Wendy's CEO sounds alarm on disturbing consumer trend
Friends, Romans and countrymen, lend me your taste buds.
Imagine for a moment that you're walking down the street of a city in Ancient Rome and you suddenly get the munchies.
💵💰Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter 💰
You're dying for something to eat but you're running late for the gladiator tournament — where people are dying for a living. What do you do?
Okay, Brutus, don't get your toga in a knot. All you have to do is stop at the nearest thermopolia for some eats.These were open-air counters selling prepared hot and cold meals, and they offered meats, cheeses, vegetables, olives, legumes, pastries, and drinks like wine and spiced beverages.
While some thermopolia had a few seats, the primary focus was on quick, on-the-go meals — which might sound an awful lot like today's fast food restaurants.
The quick-service-restaurant concept has continued through the centuries and now this global fast-food market is valued at roughly $902.1 billion, with the U.S. fast-food market alone valued at $417.5 billion.
Wendy's () is one of the biggest names in the QRS space. Founded in 1969 by Dave Thomas, the company is now the world's third-largest fast-food hamburger chain.
But the QRS industry is currently contending with rising costs, labor shortages and increased competition.
On May 3 Wendy's posted mixed first-quarter earnings and trimmed its outlook for the year, warning that sales in 2025 might fall from a year earlier.
During the Dublin, Ohio, company's earnings call President and CEO Kirk Tanner noted the tough economic climate.
"The consumer certainly is under pressure," he told analysts. "I think that's reflected in the Q1 numbers, and we see that persisting. We thought it was prudent to plan if the consumer is under pressure for the full year, what do we do to control what we can control."
More Restaurants
McDonald's launches a bold new restaurant concept
Popular pizza chain closes locations in bankruptcy
Chipotle fans skeptical of its latest restaurant move
Consumer sentiment tumbled 11% last month to the second-lowest reading on record going back to 1952, amid concerns about inflation and tariffs. April's reading was lower than anything seen during the Great Recession.
In this environment, Tanner said, "we know that customers are looking for an even more compelling reason to visit restaurants."
"In response to changing consumer behavior, we're launching a new 100 Days of Summer campaign to provide customers even more of our fresh, famous food through core innovation, collaborations, and value offerings at a time when our customers need it most," he said.
Other QRS companies have been feeling the heat.
McDonald's () CEO Christopher Kempczinski recently said that the number of low-income consumers visiting U.S. fast-food restaurants was down "nearly double digits" in the year's first three months compared with 2024. Visits from middle-income consumers across the industry "fell nearly as much,' he said.
Domino's Pizza () said consumers were gravitating from more expensive delivery options to cheaper carryout. Starbucks () posted a decline in quarterly same-store sales.
The Subway sandwich chain closed 631 locations across the country in 2024 alone, bringing the company's domestic footprint down to 19,502 stores — the lowest it's been in two decades.Hooters filed for bankruptcy after accumulating $376 million in debt.
Tanner said Wendy's was conducting individual restaurant assessments, which are key to improving visibility and benchmarking against model performance.
"These early results have enabled us to pinpoint specific improvements that we can make to improve the customer experience and productivity, including increasing focus on training," he said.
Wendy's stock is down nearly 27% since January and down almost 38% from a year ago.
Several investment firms issued research reports after Wendy's posted its earnings.
Bernstein lowered its price target on Wendy's to $15 from $18 and affirmed a market perform rating on the shares, TheFly reported.
The investment firm said the chain's first-quarter performance was below expectations, confirming its hypothesis that the QSR industry remains under significant pressure.
JP Morgan upgraded Wendy's to overweight from neutral but cut its price target to $15 from $17, saying the current share price provides a "value-oriented opportunity."
JPM sees "significant upside" to Wendy's equity value with a 6% to 7% free cash flow yield potentially going to 8.5%.Wendy's strengthened its effort to meet near-term expected comparisons and has an opportunity for longer term development, especially in what the investment firm called underpenetrated international markets.
Wendy's' free cash flow growth profile through fiscal 2028 is "healthy" as store economics stabilize and improve, JP Morgan said.
Meanwhile Loop Capital lowered its price target on Wendy's to $21 from $26 and maintained a buy rating on the shares.
The target cut reflects the "mixed" results, particularly same store sales missing estimates and earnings per share posted in line with expectations, the investment firm said. .
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
18 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Veteran fund manager resets stock market forecast amid Musk, Trump fallout
Put two mercurial personalities in the room, add competing goals and a hefty dose of media pressure, and what do you get? Let's just say that the high-profile friend-to-foe saga isn't overly surprising. Elon Musk and Donald Trump are polarizing figures with a penchant for dropping verbal bombshells, and that was particularly evident this week as the two sparred over the Big Beautiful bill, electric vehicle credits, and debt. The rift may shock some, however, given how closely Musk and Trump worked together over the past year. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Musk spent hundreds of millions helping elect Donald Trump as president, and Trump rewarded Musk with a high-profile role in his administration as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. Trump even went so far as to host a Tesla showroom on the White House lawn to support Musk after Musk's political activism caused a drop in Tesla's sales. One person who wasn't the least bit surprised by the high-profile dust-up was veteran hedge fund manager Doug Kass. Back in December, Kass picked the break-up as one of his top 15 surprises for 2025. It was far from the only correct forecast for Kass. He also predicted a stock market reckoning could cause the S&P 500 to fall 15%, and in April, he accurately forecast that stocks would find their footing after the brutal sell-off. Kass recently revisited his take on Musk and Trump, and how stocks may react to their fallout. His S&P 500 outlook may disappoint many, while his take on Trump and Musk might surprise most. After back-to-back 20% gains in the S&P 500 in 2023 and 2024, including an impressive 24% return last year, investors may have complacently expected more good times in 2025. Then reality set in. The stock market has whipsawed amid a series of shocks, many delivered by President Trump and Elon Musk, via his high-profile and much-debated cost-cutting at DOGE. Related: Elon Musk latest message sends Tesla stock surging Stocks came into 2025 arguably priced to perfection. Optimism for a friendly Federal Reserve shift in monetary policy to dovish interest rate cuts and a flood of artificial intelligence spending fueled big returns last year, pushing the S&P 500's price-to-earnings ratio north of 22. Historically, returns following high P/E ratios have been largely lackluster. That point wasn't lost on Kass, who correctly said in December that the S&P 500 could drop 15% in 2025. "Surprise #9: In 2025, the S&P Index falls by about 15%. The technology-laden Nasdaq drops by over 20%," wrote Kass. Kass beat the bearish drum continuously through February, when the S&P 500 reversed after hitting all-time highs. From mid-February through early April, bombshells in the form of shockingly high tariff announcements from President Trump and job losses stemming from Musk's DOGE efforts caused the benchmark index to plummet. At its worst, the S&P 500 fell 19%, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq fell about 24%. The sharp drop was painful, and many hit the sell button, worried that an endless stream of uncertainty would cause even greater losses. Kass, however, correctly reversed course, making bargain-basement buys on the indexes and tech leaders, including Amazon, near the lows. Since then, Trump's pause on tariffs and potential for trade deals that ease the tariffs' bite have helped fuel a dramatic recovery, lifting the S&P 500 by 20%. More Economic Analysis: Hedge-fund manager sees U.S. becoming GreeceA critical industry is slamming the economyReports may show whether the economy is toughing out the tariffs The result has been a nausea-inspiring roller coaster ride for buy-and-hold investors. That's been particularly true for Tesla (TSLA) shareholders. The EV company rallied after Trump's election amid hope that Musk's White House connections would pave the way to sales growth. Instead, Musk's DOGE efforts, and arguably controversial political comments, caused a mass exodus of left-leaning Tesla buyers. Sales cratered in key markets, including Europe and California, the largest U.S. auto market. In Europe, Tesla sales dropped 49% year-over-year in April to 7,261 vehicles, according to the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association. In California, Tesla registrations fell 21.5% year-over-year in the first quarter, while non-Tesla electric vehicle (EV) registrations grew 14%. Tesla's stock price got hammered as a result, falling 54% from mid-December highs to early April lows. It's since recovered alongside the broad market, jumping 35%, largely on news Elon Musk would step away from DOGE. Doug Kass has seen a thing or two. His career stretches back into the 1970s at money manager Putnam, including a stint as research director for billionaire Leon Cooperman's Omega Advisors. His deep experience navigating markets professionally means he had a front-row seat to his share of political, economic, and stock market surprises. He witnessed Richard Nixon's Watergate implosion, the inflation-riddled 70s, the Savings & Loan crisis, the Internet boom and bust, hanging chads, the housing-bubble-driven Great Financial Recession, Trump presidency version 1.0, Covid, and the recent inflation shock and recovery. Related: Veteran strategist unveils updated gold price forecast Every December, he tests that experience with his "surprises" list for the coming year. This year, in addition to predicting the S&P 500 sell-off, he forecast the unfriendly end of the Trump-Musk relationship. "Surprise #2: The 'other' romance, between Trump/Musk, doesn't make it past spring 2025," wrote Kass. "National protests and demonstrations emerge and demands from a wide array of members of both the Republican and Democratic parties (including conservatives and liberals) call for 'ousting' Elon Musk, an unelected official, from playing such a dominant role in the U.S. government." Kass's Musk prediction is a longer read, but the gist is simple: Musk and Trump will suffer a fallout, which may have consequences for investors. He revisited his outlook, offering a new take on the Trump-Musk situation. "Right in front of us, it is obvious that political positions of influence can easily be bought-sold by both parties (and that certainly includes the presidency)," wrote Kass. "I am not even sure where the performance ends and reality begins. In the end (probably sooner than later) - just like the president's opening salvos of ridiculously high tariff proposals - the two actors will likely have a detente (and kiss and make up) because the downside is certain for both of them, as no one will win. When that make-up happens, no one knows. It could happen today, next week or next month, but the parties' 'interests' are now so enmeshed that Musk and Trump recognize where their bread is buttered." A potential "easing" of tensions would be welcome, given that a long-term tit-for-tat would fuel market volatility. Still, Kass's view of what happens to the stock market next isn't encouraging. "Never in my investing career has there been so many possible social, political, geopolitical, economic, interest rates and fiscal policy outcomes (many of which are adverse). That is why I don't understand the uber confidence expressed by the Perma Bull cabal (led by Fundstrat's Tom Lee) and manifested in a near-vertical move higher for equities over the last two months," continued Kass. "With a forward PE of 22x, equities remain overvalued and, after covering my Index shorts yesterday, I plan to reshort any rally." If Kass is correct that instability will force stocks lower, how low could it go, and when might things improve? "I see seven lean months ahead for our markets. We estimate downside risk to be roughly 3x the upside reward," concludes Kass. Related: Veteran fund manager who predicted April rally updates S&P 500 forecast The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fund-management veteran skips emotion in investment strategy
Fund-management veteran skips emotion in investment strategy originally appeared on TheStreet. This article is based on TheStreet's Stock & Markets Podcast, Episode 8. Hosted by the veteran Wall Street investor Chris Versace, the weekly podcasts are available early to members of TheStreetPro investing club. The podcasts are also available on YouTube. More than 40 years ago Tina Turner famously asked the world: "What's love got to with it?" If the subject is investing, David Miller has a simple answer: not much. 💵💰Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter 💰 Miller, chief investment officer of Catalyst Funds, spoke with Chris Versace, lead portfolio manager for TheStreet Pro Portfolio, in the June 4 edition, episode 8, of TheStreet Stocks & Markets Podcast, to talk about what his firm is looking for in a candidate for investment. "I think the sweet spot is where you have such a good business that even if people hate them they continue to grow and grow with high margins and high EPS growth," he said. Miller cited the billionaire entrepreneur, venture capitalist and political activist Peter Thiel, who advises founders and entrepreneurs to aim for a monopoly and avoid competition. "You're either in perfect competition or you have a monopoly or an oligopoly," he said. "And clearly, anyone who owns a business wants to be in that position where you have a monopoly rather than being in perfect competition."He described how airlines historically haven't even earned their cost of capital and frequently end up going bankrupt. Restaurants, he said, have very high fixed costs and "just never earn outsized economic profits." "Whereas you look at a company like a Visa () or Mastercard () or a Microsoft or an Apple or an Adobe () or an Nvidia," () Miller said. "Phenomenal businesses, phenomenal margins, great tailwinds, really strong free cash flows." So why invest in companies that aren't monopolies when many of the best returning stocks in history have turned into monopolies? "[Frankly,] you don't have to try to pick which stock is going to be the best stock," Miller said. "You can just take these categories that are far superior businesses and invest in those. That's the ideology behind that fund and why we launched it." Miller pointed to Apple () , explaining that "once you're in the Apple ecosystem, they own you." More Wall Street Analysts: Wells Fargo analysts reboot stock price targets after Fed action Apple analyst raises alarm about earnings, revenue growth Analyst initiates SoFi coverage, mulls loans, growth prospects "You don't have a whole lot of choices and they can get great margins," he said. "As someone who's been trapped in the Apple ecosystem willingly since 2005 I am perfectly content and happy," Versace responded. "I certainly understand why a lot of people love Apple," Miller said. "I have the iPhone. I like Apple and I don't particularly like Microsoft, but I'm definitely a customer of Microsoft. I think the best businesses are those where you'll do business with them even if you don't like them." Miller said Tesla () fits this dynamic, as the electric-vehicle maker "launched a new monopoly or an oligopoly depending on how you look at it certainly from a market share perspective." "Once you decide you're going to get an EV, it's a lot easier to go ahead and buy a Tesla and be part of their ecosystem than it is to ... buy an EV that's not part of that Tesla ecosystem," he added. Tesla shares have been thrashed lately — off 14% in regular trading June 5 — in light of Chief Executive Elon Musk's controversial involvement with the Department of Government Efficiency and backing of President Donald Trump. (The two have fallen out and Musk has rankled the White House by describing what the president called his "big, beautiful" budget bill as pork-laden and a 'disgusting abomination.') And while Tesla stock is down nearly 22% in 2025, it remains up about 60% from a year ago. Miller said the courts provide one of the most telltale signs of a monopoly. "Once the courts start coming after you for being a monopoly, that's a pretty good indication that you have some monopolistic characteristics in your business whether or not you want to admit it," he that historically been the targets of court action for their monopolistic characteristics have been phenomenal investments, he added. "If you look at a company like Microsoft, () if you got into [it when] the courts first came after them pretty hard, you'd be sitting pretty today," he said. Monopolies to avoid include electric and water companies. "If you're in a space where you have a product where your profits are regulated as to how much return on equity you can actually generate, we avoid those because what we want to go for is those that are growing monopolies." And Miller prefers to leave emotion out of the equation. "If people like a product, that's great," he said, "but what I really prefer is that they need the product rather than they like the product, and that there's some growing demand around it."Fund-management veteran skips emotion in investment strategy first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 6, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 6, 2025, where it first appeared. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lululemon analysts reboot stock price target after earnings
Lululemon analysts reboot stock price target after earnings originally appeared on TheStreet. Now that was a real lulu. The dictionary tells us that the slang term "lulu", which dates to the 1850s, can be used to describe a person or thing "outstanding for some quality." 💵💰Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter 💰 That quality can be positive or negative, and for Lululemon () it translated into about 5 pounds of oy vey in a two-pound bag. Shares of the Vancouver athleisure giant nosedived on June 6 after it beat Wall Street's first-quarter-earnings expectations but slashed its full-year guidance, citing a 'dynamic macroenvironment' that included increased competition and the impact of the Trump administration's tariffs. "The current tariff paradigm has brought uncertainty into the retail environment," Chief Executive Calvin McDonald told analysts during the earnings call. "As consumers try to assess the impact they will have on daily life, as businesses evaluate these impacts as well, I believe we are better positioned than most to navigate the near term while also maintaining our focus on investing in our growth potential over the long term," he added. Chief Financial Officer Meghan Frank said Lululemon estimated a thinner operating margin, which measures profitability by dividing a company's operating income by its net sales for the full year. It now expects a narrowing of 1.6 percentage points, compared with the previous estimate of 1 point, "all driven by the net impact of tariffs." More Retail Stocks: Halloween retailer sounds warning consumers need to hear Target expands same-day delivery to 100s of retailers Walmart makes surprise cuts as it looks at tariff price hikes "We are planning to take strategic price increases, looking item by item across our assortment as we typically do, and it will be price increases on a small portion of our assortment, and they will be modest in nature," she said. Comparable sales in the quarter rose 1% from a year earlier, missing analysts' forecasts calling for a 3% increase. The result reflects a 2% decrease in the Americas and a 6% increase internationally. "We're definitely not happy where the growth is in the U.S., but relative to the market and our performance versus others, pleased that we're putting on share, pleased with the reaction to the newness and with the mix of newness that's coming," McDonald said. Lululemon is known for advanced athletic apparel, particularly its workout leggings, and it is said to use "holistic guerrilla marketing" to make customers feel that they are part of a community. In April, President Donald Trump unleashed a broad range of tariffs that he has since paused and rebooted several times, causing widespread confusion among companies and consumers and in the markets. Several retailers have reduced or withdrawn their guidance and indicated that they would raise prices due to the uncertainty surrounding the tariff regime. Meanwhile, Trump said that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick would travel to London along with U.S. Trade Representative Jameson Greer on June 9 for renewed trade talks with China, adding that "the meeting should go very well."Lululemon's stock sank nearly 20% on June 6. The shares are off 31% in 2025 and down roughly 18% from a year earlier. Several investment firms issued research reports on Lululemon following the earnings report, including Needham, which lowered its price target to $317 from $366 and affirmed a buy rating on the shares, according to The Fly. The company posted fairly lackluster Q1 results, though the selloff in the stock seems "aggressive" relative to the size of management's guidance cut, the investment firm said. That's particularly since the guidance reduction is mostly tariff-driven, and also considers that management struck an encouraging tone about how new products are performing, Needham said. Lululemon's domestic business remains sluggish, however, while international comparable-sales growth slowed in Q1, likely raising questions about the growth algorithm going forward, Needham added. Telsey Advisory analyst Dana Telsey pared the firm's price target on Lululemon to $360 from $385 and maintained an outperform rating. The Q1 results "nicely topped" the Wall Street consensus and the company's guidance, Telsey said. Consumers continue to respond well to newness and new-product launches, Tesley added. BMO Capital lowered its price target on Lululemon to $250 from $302 and maintained a market-perform rating. The company reported what the investment firm called a slight top- and bottom-line beat to estimates, with better gross margins partly offset by a miss of estimates for selling, general and administrative expense. But looking ahead, BMO Capital said, management guided in Q2 "materially below" estimates and pared the fiscal 2025 outlook for gross margin and earnings due to tariffs and markdowns. This marks the first time the company has lowered its fiscal-year earnings forecast at Q1 since fiscal 2014, BMO Capital analysts reboot stock price target after earnings first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 7, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 7, 2025, where it first appeared.