
Indian Govt Issues Major Security Warning Over MediaTek Chipsets: Millions Of Smartphone And TV Users At Risk
Last Updated:
The new security alert from the Indian government has been issued after MediaTek has raised its own bulletin for the users.
The Indian government has raised a new security warning which concerns a range of MediaTek chipsets that power phones, TVs, audio gear and more. The alert has been notified by the manufacturer via a detailed post earlier this month.
And now the Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-In) is following up with those concerns and warning the people in the country. The latest security issue affects devices running on varied MediaTek processors that can be exploited to attack the users.
The CERT-In note dated June 11, 2025 comes with high-severity rating says, 'Multiple vulnerabilities exist in the MediaTek products due to heap overflow & null pointer dereference in Bluetooth, null pointer dereference & incorrect authorisation in wlan and uncontrolled recursion in ims service."
When you read further about the security issue, the bulletin clearly talks about the risks linked to the Wi-Fi and Bluetooth modems/drivers running through the MediaTek chipset on various devices. Hackers can use these issues to target both businesses and individuals who use devices powered by any of the latest MediaTek chipset. You can get more details on this over here.
MediaTek has thankfully discovered the issues causing the concerns and an update has been passed on to the handset makers who should be offering it via a new update in the next few weeks. You are most likely going to be asked to install the latest security patch from different brands that should keep your devices secure from a whole range of attacks.
The MediaTek security alert has come a few days after Qualcomm-powered Android smartphones faced similar security risks that were notified by the government.
The bulletin talks about multiple vulnerabilities reported in a host of Qualcomm chipsets that power phones, GPUs, Wi-Fi modem and more. The company also shared the details of the Snapdragon chipsets and modems affected by the vulnerabilities to inform the users.
First Published:
June 12, 2025, 08:10 IST
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Mint
29 minutes ago
- Mint
China's rare earth crackdown: Time to rethink these Indian EV stock holdings?
China's latest restrictions on exports of rare earth minerals have sent ripples through the global electric vehicle (EV) supply chain, leaving several Indian manufacturers in the firing line. The country accounts for nearly 70% of the world's rare earth mining, with the rest split among the US, Australia, and Myanmar. That dominance means any supply disruption can reverberate across industries, especially in countries like India that rely heavily on imports. With key components at risk, input costs may surge and production timelines could slip, tightening margins for Indian EV companies just as global competition intensifies. Read this | India's EV dreams are caught between rare earth and a hard place This article looks at three Indian EV players now exposed to the rare earth squeeze—and what the evolving crisis could mean for their near-term performance. #1 Maruti Suzuki First up is Maruti Suzuki, India's largest passenger vehicle maker by production and sales, and a subsidiary of Japan's Suzuki Motor Corp. Its lineup spans hatchbacks, compact SUVs, and premium sedans. Maruti has reportedly slashed its near-term production target for the electric SUV e-Vitara by nearly two-thirds due to a shortage of rare earth materials. The company now plans to produce just 8,221 units between April and September, down from 26,512. A company document cited supply constraints in rare earth elements as the main reason. Unveiled at the Bharat Mobility Global Expo 2025, the e-Vitara was intended to be a marquee launch, with FY26 sales targeted at 70,000 units. Parent Suzuki has also scaled back its India ambitions. It recently lowered its FY31 sales target from 3 million to 2.5 million vehicles, trimming its planned EV lineup for India from six models to four. India remains Suzuki's largest market by revenue, but these revisions suggest a cautious approach at a time when global and local rivals are accelerating. Despite the strategic retreat in EVs, Maruti Suzuki has performed strongly over the past five years. Revenue has grown at a 15% CAGR, powered by post-Covid recovery and improved capacity utilization. Net profit has expanded at an even faster 35% CAGR, reflecting healthy operating leverage, a better product mix, and cost efficiencies. The company's balance sheet is among the strongest in the sector, with zero debt, a 16% return on equity (RoE), and 21.76% return on capital employed (RoCE) - metrics that outshine peers like M&M and Tata Motors. To drive future growth, Maruti is betting on a broader SUV and BEV portfolio. It has committed ₹8,000-9,000 crore in capex to expand annual production capacity to 4 million units, and plans to launch six EVs by FY31. However, its EV ambitions may be derailed if rare earth supplies remain tight. Read this | China's rare earth export curbs are India's wake-up call The market appears to be factoring in these headwinds: Maruti shares are down 3.5% over the past year. The stock trades below its 10-year average of 37.3x at 26.9x P/E, suggesting the market is pricing in some of these near-term challenges and uncertainties around its EV transition. #2 TVS Motor Next is TVS Motor, India's largest electric two-wheeler maker and the only domestic OEM with fully in-house EV and connected tech capabilities—from batteries to infotainment systems. TVS holds a 24% market share in the electric two-wheeler space (as of May 2025), led by its flagship iQube. It has also launched the electric three-wheeler EV King Max, expanding its portfolio. In a recent interview, managing director Sudarshan Venu acknowledged looming supply chain disruptions from China's export curbs. He warned of possible production halts and price hikes, and expects the impact to reflect in industry-wide numbers by June or July. EVs currently contribute 9.3% of TVS's revenue, and several new models are nearing launch. While long-term prospects remain solid, rare earth volatility poses clear near-term risks. Over the past five years, TVS has delivered strong growth: Revenue has risen at a 19.5% CAGR and net profit at a 31.6% CAGR. The company's broad presence across motorcycles, scooters, and mopeds has helped build scale and market depth. Operating profit margins have improved from 12% in FY20 to 15% in FY25, driven by cost discipline and a more premium product mix, likely driven by higher-margin premium motorcycles and EVs. This has translated into a robust RoE of 28.9% for the company – highest among its peers. However, RoCE stands lower at 19.4% mainly due to a higher debt burden. TVS Motor's debt-to-equity ratio stands high at 1.73x as capital expenditures have been significant (Rs. 1,800 crores in FY24 standalone), primarily for new products and technology (including EV and three-wheeler EV), these are seen as investments for future top-line growth and improved free cash flow in the long run Read this | TVS Motor posts 75% profit growth, but worries about capital allocation persist Shares are down 1.11% over the past month, likely reflecting concerns about EV supply constraints, but are still up 12.8% over the past year. Valuations are rich: TVS currently trades at a P/E of 58.9x, well above its 10-year average of 47.6x. This premium pricing suggests that a large part of its future growth potential may already be factored into the stock price. #3 Sona BLW Precision Forgings (Sona Comstar) The third company under pressure is Sona Comstar, a global mobility tech firm that supplies EV and non-EV components to OEMs around the world, including Tata, Maruti Suzuki, Bajaj Auto, and M&M. Unlike Maruti and TVS, which have avoided detailed commentary, Sona Comstar has been upfront about the risks. On its March 2025 earnings call, it explicitly flagged the potential for global production disruptions due to reliance on Chinese rare earth materials, especially magnets critical to EV powertrains. To mitigate this, management is engaging with stakeholders including the Chinese embassy, while also exploring alternative technologies such as ferrite magnets and non-China sourcing. Still, the pinch is already being felt. China reportedly rejected one of the company's two applications to import rare earth magnets in late May. The second is still under review. Sona Comstar is actively working with OEM partners to balance performance trade-offs in rare-earth-free motors, though that transition could come with cost and timeline challenges. Despite the external headwinds, the company's fundamentals remain robust. Over the last five years, the company's revenue has grown at a CAGR of 28.1% driven by rising electrification trends and increased global traction in powertrain solutions while net profit has grown at a CAGR of 10.8%. Operating profit margins (OPM) have also remained healthy and stable, ranging between 23% and 29% during this period. Its 5-year average OPM stands at 27.2%, well above peers like Bharat Forge and Samvardhana Motherson who have OPMs in the range of 9-18%. Return ratios, too, stand robust with an RoE of 15.1% and RoCE of 18.7%. Debt-to-equity ratio stands low at 0.04x. The company is sharply focused on the EV segment: EVs account for 39% of its total revenue, and a massive 77% of its ₹24,000 crore order book comes from EV programmes. This makes it especially vulnerable to rare earth shortages. While Sona Comstar is proactively exploring solutions, the transition may impact cost structures, product performance, and timelines. Investors must watch how effectively the company manages this material transition and whether it can maintain its technological edge and margins amid supply chain reengineering. Shares have fallen 22% over the past year, underperforming broader auto component peers. The stock trades at a P/E of 51.7x, below its 5-year average of 76x, though still expensive. Also read | Automakers urge Indian govt for diplomatic outreach to China for rare earths Conclusion All three companies—Maruti Suzuki, TVS Motor, and Sona Comstar—have strong long-term fundamentals and strategic clarity. But in the short term, the rare earth supply crunch is a real and rising risk. Production timelines, margin structures, and investor sentiment may all be affected. China's new export rules demand end-use declarations, approvals from Indian ministries and the Chinese embassy, and final clearance from Beijing. Despite 30+ pending applications from Indian automakers, none have been cleared. Delays now exceed the promised 40–45 days, and a proposed dialogue between Indian auto bodies and Chinese officials remains stuck in red tape. For more such analyses, read Profit Pulse. Until there is more clarity on approvals and alternative sourcing, investors may want to tread carefully—and track closely how these companies adapt to a fast-moving supply chain challenge. About the author: Ayesha Shetty is a research analyst registered with the Securities and Exchange Board of India. She is a certified Financial Risk Manager (FRM) and is working toward the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation. Disclosure: The author does not hold shares in any of the companies discussed. The views expressed are for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. Readers should conduct their own research and consult a financial professional before making investment decisions.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Moto Tag gets UWB support, first on Google's Find Hub: What this means
Motorola's object tracker, Moto Tag, is receiving a firmware update that adds support for Ultra-Wideband (UWB) tracking—making it the first tracker on Google's Find Hub network (formerly Find My Device) to support the feature. With UWB enabled, Moto Tag now offers precise, directional tracking with turn-by-turn assistance and proximity detection, significantly improving its location accuracy. Motorola had equipped the Moto Tag with UWB hardware at launch last year, but the feature remained dormant as Google's Find Hub network did not support the technology. Google only recently added UWB support to its platform, alongside improvements like refined Bluetooth scanning patterns for faster and more reliable tracking. According to The Verge, Moto Tag users can enable UWB by updating the Moto Tag app on Android and applying the latest 2.0.93 firmware. However, UWB support is only available on select Android smartphones, including newer flagship devices from Google Pixel and Samsung Galaxy series. Moto Tag: Details Price: Rs 2,299 Colours: Jade Green, Starlight Blue Connectivity: Bluetooth 5.4, UWB (with compatible devices) Device Compatibility: Android 9 (Pie) and above Moto Tag is designed for Google's Find Hub network, enabling users to track a wide range of items—from keys and wallets to bikes and luggage. It works even when offline by leveraging the vast Android device network nearby. When paired with a smartphone that supports UWB, the device unlocks Precision Finding—offering directional cues to locate the tracker with greater accuracy. The Moto Tag also includes a multi-function button that can help ring your phone or act as a remote shutter for taking photos. What is UWB? Ultra-Wideband (UWB) is a short-range wireless communication technology that delivers highly accurate location tracking. It operates at low power and high bandwidth over distances of up to 50 metres. By measuring Time of Flight (ToF) and Time Difference of Arrival (TDoA), UWB can calculate precise positions—far beyond what Bluetooth or Wi-Fi alone can achieve. UWB has already been adopted by Apple's AirTags (2021) and Samsung's SmartTags (2020). With Moto Tag's latest update, Motorola becomes the first brand to bring UWB to Google's tracking ecosystem.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Charging electric cars, a bane of their owners, may be improving
Since Tesla installed its first Superchargers in 2012 for the exclusive use of its customers, owners of other electric cars have often felt like second-class citizens. They have wandered in search of electric oases in desolate parking lots, often making desperate calls to help centers after becoming stymied by balky or broken chargers. It's no surprise, then, that consumers rank problems with public electric vehicle charging and the time it takes to fuel up as their top two reasons for rejecting electric vehicles, according to J.D. Power. But help may finally be at hand. Automakers and charging companies are building new stations and updating their cars to allow drivers to more easily and quickly recharge their vehicles. They are also outfitting charging stations with more amenities such as food and bathrooms while making the devices more reliable. And because chargers are only as fast as the cars they connect with, automakers are designing new cars to absorb electricity at Usain Bolt-level speeds. In addition, many automakers have cut deals with Tesla allowing owners of other cars access to the company's fast-charging network, the largest in the country and widely considered the most reliable. There is early evidence that efforts to improve electric vehicle charging are paying off. In recent years, J.D. Power surveys showed that about 20% of attempts to charge electric vehicles at all public stations ended in failure because of faulty chargers, long lines or payment glitches. But in the first three months of 2025, overall failure rates fell to 16%, the biggest improvement since the surveys began in 2021. "The industry is finally elevating as a whole," said Brent Gruber, an executive director at J.D. Power. The number of chargers has also increased. There were about 55,200 fast chargers in the United States in May, up from 42,200 a year earlier, according to federal data. In February, a former Phillips 66 gas station in Apex, North Carolina, near Raleigh, became the first " Rechargery " from Ionna , a company created by eight automakers, including General Motors, Hyundai Motors, BMW and Mercedes-Benz. Their chargers can deliver up to 400 kilowatts of juice, far more than Tesla's 250-kilowatt Superchargers. Some cars can replenish a battery in 30 minutes or less at the higher charging speeds. When connected to chargers of 350 kilowatts or more, including those at Ionna and Electrify America, another fast-charging network, a Hyundai Ioniq 5, for example, can fill its electric "tank" from 10% to 80% in 18 minutes. That adds up to 220 miles of driving range, enough for more than three hours of highway cruising. That's quick enough to keep a road trip on schedule and the family refreshed. Ionna stations offer 24-hour service. The network has installed lighted canopies over chargers, and drivers can wait in lounges equipped with Wi-Fi, coffee bars and bathrooms while their vehicles are plugged in. Seth Cutler , Ionna's CEO, said the stations seek to transform an experience that many electric drivers dread. Public chargers are sometimes installed in sketchy places, including besides dumpsters in shopping malls and in dingy parking lots with no bathrooms or refreshments nearby. "Charging an EV takes a little time, so this is a place somebody might actually want to be in the middle of the night, and there's something to do while they're there," Cutler said. "People definitely don't want to be somewhere that feels unclean or unsafe." Ionna aims to install 10 to 12 fast-charging stalls per station. Chargers can connect directly to Teslas and vehicles that use the Combined Charging System plug, which is used by most other automakers. Since February, Ionna has opened 14 stations in several states and has acquired 200 sites around the country. Its target is to build a total of 30,000 charging bays by 2030. Some models from BMW, Hyundai and Kia have also enabled a national "Plug and Charge" standard that lets car owners begin charging their vehicles at Ionna stalls without first having to use a smartphone app or swipe a credit card, eliminating a cumbersome step that sometimes results in errors. Tesla's chargers have long worked this way for Tesla cars and now work with some other vehicles, like Rivian's SUVs and pickups. More cars and charging stations are expected to have plug-and-charge capability in the coming months. Gas stations and restaurants have also improved their charging game. Buc-ee's, the Texas-based gas chain that is famous for its sprawling stores and myriad food options, is working with Mercedes to offer "premium" charging that is powered by renewable energy. Waffle House plans to begin installing BP Pulse fast chargers next year. And GM and EVgo, a charging company, are building 500 stations with 2,000 stalls at Pilot and Flying J travel centers. Olabisi Boyle, an Ionna board member and Hyundai's senior vice president of product and mobility, said her company and other automakers were committed to improving access to charging. Automakers have realized that "EV charging wasn't just a thing you did on the side," Boyle said. "It's the future of the customer experience." But that doesn't mean the complications and problems will easily be dispensed with, especially when it comes to making cars and chargers play nicely with each other. Nearly every major automaker is redesigning their cars with plug outlets and software that are compatible with Tesla chargers. The North American Charging Standard, developed by Tesla, offers a further advantage of slimmer, lighter handles that are easier to plug into cars, including for seniors or people with disabilities. Hyundai's Ioniq 5 and Ioniq 9 SUVs are now shipping with those ports from a new factory in Georgia. But older Hyundais and most other electric cars still use the Combined Charging System plug and need adapters to connect to Tesla chargers. Compatibility issues between cars and chargers that use different charging standards have begun to show up in surveys about how many charging sessions end badly. In recent years, failure rates at Tesla stations hovered around 2% or 3% when only Tesla cars charged there. But since the automaker opened its chargers to cars from other brands, that rate has risen to 7%, according to J.D. Power. Gruber noted that those failure rates included drivers who gave up after encountering lines at chargers. Some Tesla drivers have expressed unhappiness at having to share chargers with other car brands. Rajiv Diwan , who helped spearhead a charger rollout for the New York Power Authority, called the industry's coalescing around Tesla's plug standard "a great move for the American market." But Diwan said other charging competitors did not appear to be moving fast enough to build stations to meet rising demand. He said the companies were often hamstrung by onerous construction and electricity costs and bureaucratic delays. "The industry always sugarcoats things, but charging is still hard for the average person to understand and deal with," he said. "People just want to get from Point A to Point B with as little fuss as possible, and that's not happening yet." Momentum may also be short-circuited by the Trump administration and Republicans in Congress, who have proposed repealing many federal incentives for electric cars and trucks. The administration has also stopped issuing grants to states to help build chargers under the $5 billion National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Formula Program created during the Biden administration. "When we needed the whole ecosystem to come together and organize around NEVI, it's all been blown to bits," said Chris Nelder, an infrastructure expert and host of "The Energy Transition Show," a podcast. Gruber of J.D. Power said the federal charger grant program helped construct only a tiny fraction of new chargers. But the program was helpful in other ways. It published guidelines that helped automakers and charging companies work together and address technical problems. For the foreseeable future, Gruber said, the auto industry and state governments that care about addressing climate change will have to take the lead on getting more chargers built and improving their performance. "There's no doubt EVs are still the vehicle of the future," he said, "and I think the private sector will carry that torch forward."