China's defence chief forges Europe ties in Paris, Berlin plus UN peace pledge
In the first visit to Europe by a Chinese defence minister in more than four years,
Dong Jun said Beijing would intensify security exchanges with European countries and boost its role in
United Nations peacekeeping operations.
Advertisement
Dong's visit to France and Germany – ahead of his address to the sixth UN Peacekeeping Ministerial in Berlin on Wednesday – was not announced in advance by Beijing, and the defence ministry issued only brief statements about the meetings held with his counterparts in Paris and Berlin.
Each statement said that Dong held in-depth exchanges on bilateral relations and pledged to strengthen defence cooperation.
Sébastien Lecornu, Dong's French counterpart, said in a social media post on Tuesday that the dialogue was 'frank', given the two countries' shared responsibilities as nuclear-weapon states and permanent members of the UN Security Council.
According to Lecornu, both sides covered issues including free maritime navigation, the fight against nuclear proliferation, stability in the Indo-Pacific, the security situation in the Middle East, and the return to a 'just and lasting peace' in Ukraine.
Advertisement
China has strengthened its defence diplomacy in recent years, portraying itself as a defender of the global order and a source of stability amid the chaos stirred by US President Donald Trump.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
a day ago
- South China Morning Post
‘Cannibalised by Aukus': is Australia sacrificing defence for future submarines?
Since the end of World War II, Australia has repeatedly revised its defence strategy in anticipation of evolving threats. For more than 15 years, China 's rise has been viewed with growing trepidation, and since 2020, Australians have been warned they face their most precarious strategic outlook for nearly a century. Advertisement Yet despite the warnings and numerous white papers, observers say Australia remains alarmingly underprepared for conflict, with the country's political class often criticised as more fluent in the rhetoric of defence than in its execution. Its military has, meanwhile, suffered from decades of indifference and underinvestment, its population reassured by the long presumed but now uncertain conviction that the United States will come to the country's aid during a crisis. On Wednesday, Australian defence chief Admiral David Johnston echoed that alarm. Speaking at a conference on Australia's preparedness for war, he emphasised the need for increased funding and investment in infrastructure and industry to ensure the country's resilience in prolonged conflicts. 'We're now in a position where defence is already spending every dollar allocated to it,' Johnston said, adding that for the first time since the second world war, Australia may soon need to conduct combat operations from its own soil. Johnston's comments at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) conference increased already mounting pressure on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese 's government to address decades of indecision that have all but neutered the Australian Defence Force (ADF). Australia's Chief of Defence Force Admiral David Johnston attends the Shangri-La Dialogue summit in Singapore on May 31. Photo: AP
South China Morning Post
a day ago
- South China Morning Post
Thanks to Trump, Russians now see Germany, not US, as most hostile country: survey
Germany is now considered the most hostile country towards Russia, a survey conducted by the independent Moscow-based polling institute Levada showed. The survey found that 55 per cent of respondents named Germany as the most unfriendly state – a 40 percentage point increase since May 2020. In contrast, the United States, which held the top position for two decades, was named by only 40 per cent of respondents, compared to 76 per cent last year. This shift is attributed to the revival of Russian-American relations under US President Donald Trump, the institute said. Germany, however, has faced increasing criticism from the Russian leadership, particularly due to its arms deliveries to Ukraine, which has been under attack by Russia. The tone has notably hardened since Chancellor Friedrich Merz took office last month. The United Kingdom ranked second among countries perceived as hostile to Russia, with 49 per cent of respondents, followed by Ukraine at 43 per cent. 02:33 Nato kick-starts its largest-ever air force exercise in Germany, but says Russia is not the target Nato kick-starts its largest-ever air force exercise in Germany, but says Russia is not the target The representative survey also asked Russians to name the five countries they associate as having the closest and friendliest relations with Russia.
South China Morning Post
2 days ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump, Hegseth, Rubio: a triple threat to global stability
The Indo-Pacific cannot afford to become collateral damage in America's descent from diplomacy into dysfunction – a decline embodied by Defence Secretary Peter Hegseth's sabre-rattling and Secretary of State and National Security Adviser Marco Rubio's overreach. South Korea , At the recent Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore , Hegseth stunned Asia's defence and diplomatic elite by demanding that Indo-Pacific countries raise defence spending to 5 per cent of gross domestic product to 'counter China'. The proposal was not just tone-deaf; it was combustible. No country in the region, save for outliers, comes close to that threshold. Japan Australia – and certainly Southeast Asia, where military spending averages just 1.5 per cent of GDP – are in no position to meet such a demand. What Hegseth delivered was not a strategy, but an ultimatum. And in doing so, he risked catalysing the very action-reaction cycle Washington once sought to avoid: a region arming in anticipation, while Beijing accelerates its military posture in the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait. Asean , already reeling from intensifying great power rivalries, finds itself caught in the crossfire of an American foreign policy that confuses coercion with clarity, and escalation with influence. Former US president Richard Nixon and then-secretary of state Henry Kissinger wielded ambiguity to signal strategic intent. By contrast, Hegseth, Rubio and US President Donald Trump offer only confusion and contradiction – wielded like a cudgel, fracturing the very alliances they claim to reinforce. In this environment, diplomacy is no longer the art of restraining power. It has become the art of surviving it. A cabinet without guardrails The Hegseth doctrine – if it can be called one – illustrates a deeper unravelling within Trump's second administration: the near-total removal of institutional counterweights. The National Security Council is diminished. The State Department's career corps, once the backbone of US diplomacy, has been hollowed out. What remains is a cabinet of loyalists, not strategists.
