Chinese manufacturing activity perks up a little
Chinese manufacturing activity perks up a little
The new export orders sub-index for China rose to 47.5 for May from 44.7 in April. File photo: NurPhoto/AFP
The purchasing managers' index (PMI) for China's manufacturing sector came in at 49.5 in May, up 0.5 percentage points from April, official data showed on Saturday.
The non-manufacturing PMI, which includes services and construction, fell to 50.3 from 50.4, remaining above the 50-mark separating growth from contraction.
The new orders sub-index rose to 49.8 from 49.2 in April, while the new export orders sub-index rose to 47.5 from 44.7.
Earlier this month, the central bank unveiled a raft of easing steps, including interest rate cuts and a major liquidity injection, and analysts believe a trade deal with the United States could reduce the need for more aggressive stimulus.
Beijing and Washington have agreed to a 90-day pause under which both sides would cut their import tariffs, raising hopes of easing tensions, but investors worry negotiations will be slow amid persistent global economic risks.
US President Donald Trump on Friday accused China of violating the bilateral deal to roll back tariffs and announced a doubling of worldwide steel and aluminum tariffs to 50 percent, once again rattling international trade.
China's economy expanded at a faster-than-expected pace in the first quarter, and the government has maintained a growth target of around 5 percent this year, but analysts fear US tariffs could shift momentum sharply lower.
Exports beat forecasts in April, buoyed by demand for materials from overseas manufacturers who rushed out goods to make the most of Trump's 90-day tariff pause. (Xinhua/Reuters)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asia Times
an hour ago
- Asia Times
A US cavalier talks 'imminent' war in Singapore
In his recent speech in Singapore, US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth pledged to defend the region against Chinese aggression and encroachment. This should have reassured the audience presumed to be concerned about China's assertiveness. Yet, possibly, the room listening to him wasn't quite ready to believe what they were hearing. The past few months have been full of surprises for Asia. Technically, Japan is still at war with Russia, just as South Korea is with North Korea. And yet, both Russia and North Korea are fighting in Ukraine— a country that has been left hanging by the US because Washington is (was?) seeking to turn Russia (and maybe also North Korea?) against China. This situation is spreading anxiety in Asia. China may suddenly look more straightforward, reliable and easier to talk to. Plus, Chinese jet fighters look more formidable than French fighters because the French aircraft (adopted by the Indian Air Force) performed poorly compared to the Chinese ones (adopted by Pakistan) in the recent bilateral clash. Furthermore, everyone in the region— starting with the US's closest allies— is scrambling to understand what kind of trade deal they can make with America. It is all creating huge uncertainty in the region. So far, no one feels they have a clear picture, and no one has a deal. Then, America doesn't address these issues, but comes and lambasts China. Maybe Japanese, or Thai or South Korean, could say: 'Sure, China is my biggest concern in the long term. But geography doesn't change, and what if America doesn't have my back in one or two years? It dropped me about Russia and North Korea, it bugs me about my trade surplus, but it wants me to push harder on China. Sure, I'll do it, but I'll need to hedge my bets— at the very least.' These contradictory statements and actions are causing massive unease in Asia. Many (maybe all) American regional allies are getting cold feet about the US. Their feet are getting even colder because, despite many warnings, America doesn't seem to realize the gravity of the situation and that Asia can't be separated from what is happening in Europe. In the 1950s and 1960s, the Korean and Vietnam Wars had a massive impact on Europe. To cap it all, the Chinese—and thus true believers in conspiracy theories—could see this erratic US behavior as evidence that the US administration is caught in a loop of irrationality or is penetrated by Russia. Moscow could likely fuel those suspicions. And still, the pragmatic Chinese would be puzzled: if the Russians are so good at plotting in Washington, why didn't they get a peace deal in Ukraine already? Thus, short of certainty, Beijing would not sensibly talk to Washington without a clear picture of what was happening. It would realistically wait to see the developments with the US and the world. This also impacts Europe, now closely following Asian developments, and Russia. Moscow has fewer incentives to seek peace in Ukraine when the whole American fabric seems to be unraveling. America can decide to be cavalier about all of this, and the problems will certainly fester and rot transpacific and transatlantic trust, weakening US clout in the regions and the world. Or it can decide to address these concerns, which need profound rethinking. This article first appeared on Appia Institute and is republished with kind permission. Read the original here.
South China Morning Post
4 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
This moment in US-China rivalry is Asean's chance to remake the bloc
Asean is at a critical juncture. The Southeast Asian bloc, caught between the currents of the US-China trade war , is making a dive for strategic space between a new free-trade agreement with China and the possibility of a Trump tariff meeting. Last month, China and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations finalised negotiations to upgrade their 15-year-old free-trade agreement. Set to be signed by the end of the year, the deal aims to deepen China-Asean economic integration by incorporating digital trade, green economy initiatives and supply chain connectivity. Bilateral trade in goods exceeded US$980 billion last year – China and Asean are each other's biggest trading partner – underscoring the deal's strategic weight. At the same time, Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim of Malaysia, the current Asean chair, has written to US President Donald Trump to press for an Asean-US meeting to discuss tariffs. These include the 10 per cent baseline tariff and 'reciprocal' tariffs ranging from 17 per cent for the Philippines to 49 per cent for Cambodia. Anwar is seeking a unified response to ensure trade fairness for Asean's export-driven economies. In this moment of tension, Asean has a critical opportunity to rise above passivity, leveraging its diplomatic agility to assert itself as a linchpin in global trade and geopolitics – and become the architect of a new regional order. Rather than being a battleground for US-China rivalry, Asean can redefine its role by fostering a neutral, inclusive trade ecosystem that prioritises regional resilience and strategic autonomy. This opportunity hinges on Asean's ability to exploit the US-China rivalry. Asean's unique position of being geographically central, economically vibrant and diplomatically neutral allows it to shape trade rules rather than merely adapt to them. But this requires navigating internal divisions and external pressures with unprecedented cohesion.
South China Morning Post
10 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Ukraine war: will Trump finally punish Russia's Putin as senator pushes for sanctions bill?
US Senator Lindsey Graham's vow to act on a bill imposing new sanctions on Russia is set to test whether President Donald Trump is finally ready to punish Vladimir Putin for delaying a ceasefire with Ukraine. On a visit to Kyiv on Friday, Graham signalled he is tired of waiting for Trump to come around, saying he believes the Senate will 'start moving' the sanctions bill next week. His proposal would ratchet up already smothering sanctions on Russia, including by slapping a 500 per cent tariff on imports from countries that buy Russian oil products and uranium. 'I think as the Senate begins to move you will hear more from President Trump,' said Graham, a South Carolina Republican. 'I think he has reached the point now when he is looking for concrete action by Russia.' At least 81 senators have signed on to the bipartisan bill, and Senator Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat from Connecticut, said he believed Trump's views were 'evolving'. Asked two days ago if Putin is interested in peace, Trump said 'I'll let you know in about two weeks.' 'We're not waiting to find out what Putin will do, we're moving ahead in the Congress,' Blumenthal told reporters in a public square in Kyiv alongside Graham. The question remains – as it has for months – whether Trump is finally ready to take action. The president has gone back and forth on the idea of imposing sanctions, and the Graham bill would likely cause havoc in oil markets. It would almost certainly be an economic earthquake for nations including India, China and the European Union, all of which are engaged in separate trade negotiations with the US.
