logo
Israel kills at least 14 scientists behind Iran's nuclear program

Israel kills at least 14 scientists behind Iran's nuclear program

New York Posta day ago

Israel's tally of the war damage it wrought on Iran includes the targeted killings of at least 14 scientists, an unprecedented attack on the brains behind Iran's nuclear program that outside experts say can only set it back, not stop it.
In an interview with The Associated Press, Israel's ambassador to France said the killings will make it 'almost' impossible for Iran to build weapons from whatever nuclear infrastructure and material may have survived nearly two weeks of Israeli airstrikes and massive bunker-busting bombs dropped by U.S. stealth bombers.
'The fact that the whole group disappeared is basically throwing back the program by a number of years, by quite a number of years,' Ambassador Joshua Zarka said.
4 Israel's ambassador to France said the killings will make it 'almost' impossible for Iran to build weapons from whatever nuclear infrastructure may have survived.
Anadolu via Getty Images
But nuclear analysts say Iran has other scientists who can take their place. European governments say that military force alone cannot eradicate Iran's nuclear know-how, which is why they want a negotiated solution to put concerns about the Iranian program to rest.
'Strikes cannot destroy the knowledge Iran has acquired over several decades, nor any regime ambition to deploy that knowledge to build a nuclear weapon,' U.K. Foreign Secretary David Lammy told lawmakers in the House of Commons.
Here's a closer look at the killings:
Chemists, physicists, engineers among those killed
4 European governments say that military force alone cannot eradicate Iran's nuclear know-how.
AP
Zarka told AP that Israeli strikes killed at least 14 physicists and nuclear engineers, top Iranian scientific leaders who 'basically had everything in their mind.'
They were killed 'not because of the fact that they knew physics, but because of the fight that they were personally involved in, the creation and the fabrication and the production of (a) nuclear weapon,' he said.
Nine of them were killed in Israel's opening wave of attacks on June 13, the Israeli military said. It said they 'possessed decades of accumulated experience in the development of nuclear weapons' and included specialists in chemistry, materials and explosives as well as physicists.
Zarka spoke Monday to AP. On Tuesday, Iran state TV reported the death of another Iranian nuclear scientist, Mohammad Reza Sedighi Saber, in an Israeli strike, after he'd survived an earlier attack that killed his 17-year-old son on June 13.
Targeted killings meant to discourage would-be successors
4 Zarka told AP that Israeli strikes killed at least 14 physicists and nuclear engineers, top Iranian scientific leaders.
Planet Labs PBC/AFP via Getty Images
Experts say that decades of Iranian work on nuclear energy — and, Western powers allege, nuclear weapons — has given the country reserves of know-how and scientists who could continue any work toward building warheads to fit on Iran's ballistic missiles.
'Blueprints will be around and, you know, the next generation of Ph.D. students will be able to figure it out,' said Mark Fitzpatrick, who specialized in nuclear non-proliferation as a former U.S. diplomat. Bombing nuclear facilities 'or killing the people will set it back some period of time. Doing both will set it back further, but it will be reconstituted.'
'They have substitutes in maybe the next league down, and they're not as highly qualified, but they will get the job done eventually,' said Fitzpatrick, now an analyst at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, a London think tank.
How quickly nuclear work could resume will in part depend on whether Israeli and U.S. strikes destroyed Iran's stock of enriched uranium and equipment needed to make it sufficiently potent for possible weapons use.
'The key element is the material. So once you have the material, then the rest is reasonably well-known,' said Pavel Podvig, a Geneva-based analyst who specializes in Russia's nuclear arsenal. He said killing scientists may have been intended 'to scare people so they don't go work on these programs.'
'Then the questions are, 'Where do you stop?' I mean you start killing, like, students who study physics?' he asked. 'This is a very slippery slope.'
The Israeli ambassador said: 'I do think that people that will be asked to be part of a future nuclear weapon program in Iran will think twice about it.'
Previous attacks on scientists
Read the latest on the Israel-Iran conflict:
Israel has long been suspected of killing Iranian nuclear scientists but previously didn't claim responsibility as it did this time.
In 2020, Iran blamed Israel for killing its top nuclear scientist, Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, with a remote-controlled machine gun.
'It delayed the program but they still have a program. So it doesn't work,' said Paris-based analyst Lova Rinel, with the Foundation for Strategic Research think tank. 'It's more symbolic than strategic.'
Without saying that Israel killed Fakhrizadeh, the Israeli ambassador said 'Iran would have had a bomb a long time ago' were it not for repeated setbacks to its nuclear program — some of which Iran attributed to Israeli sabotage.
'They have not reached the bomb yet,' Zarka said. 'Every one of these accidents has postponed a little bit the program.'
A legally grey area
4 In 2020, Iran blamed Israel for killing its top nuclear scientist, Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, with a remote-controlled machine gun.
Getty Images
International humanitarian law bans the intentional killing of civilians and non-combatants. But legal scholars say those restrictions might not apply to nuclear scientists if they were part of the Iranian armed forces or directly participating in hostilities.
'My own take: These scientists were working for a rogue regime that has consistently called for the elimination of Israel, helping it to develop weapons that will allow that threat to take place. As such, they are legitimate targets,' said Steven R. David, a professor of political science at Johns Hopkins University.
Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here!
He said Nazi German and Japanese leaders who fought Allied nations during World War II 'would not have hesitated to kill the scientists working on the Manhattan Project' that fathered the world's first atomic weapons.
Laurie Blank, a specialist in humanitarian law at Emory Law School, said it's too early to say whether Israel's decapitation campaign was legal.
'As external observers, we don't have all the relevant facts about the nature of the scientists' role and activities or the intelligence that Israel has,' she said by email to AP. 'As a result, it is not possible to make any definitive conclusions.'
Zarka, the ambassador, distinguished between civilian nuclear research and the scientists targeted by Israel.
'It's one thing to learn physics and to know exactly how a nucleus of an atom works and what is uranium,' he said.
But turning uranium into warheads that fit onto missiles is 'not that simple,' he said. 'These people had the know-how of doing it, and were developing the know-how of doing it further. And this is why they were eliminated.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Federal Workers Took an Oath. Now We're Taking a Stand Against ICE
Federal Workers Took an Oath. Now We're Taking a Stand Against ICE

Newsweek

time36 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Federal Workers Took an Oath. Now We're Taking a Stand Against ICE

Federal buildings are supposed to be pillars of justice—places where the Constitution is upheld and the public is served. Today, they are being turned into sites of humanitarian crisis, fear, and secrecy. As federal workers, we took an oath—not to a party or a president, but to the Constitution. That oath demands we uphold the rule of law, defend human dignity, and protect the public good. The Trump administration is using federal agencies and public services to target immigrants, union leaders, and entire communities. We refuse to be silent. Federal workers in New York City, Chicago, and Seattle are taking bold action on Wednesday, June 25, to say: Our workplaces are not jails. We serve the public—not political agendas. We know our oath. Now we're taking a stand. Federal buildings—meant to serve the public, uphold justice, and safeguard rights—are being turned into lawless arenas where immigrants are harmed, detained without transparency, and stripped of their basic human rights. In Los Angeles this took the form of a three-year-old being held in a basement for 48 hours with only a bag of chips, a box of animal crackers, and a mini carton of milk as rations for each day. As for water? One bottle, shared amongst an entire family of five each day in stifling heat. Even members of Congress have been blocked from entering the buildings to conduct oversight and address these atrocities. It is an offense to the values we swore to uphold. It is an offense to the people federal workers serve. And it is an offense to the Constitution itself. It is also part of a broad and menacing trend. A demonstrator holds up a sign as they protest in front of the main entrance of Dodger Stadium to call for a boycott of the team, claiming the organization supports federal immigration efforts, in Los... A demonstrator holds up a sign as they protest in front of the main entrance of Dodger Stadium to call for a boycott of the team, claiming the organization supports federal immigration efforts, in Los Angeles, on June 19, 2025. More ETIENNE LAURENT / AFP/Getty Images The arrest of labor leader David Huerta outside the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building in Los Angeles and the recent arrest of mayoral candidate Brad Lander at the Jacob K. Javits Federal Building in New York City, the aggressive federal raids against immigrant communities, the continued use of public facilities to detain families in inhumane conditions—these are not isolated incidents. They are symptoms of an administration weaponizing the federal government against the very people it is meant to protect. These acts of cruelty are part of a coordinated agenda that started with the attacks on federal workers led by Trump allies like Russ Vought and billionaires like Elon Musk. These powerful figures seek to hollow out the federal government, discredit its workforce, and replace a democratic administrative state with a machinery of personal loyalty, abuse, and private enrichment. The anti-immigrant agenda and the attack on federal workers are both designed to dehumanize, divide, and distract. Immigrants are scapegoated to justify authoritarian crackdowns. Federal workers who resist or blow the whistle are demonized as part of a so-called "deep state." The result is a chilling feedback loop in which the government is turned against its own people—both those it serves and those who serve within it. This is why federal workers are speaking out. They are reclaiming their role as caretakers of the public trust and know they must take back their workplaces. They are saying: Not in our name. Not in our buildings. Not with our labor. We know the price of silence. History tells us that the erosion of democracy begins not with a bang, but with the quiet normalization of abuse—where violence is rationalized as "procedure," where rights are discarded due to "exceptions," where cruelty is described as "necessary enforcement." But federal workers are not here to normalize harm. We are here to raise the alarm. Federal workers chose public service because we believe in something bigger than ourselves: a government that serves all people, not just the wealthy, not just the powerful, not just the politically connected. This administration has betrayed that mission. As former federal workers we know that our former co-workers are not the "deep state." They are the real state—the people who keep this country running, who serve the people, who hold the line when democracy is under siege. We are standing up because we believe that public service is still noble. That government can still be just. That our federal workplaces can still reflect our highest values. We took an oath. Now we are taking a stand. Alissa Tafti is a federal union leader, economist, and Co-Executive Director of the Federal Unionist Network, a worker-led effort to defend democracy and transform the federal government from within. Chris Dols served as cost engineer and value officer with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in New York where he was elected President of IFPTE Local 98. Chris is a founding organizer of the Federal Unionists Network, which has organized mass actions to defend federal workers' rights across the country. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.

Trump backs away from leadership turnover in Iran: ‘Regime change takes chaos'
Trump backs away from leadership turnover in Iran: ‘Regime change takes chaos'

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump backs away from leadership turnover in Iran: ‘Regime change takes chaos'

President Trump on Tuesday backed away from talk of a regime change in Iran, amid pushback from MAGA supporters about the possibility of deeper U.S. involvement in the Middle East. The president was asked if he wants an Iranian regime change and replied, 'No.' He added that he wants to 'see everything calm down as quickly as possible.' 'Regime change takes chaos, and ideally, we don't want to see so much chaos. So we'll see how it goes,' he told reporters on Air Force One on the way to The Hague for the NATO summit. 'The Iranians are very good traders, very good businesspeople, and they got a lot of oil. They should be fine,' he added. 'They should be able to rebuild and do a good job. They're never going to have nuclear. But other than that, they should do a great job, which is exactly what I've been saying for years.' Before leaving the White House, the president railed against Israel and Iran for continuing to fight overnight after the president announced the parameters of a ceasefire the day before. The president had suggested Sunday that a regime change could be possible in Iran, leaving the door open to interfering with Iranian leadership after the U.S. bombed the country's nuclear sites. He dubbed it, 'Make Iran Great Again.' 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. While the strikes on the nuclear facilities surprised some MAGA supporters because the president had campaigned on staying out of foreign conflicts, the administration signaled the military action could end there. But, when Trump then left the door open to a regime change, fears among supporters increased about the possibility of U.S. entanglement abroad. Press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Monday walked back Trump's comment, saying he was just suggesting the Iranian people might want a new government, not suggesting a new front or motive to the war. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store