What to know about March Madness if you don't follow college basketball
The college basketball season is winding down, which means March Madness is upon us.
The annual men's and women's National Collegiate Athletic Association tournaments are among the most closely watched sporting events in the U.S.
No matter how much you know about college basketball — if you're looking to follow the fun, make your own bracket, or even just understand what all the fuss is about — here are some key things to know.
What is March Madness?
It's the basketball world's term to reference the upsets, chaos, remarkable plays and historic moments that are sure to happen in postseason tournaments.
It all starts with teams playing a tournament against the other schools in their conference, which is the division that a school competes in during the regular season. One slip up there and a team could find itself 'on the bubble,' or at risk of missing the ensuing NCAA Tournament.
And it ends with the ultimate prize: a school being crowned the champion as ' One Shining Moment ' is played over the airwaves.
The first NCAA Tournament in 1939 consisted only of eight men's teams. Today, it's a 68-team bracket that includes multiple single-elimination rounds.
The women's tournament was formally added to the NCAA championship program in 1981, following the same format as the men's. Typically, both championship games are scheduled for the same weekend in different cities.
The teams are selected, seeded and placed in a bracket by an NCAA committee made up of 12 members. The brackets are broken up into four regions: Midwest, East, South and West.
The goal of the committee is to create a bracket that's equally competitive in each region.
The bracket formation process takes place the Sunday before the tournament begins, known as Selection Sunday.
Why is it called March Madness?
The term 'March Madness' was first used by Henry V. Porter, a high school official in Illinois, in 1939. But the term wasn't officially used in reference to college basketball until 1982, when CBS broadcaster Brent Musburger used it during that year's coverage.
Most of the tournament rounds have adopted their own names as well. There's the First Four, Sweet 16, the Elite Eight, and of course, the Final Four.
Why do I hear so much about March Madness brackets?
Every year, millions of people fill out their own brackets in hopes of correctly guessing who will win each round. It's a nationwide phenomenon that takes over offices, families and friend groups, with spectators and sports bettors competing to see who will have the most accurate bracket.
A huge reason why March Madness is so popular is its unpredictability. Lower-seeded teams regularly beat the higher-seeded ones, throwing brackets and predictions completely out of the window.
How is the bracket created?
Thirty-one of the 68 teams automatically qualify to play in the NCAA Tournament because they won their respective conference tournaments. The remaining 37 teams are chosen by that 12-person committee mentioned earlier.
Next, the committee will seed all of the teams. It determines seeding by wins, losses, strength of schedule and other metrics.
The teams are seeded 1-16 within each of the four regions. The top-seeded team will play the bottom-seeded team, and so on.
In 2011, when the tournament expanded from 64 to 68 teams, it also introduced the First Four round. That pits the four lowest-seeded automatic qualifiers and the four lowest-seeded at-large teams against each other. The winners enter the traditional bracket.
What if I fill out a perfect bracket?
Well, you'd be the first.
The odds of doing so are pretty absurd. The closest anyone has ever gotten on the men's side was an Ohio man in 2019 who predicted the entire tournament into the Sweet 16.
If you do happen to make a perfect bracket, there could be more in it for you than just bragging rights.
Perfect bracket pickers have been offered as much as $1 billion. That's the figure Warren Buffett offered to his Berkshire Hathaway employees in 2014 if any of them picked it perfect.
How can I watch the tournament?
Every game of the men's and women's tournaments will be broadcast live. The men's will air on CBS, TBS, TNT or TruTV and their digital platforms, including Paramount+. CBS will handle the Final Four and national title game. The women's will air on ESPN's networks and streaming services with select games on ABC.
Selection Sunday is on March 16, the Sunday before the First Four, beginning at 6 p.m. ET.
___
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
5 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Match of the Day pundit pinpoints CBS contrast – 'It'd never happen at the BBC'
Former England defender and Match of the Day star Micah Richards has shed light on a key cultural difference between the BBC and American network CBS, which he covers the Champions League for Match of the Day's Micah Richards has opened up about a 'mad' party thrown in his honour by network CBS the night before the Champions League final. The ex-England star admitted that the BBC would never plan such an event. Richards, who retired in 2019 and immediately transitioned into punditry, provides insight across various platforms. He has starred on Match of the Day and brought laughter to Sky Sports ' coverage of the Premier League. CBS began broadcasting European football five years ago, introducing him to an American audience. While working for stateside employers, Richards has made it clear that culturally, things differ from appearing for the BBC, which operates under a Royal Charter and is, therefore, a public corporation funded primarily by TV license fees. Operating for the public good means the historically revered Beeb holds itself to incredibly high standards, and coverage of the FA Cup and World Cup, for example, is no exception. The 36-year-old has now illuminated a huge difference between the British broadcaster and the US-based CBS, epitomised by a party thrown the night before last month's Champions League final. "We got there, the sun is shining. I was drinking until about four o'clock in the morning on the Thursday night. Friday night, CBS only threw me my own party!" a bewildered Richards told Gary Lineker and Match of the Day colleague Alan Shearer on The Rest Is Football podcast. "Bearing in mind we've got the Champions League final on the Saturday night and I've been hanging for weeks before that as well. Imagine us at the Beeb throwing a party the night before, say, the FA Cup final or the World Cup final. "It would never, ever happen. CBS just embrace it. I got there thinking it's just a CBS party. I get there, the big massive flyer says: 'Big Meeks' Party.' It was madness." While cultural differences would likely prevent the BBC from allowing its staff to indulge in such revelries and borderline unprofessionalism, CBS' Champions League final broadcast went off without a hitch. Richards appeared alongside presenter Kate Scott and fellow ex-pros Thierry Henry and Jamie Carragher. Actor Tom Cruise and David Beckham were also part of the build-up to the kick-off in Munich. Yet, Richards' path to the German capital was not without its tribulations, and he detailed that a fear of flying made for an awkward journey. "For those who don't know, I don't like flying. So, me, the absolute idiot, decides to look at a route from Harrogate all the way to Munich," he continued. "I thought, 'Ok, if I get to London, it's not gonna be too bad.' So I get to London, which is three hours door to door. "Then I went to get the train from London, and it was supposed to go to Brussels. It got cancelled, so now I'm sweating, thinking what I could possibly do! I'm scrambling on my apps. "I went from London to Paris, then I had to wait a couple of hours. Paris to Stuttgart. Had to wait a couple hours, then Stuttgart to Munich, and when I got there, I was absolutely exhausted."
The Independent
10 hours ago
- The Independent
Female athletes worry for future after $2.8 billion NCAA settlement
As news of the $2.8 billion NCAA settlement broke at AthleteCon, college athletes Sydney Moore and Sabrina Ootsburg found themselves in a unique position. Surrounded by hundreds of their peers, they felt like the only ones who truly grasped the situation's gravity. Moore recounted a conversation with a Division I football player, who exclaimed, "I'm about to get paid!" Her response was pointed: "Yes, you are about to get paid, and a lot of your women athlete friends are about to get cut." While Moore admitted her response might be a projection, the House settlement, which allows college athletes to directly receive revenue from their schools and offers financial stability to some, also raises concerns for others. Starting July 1, schools can share up to $20.5 million with their athletes annually. However, projections estimate that 75 per cent of these funds will go to football, leaving non-revenue-generating sports, which include almost everything outside football and basketball, in a precarious position. It's a query that is top of mind for Ootsburg as she enters her senior year at Belmont, where she competes on the track and field team. 'My initial thought was, 'is this good or bad? What does this mean for me? How does this affect me? But more importantly, in the bigger picture, how does it affect athletes as a whole?'' Ootsburg said. 'You look at the numbers where it says most of the revenue, up to 75 per cent to 85 per cent, will go toward football players. You understand it's coming from the TV deals, but then it's like, how does that affect you on the back end?' Ootsburg asked. 'Let's say $800,000 goes toward other athletes. Will they be able to afford other things like care, facilities, resources or even just snacks?' Moore has similar concerns. She says most female athletes aren't worried about how much – if any – money they'll receive. They fear how changes could impact the student athlete experience. 'A lot of us would much rather know that our resources and our experience as a student athlete is going to stay the same, or possibly get better, rather than be given $3,000, but now I have to cover my meals, I have to pay for my insurance, I have to buy ankle braces because we don't have any, and the athletic training room isn't stocked,' Moore said over the weekend as news of Friday night's settlement approval spread. One of the biggest problems, Ootsburg and Moore said, is that athletes aren't familiar with the changes. At AthleteCon in Charlotte, North Carolina, they said, perhaps the biggest change in college sports history was a push notification generally shrugged off by those directly impacted. 'Athletes do not know what's happening,' Ootsburg said. 'Talking to my teammates, it's so new, and they see the headlines and they're like, 'Ok, cool, but is someone going to explain this?' because they can read it, but then there's so many underlying factors that go into this. This is a complex problem that you have to understand the nuances behind, and not every athlete truly does.' Some coaches, too, are still trying to understand what's coming. Mike White, coach of the national champion Texas softball team, called it 'the great unknown right now.' 'My athletic director, Chris Del Conte, said it's like sailing out on a flat world and coming off the edge; we just don't know what's going to be out there yet, especially the way the landscape is changing,' he said at the Women's College World Series in Oklahoma City. 'Who knows what it's going to be?' What about the walk-ons? Jake Rimmel got a crash course on the settlement in the fall of 2024, when he said he was cut from the Virginia Tech cross-country team alongside several other walk-ons. The topic held up the House case for weeks as the judge basically forced schools to give athletes cut in anticipation of approval a chance to play – they have to earn the spot, no guarantees – without counting against roster limits. Rimmel packed up and moved back to his parents' house in Purcellville, Virginia. For the past six months, he's held on to a glimmer of hope that maybe he could return. 'The past six months have been very tough," he said. "I've felt so alone through this, even though I wasn't. I just felt like the whole world was out there – I would see teammates of mine and other people I knew just doing all of these things and still being part of a team. I felt like I was sidelined and on pause, while they're continuing to do all these things.' News that the settlement had been approved sent Rimmel looking for details. 'I didn't see much about roster limits," he said. 'Everyone wants to talk about NIL and the revenue-sharing and I mean, that's definitely a big piece of it, but I just didn't see anything about the roster limits, and that's obviously my biggest concern.' The answer only presents more questions for Rimmel. 'We were hoping for more of a forced decision with the grandfathering, which now it's only voluntary, so I'm a little skeptical of things because I have zero clue how schools are going to react to that," Rimmel told The Associated Press. Rimmel is still deciding what's best for him, but echoed Moore and Ootsburg in saying that answers are not obvious: 'I'm just hoping the schools can make the right decisions with things and have the best interest of the people who were cut.'
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
Trump golfs with college sports' most influential figures as president weighs move days after groundbreaking ruling
President Donald Trump is reportedly on the golf course with a pair of college sports' most influential figures on Sunday days after a judge approved the settlement in the House v. NCAA case. Southeastern Conference Commissioner Greg Sankey and Notre Dame athletic director Pete Bevacqua are the college-sports duo getting facetime with Trump on Sunday. At Trump's request, Bevacqua and Sankey are joining the president to discuss the future of college sports, per Yahoo! Sports. Judge Claudia Wilken's ruling paves a pathway to allow colleges and universities to directly pay their athletes and changes the dynamic of American collegiate athletics forever. A decade ago, college athletes were treated as amateurs and were not directly compensated for their contributions to athletic departments, nor were they able to be paid by outside companies. With the rise of name, image, and likeness agreements in 2021, athletes could sign endorsement deals with companies and collectives of donors could pool money which could be given to athletes. Some of the highest earning college athletes via NIL deals have been Arch Manning with an estimated $6.5 million alone with Livvy Dunne who earned $4.1 million. Now, with this landmark 'House settlement', the NCAA's member institutions will be allowed to pay their athletes directly in the form of revenue sharing agreements. As part of the agreement, the NCAA will give up more than $2.7billion in back pay to thousands of former athletes who were barred from earning revenue over the years. Over the next year, the House settlement will allow each school to share up to $20.5m a year with their athletes. The focal point of this case began with Arizona State swimmer Grant House, who sued the NCAA and its five biggest conferences at the time - the SEC, Big Ten, Big XII, ACC, and Pac-12 - to lift restrictions on revenue sharing. Wilken gave approval to a final proposal after months of negotiating multiple finer points of the deal - including roster limits. How exactly Sankey and Bevacqua were chosen to represent the sport is unclear. However, Sankey runs the most prestigious college conference and Bevacqua is on top of one of the most profitable athletic programs in the nation.
