Hong Kong is right to curb smoking despite tobacco lobby pushback
Feel strongly about these letters, or any other aspects of the news? Share your views by emailing us your Letter to the Editor at
[email protected] or filling in
this Google form . Submissions should not exceed 400 words, and must include your full name and address, plus a phone number for verification
Advertisement
Hong Kong is not resting on its laurels when it comes to what we have achieved in protecting public health from tobacco. The government is supporting an
amendment bill to strengthen tobacco control. It has been incrementally tightening public health laws for decades, with smoke-free areas, package warnings and restrictions on tobacco advertising.
These measures, along with taxation, health promotion and cessation services, have made Hong Kong one among only a handful of jurisdictions in the world to have reduced the percentage of smokers down to single digits. That is the good news. The bad news is that it still leaves 600,000 smokers in Hong Kong, placing an enormous economic strain on our health system. Two-thirds of them could die from tobacco use.
If there was a manufacturing plant in Kwun Tong whose labour practices killed about 400,000 people, most sensible people would think the government has a responsibility – even a duty – to take immediate action.
The tobacco industry and its allies are mobilising against the proposed policies, particularly the ban on flavoured tobacco and possession or use of e-cigarettes in public places. There are a flurry of misleading arguments that such measures will
hurt the economy , particularly tourism.
Advertisement
Why am I not surprised? I have heard all these arguments many times before.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
2 days ago
- South China Morning Post
Who will win the AI contest of the century?
The arrival of artificial intelligence, robotics and new technology has been heralded as a game changer. But how will it unfold, and who will be able to take advantage of AI to win the contest of the century: the United States, China or some other country? Advertisement Writing in Foreign Affairs in 2023, James Manyika, senior vice-president of technology and society at Google, and Nobel laureate economist Michael Spence argued that 'by the beginning of the next decade, the shift to AI could become a leading driver of global prosperity'. These gains would come from not just the rapid advances in AI in creating new content and applications in daily life, but also its rapid spread through the democratisation of innovation. But for it to happen, Manyika and Spence say, we need a new policy framework as well as a new mindset towards AI, and that 'AI technologies must be embraced as tools that can enhance, rather than undermine, human potential and ingenuity'. I think the AI revolution has arrived faster than expected. So far, it looks like the US and China are in a two-horse race, with the others still struggling to catch up for various reasons. My thesis is that no country can afford not to encourage AI adoption to enhance national productivity and avoid the digital knowledge divide. Those who do not will become marginalised. The contest of the century is thus between all countries. In this cutthroat race, with Big Tech seeking to dominate the 'pay-by-subscription' game, we may end up being mentally and financially colonised in different tech domains. Advertisement This is where the Global South can innovate its way through open-access systems that meet individual or local needs, without giving away valuable data by choosing to follow one algorithm platform or becoming locked into 'pay for upgrade' contracts.
South China Morning Post
30-05-2025
- South China Morning Post
Fury as Chinese bank offers to help rich clients' kids gain top internships
A Chinese bank has triggered outrage by offering to help its rich customers secure prestigious internships for their children, prompting a heated debate about privilege and inequality on social media. Industrial Bank, a regional lender from Fujian province, said in a now-deleted post on the social platform WeChat that it could arrange for its clients' offspring to gain work experience at top firms including Google and JP Morgan, according to screenshots circulating online. To qualify for the scheme, households would need to deposit large new sums with the bank: 10 million yuan (US$1.4 million) for non-private banking customers and 5 million yuan for private banking clients, the post added. The scheme quickly went viral and triggered intense backlash on Chinese social media. The reaction has been particularly fierce given China's sky-high youth unemployment rate and a spate of recent scandals involving nepotism in the job market On Tuesday, Industrial Bank announced it had paused the offer and apologised for any 'misunderstandings caused by incomplete descriptions', according to the state-run news outlet Securities Times. In the statement, the company claimed it had not directly arranged internships for its customers' children, but had merely intended to refer them to external recruitment consultants, Securities Times reported.
South China Morning Post
20-05-2025
- South China Morning Post
Hong Kong's religious harmony is best maintained through trust
Feel strongly about these letters, or any other aspects of the news? Share your views by emailing us your Letter to the Editor at letters@ or filling in this Google form . Submissions should not exceed 400 words, and must include your full name and address, plus a phone number for verification I am writing in response to the letter , 'Hong Kong welcomes Muslims, but let's safeguard against extremism' (April 30). Hong Kong's efforts to foster inclusivity for Muslims while safeguarding social harmony are commendable and reflect the city's commitment to diversity. However, the suggestion that extremism is a significant concern with regard to Hong Kong's Muslim community lacks empirical support and risks perpetuating unnecessary stereotypes. Hong Kong's Muslim population, estimated at around 300,000, including both permanent residents and migrant workers, has historically been peaceful and law-abiding. The government's security reports do not identify the local Muslim community as a source of extremism. While vigilance against radicalisation is prudent worldwide, framing inclusivity efforts with undue caution may inadvertently stigmatise a minority that contributes positively to Hong Kong's economy and culture.
