GE2025: Ong Ye Kung took co-driver analogy too far, distorting constructive opposition idea: Chee Soon Juan
SDP chief Chee Soon Juan urged Singaporeans to vote into Parliament a meaningful opposition that can 'hold the Government's feet to the fire'. ST PHOTO: GIN TAY
Follow our live coverage here.
SINGAPORE - Health Minister Ong Ye Kung should take a good look at the 10 alternative policy papers on topics from healthcare to housing and the economy that the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) has put up before criticising the opposition, said its party chief Chee Soon Juan.
On the sidelines of a walkabout at Woodlands Mart on May 1, Dr Chee was asked for his response to Mr Ong's comments that a stronger opposition presence in Parliament could lead to paralysis in the Government.
Citing the opposition as co-driver analogy first used in 2011, Mr Ong had said at a rally on April 30 that if the co-driver also wanted to steer the car, along with the ruling party in the driver's seat, this might result in a crash.
In response, Dr Chee said the minister, who is leading the PAP team in Sembawang GRC, was taking the analogy too far and distorting and misrepresenting the idea of a constructive opposition.
Mr Ong had said that instead of having a strong opposition, a strong PAP government with a constructive opposition as a check and balance would be more effective.
Dr Chee said 'it was very disappointing' that Mr Ong would say things that are 'patently untrue (when) constructive opposition is what we're talking about all this time'.
He urged Singaporeans to vote into Parliament a meaningful opposition that can 'hold the Government's feet to the fire' and not let up until they start getting more responsive, and tell the people how they are going to lower the cost of living and address issues like under-employment.
Dr Chee added: 'There's no point… in these nine days, when you come and make yourself seen and heard at the hawker centre, and just go through the motions of having a bowl of noodles. And then after the election, you disappear again, and the people are left with this high cost of living.'
He proposed removing the Goods and Services Tax (GST) from basic necessities such as food, medication and education supplies, while raising the GST on luxury goods to 13 or 14 per cent to compensate for the loss in revenue.
At the Fullerton Rally on April 28, Prime Minister Lawrence Wong noted that foreigners, tourists and higher-income families pay the entire 9 per cent of GST, while GST vouchers ensure that the lower- and middle-income Singaporeans pay less than the headline GST rate.
Dr Chee said what PM Wong pointed out reinforced the SDP's point on further raising the GST on luxury goods.
'If you increase the GST for luxury items – Gucci handbags, Bentleys and Rolex watches – they can still afford it. I don't think they will have a problem,' he added.
He cautioned that Singapore's income disparity is going to widen if further support is not given to those earning $1,300 to $1,500 a month.
'Even those people who are making tons of money right now, (when) you destabilise society, you test society with this widening gap, you're looking for trouble.'
Dr Chee also responded to the criticism levelled against the SDP's healthcare proposals by Mr Ong at the April 30 rally for Sembawang West SMC, where Dr Chee is standing as a candidate against the PAP's Ms Poh Li San.
Mr Ong had questioned the viability of the SDP's healthcare proposal on switching to a national health insurance 'single-payer' system for hospital bills.
Today, a hospital bill is paid in three parts – namely a government subsidy, a health insurance claim through MediShield Life and then MediSave. Switching to SDP's proposal would lead to 'super high' insurance premiums, Mr Ong had said.
In response, Dr Chee said the 3Ms – MediSave, MediShield and MediFund – are very hard to administer, and should be streamlined.
He added that Singapore's current healthcare system is based on the United States system, which he found to be 'so appallingly complicated and unaffordable'.
The SDP is also contesting Sembawang GRC, Marsiling-Yew Tee GRC and Bukit Panjang SMC.
While the SDP chief is new to Sembawang West SMC, he said he and his team have been doing the legwork over the past nine days to 'make sure residents know them and their message'.
Dr Chee and his PAP opponent, Ms Poh, were both at the Woodlands Mart foodcourt to interact with residents on the morning of May 1, but kept a distance from each other.
At the foodcourt, several people approached Dr Chee for wefies and to sign on his authored books.
He reiterated that if elected, he will conduct town-hall meetings to hear about residents' concerns, in addition to holding Meet-the-People sessions.
He said: 'I do worry that with the present set of PAP folks, we're not going to get very far if we keep continuing to do the same thing over and over again, have the same few people sitting in the Cabinet and then not have meaningful opposition.'
Shabana Begum is a correspondent, with a focus on environment and science, at The Straits Times.
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Singaporeans living in Los Angeles take extra precautions amid immigration protests
Some Singaporeans living in Los Angeles say they are taking extra precautions, like avoiding downtown LA, as US immigration protests enter the fourth day. They tell CNA that the Singapore embassy has also not issued any warnings or advisory notes, as the bulk of the Singaporean community who are still there feel relatively safe.

Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
Job security today must be complemented by future job mobility: NTUC president
NTUC president K. Thanaletchimi spoke about the need to reskill workers for emerging sectors at the International Labour Conference. PHOTO: INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION LIVESTREAM SINGAPORE – To help workers adapt and thrive amid global economic uncertainty, the labour movement must aim to not only secure today's jobs, but also help workers ride on future opportunities. To this end, the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) will push on with reskilling initiatives so workers can improve their chances of landing roles in emerging sectors, its president K. Thanaletchimi said in a plenary speech on June 9. 'We believe that job security today must be complemented by job mobility tomorrow,' she said, while addressing a mostly foreign audience at the 113th session of the annual International Labour Conference in Geneva, Switzerland, held from June 2 to 13. The Singapore delegation attending the conference, organised by the International Labour Organization (ILO) , comprises representatives from the Government – including Manpower Minister Tan See Leng – NTUC and the Singapore National Employers Federation. In her speech, Ms Thanaletchimi said providing jobs, labour rights and economic growth have been key to Singapore's peace and progress over the last 60 years of independence. She said Singapore, like many other nations, is navigating the challenges of global economic uncertainty – an issue that came to the fore after US President Donald Trump announced unilateral 'Liberation Day' tariffs on most trading partners on April 2. This poses risks to the supply chains that Singapore is part of in key industries such as electronics and maritime – and the job security of those who work in these and other related sectors. To tackle the risks, the Government, employers and the labour movement have come together to set up the Singapore Economic Resilience Taskforce, she noted. She added that NTUC has also set up some 3,000 Company Training Committees (CTCs), with 400 transformation projects benefiting more than 7,400 workers to date. Under the CTC programme, employers form committees with unions and industry experts to map out the skills workers need to stay relevant. As for workers' rights, Ms Thanaletchimi highlighted two new laws passed in Singapore to shore up protections for platform workers as well as stamp out workplace discrimination, as she addressed delegates from the ILO's 187 member states. Under the Platform Workers Act, for instance, platform operators are now required to provide work injury compensation insurance for platform workers, as well as pay more in Central Provident Fund contributions. She also expressed hopes that the ILO and its constituent members will be able to come together to develop one or more international agreements to safeguard the rights of platform workers, who often 'face challenges such as poor working conditions, misclassification and exclusion from existing labour laws and social protections'. In his earlier speech, Manpower Minister Tan cited the two new laws as examples of how patient, honest dialogues between the Government, employers and unions could lead to 'win-win-win solutions'. Another example he cited was the Progressive Wage Model, which sets out sector-specific minimum salaries tied to a worker's skills and productivity improvements, with the Government stepping in to boost lower-wage workers' income through the Workfare Income Supplement scheme. Over the last five years, wages at the 20th percentile rose faster than the median, indicating that wage gaps have been narrowing, Mr Tan said. 'The trust, painstakingly built over decades, is what allows us to have difficult conversations, find common ground, and move forward in a way that is good for workers, employers and Singapore,' he said. The minister added that Singapore hopes to extend this same spirit of partnership to support efforts in creating decent work regionally and globally. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.


Independent Singapore
8 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Trump's controversial travel ban targeting 12 nations slams into action Monday morning
Screengrab from WASHINGTON, U.S.A.: A contentious presidential directive from U.S. President Donald Trump has formally gone into effect, forbidding citizens from 12 nations to enter the U.S. as of 12:01 a.m. ET on Monday. The Trump government maintains that the move is intended to protect the country from 'foreign terrorists.' Affected countries include Myanmar, Afghanistan, Chad, Sudan, the Republic of the Congo, Haiti, Equatorial Guinea, Iran, Libya, Eritrea, Yemen, and Somalia. According to the latest GMA Network report, restrictions will also apply to tourists from Cuba, Burundi, Laos, Togo, Sierra Leone, Venezuela, and Turkmenistan. Trump said that the most seriously impacted countries were chosen based on apprehensions over extremism, poor collaboration with U.S. visa security procedures, and untrustworthy identity authentication systems. Terrorism cited, but critics call the move discriminatory Trump cited the latest episode in Boulder, Colorado, where an Egyptian citizen allegedly threw a gasoline bomb into a mob of pro-Israel demonstrators, as an explanation for the prolonged travel limitations. Nevertheless, Egypt itself is not covered by the prohibition, prompting additional condemnation that the regulation is inconsistent and politically instigated. See also WHO warns virus may be here to stay as toll nears 300,000 The recent guideline mirrors a similar border closure carried out during Trump's first term, which besieged numerous Muslim-majority nations and spurred legal skirmishes, extensive objections, and disputes. Civil rights activists and Democratic policymakers have already voiced out, dubbing the move 'draconian' and a defilement of civil liberties. 'People have a right to seek asylum,' U.S. Representative Ro Khanna said in a social media post. Global reaction: Anger, retaliation, and fear The reaction from impacted countries has been quick and sharp. Chad's President Mahamat Idriss Deby Itno criticized the order and declared a punitive break to U.S. visa issuance. 'Chad has neither planes to offer nor billions of dollars to give, but Chad has its dignity and its pride,' Deby stated, alluding to prominent donations and investments made to the U.S. by more affluent countries like Qatar. In Afghanistan, many are obsessed with fear, especially those who worked with the U.S. government and are now confronted with the risk of expatriation and likely Taliban punishments. 'I risked my life for American values,' said one Afghan outworker. 'Now, I may be sent back to die.' As the new regulation gains traction, its lawful, political, and humanitarian repercussions are likely to reveal fast—and not without fierce debate.