
Republican Medicaid cuts could mean ‘Armageddon' in D.C., official says
D.C. Mayor Muriel E. Bowser (D), her staff and health-care providers have been lobbying Congress for months to stave off Medicaid cuts that one top city official said would amount to 'Armageddon' for low-income residents and wreak havoc on the region's health network.
House Republican proposals to slash government spending on Medicaid would devastate the insurance program that covers 40 percent of District residents and makes it possible for hospitals and clinics to care for the most vulnerable, they say. Under one scenario, D.C. could lose $1.1 billion, forcing the city to drop some residents from the rolls and scale back services for others.
'I have lost many hours of sleep over that possibility,' said Wayne Turnage, deputy mayor for health and human services. He likened the possibility of crafting a bare-bones health-care finance budget to 'Armageddon.'
Cuts targeting Medicaid in the District are among the proposals the House Energy and Commerce Committee is expected to consider next week. Republicans also have floated reductions in federal contributions to D.C. and the 40 states that expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act, as well as governments, such as the District's, that use local dollars to insure undocumented immigrants.
'The Medicaid cuts that are being contemplated really will be devastating really for everywhere nationwide, but there are many reasons to especially worry about D.C.,' said Joan Alker, executive director of the Center for Children and Families at Georgetown University.
Democratic lawmakers in Virginia and Maryland sent a letter Tuesday to leaders on the Energy and Commerce Committee urging them to consider how cuts could weaken health care in the nation's capital.
Reducing the federal payment in D.C. 'will undermine health care not only for Medicaid recipients in the District but for everyone in the region, regardless of their insurance status. Families will lose coverage,' Rep. Steny H. Hoyer (D-Maryland) said in a statement. 'Republicans' effort to cut Medicaid is cruel and nothing short of catastrophic for the health of the American people.'
City officials already face a $1 billion shortfall that prompted Bowser to institute a hiring freeze and other 'extraordinary measures.' The city also lost its coveted triple-A bond rating because of cuts to the federal workforce, a sluggish real estate market and the uncertainty over Medicaid funding, Moody's said.
Federal Medicaid payments for states are based on a formula that considers average per capita income, but in D.C., the rate was fixed in 1997 when the District teetered on the edge of financial collapse. Then-House Speaker Newt Gingrich and Thomas M. Davis III, a GOP congressman from Northern Virginia, brokered a deal that said the federal government would pay 70 percent of Medicaid costs and the District 30 percent.
But Davis said the national debt has ballooned since then. 'Everybody's taking a haircut,' he said Tuesday. 'We just have to understand that the circumstances have changed, and the Congress is looking around anywhere they can.'
The arrangement recognized that the District's tax revenue is limited by the amount of tax-exempt federal property within its borders and the inability to levy a commuter tax on people who work in the District but live elsewhere, said Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, the District's nonvoting representative.
D.C.'s federal payment 'is higher than that of many states in part to compensate for those revenue-generating restrictions,' Norton said in a statement. Reducing it 'would be devastating for the nation's capital and the sizable number of residents from other jurisdictions who receive care within D.C., including federal officials and their staffs, federal employees, visitors, and the children from all 50 states who receive vital care at one of the hospitals in this region. To even consider this reduction is misguided and irresponsible.'
Bowser and her federal affairs staff have talked to House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) and members of the committees overseeing Medicaid and D.C.
Members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which has jurisdiction over health care, are expected to consider cutting spending by as much as $880 billion over 10 years, which they can't do without shrinking Medicaid. Members are at odds, with moderates saying they won't vote for a bill that cuts the public insurance program.
Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Maryland) said he'll oppose such cuts if they come to the Senate.
'We'll be fighting back every step of the way against Republican efforts to strip Americans of their health care in order to pay for their giant tax giveaway for the rich,' he said in a statement Tuesday.
Trade groups representing D.C. hospitals, community health clinics, behavioral health providers and others have met with lawmakers and strategized for months on how to protect the city's Medicaid payment.
Officials at hospitals serving D.C. and parts of Maryland and Virginia say cuts will probably force some to close, jeopardizing thousands of jobs and critical services such as labor and delivery and trauma care. They estimate caring for uninsured people could cost $232 million.
About half of patients treated at Children's National Hospital receive Medicaid, putting the highly specialized care at D.C.'s only Level 1 pediatric trauma center at risk.
'This potential threat is the most concerning in my 26-year career as a health-care administrator. The impacts would be immediate and devastating,' Children's National Hospital chief executive Michelle Riley-Brown said.
Community health clinics, which care for low-income patients — many of whom have complex needs — would also be hit hard by cuts. Unity Health Care, the city's largest network of clinics, receives about 70 percent of its funding from the federal government.
'Any significant cuts to these major programs would likely lead to reduced access for patients, including those who need it most — pregnant individuals, people with substance use disorders, people needing behavioral health services, among other key groups,' Unity Chief Medical Officer Benjamin Oldfield said.
Compared to states, the District has generous income eligibility limits — up to 215 percent of the federal poverty level, which is $33,600 a year for a single adult and about $71,000 for a family of four.
Adults without children — about 91,500 — make up the biggest part of Medicaid in D.C. and are most likely to lose coverage if the program is slashed, city officials say. The second-highest number of D.C. residents are children under 20 years old — about 90,600.
D.C. consistently ranks second, behind Massachusetts, with the lowest number of uninsured residents.
'It's a very laudable goal of city councils and mayors over time that they would provide so much emphasis on providing health insurance for everybody who can't afford commercial insurance,' Turnage said. 'It's a wonderful thing.'
Meagan Flynn contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
L.A. protests lead to new bill in Congress
Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) and Rep Brandon Gill (R-TX) co-introduced the 'Lawless Cities Accountability Act' in Congress. The bill would withdraw federal funds from cities that don't stop violent unrest or don't accept help from federal law enforcement. 'We have to use the tools in our toolbox to ensure that our mayors and our governors like Gavin Newsom are following the law in this country, because if we don't have laws, we're not a country at all,' Rep. Mace told me. But will Republicans back measures like this? Of the more than 9.7 million people who live in Los Angeles County, more than 1.1 million people voted for President Trump in 2024. When I brought up the potential threat of funding to Rep. Jay Obernolte (R-CA) earlier this week warned not to 'lump everyone in California in with the actions of a few leaders.'


CNBC
16 minutes ago
- CNBC
PBS, NPR funding on the line as House nears final vote on $9.4 billion in DOGE-backed cuts
The House on Wednesday moved a step closer to approving President Donald Trump's $9.4 billion spending cut package, which would codify some cuts originally proposed by the Department of Government Efficiency. The package would grant permission to the White House not to spend billions of dollars that had already been approved by Congress. The money would be clawed back from specific agencies like the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which distributes federally appropriated grants to National Public Radio (NPR) and Public Broadcasting Service (PBS). Although the Wednesday procedural vote passed largely along party lines, a final vote expected Thursday could see some resistance from House Republicans who are uneasy about the popular programs that are being targeted, like PBS and National Public Radio. Given House Speaker Mike Johnson's narrow Republican majority, he can only afford to lose a handful of votes and still push the package over the finish line on a party-line vote. Johnson said earlier this week that he was "working on" getting enough Republicans on board to pass the DOGE package, CNN reported. Wednesday's vote also finalized changes to Republicans' "big, beautiful bill" that were required by the Senate before the measure was allowed to pass with a simple majority, rather than the typical 60-vote Senate threshold. Budget measures like the "big, beautiful bill" can be considered under a special set of rules known as reconciliation. The Senate's parliamentarian, who acts as a sort of referee in disputes over Senate rules, had flagged some provisions in the package earlier that she said were incompatible with the chamber's reconciliation rules.
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Thune on protests: LA ‘needed some outside help'
WASHINGTON, DC (KELO) — Senate Majority Leader John Thune is defending President Trump's decision to federalize the National Guard and send in Marines to put a stop to clashes between demonstrators and law enforcement in Los Angeles. Cheyenne River Reservation authorities investigating 2 deaths The South Dakota Republican fielded reporters' questions on a range of topics Wednesday on Capitol Hill, including the ongoing protests over immigration raids. The City of Los Angeles reported fewer clashes overnight as a curfew went into effect. Yet tensions remain high as members of the military are on standby in case of more violence. Thune says the military presence was needed because local officials in California didn't have a handle on the situation. Thune called public safety a 'political imperative' while discussing the protests taking place this week in Los Angeles. 'Because one of the most fundamental questions most people, or most voters ask is my family safe? Is my neighborhood safe? Is my community safe? And when you can't answer that in the affirmative, then you've got a problem and I think that's what they ran into in Los Angeles which is why they needed some outside help,' Thune said. But House Democrats say Los Angeles didn't need outside help from the military to keep the violence in check. 'And state and local law enforcement officials are prepared to do that. At the same time, we respect the right and should embrace the right for any American to peacefully protest,' (D) House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said. Thune wouldn't directly answer one reporter's question about President Trump's pardons of January 6th rioters. Manu Raju: 'Do you see any inconsistency when a president criticizes and condemns the violent LA protests but then pardons the violent January 6th protestors?' 'I think the issue that's in front of us right now is the chaos in Los Angeles. And clearly, the local officials there, for whatever reason, didn't seem up to the task,' Thune said. Critics say President Trump's deployment of troops to Los Angeles will only provoke more violence. But Thune and other Republicans on Capitol Hill say it was a move that needed to be made. 'At the end of the day, it's about preventing chaos and preserving law and order,' Thune said. A federal judge will hold a hearing Thursday on California Governor Gavin Newsom's request to stop President Trump from using troops in Los Angeles. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.