (Plus 4 Runners Up) >> Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS): Free Stock Analysis Report JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM): Free Stock Analysis Report Morgan Stanley (MS): Free Stock Analysis Report
Winnipeg Free Press
15 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Lawyers for Kilmar Abrego Garcia ask judge to keep him in jail over deportation concerns
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — Attorneys for Kilmar Abrego Garcia asked a federal judge in Tennessee on Friday to delay his release from jail because of 'contradictory statements' by President Donald Trump's administration over whether or not he'll be deported upon release. A federal judge in Nashville has been preparing to release Abrego Garcia to await trial on human smuggling charges. But she's been holding off over concerns that U.S. immigration officials would swiftly detain him and try to deport him again. Abrego Garcia's attorneys are now asking the judge to continue to detain him following statements by Trump administration officials 'because we cannot put any faith in any representation made on this issue by' the Justice Department. 'The irony of this request is not lost on anyone,' the attorneys wrote. Abrego Garcia, a construction worker who had been living in Maryland, became a flashpoint over Trump's hard-line immigration policies when he was mistakenly deported to his native El Salvador in March. Facing mounting pressure and a Supreme Court order, Trump's Republican administration returned him this month to face the smuggling charges, which his attorneys have called 'preposterous.' Justice Department spokesman Chad Gilmartin told The Associated Press on Thursday that the department intends to try Abrego Garcia on the smuggling charges before it moves to deport him, stating that Abrego Garcia 'has been charged with horrific crimes, including trafficking children, and will not walk free in our country again.' Hours earlier, Justice Department attorney Jonathan Guynn told a federal judge in Maryland that the U.S. government plans to deport Abrego Garcia to a 'third country' that isn't El Salvador. Guynn said there was no timeline for the deportation plans. Abrego Garcia's attorneys wrote in their filing on Friday that Guynn's statements were the 'first time the government has represented, to anyone, that it intended not to deport Mr. Abrego back to El Salvador following a trial on these charges, but to deport him to a third country immediately.' The filing by Abrego Garcia's lawyers also cited a post on X on Thursday from White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson: 'Abrego Garcia was returned to the United States to face trial for the egregious charges against him,' Jackson stated. 'He will face the full force of the American justice system — including serving time in American prison for the crimes he's committed.' Abrego Garcia's attorneys wrote Friday the Trump administration brought Abrego Garcia back 'only to convict him in the court of public opinion.' 'In a just world, he would not seek to prolong his detention further,' his attorneys wrote. 'And yet the government — a government that has, at all levels, told the American people that it is bringing Mr. Abrego back home to the United States to face 'American justice' — apparently has little interest in actually bringing this case to trial.' Abrego Garcia pleaded not guilty on June 13 to smuggling charges that his attorneys have characterized as an attempt to justify his mistaken expulsion to a notorious prison in El Salvador. Those charges stem from a 2022 traffic stop for speeding in Tennessee, during which Abrego Garcia was driving a vehicle with nine passengers without luggage. U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes in Nashville wrote in a ruling Sunday that federal prosecutors failed to show that Abrego Garcia was a flight risk or a danger to the community. During a court hearing Wednesday, Holmes set specific conditions for Abrego Garcia's release that included him living with his brother, a U.S. citizen, in Maryland. But she held off on releasing him over concerns that prosecutors can't prevent U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement from deporting him. Holmes ordered Abrego Garcia's lawyers and prosecutors to file briefs on the matter Thursday and Friday respectively. ___ Finley reported from Norfolk, Va.
CTV News
16 minutes ago
- CTV News
Supreme Court limits nationwide injunctions, but fate of Trump birthright citizenship order unclear
The U.S. Supreme Court is seen on Capitol Hill in Washington, Dec. 17, 2024. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File) WASHINGTON — A divided U.S. Supreme Court on Friday ruled that individual judges lack the authority to grant nationwide injunctions, but the decision left unclear the fate of President Donald Trump's restrictions on birthright citizenship. The outcome was a victory for the Republican president, who has complained about individual judges throwing up obstacles to his agenda. But a conservative majority left open the possibility that the birthright citizenship changes could remain blocked nationwide. Trump's order would deny citizenship to U.S.-born children of people who are in the country illegally. Birthright citizenship automatically makes anyone born in the United States an American citizen, including children born to mothers in the country illegally. The right was enshrined soon after the Civil War in the Constitution's 14th Amendment. In a notable Supreme Court decision from 1898, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, the court held that the only children who did not automatically receive U.S. citizenship upon being born on U.S. soil were the children of diplomats, who have allegiance to another government; enemies present in the U.S. during hostile occupation; those born on foreign ships; and those born to members of sovereign Native American tribes. The U.S. is among about 30 countries where birthright citizenship — the principle of jus soli or 'right of the soil' — is applied. Most are in the Americas, and Canada and Mexico are among them. Trump and his supporters have argued that there should be tougher standards for becoming an American citizen, which he called 'a priceless and profound gift' in the executive order he signed on his first day in office. The Trump administration has asserted that children of non-citizens are not 'subject to the jurisdiction' of the United States, a phrase used in the amendment, and therefore are not entitled to citizenship. But states, immigrants and rights groups that have sued to block the executive order have accused the administration of trying to unsettle the broader understanding of birthright citizenship that has been accepted since the amendment's adoption. Judges have uniformly ruled against the administration. The U.S. Justice Department had argued that individual judges lack the power to give nationwide effect to their rulings. The Trump administration instead wanted the justices to allow Trump's plan to go into effect for everyone except the handful of people and groups that sued. Failing that, the administration argued that the plan could remain blocked for now in the 22 states that sued. New Hampshire is covered by a separate order that is not at issue in this case. As a further fallback, the administration asked 'at a minimum' to be allowed to make public announcements about how it plans to carry out the policy if it eventually is allowed to take effect. ___ Mark Sherman, The Associated Press
