John Oliver on Signal leak: ‘Deeply unserious people doing deeply stupid things'

The Guardian

31-03-2025

John Oliver ripped Donald Trump's White House for the ongoing scandal of Signalgate, in which high-level administration officials used the messaging app for military strikes in Yemen, accidentally including the Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg in the chat.
'The White House tried to do damage control all this week, from playing semantic games of whether they were technically war plans to hinting Goldberg somehow got himself onto the chat, something undercut by literally showing Michael Waltz, the US national security adviser, adding Goldberg in,' the Last Week Tonight host explained on Sunday evening. 'And by the way, all of this was in the run up to airstrikes that are estimated to have killed up to 46 civilians on one day, which should be a scandal in and of itself.
'And it's grotesque to see the glib response in the chat afterward,' he added, noting that one official responded to the news of a collapsed building – and civilian death – with a fist emoji, American flag emoji and fire emoji.
'And look, those clearly aren't the right emojis to send after a bombing because the right emojis are no emojis,' Oliver said.
'This is something of a motif for this administration: deeply unserious people doing deeply stupid things with massively serious consequence,' he added.
Oliver encouraged others to 'push back hard' against the administration's behavior, translating the sentiment into 'the language that they seem to prefer' – the middle finger emoji, peach, heart and American flag. Or as Oliver put it: 'Go fuck yourselves, assholes. Love, America.'
In his main segment, Oliver looked into the history and use of Taser stun guns by US law enforcement. The weapon is as ubiquitous in cop shows as in real life – they are now carried by an estimated 400,000 American patrol officers. 'Which is obviously great news for the company that makes them,' said Oliver. That would be Axon, which has a market cap of over $40bn.
Axon representatives describe the weapon as 'about as non-violent as you can get', which Oliver disputed. 'I'm not sure I would describe getting shocked with 50,000 volts is as non-violent as you can get,' he said. 'It certainly doesn't sound that relaxing. There's a reason people unwind by taking a bath with lit candles or a book instead of with a toaster.'
'The reality of Tasers just isn't that simple,' he explained. There have been multiple instances of people dying after being tased; according to a 2017 investigations, at least 1,000 people died after police used Tasers on them.
But the company has worked to obscure that fact by avoiding regulation. The Taser was first invented in the 1970s using gunpowder. When the Smith brothers bought the tech in the early 1990s, they changed the prototype to use compressed nitrogen instead, thus avoiding firearm regulations. By the end of 2003, more than 4,300 police agencies were using Tasers, with plenty of positive news coverage.
The company rebranded as Axon in the early 2000s and began selling police bodycams, as well, becoming what Oliver called 'the TMZ of state-sanctioned violence'.
Oliver broke down two of the company's main claims: that Tasers are effective and safe. Though Axon says the Taser is effective at subduing a suspect about 90% of the time, some studies found its effectiveness rate as low as 55%, though the company complained that the study did not take into account instances when a suspect was subdued after an officer merely displayed or threatened to use a Taser. 'And at that point, that's not really about their device, is it?' said Oliver. 'You could presumably get that result with a gun, a flamethrower or a magic fucking wand.'
'Also when we talk about Tasers being effective – at what, exactly?' he continued. 'Because it's often a Taser being used instead of a more lethal option like a gun, and more a Taser being used instead of a less lethal option like talking to someone.'
That could make the difference between life and death, as hundreds of people have died after being tased by law enforcement. The company has attributed those deaths to a condition called 'excited delirium' unrelated to the weapon. And because Tasers are 'virtually unregulated' by any agency, 'what that means is, you basically have to take the company's word for it,' said Oliver.
Even some police officers have decried the company's line that Tasers are safe. After a 16-year-old in Warren, Michigan, died from the use of a Taser, one officer blamed Axon for not accurately marketing the risks: 'You swore that this was a statistically normal thing, that these people were not dying at any more of an unusual rate than they would have absent the Taser, you know?'
'I get why he's upset,' said Oliver. 'Axon told him the Taser was basically harmless, and the truth is it's just not. It's like finding out that a Nerf gun was used to assassinate JFK. I don't care if Nerf says that was a statistical anomaly, I'm not handling it the same way anymore!'
As for what to do about Tasers, 'it's complicated,' said Oliver. 'I don't hate that there's at least a theoretical alternative to guns, and I guess I'd much rather police tase people than shoot them, although my ultimate preference would be for them to do neither of those and be much more aware of the actual risks involved.'
He encouraged regulatory agencies to track stun gun usage more than we already do, and noted that certain states have banned 'excited delirium' as a permissible cause of death. In sum, 'we shouldn't keep using Tasers like they're magic wands, because they're not,' Oliver concluded, 'or pretending deaths that occur after they're used don't happen, because they do.'