
Will papal conclave reject Pope Francis' legacy of inclusion?
He was a man of many firsts. The first Latin American pope. The first Jesuit to lead the faith. The first to adopt the name of Francis of Assisi. And, one must imagine, the first pope to ever ask aloud, 'Who am I to judge?' when asked about a gay priest.
In a career studded with moments I didn't expect, there I was on St. Peter's Square, March 13, 2013, watching smoke pouring from the chimney above the Sistine Chapel, and when it turned white, the electricity that shot through the throng of thousands was unlike anything I'd ever covered. It's a fair moment to point out that I am not Catholic, but it was impossible not to feel the weight of the moment. Two thousand years of history, and in a moment we would meet the 266th pope.
It wasn't easy to put the pieces together at first. The man who emerged on the balcony wasn't on many of the short lists of the papabile, those considered in the running to lead the world's 1.4 billion Catholics. And even Vatican watchers in the know were asking each other, 'Bergolio? Really?'
But it took very little time for Jorge Bergolio to carve out his own path as Pope Francis, a name chosen for being synonymous with tending to the poor.
Eschewing the red shoes of his predecessors, he was instead shod in a humble black pair that you might refer to as 'sensible.'
His ardent fans would suggest that many of the changes he envisioned for the church were exactly that, sensible, a return to the simplicities of a shepherd. He declined an apartment in the papal palace. And in one of his first acts as pope, he chose to wash the feet of the faithful, not in a church, but in a prison.
More from Devin Scillian After 30 years in Detroit journalism, I can't stop thinking about this story
But it will take you no time at all to scan social media to find those who feel his collisions with tradition and tinkering with doctrine were part of a wider global collapse into liberalism.
In 2014, I traveled back to Rome to write and produce a documentary for WDIV called 'Crossroads: The Francis Factor.' I wondered aloud whether a faith can or should change. Must it evolve to keep up with a mutable world, or is a faith built on timeless foundations that must remain rigid against the whims of man?
Pope Francis sought change on a number of fronts.
He clearly saw an expanded role for women in the church (though, it must be noted, he did not see them destined for priesthood). He voiced clear compassion for LGBTQ+ Catholics, including priests.
But I'll long remember a conversation in Rome with author and Vatican journalist John Thavis. He told me that whatever change Pope Francis might wish to ignite, those changes would only go as far as the willingness of the world's bishops to carry them out.
For example, in what seemed to me a profound flourish of Christian eloquence, Francis said, 'The Eucharist is not a prize for the perfect, but a powerful medicine and nourishment for the weak.' And yet, many divorced or remarried American Catholics remain frustrated by a local parish priest or bishop who feels them unworthy of communion.
Pope Francis inspired debate and conversations in the church that had seemed unimaginable for ages — about whether priests should be allowed to marry, about celibacy, and on and on. The hopes of progressives were in direct inverse proportion to the fears of traditionalists. The true measure of his papacy may come as those issues either survive or fade.
But for many, Pope Francis will be remembered less for what he did than for who he was. His sense of humility and his never-ending pleas for mercy will long be the totems of his legacy for many. And in that way, it seemed very Francis-like that he would dutifully make his final appearance on Easter Sunday and go to his final rest the next day.
So now what?
More from Freep Opinion: Kilmar Abrego Garcia deportation to El Salvador could happen to any of us
It's not lost on me that as football fans wait breathlessly for Thursday night's NFL draft, the preparations are underway for another selection. The Arizona Cardinals are headed to Green Bay, but the rest of the world's cardinals are headed to Rome.
'With the only pick in the 2025 Papal draft, the College of Cardinals selects …'
Who?
There is a sense that the selection of popes moves in a pendular way, that the church moves to the left, the church moves to the right, the church moves back to the middle. And in a different time, that might seem logical. But how will the cardinals gathered in the chapel see the road ahead?
I'm mindful that of the 135 cardinals eligible to vote in the conclave, 108 ― 80% ― were appointed by Pope Francis. And at a time when the world's wealth is concentrated in the hands of so few, one can see the will of many of the electors to stay the Francis course and keep the compass calibrated on the tired, hungry, and poor. (Pope Francis taking on the Trump administration over its immigration policies will ring as a continuing battle cry to some, no doubt.)
But I'm also mindful of those eager to move the church back to a more conservative standing, for example those who didn't take kindly to Francis' restricting use of the traditional Latin Mass after his predecessor, Pope Benedict had allowed it to be celebrated more freely. A number of cardinals, most notably Peter Erdő of Hungary, have spoken out openly against Francis on matters like the blessing of same-sex unions and divorced parishioners taking communion. They will no doubt have their say before we hear habemus papam ('we have a pope') on St. Peter's Square.
Every conclave is worth watching. But in this one, we will bear witness to the way an institution that sees itself as constant and eternal deals with a world in flux.
Proverbs tells us that 'in an abundance of counselors, there is safety.'
Here's hoping 135 is enough.
Devin Scillian is a veteran journalist, author and former Detroit news anchor, serving Detroit viewers for 30 years on WDIV-TV (Channel 4). Submit a letter to the editor at freep.com/letters, and we may publish it online and in print.
Like what you're reading? Please consider supporting local journalism and getting unlimited digital access with a Detroit Free Press subscription. We depend on readers like you.
This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Pope Francis' passing leaves Catholic Church at crossroads | Opinion
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Pope Leo XIV calls for peace in first Pentecost message
The new Pope Leo XIV called for peace around the world in his first Pentecost address on Sunday. Speaking to tens of thousands of people in St Peter's Square, the first US-born head of the Catholic Church emphasized that peace must come from the heart. "Only a peaceful heart can spread peace in the family, society, and international relations," said Leo. He stressed the need to engage in dialogue, even in times of war. With a view to the numerous armed conflicts around the world, the 69-year-old added: "May the spirit of the risen Christ open paths of reconciliation wherever there is war. May he enlighten those who govern and give them the courage to take steps towards de-escalation and dialogue." The former cardinal was elected as the successor to the late pope Francis exactly one month ago. As pontiff, Leo - born Robert Francis Prevost - is the head of 1.4 billion Catholics worldwide. At the Pentecost Mass in St Peter's Square, he also called for "walls of indifference and hatred" to be torn down. "Where there is love, there is no room for prejudice, for 'security' zones separating us from our neighbours, for the exclusionary mindset that, tragically, we now see emerging also in political nationalisms," Leo said. According to the Vatican, 80,000 people gathered in St Peter's Square for the address. The Catholic Church is celebrating a Jubilee in 2025 as it does every 25 years. As a result, there are even more pilgrims and tourists in Rome than usual.

Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Poles march for LGBTQ+ equality after presidential vote raises fears
By Thomas Holdstock GDANSK, Poland (Reuters) -Thousands of Poles took part in a Pride march in the northern port city of Gdansk on Saturday, showing their support for the LGBTQ+ community amid fears for its future after nationalist candidate Karol Nawrocki won a presidential election. Participants waved rainbow flags and the blue, pink, and white banners representing the transgender community. Many carried placards bearing messages such as "Love is love" and "12 years together - when civil partnership?". A parallel Pride event was also held in the western city of Wroclaw. Nawrocki, supported by the conservative Law and Justice (PiS) party, has raised alarm among LGBTQ+ advocates. During its time in power from 2015 to 2023, PiS made opposition to what it termed "LGBTQ+ ideology" a central part of its platform, framing it as a threat to traditional values in the predominantly Catholic country. "I was devastated to be honest," 23-year-old student Agata said when asked about Nawrocki's victory. "I am scared. I don't know what our future looks like." Although LGBTQ+ issues were less prominent in Nawrocki's campaign than in that of his PiS-backed predecessor Andrzej Duda in 2020, his platform included commitments to resist "ideology in schools" and to oppose adoption by same-sex couples. He has stated that marriage should remain between a man and a woman and, while rejecting civil partnerships, expressed a willingness to discuss legal recognition for a "close person", regardless of sexual orientation. In contrast, a pro-European coalition that came to power in 2023 introduced a draft bill to legalise civil partnerships. However, with the presidency holding veto power, the bill's future remains uncertain. Agata said that she hoped a law on civil partnerships could come into effect, but that it was unlikely during Nawrocki's presidency. "I want more equality in our society, in our country," she said.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Biden Weaponized Law Enforcement Against Catholics
Even the initial story about the FBI targeting Catholics for suspicion and surveillance was bad enough. In December 2023, the House Judiciary Committee published a detailed report about how the FBI specifically identified traditional Catholics as potential domestic terror threats. The House report revealed the shocking finding that the Richmond, Virginia, office of the FBI suspected traditional Catholics "as violent extremists and proposed opportunities for the FBI to infiltrate Catholic churches as a form of 'threat mitigation." In sworn testimony before the U.S. Senate, former FBI Director Christopher Wray was challenged by Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri: "Now we know that, in fact, FBI agents did approach a priest and a choir director to ask them to inform on parishioners." Despite this serious allegation, Wray denied a wider FBI initiative and blamed a localized mistake in Richmond. Well … new information reveals that, at best, FBI Director Wray was playing fast and loose with the truth. At worst, the then-sitting chief law enforcement investigator of America committed perjury when he dishonestly stated that the memo was "a single product by a single field office." Oh, all while completely maligning the largest denomination of Christian believers in the United States. But, alas, the sad story of the FBI targeting Catholics does not end in 2023. New information uncovered by Sen. Charles Grassleys committee reveals that the so-called "Richmond memo" was more like a nationwide all-points-bulletin from FBI brass, informing legions of agents to suspect and investigate faithful parishioners across the land. As CatholicVote describes, "the FBIs anti-Catholic Richmond memo was distributed to more than 1,000 employees in FBI field offices across the country." Sen. Grassleys press release states that a whistleblower "produced at least 13 additional documents and five attachments that used anti-Catholic terminology and relied on information from the radical far-left Southern Poverty Law Center" to target Catholics. Amazingly, such harsh anti-Catholic actions formed a key policy agenda for Joe Biden, a politician who constantly trumpeted his Catholic bona fides and bragged about the rosary he carries in his pocket. Of course, those pronouncements did not stop him from targeting the Little Sisters of the Poor for brutal Department of Justice intimidation when he was vice president. Nor did Joes faith restrain him as president, when he awarded Americas highest civilian honor, the Presidential Medal of Freedom, to the late Cecile Richardson, one of the most prolific abortion providers in U.S. history. Unfortunately, Bidens anti-Catholic actions follow a tragic trend of recent decades for Democrats, once the proud home to generations of Catholic voters across America. In fact, Bidens eventual vice president, Kamala Harris, engaged in brazen anti-Catholic bigotry as a U.S. senator in 2018. Harris tried to derail the judicial nomination of Brian Buescher simply because the district court nominee dared to belong to the Catholic fraternal charity organization, the Knights of Columbus. I wrote about that prejudice - an unconstitutional religious litmus test - in a December 26, 2018, opinion piece for RealClearPolitics. No wonder that during the 2024 presidential race, then-Sen. JD Vance called the Biden-Harris White House "the most anti-Catholic administration in living memory." Which brings us back to the present day and these newfound facts about the breadth and scope of the anti-Catholicism of Bidens FBI. This targeting fits within a larger context of the completely unacceptable politicized weaponization of federal law enforcement by people like Biden, Harris, Wray, and former Attorney General Merrick Garland. Sen. Grassley makes it clear that he believes Wray lied under oath. If that allegation is correct, then the Trump-Vance DOJ must charge Wray. In addition, this issue carries great political peril for Democrats and big continued rewards for Republicans. Historically, Catholics decide national elections. For over half a century, the Catholic vote has determined the winner in every election but one (choosing Al Gore over George W. Bush in 2000). In 2024 Trump rolled up an incredible +11% margin among Catholics nationwide, a giant improvement over his tie among Catholics in 2020. In fact, Trump would not have won the popular vote - surprising every "expert" - without his dominant performance among Catholics. So, lets get to the truth, punish the evildoers, and reap the political spoils as well. Steve Cortes is president of the League of American Workers, a populist right pro-laborer advocacy group, and senior political advisor to Catholic Vote. He is a former senior advisor to President Trump and JD Vance, and a former commentator for Fox News and CNN.