Lawmakers hear proposals on incentives for Michigan sustainable aviation fuel market
Rep. Jerry Neyer (R-Shepherd) testifies to the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee on his legislation offering tax credits on the purchase of sustainable aviation fuels, June 3, 2025. | Kyle Davidson
Members of the Michigan House and Senate on Tuesday took up a set of mirrored proposals to establish incentives to produce more 'sustainable aviation fuel' which blend traditional jet fuel with propellants sourced from biomass like corn, soybeans, cover crops, forestry residue and hydrogen.
Rep. Jerry Neyer (R-Shepherd), who sponsored House Bills 4424 and 4425, told members of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee that his legislation is aimed at bringing Michigan into the sustainable aviation fuel supply chain.
If passed, Neyer said the bills would grant farmers access to another revenue stream and encourage the expansion of ethanol production facilities and the construction of fuel blending facilities.
Sen. Joe Bellino (R-Monroe), who sponsored the Senate's package alongside Sen. Sam Singh (D-East Lansing), explained to members of the Natural Resources and Agriculture Committee that the bills would simply allow aviation companies who choose to use the fuels to claim a tax credit.
'It's not a mandate. It's an open thing that if Delta [Airlines] wants to do it, Delta can get a tax break on how much fuel they buy and how much they decrease their CO2,' Bellino said.
The proposals offer a $1.50 rebate on the purchase of fuel blends that cut carbon dioxide emissions by 50% compared to regular jet fuel, with an additional two cents per gallon for every additional 1% in emissions reduced, with the rebate capping out at $2 a gallon. After 2030, any fuel used to claim the credit must use in-state sources for the organic materials used to produce the fuel.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
'Either our airline industry can either buy this product from out of state and have it blended out of state, or we can provide the opportunity here with this tax incentive there to allow our our farmers and our producers here in the state to participate in this market and get a leg up on the industry,' Neyer said.
Additionally, with the Federal Aviation Administration working to reach net-zero emissions by 2050, these fuels are plug and play with existing fuel systems, Neyer said.
If approved, the program carries a 10-year expiration date, with Neyer telling the committee he hoped the credit would no longer be needed by that time.
While testifying on the bill to the House committee, Sarah Gonzales, the director of state and local government affairs for Delta Airlines, assured members that the fuels are already in use, with California utilizing sustainable aviation fuels for a number of years and Delta flights out of Detroit utilizing the fuels for the first time this year.
However, there is not enough of the fuel to meet demand for even a week, Gonzales said, noting that the current cost is two to 10 times that of traditional fuels.
With Minnesota, Indiana, Illinois, Nebraska, Washington, Iowa and California all passing tax credits for sustainable aviation fuels, Michigan is in danger of being left out of the economic benefits, Gonzales said.
Although the packages won support from organizations like Clean Fuels Michigan and Corn Growers of Michigan with bipartisan support in both chambers, they were not without opposition.
Rep. Steve Carra (R-Three Rivers) spoke out against offering government incentives, arguing that these types of incentives take away from the market.
'What you're coming in here today is asking for not simply a promotion of this product, but it is still a peanut-level incentive of taking away from the free market and compelling taxpayers to fund and create a new atmosphere within the economy, further distorting the market,' Carra said.
In response, John Delmotte, president of the Michigan Corn Growers Association, asked Carra to view it as an investment rather than a handout.
During the Senate hearing, Nichole Keway Biber, the mid-Michigan campaign organizer for Clean Water Action, offered her opposition, arguing the incentives set aside $9 million in state funds that could be used to jump start lower-emission transportation solutions while supporting a status quo approach to energy.
While the emissions that come out of the pipe might be cleaner, the residual impacts on the environment from large-scale farming operations may outweigh those benefits, Keway Biber said.
'This is no time for false climate solutions that divert investments and focus away from achieving realer sustainability of healthy communities and waterways,' Keway Biber said.
As the House and Senate sit in deadlock, and Legislative leaders spar over the state budget ahead of the July 1 deadline, the packages showcase a sense of bipartisan, cross-chamber collaboration uncharacteristic of the current dynamic between the Democratic-led Senate and the Republican-led House.
While the House and Senate Committees have yet to hold a vote on Neyer's bills, he told the Michigan Advance that the package would not likely come to a vote on the House floor until after the budget is done. However, it stands a good chance given the interest in the Senate, he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Medicaid spending in Mass. has nearly quadrupled in the past 20 years. It needs reform.
Advertisement Medicaid was The cost of this is staggering. The budget for the state's Medicaid program, called MassHealth, has to over Advertisement But this explosion in the cost of Medicaid begs the question: Has all this spending led to better health outcomes? Surprisingly, Despite these findings, even modest Medicaid reform in Republican proposals before Congress — like encouraging community engagement through volunteering or work, preventing duplicate payments to insurers, and closing state-level However, it should be noted that the current proposals in Washington — which the House passed last week and are now in the Republican-controlled Senate — will result in more Medicaid spending over 10 years, not less. The bill merely slows the rate of growth. Only in Washington, D.C., is more spending decried as a cut. The fundamental issue remains: Are we prioritizing the right goals? Advertisement The evidence on the power of connection is . Past state-level experiments with work engagement in programs like food stamps and welfare cash assistance offer a promising road map. A Medicaid reform could similarly refocus state efforts on connecting enrollees with community engagement rather than solely maximizing federal funding. Encouragingly, these past reforms also saw a halving of the time individuals needed to stay on public assistance. Shouldn't we celebrate if someone like J.D. could earn enough to transition to employer-based or ACA coverage? Sadly, too often, critics characterize any transition off Medicaid as Advertisement While Medicaid reform often faces bipartisan heartburn, paradoxically there's longtime bipartisan agreement that major entitlement programs are growing unsustainably. If we can't at least slow the rate of growth, in part by delivering better outcomes, then our fiscal house of cards may fall, which hurts the most vulnerable. Our leaders must shift the debate from simply protecting the flow of federal dollars to ensuring that every Medicaid dollar genuinely improves patient health. Current inertia seems more about preserving the status quo than addressing the health impact on individuals like J.D. Meanwhile, our communities suffer as we miss out on J.D.'s contributions to society. The federal proposals provide a crucial moment to discuss opening doors of opportunity rather than defending a system that requires poverty for coverage. It's time to move beyond simply paying insurance companies for a card in J.D.'s pocket and focus on reforms that foster human thriving.
Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Are Tensions Between Trump and Musk Cooling Down?
00:00 Now, as you say, it's an extraordinary public blowup between them and some very personal things said against each other. But just as quickly, it seems perhaps there are moves already to to patch things up. We can see from Elon Musk's posts in the wee hours, Yes, he's open to doing so, agreeing with people posting on social media. Bill Ackman among them saying, guys, you need to cool this down. You know, Donald Trump saying to Politico, you know, it's going very well in his relationship with musk and politico reporting. In fact, the two men are due to talk on friday. At some point, the White House is arranging that conversation. So that kind of explosive display of anger at each other on social media, trading barbs, perhaps very quickly, followed by an effort to cool things down. And this is kind of a sign of the relationship that they have. We've seen frustrations bubble up before, but there's always been a very careful effort to keep that under wraps behind the scenes. They've disagreed on other things before. Aside from this big tax bill that Donald Trump is trying to get through the Senate in the U.S. It's just that that was a moment where everything burst into the open. The question is, even if they cool things down, you know, is the relationship repaired or is this just a temporary fix? And to that point, Ros, I mean, there was some almost kind of taking bets at the start of this relationship between Trump and Musk as to how long it would last. Some suggesting maybe it's going to be six months, some eight months. So to some extent it's not a surprise that the relationship is breaking down, given that given the nature of both individuals. And yet to see it in that public spotlight was, as you say, remarkable. What does it mean? What are the implications in terms of Trump standing? What does it mean in terms of the Republican Party? What does it mean in terms of in terms of the bill that Trump is so clearly keen to get to get across the line? Well, as you say, some people said it was a matter of time. You've got two very big egos involved here, but it comes at a very delicate time for both of them, arguably, particularly Donald Trump. He's trying everything to get this bill through. He's personally spending hours on the phone lobbying Republicans, saying we've got to get this done. And it faces a very tricky path in the Senate. And if this bill gets amended in any way whatsoever, it has to go back to the House for further review. Said he's wanting to get this done very quickly. He's up against a lot. And for Republicans, there are key questions here of loyalties to Trump or to Musk, because obviously Donald Trump is saying to them, you need to listen to me. But Elon Musk is the one with the money when it comes to, you know, the midterm elections, which are really not that far away. And a lot of his campaign money could help them individually. So how they patch this up or whether they patch this up has a real impact potentially on the bill itself, but also for individual Republicans with one eye very closely, no doubt already on those midterms.
Black America Web
2 hours ago
- Black America Web
Rep. Jasmine Crockett Announces Run To Chair House Oversight Committee
Source: Jemal Countess / Getty Rep. Jasmine Crockett — one of the few Democratic leaders who has truly been dedicated to keeping her foot on the neck of the Trump administration, and calling it the band of 'idiots' that it is — bid to become the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, a position that was vacated when the late Rep. Gerry Connoll died last month. 'Our country is in an existential crisis driven by an out-of-control Executive with a flagrant disregard for our Constitution, our way of governance, and our very way of life as citizens of a democratic republic,' Crockett said in a letter to Democratic colleagues obtained by POLITICO. 'We must pull back the curtain on the unmitigated chaos under Trump 2.0 and translate our findings to the American people in a way they can digest.' Crockett is now the fourth contestant in line to chair the Oversight Committee, which is expected to take on the Trump administration's autharatorian agenda, especially if Democrats win a House majority after the midterm elections, which might just happen if the MAGA-fied GOP's approval numbers continue to decline due largely to the White House's abysmal leadership. 'From the pulpit of the Oversight Committee, the Ranking Member must lay out our case against Trump 2.0 and his accomplices, the Republicans in the House, and discharge this message across the nation,' the 44-year-old wrote. 'Our work cannot be solely reactive.' The other Democrats who are campaigning for Connoll's spot are Reps. Robert Garcia of California, Stephen Lynch of Massachusetts and Kweisi Mfume of Maryland. Again, Crockett, who is currently serving in her second term representing Texas in the U.S. House, has been lauded by progressives and Democratic voters as one of the up-and-comers who can truly give the Democratic Party the image refresher that it sorely needs. The question is: Will the party embrace change, and is it ready to let leaders like Crockett take up the reins? SEE ALSO Rep. Jasmine Crockett Announces Run To Chair House Oversight Committee was originally published on Black America Web Featured Video CLOSE
