logo
Maine lawmakers are still wrangling over state budget with weeks left in session

Maine lawmakers are still wrangling over state budget with weeks left in session

Yahoo2 days ago

Jun. 1—Maine's legislative session is scheduled to end in just over two weeks, and many of the biggest issues remain unresolved.
Lawmakers still must close out a two-year state budget that could include tax increases and spending cuts to settle thorny policy issues ranging from transgender athletes to immigration enforcement to child care funding.
Finalizing the budget is going to be the biggest hurdle and likely will come down to the wire after some marathon days of negotiation and debate.
Democratic lawmakers passed a portion of the state budget earlier this session with enough funding to continue basic services into the new fiscal year that starts July 1.
But they left unresolved proposed tax increases and program cuts the Mills administration says are needed to meet the state Constitution's mandate for a balanced budget. They took a similar approach two years ago.
Republicans, who have criticized Democrats for using their majorities to adopt baseline budgets without their input, are not keen on helping Democrats dig themselves out of a projected budget hole, especially if it includes tax increases. Democrats will need some Republican support for the remaining pieces of the budget to take effect in July.
Lawmakers from both parties say they're aiming to conclude the session by June 18. They will need to approve a budget before they adjourn for the year, but they have the option of carrying over until next year any remaining bills, including about 100 spending bills that have passed both chambers and are awaiting funding before being sent to the governor.
'TOUGH CHOICES'
Gov. Janet Mills is expected to meet with a bipartisan group of lawmakers next week to urge Republicans and Democrats to agree to a bipartisan budget — one that makes "tough choices" that protect core services at a time when state revenues have begun to level off and decline and as federal funding becomes increasingly uncertain under the Trump administration and the Republican-controlled Congress.
"The Governor believes that with state revenues leveling off — and cuts likely coming from the President and Republicans in Congress — the time for hard budget decisions is here and now," spokesperson Ben Goodman said. "She continues to strongly urge Republicans and Democrats in the Legislature to work together to make the tough choices that are needed to ensure programs that keep Maine people healthy, our school children fed, our communities safe, and provide access to education and good-paying jobs are maintained in the years to come."
Rep. Jack Ducharme, the lead Republican on the Appropriations and Financial Affairs Committee, which is reviewing the budget, said his party is largely in the dark as Democrats debate among themselves about any changes to Mills' budget proposal. Committee Republicans have refused to support of many budget items until Democrats present a plan for new spending and revenue sources, he said.
"We're really kind of the mercy of what they're going to bring to the table and what they're not," Ducharme of Madison said. "To date, they have not come up with an idea about where they're getting the money."
In a written statement, Sen. Peggy Rotundo, D-Lewiston and co-chair of the budget committee, accused Republicans of not engaging in negotiations. Rotundo said lawmakers have routinely passed bipartisan budgets in her 19 years in elected office, though her statement did not acknowledge that Democrats, who have controlled both chambers since 2019, have passed mostly partyline budgets in recent years.
"What has always made Maine's government work, regardless of who holds the majority, is the understanding that governing is a shared responsibility." Rotundo said. "It requires both parties to come to the table, roll up their sleeves, and work through challenges together."
Earlier this session, Democrats used their majority to pass an $11.3 billion continuing services budget that continues to fund 55% of public education and provides $122 million to help stabilize the MaineCare program. But that budget doesn't include at least $122 million in additional funding needed to fund MaineCare — Maine's Medicaid program — in the second year of the budget.
The governor's budget office said that the continuing services budget does not include $285 million in additional spending originally proposed by Mills.
WHAT'S LEFT TO SPEND
It's unclear exactly how much money is or isn't left for lawmakers to spend. Ducharme says the continuing services budget already spends $100 million more than state revenue projections over the next two years, which, when coupled with the additional MaineCare spending, has created a hole of more than $200 million.
But Rep. Drew Gattine, D-Westbrook, who is co-chair of the budget committee, said there is more than $120 million in unallocated revenue available for the next biennium. That does not include any of the additional taxes or spending cuts proposed by Mills, he said.
Gattine said that lawmakers will likely alter the governor's proposal, though he didn't provide any specifics.
"The budget will be different than what the governor proposed — it always is," Gattine said. "Whether or not it's significantly different is in the eye of the beholder."
Mills proposed a series of tax increases that could generate $156 million in revenue to meet existing commitments, including proposing the first increase in cigarette taxes in 20 years. Increasing cigarette taxes from $2 a pack to $3 would increase state revenue by $78 million, according to her administration. But Republicans and others have criticized that approach as hurting low-income families.
Mills also proposed taxing online streaming services, such as Netflix and Spotify ($14 million); phasing in a new pension income tax for wealthier retirees ($44.7 million); increasing cannabis taxes ($6.3 million); and taxing pharmacies and private ambulance services, which it says will unlock additional federal funding to reinvest into the MaineCare program.
Ducharme said Republicans remain steadfastly opposed to new taxes.
"Maine people are the third or fourth highest taxed people in the nation with one of the smallest populations," Ducharme said. "It's ridiculous for us to think that we need to add more taxes because government can't get its spending under control."
Mills has also proposed cutbacks, including eliminating state-funded Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program funds for noncitizens, cutting two crisis receiving centers planned for Aroostook and Kennebec counties, stopping a planned increase in child care worker stipends and planned cost-of-living increases for direct care workers, among others.
Mills also proposed reforms to the state's General Assistance program aimed at reducing costs and returning the program to its original mission as a last resort safety net, rather than an ongoing housing assistance program.
House Democrats initially agreed to a version of those reforms earlier this year, winning Republican support for a supplemental budget bill that would have allowed the state to immediately pay hospitals for services already provided to MaineCare patients. But that deal fell apart when Senate Republicans blocked its passage.
House Minority Leader Billy Bob Faulkingham said at a news conference last week that Republicans are still fighting for some of the reforms they had previously sought in the budget, including reforms to the General Assistance and MaineCare programs.
"We're still hoping they appear in the budget," Faulkingham said.
Gattine said Democrats have focused on scrutinizing the governor's proposals, while also considering changes sought by lawmakers. But he said it's too soon to say where the final budget will land.
"When we look at this stuff, we understand that these were tough choices, so we have to be much more careful and diligent in our work reviewing that (proposal), because at the end of the day we have to come up with something that is balanced, but also something that meets the moment and the needs of Maine people, which are significant," he said.
Staff Writer Rachel Ohm contributed to this story.
Copy the Story Link

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

2 key findings on Democrats' brand problem from the new CNN poll
2 key findings on Democrats' brand problem from the new CNN poll

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

2 key findings on Democrats' brand problem from the new CNN poll

There's new evidence that the Democratic Party's reputation is in a bad place. That doesn't mean the party is doomed, electorally speaking. There's plenty of reason to doubt that, given lots of history and its performance in the 2025 elections thus far — but it is a complicating factor for the party's path forward. And a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS provides insights into the party's problems. It's worth a breakdown. The poll, which was released Sunday, asked a battery of questions about how people view both parties. Perhaps most striking was that people were more likely to view the Republicans than Democrats as the party with strong leaders (40% to 16%) and even the 'party of change' (32% to 25%). Neither party won close to a majority in either category. But the former is notable because there is such a gulf between the two parties. And the latter is notable because the party that's out of power is usually viewed as the party of change. Not this time. So what can we read into these findings? The 'strong leaders' question might be the most troublesome finding for Democrats. Only about 1 in 6 Americans said Democrats have stronger leaders than Republicans. As remarkably, only 39% of Democrats said that. We've seen hints of this in previous polls. A March CNN poll found about 3 in 10 Democrats and Democratic-leaning voters couldn't name a single leader who best reflected the party's core values. An AP-NORC poll last month showed just 35% of Democrats said they were at least 'somewhat' optimistic about the future of their party, compared with 55% of Republicans for their party. This might not seem too surprising. We just said goodbye to a Democratic president (Joe Biden) who was a diminished figure even when he was still in office. And the Democratic nominee who replaced him (Kamala Harris) wasn't exactly viewed as the future of the party when she took over the ticket in the 2024 race — and then lost. But there was a time when Democrats were at a somewhat similar crossroads, and the numbers weren't as dismal. A CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll asked the same question in 2006 — after John Kerry's unsuccessful emergence as Democrats' 2004 presidential candidate — and found a smaller 14-point advantage for Republicans. Back then, 63% of Democrats said their party had stronger leaders than Republicans — 24 points higher than today. One reason for the difference is that the 2025 and 2006 polls asked the question in a slightly different way, partly because one was conducted entirely by phone and the other mostly online. Today's poll gave people an explicit 'neither' option, which the 2006 poll didn't (though some people volunteered that option back then). Nearly half of Democrats in the new poll (48%) chose that option. That's still a remarkable finding. Combined with the 13% of Democrats who said Republicans have the stronger leaders, that's 6 in 10 Democrats this year who don't think their side has stronger leaders than a party led by a president whom a huge majority of them revile. The other notable finding is on which party is the 'party of change.' Americans chose Republicans, 32% to 25%. That's not a big gap, but it is counterintuitive given Republicans swept the House, Senate and White House last fall. Historically speaking, it's almost always the party that's out of power that's viewed as the party of change. Before the 2006 election, the same CNN-ORC poll mentioned above showed Democrats had a huge, 56% to 29% lead on this measure. Then, as now, Democrats didn't hold the presidency or either chamber of Congress. But the numbers are very different today. Not only do Democrats trail on this measure, but only a slight majority of Democrats themselves — 51% — say their party is the party of change. And only 18% of independents say that. It's likely this is, in part, about Democrats' failure to position themselves as change agents, but also about what President Donald Trump is doing — and about people not necessarily seeing 'change' as a good thing. However you feel about the changes Trump is making, there is no question he is pushing lots of them. You see that in his and the Department of Government Efficiency's rapid overhaul of the federal government and in Trump's historic efforts to expand executive power — in ways that are often being halted by the courts because they go too far, too fast. It's possible that people just see Trump changing lots of things, whether for good or ill in their opinions, so the 'party of change' mantle doesn't mean what it usually does. We already saw during the 2024 campaign that people's definitions of 'change' were somewhat jumbled by unusual circumstances — i.e., Harris replacing Biden, and a former president running as the challenger. But it's also pretty clear that Democrats have failed to make themselves into a viable and attractive alternative to the party in power. The new CNN poll also asked which party people viewed as the 'party that can get things done.' Republicans led on this by a nearly 2-to-1 margin, 36% to 19%. Only 49% of Democrats and 11% of independents picked the Democratic Party as the more formidable one. There's also, of course, Republicans' big edge on the 'strong leaders' question. None of this means Democrats are sunk in the 2026 elections — or anything close to it. History shows the party that doesn't hold the White House almost always wins midterm elections, in large part because they're viewed as a check on the president. Democrats and liberal candidates have also been doing well in special elections and other races held since the 2024 election. In other words, being not-Trump could be good enough to at least reclaim a very closely split House. But if the Democratic Party wants to run up the score in 2026 and really chart a path for the 2028 election, it has some real work to do on its branding.

DHS says FEMA head was joking when he said he wasn't aware of hurricane season
DHS says FEMA head was joking when he said he wasn't aware of hurricane season

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

DHS says FEMA head was joking when he said he wasn't aware of hurricane season

Acting Federal Emergency Management Agency Administrator David Richardson was joking when he said at a meeting Monday that he was not aware of the upcoming hurricane season, the Department of Homeland Security said in a statement. Reuters reported that Richardson said at a briefing that he was not aware the United States has a hurricane season, confusing staffers. The report, which said it was unclear if Richardson was serious or joking, cited four unnamed sources familiar with the situation. 'Despite meanspirited attempts to falsely frame a joke as policy, there is no uncertainty about what FEMA will be doing this Hurricane Season. FEMA is laser focused on disaster response, and protecting the American people,' a spokesperson for DHS said. The spokesperson added that Richardson is 'activated in preparation for Hurricane Season.' Richardson took the reins at FEMA last month. The previous acting administrator, Cameron Hamilton, was removed from his job after he told lawmakers at a congressional hearing that he did not believe the agency should be eliminated. DHS has denied that Hamilton's ouster was related to his testimony. FEMA is responsible for coordinating the government's emergency response to areas affected by natural disasters, such as hurricanes. Hurricane season runs from June through November. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration predicted there is a 60% chance of an above-normal season this year, during which the United States could get six to 10 hurricanes, three to five of which could be 'major.' Democrats blasted Richardson following the report about the meeting. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., referred to the Reuters report when he wrote on X, "And I'm unaware of why he hasn't been fired yet." Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., also took aim at Richardson, writing on X, "Bare minimum requirement for the leader of FEMA: know when hurricane season is." President Donald Trump and his allies have repeatedly floated the idea of terminating the emergency disaster agency. During a visit to North Carolina in January to survey the damage of Hurricane Helene, which swept across the state late last year, Trump suggested overhauling or doing away with FEMA, calling it 'very bureaucratic' and 'very slow.' Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has also suggested that FEMA should be eliminated. But without an alternative plan and with hurricane season approaching, Noem has also quietly made efforts to keep the agency running, sources familiar with the situation have told NBC News. This article was originally published on

Minnesota Wild re-sign veteran Marcus Johansson to 1-year, $800,000 contract to avoid free agency
Minnesota Wild re-sign veteran Marcus Johansson to 1-year, $800,000 contract to avoid free agency

CBS News

time32 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Minnesota Wild re-sign veteran Marcus Johansson to 1-year, $800,000 contract to avoid free agency

The Minnesota Wild re-signed right wing Marcus Johansson on Monday to a one-year, $800,000 contract that keeps the 15-year veteran from becoming a free agent. Johansson had 11 goals and 23 assists in 72 games for the Wild during the 2024-25 regular season, bouncing between the second and third lines. He was sixth on the team in points. The 34-year-old, who was acquired by the Wild from Washington a few days before the NHL trade deadline in 2023, played the 2024-25 season on a $2 million salary cap charge. Johansson had four goals and four assists in nine games for Sweden last month at the ice hockey world championships to help his native country's team win the bronze medal. He has 185 goals and 332 assists over 983 career regular-season games with seven teams in the NHL.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store