Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial recap: Hotel security guard says Combs paid $100,000 for video of Cassie Ventura assault as heckler is removed from the courtroom
The trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs continued Tuesday in Manhattan federal court, with two more witnesses — including a hotel security guard who was paid $100,000 by Combs for a copy of the surveillance video showing him beating Cassie Ventura — testifying in the sex trafficking case. Their testimony was briefly delayed by an outburst from a spectator who was removed by court marshals.
Federal prosecutors say that for decades, Combs abused, threatened and coerced women to participate in marathon sexual encounters called "freak offs" and used his business empire, along with guns, kidnapping and arson, to conceal his crimes.
The 55-year-old hip-hop mogul is facing five criminal counts: one count of racketeering conspiracy, two counts of sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion, and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution.
Combs has pleaded not guilty. If convicted, he could face life in prison.
Here are some key takeaways from Tuesday's testimony culled from various reporters and news organizations in the courtroom, including CNN, NBC News and the Washington Post.
Before Tuesday's testimony got underway, a woman who began screaming obscenities was removed from the courtroom at the request of Judge Arun Subramanian.
The woman could be heard yelling at Combs, 'These motherf***ers are laughing at you!'
"Escort her out right now!" Subramanian shouted from the bench.
Combs, seated in his chair at the defense table, glanced at the woman as she was taken away by court marshals.
Speaking to reporters outside, the woman said she was a Combs supporter and was upset about how people attending the trial in person had been mocking him.
"Everyone is laughing at Diddy!" said the woman, who did not identify herself. "It's not right what they're doing to him!"
Big picture: This was the first major outburst of the trial, which is now in its fourth week.
Eddy Garcia, a former security guard at the InterContinental Hotel in Los Angeles where Combs was caught on surveillance video assaulting Cassie Ventura in March 2016, took the stand first. He testified under an immunity order after asserting his Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate himself.
Garcia told the court that he was initially approached by Combs's former chief of staff, Kristina Khorram, about the footage, which showed Combs kicking and dragging Ventura in an elevator bank. The video was shown to the jury earlier in the trial.
He said he told Khorram that she would need a subpoena to see the video. Combs then called from his personal cellphone, saying the video 'could ruin' him if it got out, and that he would 'take care' of Garcia if he could secure the only copy. Garcia said he spoke to his boss and they agreed to sell it for $50,000.
Big picture: The video is a key piece of evidence in the prosecution's case as it seeks to prove that Ventura was forced by Combs to have sex with male escorts as part of 'freak-offs' held at various hotels.
At a private meeting at a Los Angeles high-rise building a few days later, Garcia said he and Combs got on a FaceTime call with Ventura, who at Combs's direction said she also wanted the video to go away.
Garcia testified that Combs made him sign documents, including a non-disclosure agreement. Garcia then handed Combs a USB drive with the footage. 'Eddy, my angel, I knew you could help,' Combs told Garcia, according to the former security guard. Combs left the room and returned with $100,000 in a brown paper bag, ran the cash through a money counter and handed it to him while warning him not to make any big purchases, Garcia recalled.
According to Garcia, Combs told him to give the extra cash to the other security guards on duty that day. Garcia testified that he gave $50,000 of the money to his supervisor who approved the deal with Combs, $20,000 to another guard involved in the incident and kept $30,000 for himself.
Big picture: The defense team does not dispute the $100,000 payout. But they say it was made to avoid any negative press — and not to obstruct any potential criminal investigation.
Derek Ferguson, the former chief financial officer of Combs's Bad Boy Entertainment, took the stand next. Ferguson told the court that he sometimes reported directly to Combs as CFO of Bad Boy from 1998 to 2012, overseeing budgets and salaries and at times was responsible for the music mogul's personal finances.
Financial records from December 2011 submitted as evidence by prosecutors while Ferguson was on the stand showed three $20,000 transfers, including:
An outgoing transfer of $20,000 from Combs to Cassie Ventura on Dec. 14
An incoming transfer of $20,000 to Combs from Broderick Ventura, Cassie Ventura's father, on Dec. 23
An outgoing transfer of $20,000 from Combs to Broderick Ventura on Dec. 27
Big picture: Earlier in the trial, Regina Ventura, Cassie Ventura's mother, testified that Combs had threatened to release explicit videos of her daughter after he learned she was dating rapper Kid Cudi. Regina Ventura testified that Combs wanted $20,000 to 'recoup' his investment in Cassie. She said she was scared for her daughter's safety and that the family took out a home equity loan to pay Combs via a wire transfer. Regina Ventura told the court that the money was returned several days later with no explanation.
Prosecutor Maurene Comey said the government intends to call three more witnesses on Wednesday, including Bryana Bongolan, who previously accused Combs of sexual battery and dangling her over a balcony; and 'Jane,' another one of Combs's accusers who is using a pseudonym during the trial.
'Mia,' a former assistant and the first accuser to testify against Combs under a pseudonym, concluded three days of testimony on Monday.
Comey said that direct examination of 'Jane' will take at least two days, followed by cross-examination that is expected to be of similar length.
Big picture: Earlier Tuesday, prosecutors asked Judge Subramanian to order a news organization that revealed the identity of 'Mia' in a social media post to remove it. Subramanian said he would consider it if the government submitted a formal request.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The sequel to Trump's so-called travel ban is not an improvement on the original
Ahead of the Republican presidential nominating contests in Iowa and New Hampshire in 2016, Donald Trump was looking to solidify his position as the likely GOP nominee. To that end, the future president came up with a stunning proposal: As 2015 neared its end, Trump declared his support for 'a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States' until such time that he was satisfied that U.S. officials understood 'what the hell is going on.' As regular readers know, it was a bigoted applause line — which his base eagerly embraced. It also turned into a campaign promise the Republican was eager to keep. On only his seventh day in the White House, Trump signed a policy that became known as the 'travel ban,' sparking outrage, bureaucratic chaos, family hardships and a series of messy legal fights. On the first day of Joe Biden's term, the then-Democratic president undid his predecessor's policy, signing a proclamation titled 'Ending Discriminatory Bans on Entry to The United States.' More than four years later, Trump is not only restoring his old policy, he's also adding to it. NBC News reported: In a return of one of the most controversial policies of his first term, President Donald Trump signed a proclamation Wednesday banning nationals from a dozen countries. ... Nationals of 12 countries will be barred from entering the United States: Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It's difficult to summarize all of the granular details of the White House's latest move in a blog post — Team Trump published relatively detailed overviews online overnight, and NBC News' report is thorough — but in addition to the aforementioned 12 countries, seven other countries (Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela) will face partial travel restrictions. There will apparently be some exceptions for athletes competing in international events, as well as those who've qualified for Afghan special immigrant visas. The administration's policy is scheduled to take effect shortly after midnight on Monday, but whether the White House will change, overhaul or worsen the strategy between now and then remains to be seen. As the world begins assessing the practical, geopolitical and moral implications of Trump's new — but not improved — policy, let no one say this is surprising. On the campaign trail ahead of the 2024 election, the Republican boasted about blocking Muslims from entering the country during his first term, telling voters, 'We didn't want people coming into our country who really love the idea of blowing our country up.' Months later, Trump assured the electorate that he intended to restore and expand his original policy. (He vowed this would happen on the first day of his second term, though he missed his own deadline by 135 days.) But the fact that the incumbent president is following through on a misguided promise does not make a bad idea good. Indeed, Democratic Sen. Chris Coons described the White House's gambit as 'new Muslim ban' in a written statement. 'President Trump's own statement makes it clear exactly what this new executive order is: the latest attempt to institute his unpopular and immoral Muslim ban which was thrown out time and again by the courts in his first term,' the Delaware senator said. 'Improving our national security should be a bipartisan goal, but fear and bigotry do not keep Americans safe. What this will do instead is cause chaos, inflict pain, and break apart families, just as his prior attempts did. This order should be reversed, and Congress needs to reassert our role by passing laws that make our immigration system secure, effective and humane.' To be sure, some of the countries affected by the president's directive have Muslim populations, but some do not. That said, the White House's official 'fact sheet' on the policy specifically included this quote from Trump: 'We will restore the travel ban, some people call it the Trump travel ban, and keep the radical Islamic terrorists out of our country that was upheld by the Supreme Court.' There were already some indications that some Muslim-American voters were feeling buyers' remorse after having backed Trump last fall. The Republican's latest move probably won't help on this front. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump and Xi hold long-awaited trade call
President Donald Trump held a long-awaited phone call Thursday with China's Xi Jinping, a person familiar with the matter said, as the two leaders tussle over trade policy. The White House did not immediately confirm the call, which was also reported by Chinese state media. The call comes after a long period of silence between the leaders, and the discrepancy in how each side was talking — or not talking — about the call ahead of time only underscored a widening gulf between the world's two largest economies. As CNN reported ahead of the call, Chinese officials — who were deeply wary of Trump's unpredictability and track record of putting foreign leaders in awkward or embarrassing situations — had put off a phone call, according to people familiar, even as Trump stated on multiple occasions this spring that he expected to speak with Xi soon. The presiden's Oval Office ambushes of Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky and South Africa's Cyril Ramaphosa caught the attention of officials in China, those people added, and officials wanted to avoid anything similar, even in a private conversation. But Trump regards securing a new agreement with Beijing both as a critical component of his broader trade agenda and as a necessary follow-up from his first term, when trade deals with China got derailed during the Covid-19 pandemic. This is story has been updated with additional information.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Issues Sweeping Travel Ban Full of Contradictions
Donald Trump's new travel ban is hard to make sense of. In a sweeping order Wednesday night, Trump fully banned travel from 12 countries: Afghanistan, Chad, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Myanmar, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. The order, which is set to go into effect on June 9, targets mostly African and Muslim-majority countries, and many of the banned countries were also on Trump's original travel ban in his first term. The new ban also partially restricts travel by nationals from an additional seven countries: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. The order includes exceptions for lawful permanent residents, existing visa holders, and certain visa holders such as Special Immigrant Visas (which many Afghans received after helping U.S. forces). Trump framed the ban as necessary to combat terrorism and strengthen national security in a video announcement posted to social media. But if that's the case, the order is full of contradictions. In his video, Trump specifically cited Sunday's attack in Colorado as why the ban is needed. 'The recent attack in Boulder, Colorado, has underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come here as temporary visitors and overstay their visas,' he said. But the man charged in that attack was an Egyptian national who initially arrived on a tourist visa, and Egypt isn't even on Trump's list of banned countries. Trump's order also cites visa oversays as a reason why multiple countries were targeted. But as The Washington Post reported, it's not clear why some countries were added to the list while others with higher visa overstay rates weren't. In some cases, the visa overstay rate was high, but the total number of overstays was relatively low. The justification listed for specific countries was a mess. The order cited the establishment of 'criminal networks' and 'national security threats' as justification for the ban on nationals from Haiti. But there is little evidence that Haitian gangs are taking over the U.S., nor is there much evidence that Haitian gang members are among the small number of Haitians entering the country. 'Haitians as a group have not exerted any kind of violence,' Renata Segura, director of the Latin America and Caribbean program at the International Crisis Group, told the Post. 'The idea that Haitian gangs could be traveling to the U.S. by legal means is completely out of the realm of the possible.' And in the case of Venezuela, which is facing partial restrictions, Trump's order claims the country has 'historically refused to accept back its removable nationals.' But in the past few months of Trump's second term, Venezuela has repeatedly accepted Trump's deportation flights, even sending Venezuelan planes to pick up immigrant deportees from the U.S. For those trying to make sense of Trump's logic with this order, don't even bother.