Bill to address misconduct at Colorado crime lab may be in trouble
With just four weeks left in the legislative session, one of the biggest criminal justice bills hangs in the balance.
The bill
is in response
to a scandal at the Colorado Bureau of Investigation involving DNA analyst Yvonne "Missy" Woods.
She's charged with
more than 100 felonies
related to tampering with or falsifying evidence.
The Colorado Division of Criminal Justice claims it needs $3 million to handle all the additional work that could result from
the scandal
. The state fiscal analyst disagrees, estimating the cost at about $165,000 initially. Either way, there's no extra money in the budget, and that could doom the bill.
"This bill is on hold until we can figure this out with the judicial department," said state Rep. Yara Zokaie, sponsor of the bill.
She says she was surprised by the judicial department's request for money, saying no one knows how many cases will result in new trials.
"There are so many unknowns with this entire scandal," Zokaie said.
The CBI says Missy Woods handled 10,000 cases over her 30 years as a DNA analyst, and it found anomalies in 1,000 cases. But it hasn't said if any of those anomalies would change the outcome of the case. Zokaie's bill calls for the lab to notify district attorneys of all misconduct by September. The DAs then must notify defendants, public defenders and victims.
"The initial work is going to fall on defense lawyers dig into cases to review these cases and talk to clients and find out if they want to challenge their convictions. And if they do, then look at whether it's viable," says James Karbach with the Public Defender's Office.
He says with 10,000 it will take time to determine whether misconduct played a material role in any one conviction.
"Predicting how many cases would reach a courtroom for a judge to rule on is very difficult," Karbach said.
But waiting another year, he says, is unacceptable. If the judiciary doesn't drop its request for money, Zokaie says the bill could die.
"There are so many departments that have extra work because of the scandal and they are finding ways to make that work. So I think the judicial department can as well," Zokaie said.
State Rep. Matt Soper, who is co-sponsoring the bill with Zokaie, also questions the judiciary's request for money, saying it's speculative at best to say how many cases will end up back in court.
The bill also addresses future misconduct -- requiring lab employees to report wrongdoing, the lab director to investigate it, and DAs to notify those impacted.
It has support from Democrats and Republicans and defense attorneys and prosecutors. It is stalled right now in the House Appropriations Committee, and it still needs to go through the senate.
"It's not a bill that's lost, it's justice for people. It's truth, it's the integrity of the system. It's repairing the harm. It's having a system that makes sense on laboratory misconduct," said Karbach. "As a state we can't do that."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
10 minutes ago
- The Hill
Senate Republicans eye public land sales in ‘big beautiful bill'
The Senate version of President Trump's 'big beautiful bill' seeks to sell off more than 2 million acres of federal lands to build affordable housing. A provision in the text released late Wednesday calls for the sales of between 2.2 million and 3.3 million acres of land under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management and the Forest Service. Lands in Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington state and Wyoming would be eligible. This represents a break with the House, which approved legislation that did not include provisions to sold off public lands, despite a push from some lawmakers to add land sales provisions. Rep. Ryan Zinke (R-Mont.) in particular has opposed the public land sales push. In a video accompanying the newly released text on Wednesday, Senate Energy and Natural Resources Chairman Mike Lee (R-Utah) lamented federal control of public lands – and also stressed that the measure would not apply to national parks or other similar protected lands. 'We're opening underused federal land to expand housing, support local development and get Washington D.C. out of the way of communities that are just trying to grow,' Lee said. 'This does not touch national parks, national monuments or wilderness. We're talking about isolated parcels that are difficult to manage or better suited for housing and infrastructure,' he added. The move, as well as other provisions in the legislation, drew pushback from Democrats and conservation advocates. 'Senate Republicans have finally said the quiet part out loud: They want to put millions of acres of our public lands up in a fire sale, destroy the investments that have created thousands of manufacturing and clean energy jobs – including in their home states, and obliterate programs that lower energy costs for everyday Americans,' said Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) in a written statement.
The Hill
11 minutes ago
- The Hill
Democrat who served in Afghanistan raises concerns about Marines in LA
Rep. Jake Auchincloss (D-Mass.), who commanded a Marine platoon in Afghanistan, is raising concerns about President Trump's deployment of Marines to Los Angeles amid immigration protests in the city. 'As a Marine, did you ever expect to see active-duty members of the military, active-duty Marines deployed on U.S. soil in the capacity that they are now?' CNN's John Berman asked Auchincloss on 'Anderson Cooper 360' in an interview highlighted by Mediaite. 'No, John, because in this scenario, as in almost every scenario imaginable, it is unnecessary, it's illegal and it's deeply unfair to these Marines,' Auchincloss responded. The 700 Marines mobilized to the Los Angeles area on Monday hadn't completed pre-mission training as of Wednesday morning, a U.S. Northern Command official confirmed to The Hill. The Marines were 'still conducting pre-mission training and they have not been employed by Task Force 51, the DoD command element in Los Angeles,' a statement from a Northcom spokesperson said. 'These Marines signed up to sweat and bleed in defense of their country, not to be a political prop for a president who's sagging in the approval ratings,' Auchincloss said Wednesday. Tensions between Democrats and Trump have flared amid the situation in Los Angeles, with the president recently deciding to mobilize thousands of California National Guard Troops and the active-duty Marines to quell immigration protests in L.A. Trump has sparred with California officials over the deployment, chiefly Gov. Gavin Newsom (D), who is challenging Trump's moves in court. Earlier this week, Trump backed arresting Newsom after the governor dared the White House border czar to do so amid their clash over the immigration protests. 'The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor,' Newsom fired back in a post on social platform X. 'This is a day I hoped I would never see in America. I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican, this is a line we cannot cross as a nation — this is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism.'
The Hill
11 minutes ago
- The Hill
Republicans barrel toward risky vote on DOGE cuts
House Republicans are facing an uncertain vote Thursday on legislation codifying cuts made by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Democrats are all expected to vote against the White House request — known as a recissions package — to claw back north of $9 billion in funding for public broadcasting and foreign aid. But in a bad sign for the House GOP, a number of Republicans have voiced opposition to the legislation, too — with member particularly upset with cuts to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which funds PBS and NPR. The vote comes as internal battles over deficits and funding slashes roil the party, and after Elon Musk — the billionaire who hatched the idea for the White House DOGE effort — fell out of favor with President Trump amid his criticism of the separate megabill of Trump's tax cut and spending priorities. Republicans can afford to lose just three GOP votes on the measure, assuming all Democrats are present and voting against it, and two Republicans told The Hill this week that the opposition hovers around 10 GOP lawmakers. Republican leaders have championed the cuts of over $1 billion to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting — which provides grants to PBS and NPR stations across the country — arguing that the government should not be funding media outlets that they say are biased against the GOP. But skeptics of the clawbacks, including more moderate Republicans and those in rural areas, worry about the practical impacts that could harm the information-sharing infrastructures in their districts. 'A lot of these public television networks are kind of the backbone infrastructure for a lot of rural Western states. So, there's more to it than just Frontline and PBS News Hour or whatever,' one GOP member said. As of Wednesday afternoon, the member said, there did not seem to be much movement in swaying the holdouts. Earlier this week, Rep. Mark Amodei (R-Nev.) — an Appropriations subcommittee chair and the co-chair of the Public Broadcasting Caucus — called on the Trump administration to rethink its cuts in the space. 'From coast to coast, Americans rely on public broadcasting for lifesaving emergency alerts, trusted news, and coverage on key issues that connects communities across our nation,' Amodei wrote in a joint statement with Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.), a co-chair of the group. 'Our local stations are dedicated to serving their communities, but their ability to continue offering free, high-quality programming would be eliminated if the federal funding is rescinded,' they added. 'Rescinding this funding also would isolate rural communities, jeopardizing their access to vital resources they depend on.' Additionally, some Republicans have said they are worried about the future of the United States President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), which the package cuts. Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.), who has been outspoken in saying the program must be protected, said he would not support the bill if it gutted PEPFAR. Earlier this week, however, he said he was okay with the cuts, but would not reveal whether he will vote for the bull. '[I] feel better about that,' Bacon said, referring to the clarifications he got on the PEPFAR cuts, 'but I'm going to work with some of my colleagues on the PBS, NPR stuff, and I'll leave it at that for the time being.' Beyond specific policy qualms, some Republicans have also raised concerns about the White House-driven rescissions package usurping authority from Congress. The legislative branch has the power of the purse, which the claw backs are cutting into. 'I think there's two major concerns: One is that this is top lines and not specifics so it is undermining Congress's authority, and two, there's concerns about some the potential cuts that people have, and that's what we're working through,' a second House Republican told The Hill this week. The bulk of the recessions package claws back billions in foreign aid programs, including many that were spearheaded by United States Agency for International Development (USAID), which was largely dismantled earlier this year through DOGE projects. The special rescissions process allows Republicans to approve clawbacks of previously-approved funds identified by the White House with just a simple majority in each chamber of Congress — circumventing the 60-vote threshold in the Senate that requires approval from Democrats to advance regular legislation. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) praised the package of cuts this week. 'It's a critical step in restoring fiscal sanity and beginning to turn the tide to removing fraud, waste, abuse from our government,' Johnson said in a Tuesday press conference.
