logo
Exclusive: British Muslim Network backed by charity set up by former archbishop Welby

Exclusive: British Muslim Network backed by charity set up by former archbishop Welby

Middle East Eye13-02-2025

A new national body appearing to challenge the leadership credentials of the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) has lost many of its earlier backers and is being backed by a charity set up by disgraced former Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby, Middle East Eye can reveal.
The new body, the British Muslim Network (BMN), is set to hold its launch event on 25 February but faces an escalating crisis as increasing numbers of Muslim MPs refuse to attend, MEE understands.
Last July, MEE first reported on plans to create a new Labour-supported Muslim group designed to engage with the government.
Since then, MEE understands that the initiative has lost most of its backing, including hundreds of thousands of pounds in funding.
Several Muslim MPs have privately said they will not accept invitations to attend the upcoming launch event.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
BMN co-founder Akeela Ahmed said in late January that the network was 'only speaking to potential funders within the British Muslim community'.
But three anonymous Labour insiders with knowledge of the matter told MEE that the BMN is receiving a large part of its support from the Together Coalition.
The coalition is a charity co-founded by Welby and Brendan Cox, the husband of the Labour MP Jo Cox who was murdered by a far-right-inspired gunman in 2016.
Muslims Don't Matter: Sayeeda Warsi lacerates her former Tory colleagues Read More »
According to its website, the Together Coalition's steering group, which oversees its direction, is chaired by the Archbishop of Canterbury, a title held until recently by Welby.
Welby resigned as archbishop late last year after a report found that the Church of England covered up sexual abuse by a barrister who attacked as many as 130 boys and young men.
Welby's successor as archbishop has not yet been appointed.
Prominent members of the Together Coalition's steering group include Matthew Elliot, who was the chief executive of the Vote Leave campaign that advocated for Brexit in 2016, and Lord Richard Dannatt, a former head of the British army.
Women's equality activist Julie Siddiqi, another member of the steering group, is understood to be heavily involved in the BMN.
'No credibility '
Labour insiders told MEE that Cox, who is the Together Coalition's head of strategy and is understood to be close to the Labour leadership, is a key figure behind the new network.
MEE also understands that Cox is concerned that figures like Siddiqi who are behind the BMN lack credibility within the Muslim community.
'The BMN has not gone in the way that they expected and instead of bringing people together, it is creating further division'
- Labour source
"Brendan is aware that figures who are rumoured to be involved with the BMN, like Julie Siddiqi or Imam Asim Hafez, have no credibility within the community,' said a source who is in regular contact with grassroots Muslim groups.
"The BMN has not gone in the way that they expected and instead of bringing people together, it is creating further division."
Cox, who is not a Muslim, has previously praised the controversial Prevent programme and warned that 'You don't need to import the conflict from Israel-Palestine into the UK'.
In 2018, Cox confessed to inappropriate behaviour and resigned from two charities after multiple allegations of sexual assault surfaced. He strongly denied the accusations.
MEE understands that a number of people involved in the project to create a new Muslim organisation held a meeting last May which was organised by the Together Coalition at Cumberland Lodge, a 17th-century country house in Windsor.
The BMN has presented itself as seeking to allow the government to engage with British Muslim communities, which is what the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB), founded in the late 1990s, aims to do.
British Jews explain their turn away from Israel and Zionism Read More »
An invitation to the BMN's launch event, seen by MEE, said the network had been created as a result of 'the joining of many heads and hearts over the past few months and is linked to conversations that have been taking place in British Muslim communities for many years.'
The proposal document MEE reported on last July said that the government and policy makers 'are not easily able to access, connect or seek credible and expert advice from diverse British Muslim communities', creating a 'dire need for a credible group'.
But consecutive governments have followed a policy of refusing to engage with Britain's largest umbrella body claiming to represent British Muslims, the Muslim Council of Britain.
The MCB has over 500 member organisations, including mosques, schools, local and county councils, professional networks and advocacy groups.
In August, MEE revealed that the Labour government even ignored communications from the MCB during the far-right riots that raged across the country for over a week.
Another Labour insider, speaking on condition of anonymity, told MEE there was outrage over 'repeated attempts to divide the Muslim community into so-called good Muslims that will be allowed to engage with the government, and so-called bad Muslims that will be boycotted.
'It is as dangerous as it is racist,' the source added. 'The involvement of non-Muslim individuals and organisations in driving these divisive projects particularly reeks of Islamophobia.'
A spokesperson for the Together Coalition told MEE: 'As part of our work to address threats to community cohesion, we work with a wide variety of civil society groups to help ensure voices and communities that are marginalised get the support they deserve.'
Access and representation
MEE understands that Cox has played a central role in shaping Labour's broader faith engagement strategy, with the party relying heavily on the Together Coalition for community outreach.
According to a Labour Party source, Cox has emerged as a key figure in these efforts.
His influence is reportedly tied to his connections within the party and his broader interfaith work, particularly through relationships with figures like the former archbishop.
'You don't need to import the conflict from Israel-Palestine into the UK'
- Brendan Cox
Cox's involvement has facilitated structured engagement with faith communities, but sources suggest that these efforts are often not representative.
And Cox has previously taken controversial positions on contentious political issues such as the Gaza war.
In December 2023, the Together Coalition held a mass vigil aiming to 'bridge divisions' by bringing people who lost family in Gaza together with those who lost family in Israel.
'The vast majority of the debate is dominated by the loudest, most extreme voices,' Cox said in an interview before the vigil.
'What we're being told time and time again is you have to take a side, there's only one side and the other side is evil. And in those moments, I guess my concern about it is you whip up this anger, you whip up this hatred.'
Prime Minister Keir Starmer has so far continued the previous government's policy of not engaging with the MCB (AFP)
He added: 'You don't need to import the conflict from Israel-Palestine into the UK.'
Cox has also advocated 'increasing public support' for the controversial Prevent anti-extremism programme, advocating for its reform but defending it against criticisms made in 2023 by government-appointed reviewer William Shawcross, who accused Prevent of insufficiently targeting Islamist extremism.
Cox also disputed the 'perception of Prevent as biased against Muslim communities', saying that the policy's mistakes in its early stages had been 'exploited by groups who wanted to undermine Prevent for ideological reasons'.
British Muslim creators 'herded' into Prevent funding, says Equi think tank Read More »
The Times reported in late January that prominent supporters of the new network included Baroness Sayeeda Warsi, a former Conservative minister and member of the House of Lords.
The report came just days after Warsi was one of the main speakers at the Muslim Council of Britain's annual dinner, where she criticised successive governments for not engaging with the organisation.
"How dare they? How dare we be told who we can have to speak on our behalf? How dare we not be allowed the agency of our own representation?" Warsi said in her speech.
"How dare we be told that we are going to be accountable for what somebody may have said two decades ago? How dare we be held accountable for every single word of every single person who's ever been involved in an institution?"
MEE contacted Warsi for comment but did not receive a response by time of publication.
A spokesperson for the Muslim Council of Britain said the organisation "welcomes all genuine efforts to serve British Muslim communities. With over 500 affiliated organisations and regular democratic elections, we remain focused on uniting, empowering, and serving our communities through impactful grassroots work and constructive dialogue with all partners.
"As part of this commitment, our Vision 2050 sets out a long-term roadmap for a confident, successful, and engaged British Muslim community."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

By threatening the ICC, David Cameron disgraced Britain
By threatening the ICC, David Cameron disgraced Britain

Middle East Eye

time14 minutes ago

  • Middle East Eye

By threatening the ICC, David Cameron disgraced Britain

By threatening the International Criminal Court's chief prosecutor, former British Foreign Secretary David Cameron has joined Russian President Vladimir Putin among a small group of unsavoury world leaders who have menaced or bullied the ICC. In plain English, the former foreign secretary (and former prime minister) has been caught red-handed in an attempt to pervert the course of justice. The motive for Cameron's appalling conduct: a determination to protect Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defence minister, Yoav Gallant, from war crimes charges. In the words of the ICC, these war crimes included 'starvation as a method of warfare; and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts'. Cameron told ICC chief prosecutor Karim Khan that issuing an arrest warrant against Netanyahu and Gallant would be 'like dropping a hydrogen bomb'. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Cameron's contempt for the rule of law and readiness to resort to menace and intimidation is standard procedure from the likes of Putin, Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump. But Britain is a country that prides itself on respect for the rule of law. We claim to be part of a moral international order. We ought to be better than that - much better. No excuses The fact that Cameron resorted to menace in order to protect the reputation of Netanyahu, a suspected war criminal, places Britain as a part of a group of gangster nations and rogue states for whom might is right. Cameron has therefore disgraced himself and the Conservative Party - and above all, he has disgraced Britain. There are no excuses. He cannot claim inexperience. Cameron was British prime minister for six years, and he had been brought back as foreign secretary when he sought to intimidate Khan. Exclusive: David Cameron threatened to withdraw UK from ICC over Israel war crimes probe Read More » So far, there has been no response from the Foreign Office or Downing Street to Middle East Eye's revelations about Cameron's despicable behaviour. The Foreign Office declined to comment in response to an MEE request. That silence is deafening. To avoid Britain's reputation being permanently besmirched, Prime Minister Keir Starmer has a duty to come out and make a statement, conveying that he is horrified and disgusted by Cameron's conduct as foreign secretary. He also needs to restate Britain's commitment to the ICC and the values it embodies. This intervention is all the more urgent, because putting pressure on the ICC could constitute a criminal act under British domestic law as well as international law. The Rome Statute that established the ICC does not just prosecute those who commit war crimes. It also criminalises those who seek to prevent war crimes from being prosecuted. The relevant passage of the Rome Statute, Article 70, awards the court jurisdiction over those responsible for 'impeding, intimidating or corruptly influencing an official of the Court for the purpose of forcing or persuading the official not to perform, or to perform improperly, his or her duties'. Cameron's threat to 'defund the court and withdraw from the Rome Statute' falls squarely within ICC jurisdiction. Reckless actions There are also potential consequences under domestic law. Section 54 (1) of the International Criminal Court Act 2001 notes: 'A person intentionally committing any of the acts mentioned in article 70.1 (offences against the administration of justice in relation to the ICC) may be dealt with as for the corresponding domestic offence committed in relation to a superior court in England and Wales.' In short, Cameron now finds himself in hot water. One lawyer with whom I spoke last night, while not conversant with all the details, told me that in his judgment, the case for a prosecution is strong. A British foreign secretary tried to subvert the course of justice. Cameron needs to break his silence and to explain himself In Britain, the maximum penalty for perverting the course of justice is life imprisonment, though in practice sentences are likely to be much lower. Leaving aside the possible long-term consequences of Cameron's reckless behaviour, the immediate political reverberations are immense. Britain is a country that prides itself on the rule of law. We claim to be part of the rules-based international order. To his eternal credit, Khan, a British citizen, stood up to Cameron's threats. But the inescapable fact remains that a British foreign secretary tried to subvert the course of justice. Cameron needs to break his silence and to explain himself. Meanwhile, Starmer would be well-advised to order an urgent enquiry into the shocking revelation that Cameron sought to intimidate the chief prosecutor of the ICC. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.

UK and allies sanction Israeli ministers Ben Gvir and Smotrich over 'monstrous' Gaza comments
UK and allies sanction Israeli ministers Ben Gvir and Smotrich over 'monstrous' Gaza comments

Middle East Eye

time14 minutes ago

  • Middle East Eye

UK and allies sanction Israeli ministers Ben Gvir and Smotrich over 'monstrous' Gaza comments

The United Kingdom and several of its allies have sanctioned far-right Israeli ministers Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich over over their "monstrous" comments about Gaza. In a significant break from Washington, the UK is imposing asset freezes and travel bans on Israel's National Security Minister Ben Gvir - a West Bank settler - and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich. The two have fiercely opposed the entry of international aid into Gaza and advocated for the forced expulsion of Palestinians from the territory, with Ben Gvir has called for Israel to "encourage the voluntary emigration of the residents of Gaza". Meanwhile, Smotrich pledged last month that "Gaza will be entirely destroyed" and that Palestinians will "leave in great numbers to third countries." Speaking to the BBC, UK Foreign Secretery David Lammy said the ministers, along with the Israeli government had been repeatedly warned against "encouraging egregious abuses of human rights." New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "Alongside our partners, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Norway today, we are announcing sanctions against those individuals, because we have been absolutely clear this has to stop. "We stand by a two state solution, and the violence that we've seen in the West Bank, particularly, is entirely unacceptable and must stop." Smotrich vows to 'rebuild temple' during Jerusalem Day celebrations Read More » Smotrich has long advocated for extending Israeli sovereignty over the occupied West Bank and Gaza, and across the Middle East as part of his vision of a 'Greater Israel'. He also declared that Israel would 'apply sovereignty' in the occupied West Bank before the next Israeli general elections in October 2026. 'Within a few months, we will be able to declare that we have won. Gaza will be totally destroyed,' Smotrich said. 'In another six months, Hamas won't exist as a functioning entity.' On Tuesday, Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said that Israel had been informed by the UK of its decision to impose sanctions on the two government ministers, describing the move as "outrageous". "We were informed about the UK decision to include two of our ministers on the British sanctions list," Saar told a press conference. "It is outrageous that elected representatives and members of the government are subjected to these kinds of measures."

Israeli hard-liners Ben-Gvir and Smotrich targeted in UK-led sanctions
Israeli hard-liners Ben-Gvir and Smotrich targeted in UK-led sanctions

The National

time29 minutes ago

  • The National

Israeli hard-liners Ben-Gvir and Smotrich targeted in UK-led sanctions

Several countries led by Britain have sanctioned two senior Israeli cabinet ministers, leading to a major diplomatic fallout. Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich will both face travel bans and financial restrictions from the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Norway. In an official statement, the British government said the pair were 'now sanctioned for their repeated incitement of violence against Palestinian civilians, effective immediately'. We expect the UK government to recognise the state of Palestine. This is good but does not get us to that point Husam Zomlot In a joint statement with foreign ministers from Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway, UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: 'Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich have incited extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights. These actions are not acceptable. This is why we have taken action now – to hold those responsible to account. 'We will strive to achieve an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, the immediate release of the remaining hostages by Hamas which can have no future role in the governance of Gaza, a surge in aid and a path to a two-state solution.' It is a significant escalation in political pressure against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government. The souring of relations with friendly western countries was further cemented after a senior Israeli cabinet minister condemned the sanctions as 'outrageous' and 'unacceptable'. Husam Zomlot, the head of the Palestinian Mission to the UK, welcomed the government's response to the ministers repeated incitements of violence against Palestinian communities. Speaking exclusively to The National he called the move a 'significant step in the right direction'. 'These two ministers have been publicly calling for the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, not only by words but by deeds,' Mr Zomlot said. 'These two ministers have been literally physically arming illegal settlers [that are] going on the rampage, committing all the crimes that the world has been following.' Mr Ben-Gvir and Mr Smotrich were given travel bans to the UK, which acted alongside partners Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway. 'Sanctioning these ministers is absolutely the right step in the right direction,' added Mr Zomlot, who called on London to make further changes to its policy in response to developments across the Palestinian territory. 'This is not a substitute for the arms embargo, not a substitute for sanctions on the entire ecosystem of illegality, including settlements, and not a substitute for the recognition of the state of Palestine.' With a French and Saudi Arabian-sponsored conference on June 17-20 at UN headquarters on advancing the two state solution, Mr Zomlot said the opportunity was looming for the UK to announce that step. 'We are awaiting that conference next week, we expect the UK government to recognise the state of Palestine. This is good but does not get us to that point.' But the renewed bloody Gaza offensive, which has seen the death toll of Palestinians increase to 55,700, has turned international opinion against Israel. British MPs from all parties have in recent weeks become angry at Israel's actions and condemnatory of the UK government's failure to impose sanctions or recognise the Palestinian state. Mr Lammy and Middle East Minister Hamish Falconer have had to fend off accusations of killings and inhumane treatment of Palestinians. From January last year to April this year extremist settlers have carried out more than 1,900 attack against Palestinian civilians, the UK government said. The diplomatic fallout began even before the sanctions were officially announced with Israel's government reacting furiously after Minister of Foreign Affairs Gideon Sa'ar condemned the 'British sanctions list'. 'It is outrageous that elected representatives and members of the government are subjected to these kind of measures.' Mr Netanyahu will now hold a special government meeting early next week 'to decide on our response to this unacceptable decision,' he added. Mr Ben Gvir reacted defiantly, stating on X that: 'We survived Pharaoh, we will also survive Keir Starmer. I will continue to work for Israel and the people of Israel without fear or intimidation!' In further retaliation to the sanctions Mr Smotrich allegedly threatened to stop transferring funds to the Palestinian Authority. Even the pair's political foe, Benny Gantz, stated that while he 'deeply' disagreed with their views, the sanctions were a 'profound moral failure and a bad message to the entire world' that he claimed would 'fuel global terrorism'. Tuesday's action could well have a unifying effect on the Israeli government which is comprised of fragile coalition that includes hard-right figures and ultraorthodox. This has allowed Mr Smotrich to approve expansion of illegal occupied West Bank settlements while he has also vigorously campaigned against allowing humanitarian aid into Gaza, He caused outrage after stating that he would allow 'not even a grain of wheat' to enter the territory and only last month stated that Gaza would be 'entirely destroyed'. He also referred to ethnic cleansing by suggesting that Palestinians should 'leave in great numbers to third countries'. His colleague Mr Ben-Gvir, who was convicted of incitement to racism in 2007, has also stoked fires by advocating the replacement of the Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem with a synagogue. He too has called for Palestinians to be expelled from Gaza and stated that 'there is no need to bring in aid, they have enough'. Among senior MPs who have called for stronger action against the pair has been Emily Thornberry, chairwoman of the foreign affairs committee. 'I and others have been calling for sanctions on these extremist Israeli ministers for the better part of a year,' she posted on X. 'The government is finally doing the right thing.' In reference to the summit jointly hosted by France and Saudi Arabia, she argued that the sanctions 'must be a precursor to recognising a Palestinian state next week – not an alternative to it'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store