Jamie Thompson and Josh Tyrangiel Joining The Atlantic as Staff Writers
As The Atlantic continues a major expansion of its editorial staff, today editor in chief Jeffrey Goldberg is announcing that award-winning journalists Jamie Thompson and Josh Tyrangiel will both become staff writers. Jamie has been a contributing writer for The Atlantic and will join the staff next week. She won this year's National Magazine Award for reporting for the March 2024 cover story, 'To Stop a Shooter,' about the Parkland shooting and the systemic failure by America's police forces to properly train their officers to confront mass shooters––and a society in denial about what it would really take to stop such tragedies. Ahead of joining staff in a few months, Josh had his first piece for The Atlantic published this morning: a romping profile of Anthony Weiner's attempted political comeback as he runs for New York's city council. From the lead: 'The last time we saw him, we saw all of him. Our subject is Anthony Weiner, whose surname was a burden long before it became a curse—so fused with his disgrace that you can't say it without triggering an avalanche of cringe.' Below is Jeffrey's note to staff announcing these hires:
Dear everyone, I'm writing this morning with excellent news. Two of journalism's most esteemed talents are joining The Atlantic as staff writers: Jamie Thompson and Josh Tyrangiel. It should go without saying, but I'll say it anyway: This is a big day for our magazine and our ambitions. I'll introduce them in alphabetical order, though for most of you, Jamie, who is already a contributing writer, needs no introduction: Her brilliant cover story for us, 'To Stop a Shooter,' was the recipient of this year's National Magazine Award for Reporting. (In her second article for us, an equally ambitious and accomplished piece of reporting, Jamie embedded with the Prince George's County Police Department's carjacking unit.) Jamie's brave, adventurous, and savvy reporting, her embrace of society's deepest complexities, and her ability to write about the most challenging characters and morally vexing issues with depth and fairness make her a perfect fit for the staff of The Atlantic. Even before winning one of the prestigious prizes in journalism, Jamie was already known as one of the best writers on criminal justice issues in America. She is the author of Standoff: Race, Policing, and a Deadly Assault That Gripped a Nation, which grew out of a story she wrote for The Dallas Morning News, which won the Edward R. Murrow Award for Excellence in Writing. Jamie began her career as a newspaper reporter in South Carolina and Florida (where she was part of a legendary crew at The Tampa Bay Times), before transitioning to writing magazine features; in addition to her work for us, she has written for, among other places, Texas Monthly, D Magazine, Politico, The Washington Post, and The New York Times Magazine. She has also been an associate professor of journalism at the University of Dallas. She will be working out of the Wharf, and her first day on staff with us is May 5. Now, onto Josh, who is new to The Atlantic (his first piece for us, about the return of Anthony Weiner, is up on the site this morning), but he is certainly among the most esteemed and well-known journalists in our country. Josh is a person of immense talent and range, and across his legendary career, he has led extraordinary journalism organizations through extraordinary times. Josh is joining us to write mainly at the intersection of technology, AI, and government policy, though (as you will see in the Weiner piece) he can write fluidly, and wittily, about most anything. Josh is the former editor of Bloomberg Businessweek and served as the chief content officer for Bloomberg Media, where he oversaw media operations across five continents. He is widely, and appropriately, credited for reinventing Businessweek. He created Vice News Tonight on HBO and has produced feature-length documentaries for HBO, Netflix, and Apple TV+. He served as executive producer (alongside Oprah Winfrey) of ABC's AI and the Future of Us, and he has won 12 Emmys and Peabody Awards for his work. Josh began his career at Vibe magazine, and then went on to fruitful employment at Time magazine. Most recently, Josh wrote a regular column for The Washington Post focused on AI. He continues to produce documentaries and is currently writing a book for Simon & Schuster about ways in which AI can be used for the common good. He will be based at Prince Street, and he will start on our staff this summer. This is a good day for The Atlantic. Please join me in welcoming Jamie and Josh to our team. Best wishes, Jeff
The Atlantic has announced a number of new hires since the start of the year, including managing editor Griff Witte; staff writers Tyler Austin Harper, Isaac Stanley-Becker, Nick Miroff, Ashley Parker, Missy Ryan, Michael Scherer, and Caity Weaver; senior editors Jenna Johnson and Dan Zak; and contributing writers Jonathan Lemire and Alex Reisner. Please reach out with any questions or requests. Press Contact: Anna Bross, The Atlantic | press@theatlantic.com
Article originally published at The Atlantic
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
The unfortunate reason Hegseth still has an incomplete leadership team at the Pentagon
Donald Trump sat down with The Atlantic in April, and when the discussion turned to his beleaguered defense secretary, the president offered support — in an awkwardly worded way. 'I think he's gonna get it together,' Trump said about Pete Hegseth. That might yet be true, but the hapless Pentagon chief apparently hasn't gotten it together just yet. NBC News reported: The White House is looking for a new chief of staff and several senior advisers to support Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth after a series of missteps that have shaken confidence in his leadership, but it has so far found no suitable takers, according to four current and former administration officials and a Republican congressional aide. Among the secretary's many problems at the Pentagon in his early months was widespread personnel turmoil inside the building, especially in the aftermath of the Signal chat scandal, leaving Hegseth without, among other things, a chief of staff. In late April, the Defense Department moved some officials around in the hopes of bolstering Hegseth's leadership team, but vacancies remained. As NBC News' report noted, these positions have traditionally been seen as 'prestigious' and 'typically attract multiple qualified candidates,' but 'at least three people have already turned down potential roles under Hegseth.' While a Pentagon spokesperson denied the accuracy of the reporting, NBC News added{ 'So far, though, the administration has not had much luck identifying people who are either willing to work for Hegseth or who fit the bill politically.' It was that sentence that stood out for me because it spoke to the complexity of the challenge: The search is on for qualified officials who are both MAGA-friendly and willing to work with an unqualified and scandal-plagued television personality who was elevated to one of the world's most difficult administrative positions. Finding people who check one of the boxes is easy; finding people who check all of the boxes is apparently not going well. As for why the public should care, The Atlantic's latest report on DOD developments summarized the landscape nicely: 'Hegseth oversees a workforce of more than 3 million, and a budget of close to $1 trillion, without a chief of staff. His shrunken circle of close aides lacks extensive Pentagon experience. Key military commanders are preparing to retire without replacements in sight. Sidelined aides have aired details of unseemly feuds at the department's senior levels, and a series of unflattering media reports have fueled what numerous officials describe as Hegseth's fixation on stopping leaks.' There may come a day when the Pentagon chief, to borrow the president's phrase, 'gets it together,' but that day has not yet arrived. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
David Pfaff Victorious In Irving City Council Race
David Pfaff won a hotly contested Irving City Council runoff Saturday, defeating Sergio Porres with 52.74% of the vote — a margin of just 580 votes. According to the official election night report, Pfaff received 5,591 votes to Porres' 5,011, improving his May 3 general election performance, when he secured 5,230 votes to Porres' 4,987. Both candidates gained supporters during the runoff campaign, but Pfaff ultimately widened his lead. Notably, The Dallas Morning News reported that it was not allowed inside the Porres campaign's watch party Saturday night — though The Dallas Express was. Inside the room, Porres' allies reflected on the campaign's broader significance, including its effect on other council races and the city's ongoing casino debate. 'Sergio's race kinda carried this whole campaign,' said attorney Cliff Riley, a close ally of the Families for Irving PAC, which backed Porres. He credited the Place 2 challenger's candidacy with creating a surge of opposition to casino development, which he said also boosted turnout for candidates John Bloch and Adam Muller — both of whom won their respective races earlier in May. Riley likened Porres' insurgent bid to that of former State Sen. Don Huffines' 2022 primary challenge to Gov. Greg Abbott, explaining that Porres was the one pulling the Overton window to the 'right.' He specifically pointed to Pfaff's decision to include 'no casinos' in his campaign mailers as evidence that the issue had become politically 'toxic.' 'We've won a big battle,' Riley said. 'Sergio made [the casino issue] utterly toxic for the other side.' Riley also emphasized the diverse coalition Porres built, saying his campaign was effective 'because of our Muslim friends' and other religious voters who had long felt alienated by Irving's political class. At the party, Porres personally thanked former general election opponents like Vicky Oduk, who endorsed him the day after the May election and campaigned with him in the runoff. He also thanked Elena Blake, president of the Irving Republican Women, who was among his earliest backers, among many others. 'We have done a really incredible thing,' Porres told supporters. Porres expressed optimism about his future political prospects, suggesting Saturday's results had only laid the groundwork for a potential rematch. 'This was a warm-up fight,' he said. 'We are going to be unstoppable.' He also pointed to shifting demographics in Irving, saying the city's Catholic and Muslim populations — including many large families — are aligned on key cultural issues and increasingly frustrated with the status quo. 'The demographics are on our side,' Porres said. For his part, Pfaff appeared elated in a video posted to his campaign's Facebook page shortly after the result was called. In the video, Pfaff is seen smiling broadly as he approaches a projector screen displaying the vote totals, then embraces his supporters. The caption read: 'THANK YOU, IRVING!' The election capped months of tension over the city's stance on casinos — an issue that dominated political discourse even after a proposed rezoning effort was formally withdrawn. Pfaff's backers included the Lone Star Conservative Action Fund, a political group linked to Las Vegas Sands, which spent nearly $200,000 supporting his campaign and others. Pfaff publicly distanced himself from the group during the campaign, saying in a video, 'I cannot be bought.' Porres, meanwhile, campaigned aggressively on an anti-casino message and frequently questioned why casino-affiliated groups were still involved in city races if the issue was truly 'dead.' The campaign also exposed shifting alliances in Irving's Muslim community. Though CAIR Action Texas initially backed Pfaff, it later withdrew its endorsement. Other Muslim civic organizations moved to support Porres, culminating in the formation of the Irving Muslims PAC, which endorsed him exclusively. Saturday's result means Pfaff will take the Place 2 seat on the Irving City Council — a seat previously held by Brad LaMorgese, who did not seek reelection. With Pfaff's victory, the composition of the council now includes a complex blend of pro- and anti-casino voices, but momentum appears to remain with casino skeptics — a movement Porres helped galvanize, even in defeat.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Trump's war with California will test MAGA's limits
During the last months of last year's presidential campaign, Donald Trump would hold his rallies in places like Pennsylvania and complain about Vice President Kamala Harris' home state of California being a violent hellscape that had its residents cowering in terror of the rampaging hordes of immigrant criminals who were routinely killing people in their beds. He would often complain that the police were hamstrung by "woke" policies that wouldn't allow them to take the gloves off. At one of his rallies, Trump even daydreamed about what he would do about it if he became president again: allow the cops to have "one really violent day." His crowds loved it. He's always entertained them with his lurid, violent fantasies. It's one of the things they love about him. Californians didn't love it so much, however. The fact that Harris hailed from the state was certainly an invitation for him to trash the state, but he'd been doing that long before Harris was in the race. In fact, despite owning a house and a golf course in Los Angeles, Trump has been openly hostile toward California ever since it failed to vote for him in 2016. During his first term, he raged at the state for failing to "clean the floors of the forest," which he claimed was responsible for the fires that hit Northern California. As The Atlantic's Ron Brownstein reported, during the global pandemic crisis, he demanded that if the Golden State wanted pandemic supplies and federal help, they would need to "ask nicely" and capitulate on issues like sanctuary cities. Trump and then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., called such requests a "blue state bailout" and suggested that the state should go bankrupt if it requests relief during the global emergency. Trump behaved similarly toward other blue states, but reserved a special portion of his ire for California. He started his second term by maligning Los Angeles during the devastating wildfires in January. He fatuously insisted that if the state had listened to him about "turning on the valve" in Northern California to release water to the south from Canada, there would have been no fires. He even ordered the Army Corps of Engineers to release millions of gallons into a flood plain and then weirdly claimed that he'd "invaded" Los Angeles and solved its water problem. " He never had a word of sympathy for the victims of the tragedy. All he could do was blame the governor, who he immaturely calls Gavin "Newscum." All that was bad enough. But now he's pretty much declared war on Los Angeles. Ever since Trump came into office with his mandate for "Mass Deportation Now," he's been impatient with the pace and the numbers. What was touted as a plan to rid the country of violent gang members has proved to be less fruitful than he promised. He always meant to deport as many immigrants as possible, regardless of their legal status or criminal history. (Why else would he pounce on the Haitian community as he did?) As the Washington Examiner reported last week, Trump's enforcer and shadow president Stephen Miller brought the hammer down on ICE in recent days, instituting a quota and demanding that they stop looking for criminals and start arresting people at their workplaces, schools and outside places like Home Depot and 7-Eleven. They've been doing smaller raids around the country for some time. But after Miller's edicts, they are now waging full-scale assaults. They've come to LA, with its large Latino and Asian immigrant communities, carrying assault weapons and wearing masks, to make an example of the already stressed city, which is still recovering from an epic natural disaster. What better way to demonstrate our new constitution-shredding, authoritarian police state? (And, naturally, it happens to be Stephen Miller's hometown, which he has loathed since he was an angry xenophobic misfit at Santa Monica High School.) Last week, ICE began a series of large-scale raids, naturally provoking protests from the community. As the demonstrations against them escalated over Friday and Saturday, ICE lied about the LAPD failing to help protect them, clearly as a way to allow Trump to deploy the National Guard. He claimed it was a riot. Los Angeles knows what a riot is. We have had real ones here, and this is not that. He did not ask the governor to deploy the National Guard, as he is expected to do. He instead evoked a very rarely used law that was last applied in 1965 by President Lyndon Johnson to protect civil rights workers from local police, allowing him to federalize those issued a memorandum ordering "at least 2,000" troops to the city of LA for "no less" than 60 days. It instructed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, most recently a former Fox News weekend host, to order active duty military on standby as well. Several hundred of these federalized California National Guard troops entered the city on Sunday. All this action did was escalate tensions and prompt more unrest. But then, that was the point. I live here and I can validate the fact that immigrants in this city are part of the fabric of our lives. There have always been many undocumented workers here and they're part of the community — they're our families, friends and co-workers. We value them and the contribution they make culturally and economically. Nobody here is asking for this. Having militarized federal cops and active duty troops raiding our neighborhoods and violently grabbing people off the streets is the real invasion, not the people who've been living and working here forever. And it isn't going to be just us. Liza Goiten, director of the National Security Project at the Brennan Center, told CNN: [Trump's] memorandum doesn't even mention Los Angeles. It authorizes the deployment of federalized national guard forces and active armed duty forces anywhere in the country where protests against ICE activity are occurring regardless of whether those protests involve any violence or in places where protests are simply likely to occur. And that could really be anywhere in the country. That kind of pre-emptive nationwide deployment of the military to effectively police protests is unprecedented, incredibly dangerous and an abuse of any law the president might be relying on. " On Sunday, Donald Trump spoke to the media and promised that "we're going to have troops everywhere." Late last night, he posted this: We can probably expect to see even more escalation by Trump in the coming days. The state of California is filing suit, so perhaps the court will stay his hand temporarily. But that won't be the end of it. If they rule that he cannot use this rarely used law, he will almost certainly invoke the Insurrection Act and, if necessary, declare martial law. This is just the beginning. Anyone who lives in a blue American city should get ready. They're coming for you, too.
