logo
Exclusive: British Muslim Network backed by charity set up by former archbishop Welby

Exclusive: British Muslim Network backed by charity set up by former archbishop Welby

Middle East Eye13-02-2025

A new national body appearing to challenge the leadership credentials of the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) has lost many of its earlier backers and is being backed by a charity set up by disgraced former Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby, Middle East Eye can reveal.
The new body, the British Muslim Network (BMN), is set to hold its launch event on 25 February but faces an escalating crisis as increasing numbers of Muslim MPs refuse to attend, MEE understands.
Last July, MEE first reported on plans to create a new Labour-supported Muslim group designed to engage with the government.
Since then, MEE understands that the initiative has lost most of its backing, including hundreds of thousands of pounds in funding.
Several Muslim MPs have privately said they will not accept invitations to attend the upcoming launch event.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
BMN co-founder Akeela Ahmed said in late January that the network was 'only speaking to potential funders within the British Muslim community'.
But three anonymous Labour insiders with knowledge of the matter told MEE that the BMN is receiving a large part of its support from the Together Coalition.
The coalition is a charity co-founded by Welby and Brendan Cox, the husband of the Labour MP Jo Cox who was murdered by a far-right-inspired gunman in 2016.
Muslims Don't Matter: Sayeeda Warsi lacerates her former Tory colleagues Read More »
According to its website, the Together Coalition's steering group, which oversees its direction, is chaired by the Archbishop of Canterbury, a title held until recently by Welby.
Welby resigned as archbishop late last year after a report found that the Church of England covered up sexual abuse by a barrister who attacked as many as 130 boys and young men.
Welby's successor as archbishop has not yet been appointed.
Prominent members of the Together Coalition's steering group include Matthew Elliot, who was the chief executive of the Vote Leave campaign that advocated for Brexit in 2016, and Lord Richard Dannatt, a former head of the British army.
Women's equality activist Julie Siddiqi, another member of the steering group, is understood to be heavily involved in the BMN.
'No credibility '
Labour insiders told MEE that Cox, who is the Together Coalition's head of strategy and is understood to be close to the Labour leadership, is a key figure behind the new network.
MEE also understands that Cox is concerned that figures like Siddiqi who are behind the BMN lack credibility within the Muslim community.
'The BMN has not gone in the way that they expected and instead of bringing people together, it is creating further division'
- Labour source
"Brendan is aware that figures who are rumoured to be involved with the BMN, like Julie Siddiqi or Imam Asim Hafez, have no credibility within the community,' said a source who is in regular contact with grassroots Muslim groups.
"The BMN has not gone in the way that they expected and instead of bringing people together, it is creating further division."
Cox, who is not a Muslim, has previously praised the controversial Prevent programme and warned that 'You don't need to import the conflict from Israel-Palestine into the UK'.
In 2018, Cox confessed to inappropriate behaviour and resigned from two charities after multiple allegations of sexual assault surfaced. He strongly denied the accusations.
MEE understands that a number of people involved in the project to create a new Muslim organisation held a meeting last May which was organised by the Together Coalition at Cumberland Lodge, a 17th-century country house in Windsor.
The BMN has presented itself as seeking to allow the government to engage with British Muslim communities, which is what the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB), founded in the late 1990s, aims to do.
British Jews explain their turn away from Israel and Zionism Read More »
An invitation to the BMN's launch event, seen by MEE, said the network had been created as a result of 'the joining of many heads and hearts over the past few months and is linked to conversations that have been taking place in British Muslim communities for many years.'
The proposal document MEE reported on last July said that the government and policy makers 'are not easily able to access, connect or seek credible and expert advice from diverse British Muslim communities', creating a 'dire need for a credible group'.
But consecutive governments have followed a policy of refusing to engage with Britain's largest umbrella body claiming to represent British Muslims, the Muslim Council of Britain.
The MCB has over 500 member organisations, including mosques, schools, local and county councils, professional networks and advocacy groups.
In August, MEE revealed that the Labour government even ignored communications from the MCB during the far-right riots that raged across the country for over a week.
Another Labour insider, speaking on condition of anonymity, told MEE there was outrage over 'repeated attempts to divide the Muslim community into so-called good Muslims that will be allowed to engage with the government, and so-called bad Muslims that will be boycotted.
'It is as dangerous as it is racist,' the source added. 'The involvement of non-Muslim individuals and organisations in driving these divisive projects particularly reeks of Islamophobia.'
A spokesperson for the Together Coalition told MEE: 'As part of our work to address threats to community cohesion, we work with a wide variety of civil society groups to help ensure voices and communities that are marginalised get the support they deserve.'
Access and representation
MEE understands that Cox has played a central role in shaping Labour's broader faith engagement strategy, with the party relying heavily on the Together Coalition for community outreach.
According to a Labour Party source, Cox has emerged as a key figure in these efforts.
His influence is reportedly tied to his connections within the party and his broader interfaith work, particularly through relationships with figures like the former archbishop.
'You don't need to import the conflict from Israel-Palestine into the UK'
- Brendan Cox
Cox's involvement has facilitated structured engagement with faith communities, but sources suggest that these efforts are often not representative.
And Cox has previously taken controversial positions on contentious political issues such as the Gaza war.
In December 2023, the Together Coalition held a mass vigil aiming to 'bridge divisions' by bringing people who lost family in Gaza together with those who lost family in Israel.
'The vast majority of the debate is dominated by the loudest, most extreme voices,' Cox said in an interview before the vigil.
'What we're being told time and time again is you have to take a side, there's only one side and the other side is evil. And in those moments, I guess my concern about it is you whip up this anger, you whip up this hatred.'
Prime Minister Keir Starmer has so far continued the previous government's policy of not engaging with the MCB (AFP)
He added: 'You don't need to import the conflict from Israel-Palestine into the UK.'
Cox has also advocated 'increasing public support' for the controversial Prevent anti-extremism programme, advocating for its reform but defending it against criticisms made in 2023 by government-appointed reviewer William Shawcross, who accused Prevent of insufficiently targeting Islamist extremism.
Cox also disputed the 'perception of Prevent as biased against Muslim communities', saying that the policy's mistakes in its early stages had been 'exploited by groups who wanted to undermine Prevent for ideological reasons'.
British Muslim creators 'herded' into Prevent funding, says Equi think tank Read More »
The Times reported in late January that prominent supporters of the new network included Baroness Sayeeda Warsi, a former Conservative minister and member of the House of Lords.
The report came just days after Warsi was one of the main speakers at the Muslim Council of Britain's annual dinner, where she criticised successive governments for not engaging with the organisation.
"How dare they? How dare we be told who we can have to speak on our behalf? How dare we not be allowed the agency of our own representation?" Warsi said in her speech.
"How dare we be told that we are going to be accountable for what somebody may have said two decades ago? How dare we be held accountable for every single word of every single person who's ever been involved in an institution?"
MEE contacted Warsi for comment but did not receive a response by time of publication.
A spokesperson for the Muslim Council of Britain said the organisation "welcomes all genuine efforts to serve British Muslim communities. With over 500 affiliated organisations and regular democratic elections, we remain focused on uniting, empowering, and serving our communities through impactful grassroots work and constructive dialogue with all partners.
"As part of this commitment, our Vision 2050 sets out a long-term roadmap for a confident, successful, and engaged British Muslim community."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel should work with regional states to 'build alternative to Hamas' in Gaza, left-wing leader says
Israel should work with regional states to 'build alternative to Hamas' in Gaza, left-wing leader says

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

Israel should work with regional states to 'build alternative to Hamas' in Gaza, left-wing leader says

Israel should work with regional powers to secure Gaza's future and establish an alternative to Hamas in the enclave, as well as forging an alliance against Iran, a key leader of the Israeli opposition has said. Yair Golan, a former deputy chief of the Israeli military who now leads the Democrats party, also said he was determined to 'save Israel from a messianic and extremist' government, as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu 's far-right coalition teeters on the brink of collapse. Mr Golan has emerged as one of the most dynamic leaders on the country's beleaguered political left, which for years has struggled to have its voice heard by voters in an increasingly religious and right-wing society. In an address on Monday to foreign journalists in East Jerusalem, he emphasised his stance – shared by the majority of Israelis, according to the most recent polling – that the government should prioritise efforts to secure a ceasefire deal and the release of hostages in Gaza, over continuing the conflict. 'I believe we can reach hostage deal in matter of days … I believe that by ending the war and freeing the hostages we will be able to build an alternative to Hamas inside Gaza Strip,' he said. 'We should work with the region in order to build this alternative. With the moderate Sunni countries we should build an alternative in order to provide Gazans with an alternative to the extreme and violent regime of Hamas.' Such efforts would also allow Israel to "forge a regional alliance against the Iranian threat', he added. Mr Golan has previously come under fire for his criticism of the war in Gaza. In May, he faced widespread condemnation for comments that appeared to criticise Israel for killing Gazan babies 'as a hobby'. 'Israel is on the way to becoming a pariah state, like South Africa was, if we don't return to acting like a sane country,' Mr Golan said on Kan radio. "A sane country does not fight against civilians, does not kill babies as a hobby and does not set itself the aim of expelling populations." He later said the remarks were aimed at Mr Netanyahu's government, rather than the military. Mr Golan also criticised the idea of annexing the occupied West Bank, a priority for some members of Mr Netanyahu's far-right coalition. He said the move would be a "disaster for Israel', given that millions of Palestinians would suddenly be added to the country's population. The Democrats party, which holds four of the 120 seats in Israel's parliament, also addressed the years-long saga over whether ultra-Orthodox Israelis should serve in the military like all other young Jewish citizens. The issue is coming to a head, with potentially terminal results for Mr Netanyahu's government. Ultra-Orthodox parties have threatened to withdraw from the coalition over the lack of progress in passing a law that would enshrine the community's exemption from military service. "The vast majority [of Israelis] want a new draft law that encompasses all young citizens of Israel," Mr Golan said.

Seizure of Madleen is the latest in more than a decade of Israeli attacks on aid flotillas
Seizure of Madleen is the latest in more than a decade of Israeli attacks on aid flotillas

Middle East Eye

timean hour ago

  • Middle East Eye

Seizure of Madleen is the latest in more than a decade of Israeli attacks on aid flotillas

Israeli forces seized control of the Madleen aid vessel aiming to break the blockade of the Gaza Strip on Monday morning - the latest of many such Israeli interceptions over the past decade and a half. The British-flagged Madleen, which is operated by the Freedom Flotilla Coalition (FFC), was seeking to deliver a symbolic amount of humanitarian aid, including rice and baby formula, and raise international awareness of the humanitarian crisis there. However, the boat was intercepted in the early hours of Monday before it could reach Gaza, the FFC said on its Telegram account. Israeli authorities detained its crew of 12, including Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg and French politician Rima Hassan. Before their arrest, crew aboard the FFC had said that quadcopters surrounded the vessel and sprayed it with a "white liquid". New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters It's the latest instance of years of Israeli attacks on FFC-organised aid vessels attempting to break Israel's 18-year air, naval and land blockade on the Palestinian territory. The FFC says that it is governed by the principles of non-violent resistance. The coalition includes member organisations from several countries, including Canada, Italy, Malaysia, New Zealand, Norway, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, the US, Ireland, Brazil, Australia and France. Middle East Eye takes a look at the history of Israeli attacks on FFC flotillas. Decade and half of Israeli attacks The coalition first came together in 2010, after Israeli forces boarded a Freedom Flotilla mission in May that year and killed 1o activists. The Mavi Marmara mission had been organised by the Free Gaza Movement and Turkey's IHH Humanitarian Relief Foundation. The ship set sail on 22 May from Sarayburnu port, Istanbul, in an attempt to breach the Israeli blockade on Gaza. A week later, in the Mediterranean Sea south of Cyprus, it joined the rest of the aid flotilla, comprising three passenger and three cargo ships carrying essential humanitarian aid and 700 activists. But on 31 May 2010, despite being in international waters, Israeli troops violently boarded the Mavi Marmara vessel using helicopters and speedboats. Nine people were killed instantly, while another later died as a result of his wounds. The incident became a major international story, with Israel's actions receiving strong condemnations. Following the 2010 mission, the FFC was created to bring together and coordinate various campaigns from around the world seeking to break Israel's siege. A subsequent mission in 2011, named "Freedom Flotilla II - Stay Human", was due to set sail towards Gaza on 5 July. However, the vast majority of vessels in the flotilla were unable to depart. Organisers said that Israel had sabotaged two of the ships set to depart from Turkey and Greece. One of the vessels, organised by an Irish group, was not allowed to leave the port after Greek authorities cited safety concerns. The only aid ship that managed to get near Gaza, the French vessel Dignite al-Karama, was intercepted by Israeli authorities. Greta Thunberg aboard Gaza flotilla: Doing nothing 'is not an option' Read More » Freedom Flotilla III, which left Sweden on 10 May 2015, was again intercepted by Israeli authorities in international waters a month and a half after setting sail. One of the boats, named Marianne, was forced by Israeli troops to turn towards the city of Ashdod, in southern Israel. Other vessels also turned back. Among those on Marianne were lawmaker Basel Ghattas, a Palestinian citizen of Israel, and Moncef Marzouki, the former president of Tunisia. The following year, the FFC organised the Women's Boat to Gaza, a single ship with an entirely female crew. It set sail from Barcelona on 14 September 2016, but two weeks later, on 5 October, was seized by Israeli forces. The entirety of the all-female crew - which included journalists, actors, politicians and even a Nobel Peace Prize winner - were arrested by Israeli troops, who took them to Ashdod. All of them were subsequently deported. Another mission, which set sail in May 2017 in solidarity with Gaza fishermen, was attacked by a suspected Israeli drone in international waters near Malta. In July the following year, Israeli forces stopped al-Awda, a Norwegian flagged fishing boat that was part of the coalition. All 22 people on board were arrested and taken to Ashdod. In 2023 and 2024, the ship Handala, which focused on the children of Gaza, set sail to several destinations in Europe to educate people about Israel's siege and war on Gaza. Last month, another vessel organised by the FFC, the Conscience, failed to continue its journey after being struck by an Israeli drone near Maltese waters.

On Palestine at the UN, it's Netanyahu versus the world
On Palestine at the UN, it's Netanyahu versus the world

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

On Palestine at the UN, it's Netanyahu versus the world

The government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is setting the stage for the upcoming UN International Conference for the Peaceful Settlement of the Question of Palestine and the Implementation of the Two-State Solution. The three-day session, to be held in New York from June 17-20, will be chaired by the President of France, Emmanuel Macron, and Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. It is believed that at this confab, France and a number of other countries will formally recognise the State of Palestine. In an angry response, Mr Netanyahu announced that should France and others make this announcement, Israel will retaliate with the formal annexation of the Occupied Palestinian Territories. In a sense, the threats are meaningless, not because Israel couldn't take measures to sabotage a Palestinian state, but because this is precisely what it has been doing for several decades – and it has accelerated its efforts in the past few years. The daily news from Gaza is numbing. Earlier, in March this year, after 18 months of an immense toll in lives and property, Israel agreed to a ceasefire, only to break it and intensify its plans to wipe out and annex large swathes of this territory. Daily, there are reports of Israeli bombings, shelling, or shootings that kill scores of Palestinians at shelters or food distribution sites. In too many instances, Israeli officials first deny that it happened, then deny that they had anything to do with the killings – 'it might have been Hamas' or, 'if we did, it was because our soldiers were forced to shoot in the air' to control unruly crowds. When all else fails, the government obfuscates by announcing that a military review panel is looking into the matter (coupled with the charge that anyone prejudging the matter before the Israeli military publicly issues its findings – which they never do – must be harbouring an anti-Israel bias). The result is that there is no accountability, and the killings continue. The Netanyahu government's plan for Gaza is taking shape. The logic behind the Israeli-US 'humanitarian mission' in Gaza is now established and that is to facilitate their masterplan for the area to wipe out the population. First, the Israeli government is conducting 'mopping up' operations in the north, evicting as many Palestinians as possible from 80 per cent of Gaza and forcing them to congregate in congested areas along the southern border. Then, after denying Palestinians food aid for three months, they have set up these Israeli-run food distribution sites in the south with the clear message that 'if you're hungry and want food, this is the only place you'll get it.' As throngs of desperate Palestinians amass at the sites, Israeli forces use live ammunition as crowd control, killing dozens at each location. The entire enterprise is inhuman and yet it continues. The situation in the West Bank has gone from bad to worse. After months of raids that have taken the lives of 1,000 Palestinians and destroyed the homes of 40,000, the Israeli government has authorised the establishment of 22 new settlements, the confiscation of more Palestinian lands, and the construction of more Jewish-only roads. All of this will serve to further the cantonisation of the West Bank, isolating Palestinian population centres from one another. The design Israel's government is following was laid out in 1978 by Matityahu Drobles of the World Zionist Organisation. The Drobles Plan envisioned total conquest of the West Bank through the establishment of Israeli settlement blocs connected by highways and secured infrastructure that would divide the area making the establishment of a contiguous Palestinian state impossible. This was Drobles' declared intent. Back in the 1970s, Israel's Labour governments rejected this idea, preferring to build settlements along the 1967 lines. When the Likud party came to power, they embraced Drobles in 1979 and began to implement it, but without ever formally acknowledging it. Now they have. Palestinians in East Jerusalem fare no better. They still face threats of confiscation of homes and properties, the weaponisation of archaeology through which the Israeli government has seized sites they believe hold special importance to their history, while ignoring that same site's pre-history or current importance to Palestinian Muslims or Christians. And while Christians and Muslims are violently assaulted or harassed as they seek to pray on their faiths' holy days, Jewish worshippers are protected by the Israeli military as they violate what had been the previously accepted 'status quo' at the Haram Al Sharif. While in the past, these violations were carried out by a handful of Jewish religious extremists, now there are thousands, including officials, who annually invade the Haram. And as if to signal their clear intentions, Israeli officials have changed street signs which once pointed the way to the 'Haram' to now read the 'Temple'. And so, the upcoming UN sessions have the makings of a supreme test of wills. It pits the Israeli government, backed by the US, against the rest of the world. What Israel's government is doing and what it still can do is known. The question is whether other nations will find the resolve to directly confront Israel's plans and take action to isolate and seek accountability from it for its actions. It will require more than recognition of Palestinian rights, verbal protests, or resolutions of disapproval of Israeli policies. Europe can't just protest settlements and genocide in Gaza, while continuing to be the largest buyers of Israeli-made weapons. If they don't apply sanctions (like Spain) or boycott settlement products (like Ireland), nothing will change. In a real sense, at stake during next week's UN sessions is more than just recognition of a Palestinian state, it is the survival of the rule of law and human rights covenants and the integrity of the UN.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store