‘A big decision to make': Child-care association says many operators troubled by funding changes
Association of Alberta Childcare Entrepreneurs chair Krystal Churcher speaks with Alberta Primetime host Michael Higgins about provincial funding changes.
This interview has been edited for clarity and length.
Michael Higgins: How expected was notification that these subsidies might not be available, that this federal provincial program was nearing the limit and would be capped?
Krystal Churcher: Totally unexpected. We knew that there was a ticking deadline for these spaces to be allocated, but there was no real communication from the ministry or any of the departments that there was a timeline as close as May 15 for anyone to prepare.
I think the very last update made on the government's website said that it was expected possibly summer of 2025 so that's the level of vague communication that we've seen around this by the ministry.
MH: For those businesses getting ready to open new facilities, others expanding existing operations, where does this development leave them?
KC: It leaves them with a big decision to make about what they're going to do. It will really fall on families, is really where we're at. If a centre is opening right now as a for-profit model, families won't have access to the affordability grant funding under that child-care license.
So it's going to put families in a difficult decision of whether they can afford to pay full price and true market cost for child care at new centres, or if they remain on wait lists hoping for a government funded space.
MH: On the new child care centres themselves, I have to think these grants are built into business plans for small businesses?
KC: It's horrible. It is absolutely a horrific way to treat your investors and your stakeholders in a space, especially something as critical as child care. Most of us have our houses, our assets, tied to commercial leases in order to be able to open child-care centres.
This is exactly the same thing, on a larger scale, that happened when Alberta signed us into this program back in 2022. I was hoping that we would have learned from that experience that we need to really be transparent and allow people to be informed when making such large investments.
We're definitely going to see bankruptcies. We're going to see a lot of duress and financial stress. These financial decisions have been made years ahead of time. It takes nine to 12 months to open a child-care centre, minimum in Alberta, and unfortunately child-care licensing is one of the last steps to doing that.
So I would expect there's probably hundreds of operators out there that are not in the system yet, that may even have no idea that this has happened. It's an absolute mess.
MH: Back on that element of parents, especially for those queuing up for these new facilities, have some put down deposits on spaces, maybe building it into their own home budgets?
Where are they left? Is it just a matter of looking for a different option? Is there a different option at this point?
KC: We have an average of a two-to-three-year wait list in Alberta for a child care space right now. It just goes to show you, with this federal program, from the beginning, that parents, families and children are really not at the heart of it.
If they were, a business model like this wouldn't impact a family's access to child care or to these supports, like affordability grants. Parents are going to be in a difficult decision, difficult position of what they want to pay, and what they can afford to pay, and if that centre will even still be opening, because I know of a few that are not going to be able to move forward with this.
My inbox is full. I've had four conversations today with centres that were expected to open within the next week, that won't have access to this. So it's going to have a massive impact, for sure.
MH: How does the element of for-profit versus not-for-profit, weigh into this whole equation?
KC: It is the strongest element of this program. It's the whole ideology driving the $10/day child-care program. We never experienced anything prior to this where your business model of a for-profit or non-profit, would have impacted your ability for families to access subsidies and supports in your child care centre.
It didn't exist in Alberta or Canada like that prior to this. So it absolutely is the driving ideology behind this federal program.
MH: This notification arrived in the midst of a provincial government cabinet shuffle. Education Minister Dimitrios Nicolaides now has child care added to his portfolio. What kind of conversation are you prepared to have with him?
KC: I hope a transparent conversation. I don't know how many different ways that our association can ask the same question. You want child-care operators to invest in child care, you want high quality care for children in Alberta, yet you treat your stakeholders in this way where you're disregarding their investment.
You're totally disrespecting them as stakeholders and partners in creating this child-care system. It is not going to be long before quality child-care operators don't want to be in this space anymore.
I personally don't know why you would invest in Alberta in child care, and it's a substantial investment of money and time and education to do all of this when you're treated this way by your partner in this, which is your provincial government.
I wouldn't be surprised to see child care operators move to other provinces or other countries and look at those as options before they look in Alberta.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
30 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
What Canadian investors need to know about the Trump tax bill
If the first six months are any indication, the reign of U.S. President Donald Trump is going to be a rough one for Canadian investors. First, the stock market plunged earlier this spring as Mr. Trump's tariffs started a global trade war. Stocks have mostly recovered, but a new threat has emerged in the form of legislation that would allow Washington to ramp up the taxation of Canadians holding U.S. stocks. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act is not yet law – it passed in the U.S. House of Representatives by a single vote but must still pass in the Senate – and may change in scope. For now, it has the potential to more than double the tax applied to dividends from U.S. companies received by Canadian investors and corporations. The ultimate effect of the tax changes could be costly in total but perhaps not so bad on an individual basis. Regardless, it's too early to make changes in your investment portfolio. 'Currently, we're not making any moves, and I'm recommending everyone do the same thing and just wait to see what the information actually is,' said Justin Bender, a portfolio manager at PWL Capital. 'Then we can assess and see if there's any changes necessary.' Wealth managers brace for proposed U.S. tax bill's impacts on Canadian clients What's in Trump's big budget bill? From cuts to taxes and Medicaid, here's what to know Ultimately, Section 899 of the legislation could introduce a withholding tax of 20 to 50 per cent of dividends received by Canadians. There are estimates that this extra tax could cost individual investors, pension funds and others billions of dollars. The point of Section 899 is to give the U.S. a weapon to punish what it considers to be unfair taxes in other countries. Thought to be a target is our digital services tax, which mainly applies to U.S. tech giants generating revenue in Canada. Estimates from Mr. Bender show a worst-case additional drag on returns of 0.46 percentage points from U.S. stocks and U.S. equity exchange-traded funds when the higher withholding tax is fully phased in over four years. Think of this cost as being in addition to the management expense ratio of an ETF or mutual fund. If your return from a U.S. equity fund was a net 10 per cent with the management expense ratio (MER) included, then a higher withholding tax could ultimately leave you with as little as 9.54 per cent. Note that fund returns are always published on a net basis, with the MER included and, where applicable, foreign withholding taxes already deducted. Under existing U.S. tax law, there is a base withholding tax rate of 30 per cent for foreign investors holding U.S. stocks. A Canada-U.S. tax treaty generally reduces this rate to 15 per cent. No withholding tax applies to U.S. dividends paid into registered retirement savings plans and registered retirement income funds by U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs. There's no clear sense of whether this exemption would continue to apply under Section 899. In a non-registered account, you can offset the 15-per-cent withholding tax by claiming an offsetting foreign tax credit. In a TFSA, registered education savings plan, first home savings account or registered disability savings plan, the withholding tax cannot be recovered; it is also non-recoverable in RRSPs and RRIFs if you hold a Canadian-listed U.S. equity ETF. Canadian investors have a massive level of exposure to U.S. stocks directly and through funds. About $60-billion is invested in just four TSX-listed ETFs that track the S&P 500 index. But investing in the S&P 500, and the even more tech-focused Nasdaq, is much more about growth than dividend income. The dividend yield on the S&P 500 right now is about 1.3 per cent, half the level of the yield on Canada's S&P/TSX composite index. 'It's very low, which is why this tax maybe isn't as much of an issue as people are making it out to be,' Mr. Bender said. 'Some extra withholding taxes are probably not going to blow up your financial plan.' Mr. Bender added that the impact is further diminished by the fact that most investors have diversified their U.S. exposure with bonds and Canadian stocks, plus international markets in many cases. Investors who use ETFs for exposure to U.S. stocks can buy funds listed on U.S. exchanges as well as those located in Canada. Among Canadian-listed funds, there are those that hold U.S. stocks directly and those that are effectively a wrapper for a U.S.-listed fund in the same corporate family. Mr. Bender said each of these three ETF types would be affected similarly by higher U.S. withholding taxes. Are you a young Canadian with money on your mind? To set yourself up for success and steer clear of costly mistakes, listen to our award-winning Stress Test podcast.
CTV News
43 minutes ago
- CTV News
A timely start to strawberry season at Tincap Berry Farm near Brockville, Ont.
The strawberry picking season is underway in eastern Ontario. Tincap Berry Farm - just eight kilometres north of Brockville - sold its first batch of 2025 on Saturday. According to market manager Terri Dentz, it's a typical time to start the season and a nice change of pace from 2024 and 2023. 'Last year we started selling strawberries I think on May 28 or something,' says Dentz. 'So much, much earlier last year and the year before that.' The window to grow strawberries is limited in eastern Ontario's climate, but it's something Tincap is used to and it's why the farm is happy that this year's season started a bit later. 'Both of those years were really hard for us as producers to just manage the different weather conditions,' says Dentz. According to Environment Canada, Brockville's average temperature in May was 12.8 C - down from an average of 15.5 C in May 2024 - part of what allowed Tincap to start picking at its regular time. Starting to pick strawberries on May 28 compared to June 7 is a difference of just 11 days. In the grand scheme, it isn't a huge difference. But it does have an impact on the farm's day-to-day operation. 'That real extreme warmth brings the crop on early, but it means we have to do more frost protection, means we have to do more management.' Dentz says weather has been harder to predict in recent years, but the farm just has to adjust accordingly. Tincap Berry Farm also grows asparagus, raspberries, pumpkins and apples throughout the year. More details to come.
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Another northern Ont. beer store to close
The Beer Store has announced its latest round of closures, affecting one outlet in northern Ontario. The store in Iroquois Falls will close Aug. 10, one of 10 locations that will cease operating that day. The Beer Store has announced its latest round of closures, affecting one outlet in northern Ontario. The store in Iroquois Falls will close Aug. 10, one of 10 locations that will cease operating that day. The other stores are mainly in the GTA, the company said in a news release Monday. 'We made the difficult decision to close these retail locations. We will continue our focus on what we do best, ice-cold beer, great customer service and a world-class recycling program that last year returned more containers than we sold,' Ozzie Ahmed, vice-president of retail, said in the release. Changing marketplace 'Modernizing operations in a changing marketplace is never easy. We know this will be difficult news for customers and employees. The Beer Store is committed to treating employees with respect and supporting them during this process.' Efforts will be made to support employees through this process in alignment with commitments and agreements, the release added. In addition to Iroquois Falls, a beer store in Sault Ste. Marie has been converted into a distribution warehouse. And last year, beer stores in Cochrane, Geraldton and Nipigon all closed. The decision to close the store has been driven, in part, by the fact that convenience stores are now allowed to sell beer and wine. A list of stores still operating can be found here.
