A grooming gang inquiry will expose Labour's guilty men
Sir Keir Starmer claimed in January that those who were concerned about the systematic rape and abuse of little girls were 'calling for inquiries because they want to jump on a bandwagon of the far right'. Yesterday, Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, promised that victims would finally get the full national inquiry which campaigners have been demanding for so many years.
If Starmer has any sense, he will bring out his party's bodies willingly before he is forced to
Cooper's statement in the Commons was relatively encouraging. She conceded that much of the (admittedly shoddy) data around child grooming points to 'clear evidence of overrepresentation amongst suspects of Asian and Pakistani heritage men'. She admitted that there is evidence of 'many organisations avoiding the topic [of grooming gangs] altogether for fear of seeming racist or raising community tensions.' The government has also finally promised to collect ethnicity data for these crimes – something successive ministers have been reluctant to do.
But why the sudden U-turn? Have Labour ministers suddenly had a collective moral epiphany? How can a cause be 'racist' one minute, and suddenly worthy of attention the next?
The answer: Labour have been backed into a corner. They never wanted to have this inquiry. Ministers hoped that the public outrage about the vile crimes committed against women and girls, and the total failure of institutions to protect them, would die down. They thought an inadequate six-month review, with a focus on just a few towns, might be enough to appease public anger.
This is not what was delivered. Baroness Casey's audit of group-based child sexual exploitation and abuse is damning. The 200-page report which was published yesterday details how institutions consistently ignored victims. An entire chapter is entitled 'Denial'. Girls as young as ten were systematically raped and groomed by much older perpetrators. They were described by those in positions of power as 'child prostitutes' and often treated as criminals while their abusers walked free. The audit notes that a 'significant proportion of these cases appear to involve suspects who are non-UK nationals and/or who are claiming asylum in the UK'. This argument – dismissed as a right-wing dogwhistle just a few months ago – has now been confirmed as fact in a government report.
Blindsided by Casey's findings, Starmer changed his tune on Saturday, committing to a national inquiry before the report was made public. So, can we trust the Prime Minister? A quick look at his closest allies answers that question: No.
Shaun Davies, the Labour MP for Telford, was elected in 2024 and immediately given a place on the Home Affairs Select Committee – a group tasked with scrutiny of inquiries into grooming. Before that he led Telford and Wrekin Council – one of the areas worst impacted by child grooming.
Councils run many of the support services for victims of child sexual exploitation. So how did Davies advocate for victims? On at least one occasion, he seems to have actively stood in the way of justice.
In 2016, Telford's Conservative MP, Lucy Allan, called for a statutory inquiry into child grooming in Telford. Contacted by survivors who wanted justice, she set out on a campaign to help them.
But Davies rejected calls for an inquiry. He signed a letter to the Home Secretary, Amber Rudd, claiming that 'we do not feel at this time that a further inquiry is necessary'.
It would take six more years for victims to get that inquiry. When it did arrive, it was non-statutory, meaning the chair was unable to compel witnesses to give evidence. The report found huge failings on behalf of the council. Will Davies apologise to those who felt that he let them down?
Today, after Cooper's statement, Davies stood up to speak. Did he apologise? No. Instead, he claimed that Telford chose to have a 'local-based review' (as opposed to statutory) because 'the then Home Secretary, Amber Rudd, and the then local government minister, Rishi Sunak, refused to provide a statutory inquiry into Telford'. He made no reference to the letter that he signed in 2016.
Davies is not unique. There are others like him on Labour-run councils across the country, whom victims of the grooming gangs feel could have done more to help them get justice.
Is this why Starmer fought as hard as he could against an inquiry? He surely knew that some Labour politicians would be caught in the crossfire.
Starmer had no choice but to cave on a grooming gang inquiry. The evidence in Baroness Casey's report is so devastatingly damning that it cannot be ignored. Now, Labour must wait for the inquiry's findings. If Starmer has any sense, he will bring out his party's bodies willingly before he is forced to.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Desperate father who set himself alight while serving 13 years in jail for stealing a phone finally moved to hospital
A father who set himself alight as his mental health crumbled while serving 13 years in prison for stealing a phone is finally being transferred to hospital following a six-year battle by his family. Thomas White, who is languishing under an abolished indefinite jail term described as 'psychological torture' by the UN, developed paranoid schizophrenia and psychosis in prison as he lost hope of being freed from his Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentence. Last year, The Independent revealed how he had set himself on fire in his cell as this newspaper backed his family's calls for him to be transferred for inpatient mental health treatment, after he was repeatedly refused a hospital bed. In March, we revealed how he had he had suffered yet another mental health crisis, which saw him repeatedly smash his face on the floor of maximum security HMP Manchester, where he was being held. This week, the 42-year-old father of one learned he will finally be discharged from prison into hospital care. His tearful sister Clara White told The Independent: 'Thomas will now be a patient and not a prisoner.' White will be moved from the Category A jail, where inspectors last year raised the alarm over widespread drug use, rising violence, poor living conditions and a string of self-inflicted deaths, to the specialist medium secure Rothbury unit at Northgate Park in Northumberland. 'Thomas has been a casualty in this, but so have I and my mum and family,' she said, after years watching him deteriorate inside jail. 'He deserves to be treated with dignity, and I am just overwhelmed that he will go to a safe environment where he's not being hurt.' She said every member of the family shed tears of joy after learning the news on Monday evening. 'The hardest thing was watching my brother dying in front of me,' she added. 'Every visit, he was just dying in front of me; he was weighing less and less. Look at his eyes, you could just tell the pain he was in.' The move comes after prisons minister James Timpson personally visited White on the hospital wing of HMP Manchester during a visit in March, The Independent can reveal. IPP sentences – under which offenders were given a minimum jail term but no maximum – were scrapped in 2012 amid human rights concerns, but not retrospectively, leaving thousands of inmates trapped in jail for years beyond their original prison terms. White, who had previous convictions for theft, was handed an IPP sentence with a two-year tariff for robbery just four months before the sentences were outlawed. Then aged 27, he had been binge-drinking when he took the phone from two Christian missionaries in Manchester. But thanks to the indefinite jail term, he has remained incarcerated as his mental health has deteriorated. He moved prisons 12 times and was banned from seeing his only son, Kayden, nearly 16, for the majority of his prison term. Three psychiatrists had called for White to be moved to a hospital to treat his mental health conditions. The latest on 13 February concluded he was 'struggling in the prison environment' and it is likely 'he is deeply frustrated and angry as a result of his predicament'. Two medical reports last year laid bare the toll of the devastating IPP jail term, warning that White's 'lengthy incarceration' was creating 'impermeable barriers' to his recovery. Dean Kingham, White's lawyer, had argued it was 'inhumane' to keep a man who needs hospital treatment incarcerated inside HMP Manchester. Discussing White's case earlier this year, he told The Independent: 'The British Psychological Society has recognised the psychological harm caused by the IPP sentence. 'Here we have a man whose condition has deteriorated day by day, year by year, being held in a prison that's failing, where the inspector in October 2024 issued an urgent notification. Somewhere, he can more easily access drugs than in the community. 'For me, here we have a potential Article 3 breach of his human rights.' At least 94 IPP prisoners have taken their own lives in prison as they lose hope of being freed, according to campaigners. Of 2,614 people still incarcerated on an IPP jail term, almost 700 have served at least 10 years longer than their original minimum term. However, successive governments have refused to re-sentence IPP prisoners, despite calls from the justice committee and the UN special rapporteur on torture amid high rates of suicide and self-harm.
Telegraph
17 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Strangulation in pornography to be made illegal
Pornography depicting any act of strangulation is to be made illegal as part of government efforts to combat an 'epidemic' of sexual violence against women and girls. The move was recommended in a review for the Government by Baroness Bertin, a Conservative peer, who found that porn had effectively established choking as a 'sexual norm'. She said that a belief had taken root that choking a partner during sex was 'safe' because it was not fatal, despite overwhelming evidence that there was no safe way to strangle a person. The Government has already introduced a specific offence for abusers who strangle their partners, with perpetrators facing jail sentences of up to five years. Alex Davies-Jones, the justice minister, said: 'Depicting strangulation during sex is not only dangerous, but also degrading, with real-life consequences for women. 'Cracking down on the appalling rise of strangulation pornography will protect women and send a clear signal to men and boys that misogyny will not be tolerated.' Lady Bertin, who was commissioned to carry out the review by Rishi Sunak, also recommended that harmful online porn that would be illegal on the high street should be banned. The review, published on Thursday, found that violent, harmful and misogynistic porn was common on mainstream platforms. However, the material would be judged as illegal and refused classification by the British Board of Film Classification if it was sold in shops on the high street, according to Lady Bertin's review. It comes ahead of new legally enforced rules requiring websites that host pornographic or other harmful content to have 'robust' age verification in place for UK users by July at the latest. Methods to be required include open banking, photo ID matching, facial age estimation, credit card checks, digital ID services and email-based age estimation. 'No such thing as safe strangulation' Andrea Simon, the director of the End Violence Against Women Coalition (EVAW), said: ' We welcome the Government's decision to criminalise the depiction of strangulation in pornography, a move that reflects years of campaigning by EVAW and other experts who have long warned about the normalisation of violence against women and girls in online content. 'There is no such thing as safe strangulation; women cannot consent to the long-term harm it can cause, including impaired cognitive functioning and memory. Its widespread portrayal in porn is fuelling dangerous behaviours, particularly among young people. 'This is a vital step towards recognising the role violent pornography plays in shaping attitudes to women and regulating an industry which promotes and profits from violence against women. The UK's flagship Online Safety Act must now be updated to ensure online platforms are made to remove this content.'
Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
‘Man with gun' arrested at London Underground station
A 61-year-old man was arrested at a London Underground station after reportedly carrying a gun. British Transport Police officers swarmed Elm Park station on Thursday morning after receiving reports of a man 'in possession of a firearm' in east London. The force was called as rush hour began at 7am, with commuters starting to board the Tube at the District Line station. The station was closed for several hours as a result, with Transport for London confirming it had only reopened by 10.45am. A British Transport Police spokesman said: 'A 61-year-old man was arrested on suspicion of possession of a firearm and taken into custody. 'Anyone who witnessed the incident or who has information is asked to contact BTP by texting 61016, or by calling 0800 40 50 40 quoting reference 109 of June 19.'
