logo
Swinney defends Gray Japan trip as opposition quiz FM on record cancer delays

Swinney defends Gray Japan trip as opposition quiz FM on record cancer delays

Yahoo5 hours ago

John Swinney has insisted his government is 'absolutely focused' on reducing waiting times for cancer care, after coming under pressure over record-breaking delays to treatment.
At First Minister's Questions on Thursday, Scottish Conservative leader Russell Findlay claimed the SNP were presiding over a 'cancer care crisis".
Earlier this week, Public Health Scotland published data showing that just 68.9% of patients with an 'urgent suspicion' of cancer were seen within the 62-day target, in the first three months of 2025.
This was the worst performance since records began, and well below the pre-pandemic figure of 83.7% for the same quarter in 2019.
The Scottish Government's target is for 95% of patients to start treatment within 62 days of referral.
Publication of the new figures coincided with a trade visit to Japan by Health Secretary Neil Gray, who was sent to the Osaka Expo by Mr Swinney to promote Scotland's life sciences and digital health sectors.
READ MORE:
Gray in Japan as cancer waiting times reach record high
Prestwick Airport hits back at Humza Yousaf in 'complicit in war crimes' row
Calls for seagull summit as fears grow someone could be 'killed' in bird attack
Speaking in Holyrood, Mr Findlay said: 'If Neil Gray really thinks his time is better spent in Japan than in Scotland during an NHS crisis, then he shouldn't be Health Secretary.'
The Scottish Tory leader branded the statistics 'bleak' and accused the SNP of a 'culture of failure' that was putting lives at risk.
'There is a cancer care crisis but [Neil Gray] took taxpayer-funded limos to the pub and the football, and then he decided to go to Japan,' he said. 'What has the Health Secretary done to give John Swinney any confidence that he can bring down cancer waiting times?'
The Scottish Government's target is for 95% of patients to start treatment within 62 days of referral. (Image: Jane Barlow/PA) Mr Swinney acknowledged that the failure to meet the 62-day standard for so many patients was 'not acceptable', but pointed to 'improvements in capacity' and said the median time from diagnosis to treatment was now just three days.
He also told MSPs that NHS Lanarkshire had met both the 31-day and 62-day targets, and said other health boards were being urged to adopt its model of care.
'What we are ensuring is the learning from NHS Lanarkshire is being applied in other boards around the country to ensure the performance is achieved,' he said.
Defending Mr Gray's trip, Mr Swinney told MSPs: 'The Health Secretary is in Japan at my request, at my approval, to ensure that Scotland's life sciences sector is able to be promoted to an international audience.'
He insisted that the Scottish Government was 'treating more patients with cancer on time, within both standards, compared to the same quarter six years ago, pre-pandemic', and was investing record sums in NHS services.
However, Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar said the SNP was failing across the board and leaving Scots to 'pay the price'.
'This is a failing First Minister in a failing SNP Government,' he said. 'Waiting lists are up, thousands more Scots are forced to go private, and cancer waiting times are the worst they have ever been.'
Mr Sarwar said people were being let down on housing, delayed discharges and access to healthcare, citing one constituent who waited 76 weeks for hip and knee surgery, and another who had to pay £4,500 for cataract treatment to avoid going blind.
He said Mr Swinney had 'taken personal responsibility for tackling the crisis in Scotland's NHS and now things are getting worse'.
Mr Swinney said his government had provided 'a record financial settlement for the NHS' and pointed to the 105,500 additional appointments delivered in the first year of his term.
READ MORE:
'An opportunity missed': Education Bill condemned by teaching union, MSPs and expert
Analysis: In all my Holyrood committee-watching years, I've never seen such a mauling
Imodium or wee red carrier bag? Shona Robison's Poop Cruise problem
Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Alex Cole-Hamilton said patients facing an urgent suspicion of cancer 'deserve to know they've got the best chance of survival — but under this SNP Government, that is just not happening'.
He also criticised the slow pace of rolling out targeted lung cancer screening in Scotland, despite a UK-wide recommendation from the National Screening Committee three years ago.
Mr Swinney said he would examine the issue and insisted early detection remained a priority.
Earlier this week, a British Medical Association survey suggested 29% of Scots had turned to private healthcare in the past two years. That prompted BMA Scotland chair Dr Iain Kennedy to say the NHS was 'dying before our eyes'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nippon Steel Will Finally Get To Buy U.S. Steel. The Deal Likely Ensures More Federal Meddling in the Future.
Nippon Steel Will Finally Get To Buy U.S. Steel. The Deal Likely Ensures More Federal Meddling in the Future.

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Nippon Steel Will Finally Get To Buy U.S. Steel. The Deal Likely Ensures More Federal Meddling in the Future.

The Trump administration is finally getting out of the way of Nippon Steel's acquisition of U.S. Steel—but in a way that seems to ensure more federal meddling in the future. It has been more than 17 months since U.S. Steel, a private company, struck a deal to be bought by Japan-based Nippon Steel for about $15 billion. Before the deal could be finalized, however, then-President Joe Biden swooped in to block the transaction, citing national security concerns that were never well defined. After an extensive review by the Biden administration found no reason to block the deal, Biden unilaterally decided to derail it anyway. During last year's campaign, President Donald Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance sided with Biden (and U.S. Steel's union) and opposed the deal. But Trump has abruptly changed course. On Friday, he announced "a planned partnership" between the two companies. In a statement posted to Truth Social, the president said the deal would "create at least 70,000 jobs, and add $14 Billion Dollars to the U.S. Economy." The details of the deal remain cloudy, but it seems like Nippon will invest $14 billion to take over U.S. Steel, with a few caveats. On Sunday, Trump told reporters that the deal is "an investment and it's a partial ownership, but it'll be controlled by the U.S.A," according to the Associated Press. On Tuesday morning, Sen. Dave McCormick (R–Pa.) told CNBC that the deal ensures an American CEO will continue to run U.S. Steel (presumably as a subsidiary to Nippon Steel) and that the federal government will get a "golden share" in the company. That would "essentially require U.S. government approval of a number of the board members. And that will allow the United States to ensure that production levels aren't cut," McCormick said. If true—none of this has been disclosed officially yet—then the federal government would effectively hold a majority stake in what remains of U.S. Steel after the Nippon acquisition is completed. In short, Trump would have converted Biden's meddling in the affairs of a private company into an official, permanent place for the federal government on the board of U.S. Steel—which is, I stress once again, a private company. So-called "golden shares" originated in Britain during the 1980s, when the British government used the arrangement to retain control over companies that were privatized, including several utilities and Rolls-Royce. More recently, they have been used by the Chinese government to exert direct control over supposedly private companies. It is not surprising to see the U.S. following in China's footsteps in that regard, but it sure is disheartening. While Trump appears to have made the right decision in standing aside and allowing this deal to go through, the inclusion of a "golden share" for the federal government would be a worrying precedent that is likely to chill future investment in American companies. There was nothing objectionable about the original U.S. Steel/Nippon Steel deal. It was always ridiculous for the federal government, under Trump and Biden, to suggest that Nippon Steel, a publicly traded company based in a close American ally that already operates several steelmaking facilities in the United States, is any sort of a national security threat. Biden's decision to unilaterally block the deal was a dangerous, disgraceful expansion of executive power that relied on a willingness to stretch the definition of national security beyond any reasonable point. Trump, unsurprisingly, has used that leverage to extend the federal government's control over decisions that should be left to executives and shareholders. All of this will make it easier for Trump (or the next president) to meddle in the future of U.S. Steel, or to apply the same terms to a future foreign investment in any business a future president decides to call a national security threat. Credit Nippon's negotiators for doing what needed to be done to land a deal that's in the best interests of shareholders and workers on both sides of the Pacific. But don't cheer the bipartisan effort to expand executive power in the marketplace. The post Nippon Steel Will Finally Get To Buy U.S. Steel. The Deal Likely Ensures More Federal Meddling in the Future. appeared first on Erreur lors de la récupération des données Connectez-vous pour accéder à votre portefeuille Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données

Trump's Controlling Stake in U.S. Steel Is Indefensible Socialist Nonsense
Trump's Controlling Stake in U.S. Steel Is Indefensible Socialist Nonsense

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's Controlling Stake in U.S. Steel Is Indefensible Socialist Nonsense

U.S. Steel isn't just getting nationalized. It's getting…personalized? President Donald Trump will personally control the so-called "golden share" that his administration has forced U.S. Steel to accept as part of the terms of a deal that will see the previously private company get acquired by Japan-based Nippon Steel. It's an utterly absurd arrangement—one that will leave the federal government with a controlling share of U.S. Steel even after Trump leaves office—that gives Trump the power to block future attempts by U.S. Steel to relocate its headquarters or make changes to its production facilities. Documents filed this week with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) spell out the specifics of the deal. Trump must provide "written consent" before U.S. Steel will be allowed to change its name, relocate its headquarters, reduce or alter any planned capital investments, "close, idle, or sell" its existing plants, or attempt to acquire any part of a competing business. In short: Whatever decisions are made by U.S. Steel's executives and shareholders (or by Nippon, which will own U.S. Steel) will require approval from Trump, his appointees, or his successors. The terms spelled out in the SEC documents extend well beyond government meddling in the future of a private business. The deal also means that the same federal government charged with regulating other steel companies operating in the United States now owns a controlling share in a direct competitor. That's a massive conflict of interest, on top of the other gross implications here. This is socialism of the particularly stupid variety, like something ripped from the pages of Atlas Shrugged. No surprise, then, that The New Republic is a fan: "This leftish maneuver—one might even call it socialist—represents a promising new experiment in regulatory policy," writes Timothy Noah. As he points out, the idea of using these "golden shares" to effectively take over private business has gained some traction on the political left in recent years. The Roosevelt Institute, for example, has advocated for using them to force car companies to build more electric vehicles and to artificially hike wages. The Trump administration's handling of the U.S. Steel/Nippon deal will only open the door to more arrangements like this—giving future presidents a precedent for forcing their way into the board rooms of private companies. For anyone to the right of hardened socialists, this arrangement should be completely indefensible. That being said, I do look forward with a sort of grim amusement to the rhetorical gymnastics that many Republicans will no doubt deploy to not only defend this deal but to insist that Trump's takeover of U.S. Steel is actually a brilliant exercise of executive power. When that happens—and it will—keep in mind how conservatives and Republicans reacted to the Obama administration's partial takeover of General Motors a decade ago. "If congressional Republicans do not object to this arrangement, the GOP position is simple," writes Jim Geraghty at National Review. "The U.S. government owning shares in private companies and directing a company's decisions is socialism, communism, economic foolishness, and arguably a form of economic fascism. But that's only when a Democratic president does it. When a Republican president does it, it's perfectly fine." Trump's takeover of U.S. Steel is socialist nonsense that violates every principle of limited government and represents an unrestrained view of executive power. It should be universally opposed by Congress and the public, and it ought to be reversed as soon as possible. The post Trump's Controlling Stake in U.S. Steel Is Indefensible Socialist Nonsense appeared first on

CANADA ANNOUNCES RECIPIENTS OF THE NATIONAL HOUSING STRATEGY RESEARCH AND PLANNING FUND
CANADA ANNOUNCES RECIPIENTS OF THE NATIONAL HOUSING STRATEGY RESEARCH AND PLANNING FUND

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

CANADA ANNOUNCES RECIPIENTS OF THE NATIONAL HOUSING STRATEGY RESEARCH AND PLANNING FUND

OTTAWA, ON, June 26, 2025 /CNW/ - The Government of Canada is committed to addressing housing challenges and supporting collaborative solutions to improve housing outcomes for all Canadians. To support housing research, the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) today announced funding of nearly $1.7 million through the National Housing Strategy Research and Planning Fund for 15 new planning, research, and knowledge mobilization initiatives selected from applications across Canada. The fund, administered by CMHC, allows recipients to address key information and knowledge gaps in National Housing Strategy (NHS) priority areas to better understand the housing needs of Canada's most vulnerable populations, including women and children, seniors, Indigenous peoples, people experiencing homelessness, people with disabilities, young adults and newcomers. The goal of the fund is to advance the NHS and support the development of evidence and research capacity within the affordable housing sector. The successful submissions include: Identifying Strategies to Optimize and Scale Community Housing Development (ON) Effective Housing Solutions: Best Practices for Justice-Involved and Unhoused Populations (ON) Wildfire Smoke Exposure in Pelican Narrows: Improving Indoor Air Quality within Peter Ballantyne Cree Nation (SK) Invisible Journeys: Documenting the Spatial and Housing Networks of Homeless Migrants in Montreal (QC) Espace-Vie TSA: An innovative housing solution for high-needs autistic adults (QC) Roadmap for Black Youth-Focused Supportive Housing (ON) Options in Ontario: Evaluating Zoning and Land Use Regulations and their Effect on Housing Supply for Different Groups (ON) Researching Solutions to Community Acquisition of Deeply Affordable Housing (BC) Community Housing and Insurance in a Changing Climate: Examining the Impacts of Evolving Insurance Coverages on the Community Housing Sector and Innovative Policies and Practices to Strengthen Resilience Métis-specific Homelessness Data: Building tools and community consultation for more culturally relevant data collection (ON) Indigenous-led Housing Needs Assessment Tool (BC) Unlocking the Potential of Sagatay: An Indigenous Men's Transitional Housing Program (ON) Delivering Affordable Housing to Black Communities: A Case-Study Approach Métis Nation Saskatchewan Housing Needs Assessment (SK) A tenant-based 'building assessment' framework for the rehabilitation of low-income housing in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside (BC) Quick facts: The National Housing Strategy Research and Planning Fund provides support to not-for-profit organizations, registered charities, and Indigenous partners for housing-related research. The objectives of the fund are to advance evidence-based research that addresses housing challenges in Canada, promote collaboration to develop new housing solutions, and develop research capacity in Canada's housing sector. The fund provides financial support for research through three different activity streams: Planning activities: up to $75,000 for up to 12 months, helping organizations lay the groundwork for future research projects. Research projects: up to $250,000 for up to 24 months, supporting detailed research initiatives with clear objectives and methodologies. Knowledge mobilization projects: up to $75,000 for up to 12 months, focusing on strategies to share research findings. CMHC administers this program on behalf of the Government of Canada as part of the National Housing Strategy. The Government of Canada's National Housing Strategy (NHS) is an $115+ billion plan to give more Canadians a place to call home. Progress on programs and initiatives are updated quarterly on the Housing, Infrastructure and Communities Canada (HICC) website. The Housing and Infrastructure Project Map shows affordable housing projects that have been developed. As of March 2025, the federal government has committed $65.84 billion to support the creation of over 166,000 units and the repair of over 322,000 units. These measures prioritize those in greatest need, including seniors, Indigenous Peoples, people experiencing or at risk of homelessness, and women and children fleeing violence. Additional Information: Visit for the most requested Government of Canada housing information. CMHC plays a critical role as a national facilitator to promote stability and sustainability in Canada's housing finance system. Our mortgage insurance products support access to homeownership and the creation and maintenance of rental supply. We also actively support the Government of Canada in delivering on its commitment to make housing more affordable. Our research and data help inform housing policy. By facilitating cooperation between all levels of government, private and non-profit sectors, we contribute to advancing housing affordability, equity, and climate compatibility. Follow us on X (formerly Twitter), YouTube, LinkedIn, Facebook and Instagram. Progress on programs and initiatives is updated quarterly on the Housing, Infrastructure and Communities Canada (HICC) website. The Housing and Infrastructure Project Map shows the affordable housing projects developed so far. Backgrounder: CMHC Research and Planning Fund — Selected Submissions for 2024 Selected Submission Partners Project Location Funding Awarded Identifying Strategies to Optimize and Scale Community Housing Development Lead organization: • Ontario Non-Profit Housing Association (ONPHA) Partner organizations: • StrategyCorp Ontario $34,388 Effective Housing Solutions: Best Practicesfor Justice-Involved and Unhoused Populations Lead organization: • John Howard Society of Ontario Partner organizations: • Social Research and Demonstration Corporation Ontario $187,500 Wildfire Smoke Exposure in Pelican Narrows: Improving Indoor Air Quality within Peter BallantyneCree Nation Lead organization: • Peter Ballantyne Cree Nation Partner organizations: • Toronto Metropolitan University • University of Toronto • Carleton University Saskatchewan $249,915 Invisible Journeys: Documenting the Spatial and Housing Networks of Homeless Migrants in Montreal Lead organization: • Liquid Space Lab Partner organizations: • Architecture sans frontières Québec • Université de Montréal • Sherpa University Institute • Le regroupement des organismes en hébergement pour les personnes migrantes Quebec $79,575 Espace-Vie TSA: An innovative housing solution for high-needs autistic adults Lead organization: • Espace-Vie TSA Partner organizations: • Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières Quebec $179,783 Roadmap for Black Youth-Focused Supportive Housing Lead organization: • REST Centres Partner organizations: • Canadian Observatory on Homelessness Ontario $73,500 Options in Ontario: Evaluating Zoning and Land Use Regulations and their Effect on Housing Supply for Different Groups Lead organization: • One Ontario Partner organizations: • AECO Innovation Lab • LandLogic Ontario $88,200 Researching Solutions to Community Acquisition of Deeply Affordable Housing Lead organization: • Downtown Eastside Community Land Trust Association Partner organizations: • University of British Columbia • Vancouver Aboriginal Community Policing Centre • Canadian Network of Community Land Trusts • Parkdale Neighbourhood Land Trust British Columbia $60,000 Community Housing and Insurance in a Changing Climate: Examining the Impacts of Evolving Insurance Coverages on the Community Housing Sector and Innovative Policies and Practices to Strengthen Resilience Lead organization: • The Resilience Institute Partner organizations: • Ambrose University • Mount Royal University • Climate Ready Together Ltd National $71,250 Métis-specific Homelessness Data: Building tools and community consultation for more culturallyrelevant data collection Lead organization: • Metis Nation of Ontario Partner organizations: • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) Ontario $74,750 Indigenous-led Housing Needs Assessment Tool Lead organization: • Aboriginal Housing Management Association (AHMA) Partner organizations: • University of British Columbia • First Nations Health Authority British Columbia $249,637 Unlocking the Potential of Sagatay: An IndigenousMen's Transitional Housing Program Lead organization: • Na Me Res Partner organizations: • Canadian Observatory on Homelessness Ontario $73,882 Delivering Affordable Housing to Black Communities: A Case-Study Approach Lead organization: • Black Planning Project Partner organizations: • Akoma Holdings • Upper Hammon Plains Community Land Trust • Studio of Contemporary Architecture • University of Calgary • Hogan's Alley Society • ZZap Consulting National $120,000 Métis Nation Saskatchewan HousingNeeds Assessment Lead organization: • Métis Nation Saskatchewan Partner organizations: • Northern Research Group Saskatchewan $75,000 A tenant-based 'building assessment' framework for the rehabilitation oflow-income housing in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside Lead organization: • Downtown Eastside (DTES) Single Room Occupancy (SRO) Collaborative Partner organizations: • Downtown Eastside Community Land Trust • University of British Columbia • City of Vancouver British Columbia $66,700 SOURCE Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) View original content to download multimedia: Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store