Determined Glasgow student earns degree while caring for mum battling cancer
A young man who cares for his mum battling cancer has been able to complete his degree thanks to a bursary.
Wheatley Homes tenant David Burns, 28, who lives in the south side of Glasgow, received a bursary in 2024 from the Wheatly Foundation, the group's charitable trust.
The bursary aims to ease students financial burden, to help with the expense of studying for an HNC, HND, undergraduate degree, or postgraduate course.
David has been caring for his ailing mum ever since she was diagnosed with cancer.
Thanks to the bursary he received, he was able to complete his studies without the struggle of additional financial stress.
He has now successfully completed his degree in electrical and electronic engineering at Strathclyde University.
Read more: New Glasgow-inspired wellbeing wallpaper unveiled by SAMH
He said: "The bursary from Wheatley Foundation helped me with the cost of travel, which became much more expensive when peak fares were reintroduced, as well as the costs of study materials and some new tech to help me study.
"It made things a lot less stressful, as I didn't need to worry about money as much.
"It also helped bridge the gap between Student Awards Agency Scotland payments."
Wheatley Group has now opened its bursary programme for 2025.
The programme offers bursaries of up to £1,500 a year for full-time students and up to £750 for part-time students.
It is open to customers living in homes owned by Wheatley Homes in the central belt and in Dumfries and Galloway, as well as tenants of Loretto Housing, and people who live in a home factored by or rented from Lowther.
Read more: Nurse gears up to take part in global motorcycle event
Professor Paddy Gray OBE, chair of Wheatley Foundation, said: "Since 2016, the scheme has helped 482 people to go on to further education and get the qualifications they need.
"Our bursary programme is another way Wheatley Foundation can help people in our communities achieve their dreams."
Applications for the scheme will be open until June 30, 2025.
More information on the bursary programme is available by emailing bursaries@wheatley-group.com or visit the Wheatley Group website.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dr. Martens' Stock Soars as CEO Implements New Strategic Plan Following ‘Year of Stabilization'
Shares for Dr. Martens Plc surged nearly 24 percent on Thursday following the release of a new strategic turnaround plan in efforts to return to profit growth in fiscal 2026. According to chief executive officer Ije Nwokorie, who took the helm earlier this year, the company's 'single focus' in fiscal 2025 was to bring stability back to Dr. Martens. More from WWD Journeys Helps Genesco Deliver Q1 Sales Above Expectations Dr. Martens Looks to Adidas For New Chief Brand Officer Name Game: Shoe Carnival Is Converting More Stores to Shoe Station Banner 'We have achieved this by returning our direct-to-consumer channel in the Americas back to growth, resetting our marketing approach to focus relentlessly on our products, delivering cost savings, and significantly strengthening our balance sheet,' Nwokorie said in a statement. In fiscal 2025, the UK-based footwear company reported that net revenue fell 10 percent to 787.6 million pounds from 877.1 million in fiscal 2024. Dr. Martens noted that the results were in-line with guidance, however, and came up against a challenging macroeconomic and consumer backdrop in several of its core markets. Net debt for the year was 249.5 million pounds, down from 359.8 million pounds in fiscal 2024. Net profit stood at 4.5 million pounds in the year to the end of March, down from 69.2 million pounds the year prior. By category, overall, pairs were down 9 percent, with DTC pairs flat and wholesale pairs down 15 percent as expected, as the company's wholesale partners normalized their inventory levels. 'We saw a very strong performance in shoes, with DTC pairs up 15 percent with particular success in our bestselling Adrian loafer, as well as in new shoe families, the Lowell and Buzz,' the company said in its latest earnings statement. 'Sandals also saw a good performance, with DTC pairs up 7 percent, and we continue to see a strong performance in our mules range, led by the Zebzag. Boots remained challenging, with DTC pairs down 9 percent, with our continuity boots weaker, as expected. This was partially offset by success in product newness, both as extensions of the core icons, for example through the Ambassador soft leather boot and through new product lines such as the Anistone biker boot.' As a proportion of fiscal year 2025 Group revenue, boots accounted for 57 percent, shoes 26 percent, sandals 12 percent and bags & other 5 percent. By channel, direct-to-consumer revenue was down 4.2 percent to 510.7 million pounds in fiscal 2025, while wholesale fell 19.5 percent to 276.9 million pounds, as expected. Within DTC, retail revenue was down 5.6 percent to 242.4 million pounds and e-commerce was down 2.9 percent to 268.3 million pounds. By region, EMEA revenue was down 11.0 percent to 384.2 million pounds for the year, which was driven by the UK. In the Americas, revenue was down 11.4 percent to 288.5 million pounds, and in APAC, revenue dipped 3.8 percent to 114.9 million pounds, with a good performance in Japan and China, the company noted. Looking closer at the Americas, Dr. Martens stated that the region delivered DTC growth in the second half of fiscal 2025 as the company pivoted its marketing to 'relentlessly focus' on product. 'With new products such as Ambassador, Anistone, Buzz and Dunnet Flower performing very strongly for us and our partners; we delivered 25 million pounds of annualized cost savings, at the top end of our target, with the full benefit in fiscal 2026; and we strengthened our balance sheet through a significant reduction in inventory and net debt, as well as the successful refinancing of the Group,' the company said. As for tariffs, the company noted that the entirety of its spring/summer 2025 stock is already in the market, and by the start of July, the majority of autumn/winter 2025 will be either in the market or in transit. 'We generate strong product gross margins, which is helpful given that tariffs are charged on cost, not retail price,' the company stated. 'We will continue to assess the situation carefully, but can confirm that for SS25 and AW25 we will be keeping average prices unchanged in the market. More broadly, we continue to manage all costs tightly, working closely with our wholesale and supplier partners.' The company also released a new strategic plan on Thursday. Dubbed 'Levers For Growth,' Dr. Martens said that the plan builds on the work undertaken in fiscal 2025 to stabilize the business. The new plan focuses on four 'levers' including engaging more consumers, driving more product purchase occasions, curating market-right distribution, and simplifying the operating model. Dr. Martens said that the new strategy capitalizes on the strengths of its business, including its 'iconic global brand, high quality products, world-class supply chain, modern technology systems, committed wholesale and distributor partners and passionate and talented team,' and taps into the significant new markets and profit pools that are available to the company. Over the medium-term, Dr. Martens said it expects to deliver sustainable, profitable revenue growth above the rate of the relevant footwear market, with operating leverage driving a mid to high-teens EBIT margin and underpinned by strong cash generation. 'Levers For Growth will increase our opportunities by shifting the business from a channel-first to a consumer-first mindset,' Nwokorie said. 'We will give more people more reasons to buy more of our products, whether that's our iconic boots and shoes, newer product families such as Zebzag and Buzz, or adjacent categories such as sandals, bags and leather goods. And we will tailor distribution to each market, blending DTC and B2B, optimizing brand reach and ensuring a better use of capital.' The CEO added that he is 'laser focused' on day-to-day execution, managing costs and maintaining the company's operational discipline while it navigates the current macroeconomic uncertainties. Best of WWD All the Retailers That Nike Left and Then Went Back Mikey Madison's Elegant Red Carpet Shoe Style [PHOTOS] Julia Fox's Sleekest and Boldest Shoe Looks Over the Years [Photos] Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
News24
an hour ago
- News24
Onderstepoort collapse ‘left SA defenceless', says Steenhuisen as foot-and-mouth surges
Be among those who shape the future with knowledge. Uncover exclusive stories that captivate your mind and heart with our FREE 14-day subscription trial. Dive into a world of inspiration, learning, and empowerment. You can only trial once.
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
What is accreditation and what happens if Columbia University loses it?
Student life Federal agencies Education policy Donald TrumpFacebookTweetLink Follow Columbia University could find itself facing far-reaching consequences as the Trump administration threatens its accreditation and accuses the school of violating federal anti-discrimination laws. The potential loss of accreditation raises unanswered questions and poses serious risks for Columbia – or any other higher education institution – as a high-stakes battle between the White House and colleges across the country escalates. Accreditation is required for federal student loan eligibility and Pell Grants, and its loss would have direct impacts on students and faculty. Here's what we know about what losing accreditation could mean for Columbia. The Department of Education announced Wednesday it had notified Columbia's accrediting agency – the Middle States Commission on Higher Education – of the school's alleged violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and said the school 'no longer appears to meet' the commission's accreditation standards. Accreditation decisions are made by federally recognized independent accrediting bodies through a lengthy process, but the new Department of Education statement adds significant pressure on Columbia. It's a peer-review process where schools and programs are evaluated to ensure they meet basic standards of quality, according to the Department of Education. Standards are set by accrediting agencies – private organizations that work with educational institutions to establish benchmarks. It's a critical system that determines which institutions can access billions of dollars in federal financial aid. In order to ensure 'a basic level of quality, the practice of accreditation arose in the United States as a means of conducting non-governmental, peer evaluation of educational institutions and programs,' the Department of Education's website says. If the institution or program meets the agency's standards, it earns accreditation and is listed in official publications. But it doesn't stop there. Accrediting agencies monitor schools and re-evaluate them periodically to ensure they continue to meet the required standards. Accreditation comes in two forms: institutional, for entire colleges, and specialized, for specific programs like law or nursing. Some accreditors also assess vocational institutions. The system helps identify quality schools, ease credit transfers, secure federal aid, and set professional licensing standards. The Council for Higher Education Accreditation ensures accrediting agencies uphold rigorous standards. The US has numerous accrediting agencies, but only those recognized by the Department of Education are considered reliable authorities on educational quality. The department currently recognizes dozens of accrediting agencies. Loss of accreditation could have sweeping consequences for Columbia students, rendering their academic credits ineligible for transfer and potentially disqualifying them from admission to many graduate programs, which typically require a degree from an accredited institution. And accreditation is required for federal student loans and Pell Grant eligibility. Columbia, in a statement, said Wednesday it is 'aware of the concerns raised' by the government and has 'addressed those concerns directly with Middle States.' 'Columbia is deeply committed to combatting antisemitism on our campus. We take this issue seriously and are continuing to work with the federal government to address it,' the university said. But the White House takes an entirely different view. 'After Hamas' October 7, 2023, terror attack on Israel, Columbia University's leadership acted with deliberate indifference towards the harassment of Jewish students on its campus,' US Secretary of Education Linda McMahon said Wednesday. 'We look forward to the Commission keeping the Department fully informed of actions taken to ensure Columbia's compliance with accreditation standards including compliance with federal civil rights laws,' McMahon said. The Middle States Commission on Higher Education, one of the nation's major accrediting agencies, serves as the accreditor for Columbia University. 'Everything done in the name of the institution, including all academic programs and services, falls within their scope of accreditation,' the commission's website reads. Columbia University was set to undergo an accreditation review by the commission during the 2024-25 academic year, according to the student newspaper Columbia Spectator. The university was previously accredited in 2015-16, with an earlier review in 2005-06. The process is crucial for maintaining access to federal student aid, including grants and loans, and serves as a measure of academic quality. The commission said it received a letter on the matter but does 'not have any other comment at this time.' Columbia has been gearing up for the review since early 2023 by forming a steering committee and six working groups tasked with addressing seven core accreditation standards, including governance, ethics, educational effectiveness and institutional improvement, the newspaper wrote. In September, the Office of the Vice Provost for Academic Programs released a 103-page draft self-study report outlining Columbia's compliance with accreditation benchmarks. 'It provides an opportunity for us to showcase the work that we're doing and our ongoing evolution as an institution,' Dana Palmer, senior associate provost for academic programs, told the student paper. 'What does student life look like outside of the classroom, looking at a very multidimensional perspective?' Schools have lost accreditation – or had it revoked and reinstated – in the past. In 2004, Barber-Scotia College, a historically Black institution founded by the Presbyterian Church, lost its accreditation and chose not to appeal, leaving its students ineligible for federal financial aid, according to the Church's news service. The Southern Association of Colleges and Schools cited 'a fundamental issue of integrity,' including improperly awarded degrees, in its decision. Schools that fail to meet accreditation standards may be placed on probation, according to the Accrediting Commission of Career Schools and Colleges. A few schools currently on probation include Cambridge Technical Institute in Puerto Rico, East West College of Natural Medicine in Florida, and American Trade School in Missouri. On April 23, President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at overhauling the university accreditation process. The executive order accuses accreditors – independent bodies that regulate academic standards – of abusing their authority by prioritizing diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives over academic outcomes. That order singled out on its criticism the American Bar Association – which provides accreditation for Juris Doctor programs in the country – and the Liaison Committee on Medical Education, the only federally recognized body that accredits Doctor of Medicine degree programs in the US and Canada. The White House criticism set the tone for its take on higher education institutions. At the core of its offensive was the requirement of concrete actions to end diversity and inclusion programs for both student bodies and faculty. 'American students and taxpayers deserve better, and my Administration will reform our dysfunctional accreditation system so that colleges and universities focus on delivering high-quality academic programs at a reasonable price,' the April executive order stated. The Council of Regional Accrediting Commissions, which represents the seven largest accrediting entities, criticized Trump's order, saying it misrepresented the role of accreditors in higher education. 'Accrediting agencies are instrumental to promoting quality assurance and protecting student and taxpayer investments in higher education,' Heather Perfetti, the president of the organization, said, adding the council 'firmly rejects' the administration's characterization. The order makes it easier for universities to switch accreditors or for new accrediting institutions, while also directing the government to 'take appropriate action to terminate unlawful discrimination' in the accreditation process.
