Nigeria: Borno govt, Oxfam launch $1.2mln project to deepen inclusive governance
Borno State Government, in partnership with Oxfam International, has launched a $1.2 million project to promote inclusive governance and representation of marginalized groups in decision-making processes in two Local Government Areas (LGAs) in the state.
Speaking at the launch, Samuel Lashom, Oxfam's Project Coordinator in Nigeria, said the project aims to strengthen democratic principles and foster social cohesion, ensuring that all voices are heard and governance is responsive to every citizen's needs.
The project will utilize the Community Development Plan (CDP) model, allowing grassroots communities to participate in development decisions. It targets 3,100 direct beneficiaries, with 100 participants from each of the 31 wards where the project will be implemented.
The focus is on building the capacity of duty bearers, including political and traditional leaders. The project is expected to make a significant impact in promoting inclusive governance and community participation in Borno and Adamawa States.
'Inclusive governance is crucial for building a resilient and equitable society,' Lashom noted. 'Through this partnership, we aim to create platforms for dialogue and collaboration, ensuring diverse perspectives shape policy and development.'
The $1.2 million project will include capacity-building workshops, community outreach programs, and advocacy initiatives. It is expected to run for a period of two years, focusing on sustainable impact and long-term change.
Local community leaders and civil society organizations have expressed support for the project, acknowledging its potential to address existing gaps in governance and promote social inclusion.
The Borno State Government and Oxfam have reaffirmed their commitment to working closely with all stakeholders to ensure the project's successful implementation and achieve its objectives.
Borno Commissioner for Reconstruction, Rehabilitation and Resettlement, Haladu Garba, reiterated the state government's commitment to promoting inclusive governance in partnership with stakeholders.
Copyright © 2022 Nigerian Tribune Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (Syndigate.info).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
13-05-2025
- Middle East Eye
Rights groups call on UK to end all arms sales to Israel as court case resumes
Rights groups and charities gathered outside the Royal Courts of Justice on Tuesday to support a legal challenge against the UK government's continuing export of F-35 fighter jet parts for use by Israel. Holding Palestinian flags and signs calling on the government to 'stop arming Israel', dozens of campaigners joined the lawyers leading the case to demand an end to all UK arms exports to the country. Groups present at the protest included Palestinian rights group Al-Haq, which bought forward the current case with the support of the Global Action Legal Network (GLAN), Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and Oxfam. Zarah Sultana, a suspended Labour MP, joined the protest alongside independent MPs Jeremy Corbyn, the former Labour leader, and Imran Hussain. Sultana told Middle East Eye that British arms exports to Israel made the UK "complicit in genocide" in Gaza. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "Every F-35, which is described as the most lethal fighter by its own manufacturer, is dropping 2,000-pound bombs on people in Gaza and decimating whole neighbourhoods and universities," Sultana said. "And with 15 percent of every F-35 made here in the UK, it makes us complicit in the live-streamed genocide unfolding in Gaza." Clemence Lagourdat, Oxfam's humanitarian coordinator in Gaza, also joined the protest and submitted evidence put forward by Al-Haq. Recently returned from the territory, Lagourdat said Israel was "systematically destroying" Gaza's infrastructure. 'When you sell the weapons destroying an entire territory, you've made a clear choice: to endanger an entire population' - Clemence Lagourdat, Oxfam 'Bombing has severely affected the entire Gaza Strip. For the court case, we've submitted evidence showing that Israeli air strikes have destroyed over 70 percent of Gaza's water infrastructure," she told MEE. "In addition, Israel has systematically blocked the entry of equipment needed for repairs, making it extremely difficult for people to access safe drinking water." 'When you sell the weapons destroying an entire territory, you've made a clear choice: to endanger an entire population.' The legal challenge, brought by Al-Haq and the Global Legal Action Network (GLAN), began just over a week after the 7 October 2023 Hamas-led attacks and Israel's subsequent ground invasion of Gaza. Nineteen months later, Israeli forces have killed 52,908 Palestinians in Gaza, as the four-day judicial review opened on Tuesday. The case has had dramatic developments. In February 2024, a judge dismissed the case, stating there was 'no realistic prospect' of proving that the government's arms export decisions were legally flawed. However, a successful appeal revived the case. Even as court proceedings moved slowly, documents submitted to the court revealed key details about UK arms exports to Israel that the government had not made public. In September 2024, just hours before Al-Haq and GLAN were set to request a full suspension of UK arms exports to Israel, the newly elected Labour government announced a partial suspension affecting around 30 licences. This shifted the focus of the case to UK-made components for F-35 fighter jets. Though direct exports of these parts - critical to Israel's attacks on both Gaza and Lebanon - were suspended in September, the components have continued to be sent indirectly via a global pool supplying spare parts to Israel. The F-35 programme has stated that it does not track or trace these parts. The UK government has argued that blocking shipments to the global pool would jeopardise the entire F-35 programme and pose a threat to global peace and security. But rights groups say the carve-out for F-35 parts undermines international norms and breaches both domestic and international law. Last week, a report based on Israeli Tax Authority data suggested the UK may still be exporting F-35 parts directly to Israel - sparking questions among arms control experts that are expected to be raised in court.
Middle East Eye
08-05-2025
- Middle East Eye
Oxfam calls for urgent action over new Israeli NGO registration rules
Oxfam and 54 other organisations have called on the international community to take action against Israel's new registration rules for international NGOs. The organisations argue that the rules, which impose vague and politically motivated criteria, threaten to silence humanitarian efforts and further entrench Israeli control over Palestinian territories. 'These rules appear designed to assert control over independent humanitarian, development, and peacebuilding operations,' Oxfam said in a statement. The new regulations, which could lead to the de-registration of existing INGOs, make it harder for organisations to operate by introducing politically charged disqualifiers, such as supporting accountability for Israeli violations of international law. Oxfam warns that these measures are not routine but signal a dangerous escalation in restrictions on humanitarian work, potentially forcing organisations to choose between delivering aid or advocating for international law. 'Humanitarian and human rights advocacy is being framed as a threat to the state,' Oxfam added, highlighting the risk to organisations simply for speaking out against violations they witness.
The National
06-05-2025
- The National
International groups condemn Israel's move to tighten control over aid and rights organisations
More than 50 international aid organisations have condemned Israel 's tightened restrictions on humanitarian groups operating in Gaza and the occupied Palestinian territories, warning that new registration rules pose a 'grave threat to humanitarian operations and international law' amid a deepening humanitarian crisis. In a joint open letter, Oxfam, Doctors Without Borders (MSF), Save the Children, the Norwegian Refugee Council and others rejected Israel's March policy that allows it to ban international NGOs if they or their staff support boycotts of Israel or accuse it of violating international law. The letter expressed concern over the requirement to submit complete staff lists and other sensitive information, including about their families, when registering. 'In a context where humanitarian and healthcare workers are routinely subject to harassment, detention and direct attacks, this raises serious protection concerns,' the 55 humanitarian groups wrote in the letter. Israel has argued the requirements are necessary to vet employees for any ties to militants. But aid groups fear this could endanger their teams, saying hundreds of humanitarian personnel have been killed in the conflict. 'By framing humanitarian and human rights advocacy as a threat to the state, Israeli authorities can shut out organisations merely for speaking out about conditions they witness on the ground, forcing INGOs to choose between delivering aid and promoting respect for the protections owed to affected people,' the groups said. They called on donors and the international community to use all possible means to protect humanitarian operations, and to take concrete political and diplomatic action beyond statements of concern to ensure unhindered humanitarian access and prevent the erosion of aid delivery. The crackdown coincides with Israel's new aid distribution plan for Gaza, where a two-month blockade has pushed more than a million people to the brink of famine. The proposal would funnel limited food supplies through six Israeli-controlled centres, with security handled by US private contractors. The UN and all aid organisations operating in Gaza jointly announced on Sunday they would not co-operate with the Israeli-US plan to establish the new mechanism for aid delivery because it 'contravenes fundamental humanitarian principles and appears designed to reinforce control over life-sustaining items as a pressure tactic – as part of a military strategy'.
