'What kind of son have I created?': A look at Donald Trump's relationship with his mother Mary on Mother's Day
On his first day back in the White House, President
Donald Trump
made a personal statement through the décor of the Oval Office, filling it with sentimental items that spoke to his deep family ties.
As he signed a series of executive orders just hours after taking the oath of office, the Resolute Desk became the backdrop for framed family portraits and meaningful memorabilia.
Among the items on display were photographs of his parents, Mary Anne and Fred Trump, whose influence shaped his journey into the real estate world. These images, nestled alongside a collection of challenge coins and military insignia, offered a glimpse into the president's personal history and the legacy of those who helped guide him to power.
His father, who died in 1999, and his mother, who passed away in 2000, are both prominently featured in this intimate arrangement, reflecting a side of the president not often seen in the corridors of power.
A Less Examined Influence
For years, Donald Trump has frequently spoken about the profound impact his father had on his life. Fred Trump, a tough and ambitious real estate developer, pushed his son hard, leaving an indelible mark on his personality and success. In his 2007 book
Think Big
, Trump wrote, 'That's why I'm so screwed up, because I had a father that pushed me pretty hard.' In contrast,
Mary Trump
has often been depicted in a more passive light, a quiet, devoted housewife who fulfilled her role without imposing much influence on her son's ambitious nature.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
[Click Here] - 2025 Top Trending Search - Local network access
Esseps
Learn More
Undo
However, such a portrayal risks oversimplifying her role in shaping Donald Trump.
Mary Trump: A Woman of Resilience
Mary Anne MacLeod, born in 1912 on the rugged Isle of Lewis in Scotland, grew up in an environment marked by poverty and hardship. The youngest of ten children, her early life was shaped by the challenges of subsistence farming and the impact of World War I, which devastated the local male population. At the age of 18, Mary emigrated to America, seeking better opportunities than those available in her isolated Scottish hometown.
She arrived in New York in 1930 and worked as a domestic servant before marrying Fred Trump in 1936. The couple settled in the affluent neighbourhood of Jamaica Estates in Queens, where Mary quickly adapted to the role of a supportive housewife. While Fred Trump focused on building his real estate empire, Mary managed their household and became known for her social gatherings and occasional charity work. Despite this, her son, Donald, would later recall that his mother 'wanted me to be happy,' but that she did not play as active a role in shaping his business ventures or ambitions as his father did.
A Complex Dynamic
During the late 1980s, as Donald Trump's very public divorce from Ivana Trump unfolded and his affair with Marla Maples made tabloid headlines, his mother, Mary Anne MacLeod Trump, was reportedly mortified by her son's conduct. According to a Vanity Fair account, she once turned to Ivana and asked plaintively, 'What kind of son have I created?'
Donald Trump's relationship with his mother, though less visible, was undoubtedly shaped by moments of emotional tension.
One key event was Mary's near-death experience after complications from childbirth when Donald was just a toddler. This traumatic episode may have had a deep psychological impact on the young boy, as he was at an age when children begin to form a stronger sense of independence from their mothers.
Psychologists suggest that disruptions in the maternal bond at this stage can lead to emotional insecurities that later manifest in attention-seeking behaviour.
While Fred Trump's influence was marked by stern discipline and a focus on achievement, Mary Trump's role seems to have been more about creating a sense of stability, even if she wasn't as directly involved in her son's professional pursuits. As his biographers note, the absence of a strong emotional connection with Mary may have contributed to Donald Trump's reliance on his father's approval and guidance, while his mother remained a more peripheral figure in his life.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Give us jobs': Madrasi Camp resident after Delhi demolition drive, Tamil Nadu govt offers aid in return
'Give us jobs': Madrasi Camp resident after delhi demolition drive, Tamil Nadu govt offers aid to return NEW DELHI: The Tamil Nadu government has pledged full support to residents of Madrasi Camp in Delhi's Jangpura who wish to return to their home districts in Tamil Nadu, following a demolition drive on June 1. The demolition, conducted to remove illegal encroachments along the Barapullah drain in compliance with a Delhi high court order, has left hundreds of families, mostly originally from Tamil Nadu, displaced. Mani, a Tamil resident affected by the demolition, expressed frustration over the lack of opportunities in Tamil Nadu, stating, "They should give jobs to those already in Madras right now, and then they should call us. Why are people roaming around there? First, they should handle Tamil Nadu, then they should look at Delhi. If they had given us jobs, why would we have come to Delhi from Tamil Nadu?" On Sunday, authorities carried out a demolition drive at Madrasi Camp in Jangpura, South East Delhi, following court orders to remove encroachments along the Barapullah drain. The clearance was aimed at addressing flooding problems caused by the narrowing of the drain, which restricts water flow during heavy rainfall. A total of 370 encroachments were removed. Of the affected residents, 189 have been found eligible for resettlement and have been allotted flats in Narela, while 181 were deemed ineligible for rehabilitation. Anil Banka, district magistrate of South East Delhi, on the ongoing demolition drive at Madrasi Camp in the Jangpura area, said to ANI, "This action is being carried out as per the court's orders, and we are removing the encroachments solely based on those directives. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 2025: Steel Suppliers From Mexico At Lowest Prices (Take A Look) Steel Suppliers | search ads Search Now Undo The Barapulla drain had become narrow, hindering its cleaning and causing issues with water flow. During heavy rains, flooding spreads across the area due to these obstructions. The matter was under consideration in court, which has now permitted us to proceed with the removal starting today. We have also allotted flats in Narela to all eligible residents affected by this drive." He further said, "Notices regarding the encroachments were already given to residents, and until now, 370 illegal encroachments have been demolished. While 189 are eligible for resettlement, 181 are not eligible."
Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump tariff hike threatens to impact $5 billion engineering goods exports: EEPC India
New Delhi: The proposed 50% tariff on all foreign steel and aluminium by US President Donald Trump could hurt India's engineering exports, as these metals and their derivatives account for nearly a quarter of the country's total engineering goods shipments to the US. The annual export of steel, aluminium and their derivatives to the US currently stand at around $5 billion. The 25% tariffs imposed by the US on steel imports (as per the proclamation order dated on 18th March 2025) have created a challenging environment for Indian steel exporters. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Elegant New Scooters For Seniors In 2024: The Prices May Surprise You Mobility Scooter | Search Ads Learn More Undo Although India's direct steel exports to the US are relatively low, the tariffs have led to increased global competition and price pressures. The tariffs have also resulted in a shift in trade flows. 'In case the US goes ahead with its plan and impose a 50% tariff on steel, aluminium and their derivatives, exports of these key items will become costlier leading to a likely dip in shipments," said Pankaj Chadha, Chairman, EEPC India, in a statement. Live Events Chadha highlighted that the UK through its trade deal with the US recently got exemptions from 25% tariff on steel and aluminium and suggested that India should also ask for the same kind of waiver during the ongoing bilateral trade agreement (BTA) negotiations with the US. "This is perhaps not the opportune time to introduce such unilateral tariff especially when BTA negotiations are going on. It can make the work of the negotiators tricky. The proposed tariff increase by the Trump administration is likely to impact the engineering exports which are about $5 billion under this head," the EEPC India Chairman said.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
US remittance tax to revive hawala, hand cartels a financial lifeline
Hidden on page 1,054 of President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' is a threat to impose a 3.5 per cent tax on all remittance transfers made by non-citizens to accounts outside the country. This is a dangerous, backward-looking provision, and will make Americans less safe without raising much revenue. It is easy to understand why a measure like this would appeal to the current administration. It makes migrants' lives harder, and that's enough for it to be worth passing into law. And it certainly will create difficulties for millions of legal and illegal immigrants in the US, as well as for their families outside. Mexico's president, Claudia Sheinbaum, has been a vocal opponent, saying — correctly — that this is unjustifiable double taxation. Her country, the largest destination for such transfers, has a lot to lose. But other countries are also worried. India is the third-largest destination for remittances from the US, receiving about $18 billion in 2024; the Philippines and China aren't far behind, at $14 billion each. According to Capital Economics, US-based remittances support 3 per cent of the Philippines' GDP. The impact on migration-dependent areas of the world will be severe. For some countries in Central America, national income might fall by almost 1 per cent if this proposal is implemented. Meanwhile, some estimates suggest that even a higher 5 per cent rate would only increase the US' takings by 0.1 per cent. For the remittance tax's backers, that's beside the point. Vice President JD Vance, when he was still a senator, introduced a similar bill. At that time, he said that 'this legislation is a common-sense solution to disincentivise illegal immigration and reduce the cartels' financial power.' That argument is exactly backward. What common sense actually tells you is that if less money is available in some of the poorest parts of Central America, it increases the incentives for people there to try and move to the US to join their family members already there. As for the impact on criminal networks — well, history suggests that they'll welcome this. The world has spent decades trying to make legal transfers cheap and efficient. An additional levy might increase the cost of transferring even small sums four fold. This would reverse all our efforts to force this trade above ground. If legal transfers are made too expensive, illegal and informal networks take their place. Some people have happily assumed that Bitcoin will fill the gap. But, more likely, there will be a renaissance in simpler, older mechanisms for international transfers. In South and West Asia, we call these methods 'hawala.' But other parts of the world derived equivalents independently. In China, for example, such mechanisms are called 'fei-ch'ien.' From a customer's point of view, they're simple to use. All you need to do is find a well-networked trader and give them the cash to be transferred. That person then calls somebody in their clan or village back home, who gives the same amount of cash to the chosen recipient. The two members of the hawala network settle accounts between each other once or twice a year, through smuggling or perhaps through false invoices and shell companies. Naturally, such informal mechanisms to transfer value can be used not just to evade the remittance excise, but taxes in general. Worse, they are frequently used as conduits for terrorism and drug financing — which is why governments have spent decades trying to stamp them out. This was hard because, if enough people use these systems, they can be more efficient and cheaper than formal finance. The exchange rates that hawala traders offer are often more attractive, and their fees take less of a bite out of small transactions than many banks do. In spite of the best efforts of regulators and cops, hawala networks only really shrank when other routes became more competitive. Informal currency traders need a large volume of transactions to be efficient and offer the best rates to their customers, so when their custom shrank, they became less attractive. It's this self-reinforcing loop that the remittance tax threatens to break. Suddenly, hawala networks — and their equivalents in South and Central America — will become appealing again. And when this method returns to its former prominence, it will become easier to pay those who smuggle opiates or people. And, of course, criminal syndicates of various types will once again step in to run these systems, and profit accordingly. The vice president is, not for the first time, wrong: His administration's remittance tax doesn't attack the cartels, it empowers them.
